Research Article

The Construction of Architecture in Mysticism and the Approach to Islamic Architecture

Volume: 2 Number: 1
EN TR

The Construction of Architecture in Mysticism and the Approach to Islamic Architecture

Abstract

This article examines the formative impact of mystical thought on architecture, focusing on Islamic architectural traditions through an analytical and interpretive methodology. The central hypothesis is that Islamic architecture is not merely an aesthetic or functional practice; rather, it is a spatial language in which Sufi ontology and metaphysical imagination become embodied. The study adopts a qualitative design, combining hermeneutic textual analysis, conceptual inquiry, and comparative case study. In the textual corpus, Ibn ʿArabī’s notions of manifestation and orientation, al-Ghazālī’s metaphysics of nūr, and Suhrawardī’s Illuminationist cosmology are discussed; in the architectural corpus, light, centrality, domes, geometry, calligraphy, and intentional emptiness are analyzed together. The cases include Isfahan in Iran, Samarkand–Bukhara in Uzbekistan, and Seljuk–Ottoman continuities in Türkiye. Findings indicate that tawḥīd becomes legible through symmetry and rhythm; nūr through calibrated light regimes; and fanāʾ–baqāʾ through strategies of emptiness, thresholds, and continuity. The article argues that Islamic sacred space can be approached as a technology of consciousness that mediates the human encounter with the transcendent.

Keywords

References

  1. Ardalan, N., & Bakhtiar, L. (1973). The sense of unity: The Sufi tradition in Persian architecture. University of Chicago Press. (xviii + 151 pp.).
  2. Burckhardt, T. (2009). Art of Islam: Language and meaning. World Wisdom. (Toplam sayfa: 272).
  3. Corbin, H. (1998). The man of light in Iranian Sufism. Omega Publications. (Toplam sayfa: 174).
  4. Gazâlî. (2011). Mişkâtü’l-envâr (S. Uludağ, Çev.). Kabalcı Yayınları. (Toplam sayfa: 168).
  5. Goudarzi, M., Bemanian, M., & Leylian, M. (2020). Geometrical analysis of architectural drawings in the Shah-mosque Isfahan. Curved and Layered Structures, 7, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/cls-2020-0007
  6. Grabar, O. (1987). The formation of Islamic art (Rev. & enl. ed.). Yale University Press. (Toplam sayfa: 256). İbn Arabî. (2008). Fütûhât-ı Mekkiyye (Cilt II). Dâru’s-Sâdır.
  7. Matracchi, P., & Sadeghi Habibabad, A. (2021). Explaining and evaluating the quality of “light” in religious environments and its effect on spirituality. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(4), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.06.001
  8. Mohammadi, N. (2023). Exploring the hidden geometry in the physical of sacred architecture: A case study in traditional Islamic architecture of Iran. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/16874048.2023.2277084

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Communication Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Shabnam Golkarian *
0000-0001-8833-9516
Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti

Publication Date

-

Submission Date

January 7, 2026

Acceptance Date

January 23, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 2 Number: 1

APA
Golkarian, S. (n.d.). The Construction of Architecture in Mysticism and the Approach to Islamic Architecture. Journal of Scientific Mysticism and Literature, 2(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.32955/neujsml2026211194
AMA
1.Golkarian S. The Construction of Architecture in Mysticism and the Approach to Islamic Architecture. neujsml. 2(1):41-60. doi:10.32955/neujsml2026211194
Chicago
Golkarian, Shabnam. n.d. “The Construction of Architecture in Mysticism and the Approach to Islamic Architecture”. Journal of Scientific Mysticism and Literature 2 (1): 41-60. https://doi.org/10.32955/neujsml2026211194.
EndNote
Golkarian S The Construction of Architecture in Mysticism and the Approach to Islamic Architecture. Journal of Scientific Mysticism and Literature 2 1 41–60.
IEEE
[1]S. Golkarian, “The Construction of Architecture in Mysticism and the Approach to Islamic Architecture”, neujsml, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–60, doi: 10.32955/neujsml2026211194.
ISNAD
Golkarian, Shabnam. “The Construction of Architecture in Mysticism and the Approach to Islamic Architecture”. Journal of Scientific Mysticism and Literature 2/1 (n.d.): 41-60. https://doi.org/10.32955/neujsml2026211194.
JAMA
1.Golkarian S. The Construction of Architecture in Mysticism and the Approach to Islamic Architecture. neujsml.;2:41–60.
MLA
Golkarian, Shabnam. “The Construction of Architecture in Mysticism and the Approach to Islamic Architecture”. Journal of Scientific Mysticism and Literature, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41-60, doi:10.32955/neujsml2026211194.
Vancouver
1.Shabnam Golkarian. The Construction of Architecture in Mysticism and the Approach to Islamic Architecture. neujsml. 2(1):41-60. doi:10.32955/neujsml2026211194

Evaluation Process
Academic studies submitted to the Journal of Scientific Mysticism and Literature are primarily pre-evaluated by the editorial board in compliance with the journal's focus and scope. The suitable studies are then transferred to the field editor and sent to the double referee for field evaluation. The double-masked peer review application is valid, and the referee cannot see the information of the academic study owners. Reviewers are given 30 days to complete their review for formality and originality.
As a result of the reports from the referees:
1. Accepting the application (no editing needed),
2. Minor editing required (Author will be accepted if they make the minor corrections specified),
3. Major editing required (Author will be accepted if they make the essential corrections indicated),
3. Reject application (if the writing is substandard)
It must specify one of its options. In case of an "accept the application" or a "reject the application" evaluation from the
referees, the article is sent to a third referee to be examined for formality and originality. Then, all evaluations on the subject are sent to the author. A stylistic change may be requested if the language or writing style is substandard. The editorial board makes the final decision regarding the publication of the studies.
Authors are advised to download and review all evaluation forms (form and content pre-evaluation, field editor, and referee forms) used by the journal to guide them while writing their article proposals.
Before the author receives final approval for their articles, they must complete the commitment or declaration of originality form (Form 1.a) and send it to the journal editor.