Research Article

Common Religious-Epic Sagas of the Oghuz Turks

Volume: 2 Number: 1 January 30, 2026
EN TR

Common Religious-Epic Sagas of the Oghuz Turks

Abstract

An epic (epos) is an idealized artistic memory created by a people about their own history. From the mid-first millennium BCE, Turks appeared on the historical stage, spreading across a vast geography from the Sayan Mountains to the Pacific Ocean, from the Aral Sea to the Caspian Sea. These lands later became known as Turkestan. The Turks' rich worldview and traditions of statehood are reflected in ancient epics such as "Grey Wolf", "Oghuz Khagan," and "Alp Er Tonga." Among Turkic peoples, the Oghuz stand out, particularly for their strong state traditions. Scholars divide their history into three periods: ancient, medieval, and modern. Sources such as Rashid al-Din mention that the Oghuz were divided into 24 tribes. Today, the term "Oghuz" primarily refers to the Turks of Turkey and Azerbaijan, the Turkmens, and the Gagauz. Their differentiation intensified after adopting Islam, which also contributed to geographic stabilization. From the 10th century, with their conversion to Islam, the term "Turkman" emerged, and under the Seljuk alliance, Islam and Oghuz culture spread throughout the Middle East. Religious leaders, alongside Seljuk forces, helped spread Islam in newly conquered lands. During this period, religious-heroic epics such as "Battal Gazi," "Danishmend Gazi," and "Saltukname" became widespread. These epics were considered both ideologically and politically significant and were supported by the state. The "Book of Dede Qorqud," transcribed in the 16th century, combines elements of heroism and religious heroism. It stands as a cultural memory of the Oghuz who spread Islam and shows thematic parallels with other similar epics.

Keywords

References

  1. Azərbaycan ədəbiyyatı tarixi. (2004). Altı cilddə (Cilt 1, s. 23–78). Elm.
  2. Cəfərov, N. (2004). Qədim türk ədəbiyyatı (s. 41–96). Az Ata M.
  3. Golden, P. B. (1992). An introduction to the history of the Turkic peoples (pp. 55–89). Otto Harrassowitz.
  4. İslam Ansiklopedisi. (2007). Cilt 33 (s. 112–130). İSAM.
  5. Kafesoğlu, İ. (1984). Türk millî kültürü (s. 88–115). Boğaziçi.
  6. Koroğlu, X. (1999). Oğuz qəhrəmanlıq eposu (s. 9–34). Yurd.
  7. Lord, A. B. (2000). The singer of tales (pp. 1–45). Harvard University Press.
  8. Ocak, A. Y. (1992). Türk halk inançlarında menkıbe (s. 61–92). TTK.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Literary Studies (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 30, 2026

Submission Date

June 23, 2025

Acceptance Date

January 22, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 2 Number: 1

APA
Rahimova, A. (2026). Common Religious-Epic Sagas of the Oghuz Turks. Bilimsel Mistisizm Ve Edebiyat Dergisi, 2(1), 85-91. https://doi.org/10.32955/neujsml2026211104
AMA
1.Rahimova A. Common Religious-Epic Sagas of the Oghuz Turks. neujsml. 2026;2(1):85-91. doi:10.32955/neujsml2026211104
Chicago
Rahimova, Aybeniz. 2026. “Common Religious-Epic Sagas of the Oghuz Turks”. Bilimsel Mistisizm Ve Edebiyat Dergisi 2 (1): 85-91. https://doi.org/10.32955/neujsml2026211104.
EndNote
Rahimova A (January 1, 2026) Common Religious-Epic Sagas of the Oghuz Turks. Bilimsel Mistisizm ve Edebiyat Dergisi 2 1 85–91.
IEEE
[1]A. Rahimova, “Common Religious-Epic Sagas of the Oghuz Turks”, neujsml, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 85–91, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.32955/neujsml2026211104.
ISNAD
Rahimova, Aybeniz. “Common Religious-Epic Sagas of the Oghuz Turks”. Bilimsel Mistisizm ve Edebiyat Dergisi 2/1 (January 1, 2026): 85-91. https://doi.org/10.32955/neujsml2026211104.
JAMA
1.Rahimova A. Common Religious-Epic Sagas of the Oghuz Turks. neujsml. 2026;2:85–91.
MLA
Rahimova, Aybeniz. “Common Religious-Epic Sagas of the Oghuz Turks”. Bilimsel Mistisizm Ve Edebiyat Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 1, Jan. 2026, pp. 85-91, doi:10.32955/neujsml2026211104.
Vancouver
1.Aybeniz Rahimova. Common Religious-Epic Sagas of the Oghuz Turks. neujsml. 2026 Jan. 1;2(1):85-91. doi:10.32955/neujsml2026211104

Evaluation Process
Academic studies submitted to the Journal of Scientific Mysticism and Literature are primarily pre-evaluated by the editorial board in compliance with the journal's focus and scope. The suitable studies are then transferred to the field editor and sent to the double referee for field evaluation. The double-masked peer review application is valid, and the referee cannot see the information of the academic study owners. Reviewers are given 30 days to complete their review for formality and originality.
As a result of the reports from the referees:
1. Accepting the application (no editing needed),
2. Minor editing required (Author will be accepted if they make the minor corrections specified),
3. Major editing required (Author will be accepted if they make the essential corrections indicated),
3. Reject application (if the writing is substandard)
It must specify one of its options. In case of an "accept the application" or a "reject the application" evaluation from the
referees, the article is sent to a third referee to be examined for formality and originality. Then, all evaluations on the subject are sent to the author. A stylistic change may be requested if the language or writing style is substandard. The editorial board makes the final decision regarding the publication of the studies.
Authors are advised to download and review all evaluation forms (form and content pre-evaluation, field editor, and referee forms) used by the journal to guide them while writing their article proposals.
Before the author receives final approval for their articles, they must complete the commitment or declaration of originality form (Form 1.a) and send it to the journal editor.