Elektrikli Araçların Benimsenmesinde Çevresel, Politik ve Sosyo-Psikolojik Faktörlerin Etkileşimi

Abstract

Ulaşım sektörü, sera gazı emisyonlarının önemli bir bölümüne neden olmaktadır ve bu durum iklim krizi tartışmalarının merkezine oturmuştur. Elektrikli araçlar hem çevreci hem de enerji verimliliği yüksek bir alternatif olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Türkiye’nin Paris Anlaşması’nı onaylaması ve 2053 net sıfır emisyon hedefi doğrultusunda, elektrikli araç ekosistemini güçlendiren altyapı ve teşvik politikalarını hızlandırdığı görülmektedir. Öte yandan, elektrikli araç benimseme hızının hedeflenen dönüşüm ölçeğinin gerisinde kalma riski de bulunmaktadır. Bu araştırmada, Türkiye’de elektrikli araç satın alma niyetini etkileyen temel unsurlar birlikte ele alınmıştır. Devlet teşvikleri, menzil ve şarja yönelik tutumlar, çevresel kaygılar, algılanan hizmet kalitesi, tüketici yenilikçiliği ve elektrikli araçların statü sembolü olarak algılanması, elektrikli araç satın alma niyetinin belirleyicileri olarak modele dahil edilmiştir. Veriler, binek araç sahipleri veya kısa vadede araç satın almayı düşünen tüketicilerden anket yoluyla toplanmıştır. Hipotezler, çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi ile test edilmiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları, makro düzeyde politika araçları, mikro düzeyde tüketici tutum ve algılarını aynı çerçevede ele alarak elektrikli araç benimsenmesine ilişkin bütüncül bir bakış sunmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, pazarlama yöneticileri ve politika yapıcılar için elektrikli araç satın alma niyetini güçlendirmeye yönelik öneriler sunulması hedeflenmiştir.

Keywords

• Elektrikli araç
• Satın alma niyeti
• Sürdürülebilir ulaşım
• Çevresel kaygı
• Algılanan hizmet kalitesi

The Interaction of Environmental, Political and Sociopsychological Factors in the Adoption of Electric Vehicles

Abstract

The transportation sector accounts for a significant portion of greenhouse gas emissions and has become central to climate crisis discussions. Electric vehicles have emerged as an environmentally friendly and energy-efficient alternative. Following the ratification of the Paris Agreement and the 2053 net-zero emission target, Türkiye has accelerated infrastructure investments and incentive policies to strengthen the electric vehicle ecosystem. However, the pace of electric vehicle adoption still risks falling short of the desired transformation. This research examines the key factors influencing electric vehicle purchase intention in Türkiye. Government incentives, attitudes toward range and charging, environmental concerns, perceived service quality, consumer innovativeness, and the perception of electric vehicles as a status symbol are included in the model as determinants of purchase intention. Data were collected through a survey of car owners or consumers planning to buy a vehicle in the near future. Hypotheses were tested using multiple linear regression analysis. The findings provide an integrated perspective on electric vehicle adoption by combining macro-level policy instruments with micro-level consumer attitudes and perceptions. The results aim to offer practical recommendations for marketing managers and policymakers to strengthen consumers’ purchase intentions toward electric vehicles.

Keywords

• Electric vehicle
• Purchase intention
• Sustainable transport
• Environmental concern
• Perceived service quality

References

1. Acar, O., & Taşkın, Ç. (2024). Türkiye’de Elektrikli Otomobillerin Benimsenmesi Sürecinin Değerlendirilmesine Yönelik Nitel Bir Araştirma. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 205-241.
2. Acar, O., & Taşkın, Ç. (2025). Environmental concern and government incentives on perceived value and electric automobile adoption. Transport Policy.
3. Acikalin, S., Gul, E., & Develioglu, K. (2009). Conspicuous consumption patterns of Turkish youth: case of cellular phones. Young Consumers, 10(3), 199-209.
4. Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., Rahman, I., Vasant, P. M., & Noor, A. (2017). A comprehensive review on theoretical framework‐based electric vehicle consumer adoption research. International Journal of Energy Research, 41(3), 317-335.
5. Adu-Gyamfi, G., Asamoah, A. N., Obuobi, B., Nketiah, E., & Zhang, M. (2024). Electric mobility in an oil-producing developing nation: Empirical assessment of electric vehicle adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123173.
6. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Çevre Koruma Ajansı. (2025). Küresel sera gazı genel görünümü. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-overview (Erişim tarihi: Eylül, 2025).
7. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411.
8. Avrupa Komisyonu. (2025). Otomobiller ve hafif ticari araçlar için CO₂ emisyon performans standartları ve araç etiketleme konusunda kamuoyu yoklamasının başlatılması. https://climate.ec.europa.eu/news-other-reads/news/commission-launches-public-consultation-co2-emission-standards-cars-and-vans-and-car-labelling-2025-07-07_en (Erişim tarihi: Eylül, 2025).

9. Alanazi, F. (2023). Electric vehicles: benefits, challenges, and potential solutions for widespread adaptation. Applied Sciences, 13(10), 6016.
10. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
11. Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21-32.
12. Baumeister, C., Scherer, A., & Wangenheim, F. V. (2015). Branding access offers: the importance of product brands, ownership status, and spillover effects to parent brands. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(5), 574-588.
13. Benli, B., & Ferman, M. (2019). The effect of cultural dimensions on conspicuous consumption and online compulsive buying behavior: a comparative study among Turkish and American consumers. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 6(2), 103-127.
14. Bennett, R., Kottasz, R., & Shaw, S. (2016). Factors potentially affecting the successful promotion of electric vehicles. Journal of Social Marketing, 6(1), 62-82.
15. Bockarjova, M., & Steg, L. (2014). Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands. Global Environmental Change, 28, 276-288.
16. Brislin, R. (1970), “Back translation for cross-cultural research”, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
17. Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Bresciani, S. (2024). Exploring the effect of government incentives on electric vehicle purchase intention in smart cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 477, 143841.
18. Chao, C. W., Hung, Y. C., & Sun, L. (2022). Does consumer innovativeness matter in electrified vehicle? The moderation role of consumer involvement. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 34(3), 298-311.
19. Chen, K., Ren, C., Gu, R., & Zhang, P. (2019). Exploring purchase intentions of new energy vehicles: From the perspective of frugality and the concept of “mianzi”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 230, 700-708.
20. Coffman, M., Bernstein, P., & Wee, S. (2017). Electric vehicles revisited: a review of factors that affect adoption. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 79-93.
21. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
22. Cook, R.D. (1977), “Detection of influential observation in linear regression”, Technometrics, 19(1), 15-18.
23. Daily Sabah. (2025). Turkish auto sales up nearly 13%, EVs’ share tops 20% again. https://www.dailysabah.com/business/automotive/turkish-auto-sales-up-nearly-13-evs-share-tops-20-again (Erişim tarihi: Eylül, 2025).
24. Dutta, B., & Hwang, H. G. (2021). Consumers purchase intentions of green electric vehicles: The influence of consumers technological and environmental considerations. Sustainability, 13(21), 12025.
25. Ebaidalla, M. E., Abusin, S., Malkawi, A., & Mandikiana, B. (2025). Exploring Youth's Intentions to Purchase Electric and Hybrid Vehicles in Qatar: The Role of Moral Norms and Environmental Concern. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 100343.
26. Efendioğlu, İ. H. (2024). Elektrikli Araç Satın Alma Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 106–122.
27. Enkel, E., & Wintgens, S. (2025). Understanding mass-market electric vehicle adoption: Integrating diffusion of innovation theory with risk mitigation strategy in Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 220, 124329.
28. Erdoğan, E. C., Tengilimoğlu, D., Bilgin, P., & Reyhanoğlu, İ. (2024). Elektrikli Araç Satın Alma Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi: Ankara İli Örneği. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(3), 2043–2061.
29. Farjam, M., Nikolaychuk, O., & Bravo, G. (2019). Experimental evidence of an environmental attitude-behavior gap in high-cost situations. Ecological Economics, 166, 106434.
30. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
31. Franke, T., Neumann, I., Bühler, F., Cocron, P., & Krems, J. F. (2012). Experiencing range in an electric vehicle: Understanding psychological barriers. Applied Psychology, 61(3), 368-391.
32. Galloway, A. (2005). Non-probability sampling. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encylopedia of Social Measurement (pp. 859–864). New York, NY: Elsevier.
33. Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7.
34. Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 209-221.
35. Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499–510.
36. Groskurth, K., Bluemke, M., & Lechner, C. M. (2024). Why we need to abandon fixed cutoffs for goodness-of-fit indices: An extensive simulation and possible solutions. Behavior Research Methods, 56(4), 3891-3914.
37. Gulzari, A., Wang, Y., & Prybutok, V. (2022). A green experience with eco-friendly cars: A young consumer electric vehicle rental behavioral model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102877.
38. Gutjar, M., Calastri, C., & Kowald, M. (2025). Electric vehicle ownership dynamics at the household level: a stated adaptation experiment on the effects of pricing and incentive policies. Transportation, 1-54.
39. Hagman, J., & Stier, J. J. (2022). Selling electric vehicles: Experiences from vehicle salespeople in Sweden. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 45, 100882.
40. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., ve Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
41. Han, C. S., Hsu, Y. M., & Hsu, H. J. (2024). Charging forward: unveiling the dynamics of consumer EV adoption in Asia's transition to green mobility. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 36(11), 3192-3212.
42. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
43. Higueras-Castillo, E., Molinillo, S., Coca-Stefaniak, J. A., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2019). Perceived value and customer adoption of electric and hybrid vehicles. Sustainability, 11(18), 4956.
44. Higueras‐Castillo, E., Liébana‐Cabanillas, F., Santos, M. A. D., Zulauf, K., & Wagner, R. (2024). Do you believe it? Green advertising skepticism and perceived value in buying electric vehicles. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 4671-4685.
45. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. Hürriyet News. (2025). Türkiye’de elektrikli araç şarj noktası sayısı 33 bini geçti. https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/ev-charging-sockets-in-turkiye-exceed-33-000-in-august-213832 (Erişim tarihi: Eylül, 2025).
46. Jain, N. K., Singh, A. K., & Kaushik, K. (2020). Evaluating service quality in automobile maintenance and repair industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(1), 117-134.
47. Khalid, A., & Anwar, A. (2025). Pro-environment consumer behaviour and electric vehicle adoptions: A comparative regional meta-analysis. Applied Economics, 57(2), 191-215.
48. Khazaei, H., & Tareq, M. A. (2021). Moderating effects of personal innovativeness and driving experience on factors influencing adoption of BEVs in Malaysia: An integrated SEM–BSEM approach. Heliyon, 7(9).
49. Kilbourne, W., & Pickett, G. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61(9), 885-893.
50. Kim, S., Connerton, T. P., & Park, C. (2022). Transforming the automotive retail: Drivers for customers' omnichannel BOPS (Buy Online & Pick up in Store) behavior. Journal of Business Research, 139, 411-425.
51. Kim, S., Lee, J., & Lee, C. (2017). Does driving range of electric vehicles influence electric vehicle adoption?. Sustainability, 9(10), 1783.
52. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
53. Kong, Q., Fowler, M., Entchev, E., Ribberink, H., & McCallum, R. (2018). The role of charging infrastructure in electric vehicle implementation within smart grids. Energies, 11(12), 3362.
54. Köksal, C., Ardıyok, Ş., & İkiler, H. (2024). Türkiye’de elektrikli araç şarj altyapısının güçlendirilmesi: politika önerileri. Ekonomi-tek, 13(1), 31–60.
55. Kropfeld, M. I., Nepomuceno, M. V., & Dantas, D. C. (2018). The ecological impact of anticonsumption lifestyles and environmental concern. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 245-259.
56. Kumar, R. R., & Alok, K. (2020). Adoption of electric vehicle: A literature review and prospects for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119911.
57. Langbroek, J. H., Franklin, J. P., & Susilo, Y. O. (2016). The effect of policy incentives on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 94, 94-103.
58. Langbroek, J. H., Franklin, J. P., & Susilo, Y. O. (2018). How would you change your travel patterns if you used an electric vehicle? A stated adaptation approach. Travel Behaviour and Society, 13, 144-154.
59. Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., Yang, T., Geng, J., & Yang, M. (2018). Effects of personal carbon trading on the decision to adopt battery electric vehicles: Analysis based on a choice experiment in Jiangsu, China. Applied Energy, 209, 478-488.
60. Li, L., Wang, Z., Chen, L., & Wang, Z. (2020). Consumer preferences for battery electric vehicles: A choice experimental survey in China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 78, 102185.
61. Liao, F., Molin, E., & Van Wee, B. (2017). Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 252-275.
62. Liu, R., Ding, Z., Wang, Y., Jiang, X., Jiang, X., Sun, W., ... & Liu, M. (2021). The relationship between symbolic meanings and adoption intention of electric vehicles in China: The moderating effects of consumer self-identity and face consciousness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125116.
63. McDonald, R. I., Chai, H. Y., & Newell, B. R. (2015). Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 109-118.
64. Melliger, M. A., van Vliet, O. P., & Liimatainen, H. (2018). Anxiety vs reality–Sufficiency of battery electric vehicle range in Switzerland and Finland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 101-115. Menard, S. (2001). Applied logistic regression analysis. SAGE Publications.
65. Noel, L., Carrone, A. P., Jensen, A. F., de Rubens, G. Z., Kester, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2019). Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid applications: A Nordic choice experiment. Energy Economics, 78, 525-534.
66. Novotny, A., Szeberin, I., Kovács, S., & Máté, D. (2022). National culture and the market development of battery electric vehicles in 21 countries. Energies, 15(4), 1539.
67. Nunnally, J., ve Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.
68. Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., & Hladik, G. (2023). Evaluation of barriers to electric vehicle adoption: A study of technological, environmental, financial, and infrastructure factors. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22, 100962.
69. Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2003). The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(8), 901-918.
70. Peters, A., & Dütschke, E. (2014). How do consumers perceive electric vehicles? A comparison of German consumer groups. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(3), 359-377.
71. Peterson, R. A., & Merunka, D. R. (2014). Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 1035–1041.
72. Plötz, P., Schneider, U., Globisch, J., & Dütschke, E. (2014). Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67, 96-109.
73. Rainieri, G., Buizza, C., & Ghilardi, A. (2023). The psychological, human factors and socio-technical contribution: A systematic review towards range anxiety of battery electric vehicles’ drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 99, 52-70.
74. Rauh, N., Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2015). Understanding the impact of electric vehicle driving experience on range anxiety. Human Factors, 57(1), 177-187.
75. Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015). Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 34, 122-136.
76. Rogers, E. M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press
77. Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. The Free Press.
78. Rusyani, E., Lavuri, R., & Gunardi, A. (2021). Purchasing eco-sustainable products: Interrelationship between environmental knowledge, environmental concern, green attitude, and perceived behavior. Sustainability, 13(9), 4601.
79. Sajjad, A., Asmi, F., Chu, J., & Anwar, M. A. (2020). Environmental concerns and switching toward electric vehicles: geographic and institutional perspectives. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(32), 39774-39785.
80. Salari, N. (2022). Electric vehicles adoption behaviour: Synthesising the technology readiness index with environmentalism values and instrumental attributes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 164, 60-81.
81. Schmalfuß, F., Mühl, K., & Krems, J. F. (2017). Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 47-69.
82. Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39-49.
83. Shamsuddoha, M., & Nasir, T. (2025). The road ahead for hybrid or electric vehicles in developing countries: market growth, infrastructure, and policy needs. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(3), 180.
84. Shi, D., Lee, T., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2019). Understanding the model size effect on SEM fit indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79(2), 310-334.
85. Skippon, S. M. (2014). How consumer drivers construe vehicle performance: Implications for electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 23, 15-31.
86. Steinhilber, S., Wells, P., & Thankappan, S. (2013). Socio-technical inertia: Understanding the barriers to electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 60, 531-539.
87. Sitinjak, C., & Ober, J. (2025). Examining the impact of service quality and product innovation on willingness to buy electric vehicles: The mediating role of customer satisfaction. Production Engineering Archives, 31.
88. Şişman, İ. N., & Çarklı, Y. B. (2026). Determinants of Electric Vehicle Adoption Intentions in Turkey: An Explainable Machine Learning Analysis of Economic, Infrastructure, and Behavioral Factors. Sustainability, 18(5), 2463.
89. T.C. Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı. (2023). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Güncellenmiş Birinci Ulusal Katkı Beyanı (NDC). https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/dokumanlar/turkiye-cumhuriyeti--8230-102-20230512125223.pdf (Erişim tarihi: Eylül, 2025).
90. T.C. Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı. (2025). Türkiye’nin Uzun Dönemli İklim Stratejisi. https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/dokumanlar/turkiyenin--8230-3143-20250210095501.pdf (Erişim tarihi: Eylül, 2025).
91. Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95.
92. Uluslararası Enerji Ajansı (IEA). (2025). Küresel Elektrikli Araç Görünümü 2025: Elektrikli otomobil pazarındaki eğilimler. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2025/trends-in-electric-car-markets (Erişim tarihi: Eylül, 2025).
93. Uratani, J. M., Evensen, D., Sovacool, B. K., & Griffiths, S. (2025). Benchmarking and tailoring electric vehicle policies to stimulate adoption. Energy Research & Social Science, 125, 104074.
94. Uslu, H., & Demirel, O. (2022). Elektrikli Otomobil Satın Alma İstekliliğini Etkileyen Faktörler: Konya İli Örneği. SDÜ Vizyoner Dergisi, 13(35), 961–975.
95. Vishwakarma, P. (2024). Investigating consumers’ adoption of electric vehicles: a perceived value-based perspective. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 42(6), 1028-1051.
96. Wang, N., Huang, Y., Fu, Y., & Chen, L. (2022). Does lead userness matter for electric vehicle adoption? An integrated perspective of social capital and domain‐specific innovativeness. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21(6), 1405-1419.
97. Wang, S., Li, J., & Zhao, D. (2017). The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 105, 14-26.
98. Wang, S., Wang, J., Li, J., Wang, J., & Liang, L. (2018). Policy implications for promoting the adoption of electric vehicles: do consumer’s knowledge, perceived risk and financial incentive policy matter?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 58-69.
99. White, L. V., & Sintov, N. D. (2017). You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 94-113.
100. Xie, R., Fang, J., & Liu, C. (2017). The effects of transportation infrastructure on urban carbon emissions. Applied Energy, 196, 199-207.
101. Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M. (2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 256-269.
102. Zarazua de Rubens, G., Noel, L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2018). Dismissive and deceptive car dealerships create barriers to electric vehicle adoption at the point of sale. Nature Energy, 3(6), 501-507.