Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

ASSESSMENT WITH GREEN LABORATORY CERTIFICATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES IN TURKEY

Year 2019, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 23 - 30, 28.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.516792

Abstract

   Environmental
laboratories create a lot amount of waste in the routine use; waste products
range from simple solvents, such as water, to biologically or chemically
hazardous wastes that require special disposal. The Green Laboratory
certificate is a certification method that determines principles to increase
the sustainability of the laboratory. It is known that green laboratory
certification provide significant risk methods and competitive advantages
within countries and regions, not just individual organizations or companies. In this study, the environmental sustainability of
environmental laboratories in Turkey was evaluated according to the 31
principles of green laboratory using survey techniques.

References

  • [1] FAS Green Lab Certification. Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (2011). http://www.green.harvard.edu/fas-green-lab-certification-overview.
  • [2] ISO 14024, Environmental labels and declarations – Type I Environmental labeling Principles and Procedures, ISO, 1999.
  • [3] ISO 14021, Environmental Labels and Declarations–Self-declared environmental claims (Type II Environmental labeling), ISO, 1999.
  • [4] ISO 14040, Environmental management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and framework, 2006.
  • [5] İyi Laboratuvar Uygulamaları Prensipleri, Test Birimlerinin Uyumlaştırılması, İyi Laboratuvar Uygulamalarının ve Çalışmaların Denetlenmesi Hakkında Yönetmelik 2010. (R.G tarih ve sayı:09.03.2010- 27516)
  • [6] The Yale Green Laboratories Certification Program, The Yale Department of Environmental Health and Safety. http://www.yale.edu/ehs/sustainability/greenlabs.htm
  • [7] ABDEL-RAHIM, M., CANEZO, L., COTTRELL, B., GUNTHER, W., LIU, J., The University of South Florida Green Lab Guide, Campus Ecology, University of South Florida, 2011.
  • [8] NOLAN, D., LEBANSKY, R., PETERSON, C., Developing A Green Laboratory Self-Evaluation Program, GARRISON, M., & WILSON, BB., (Eds.), Sustainability on the UT Campus, 75-79, 2010.
  • [9] ANASTAS, PT., WARNER, JC., Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press: New York, p.30, 1998.
  • [10] Laboratories for the 21st Century: Best Practice Guide – Optimizing Laboratory Ventilation Rates, 2016. http:// www.i2sl.org/documents/toolkit/bp_opt_vent_508.pdf.
  • [11] SOMERVELL, D., MCGRATH, T., Intern The University of Edinburgh Auditing and Improving Energy Efficiency at the University of Edinburgh Cancer Research CentreLaboratory Environmental Improvement Workshop, 23 April 2010.
  • [12] BORCHARDT, JK., “Achieving Laboratory Energy Efficiency”, Lab Manager Magazine, 4(3), 16-19, 2009.
  • [13] MILLS, E., SARTOR, D., “Energy Use and Savings Potential For Laboratory Fume Hoods”, Energy, 30,1859-1864, 2005.
  • [14] REINDORF, L., GOLDMAN, M., Retrofitting Labs to Reduce Energy Consumption, 16,1,2011. http://www.rdmag.com/Lab-Design-News/Articles/2011/02/Sustainability-Retrofitting-Labs-To-Reduce-Energy-Consumption/
  • [15] DE PALMA, AK., “Fume Hoods: Ductless Models at Forefront of “Green” Lab Movement”, Lab Manager Magazine, 6(3), 45-46, 2011.
  • [16] RAPHAEL, J.R, Unplug for Dollars: Stop 'Vampire Power' Waste. PC World, 2008. http://www.pcworld.com/article/153245/unplug_for_dollars_stop_vampire_power_waste.html.
  • [17] DAUES, J., Green Labs Pilot Program Ends with Significant Energy Savings, 2012. http://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/23543.aspx
  • [18] BCST & DELS (Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology and Earth and Life Sciences), Prudent Practices in the Laboratory: Handling and Management of Chemical Hazards, ISBN-13: 978-0-309-13865-9. Washington, DC, 2011.
  • [19] CPSMA & DELS (Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications and Earth and Life Sciences), Prudent Practices in the Laboratory: Handling Disposal of Chemicals. ISBN-13: 978-0-309-13865-9, Washington, DC, 1995.
  • [20] CARSON, V., Analytical Chemistry Lab Manual, Analytical Chemistry, CHM 3120, 2012.
  • [21] BUIE J., MindMap: Reduce My Lab’s Environmental Impact. Lab Manager Magazine, 6(3), 70-71. 2011.
  • [22] POLLENZ, R.S., KIMBLE, M., CANNONS, A., Experiments in Cell Biology. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. 37-44, 2008.

TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇEVRE LABORATUVARLARININ ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNİN YEŞİL LABORATUVAR SERTİFİKASI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Year 2019, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 23 - 30, 28.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.516792

Abstract

   Çevre laboratuvarları rutin kullanımlarında
basit solvent, su veya özel bertaraf gerektiren biyolojik veya kimyasal
tehlikeli atıklar gibi çok çeşitli ve çok miktarlarda atık üretmektedir. Yeşil
Laboratuvar sertifikası, laboratuvarın sürdürülebilirliğini arttırmak için
ilkeler belirleyen bir sertifikasyon yöntemidir. Yeşil laboratuvar sertifikasının
sadece kuruluş veya firmalar değil, ülke ve bölgeler içinde önemli risk yöntemi
ve rekabet avantajları sağladığı bilinmektedir. Bu çalışma da Türkiye’deki
çevre laboratuvarlarının çevresel sürdürülebilirliği 31 yeşil laboratuvar
ilkesine göre anket tekniği kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir.

References

  • [1] FAS Green Lab Certification. Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (2011). http://www.green.harvard.edu/fas-green-lab-certification-overview.
  • [2] ISO 14024, Environmental labels and declarations – Type I Environmental labeling Principles and Procedures, ISO, 1999.
  • [3] ISO 14021, Environmental Labels and Declarations–Self-declared environmental claims (Type II Environmental labeling), ISO, 1999.
  • [4] ISO 14040, Environmental management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and framework, 2006.
  • [5] İyi Laboratuvar Uygulamaları Prensipleri, Test Birimlerinin Uyumlaştırılması, İyi Laboratuvar Uygulamalarının ve Çalışmaların Denetlenmesi Hakkında Yönetmelik 2010. (R.G tarih ve sayı:09.03.2010- 27516)
  • [6] The Yale Green Laboratories Certification Program, The Yale Department of Environmental Health and Safety. http://www.yale.edu/ehs/sustainability/greenlabs.htm
  • [7] ABDEL-RAHIM, M., CANEZO, L., COTTRELL, B., GUNTHER, W., LIU, J., The University of South Florida Green Lab Guide, Campus Ecology, University of South Florida, 2011.
  • [8] NOLAN, D., LEBANSKY, R., PETERSON, C., Developing A Green Laboratory Self-Evaluation Program, GARRISON, M., & WILSON, BB., (Eds.), Sustainability on the UT Campus, 75-79, 2010.
  • [9] ANASTAS, PT., WARNER, JC., Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press: New York, p.30, 1998.
  • [10] Laboratories for the 21st Century: Best Practice Guide – Optimizing Laboratory Ventilation Rates, 2016. http:// www.i2sl.org/documents/toolkit/bp_opt_vent_508.pdf.
  • [11] SOMERVELL, D., MCGRATH, T., Intern The University of Edinburgh Auditing and Improving Energy Efficiency at the University of Edinburgh Cancer Research CentreLaboratory Environmental Improvement Workshop, 23 April 2010.
  • [12] BORCHARDT, JK., “Achieving Laboratory Energy Efficiency”, Lab Manager Magazine, 4(3), 16-19, 2009.
  • [13] MILLS, E., SARTOR, D., “Energy Use and Savings Potential For Laboratory Fume Hoods”, Energy, 30,1859-1864, 2005.
  • [14] REINDORF, L., GOLDMAN, M., Retrofitting Labs to Reduce Energy Consumption, 16,1,2011. http://www.rdmag.com/Lab-Design-News/Articles/2011/02/Sustainability-Retrofitting-Labs-To-Reduce-Energy-Consumption/
  • [15] DE PALMA, AK., “Fume Hoods: Ductless Models at Forefront of “Green” Lab Movement”, Lab Manager Magazine, 6(3), 45-46, 2011.
  • [16] RAPHAEL, J.R, Unplug for Dollars: Stop 'Vampire Power' Waste. PC World, 2008. http://www.pcworld.com/article/153245/unplug_for_dollars_stop_vampire_power_waste.html.
  • [17] DAUES, J., Green Labs Pilot Program Ends with Significant Energy Savings, 2012. http://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/23543.aspx
  • [18] BCST & DELS (Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology and Earth and Life Sciences), Prudent Practices in the Laboratory: Handling and Management of Chemical Hazards, ISBN-13: 978-0-309-13865-9. Washington, DC, 2011.
  • [19] CPSMA & DELS (Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications and Earth and Life Sciences), Prudent Practices in the Laboratory: Handling Disposal of Chemicals. ISBN-13: 978-0-309-13865-9, Washington, DC, 1995.
  • [20] CARSON, V., Analytical Chemistry Lab Manual, Analytical Chemistry, CHM 3120, 2012.
  • [21] BUIE J., MindMap: Reduce My Lab’s Environmental Impact. Lab Manager Magazine, 6(3), 70-71. 2011.
  • [22] POLLENZ, R.S., KIMBLE, M., CANNONS, A., Experiments in Cell Biology. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. 37-44, 2008.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Environmental Engineering
Journal Section Environmental Engineering
Authors

Gülnihal Kara 0000-0002-1955-1596

Publication Date January 28, 2019
Submission Date August 28, 2018
Acceptance Date January 15, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Kara, G. (2019). TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇEVRE LABORATUVARLARININ ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNİN YEŞİL LABORATUVAR SERTİFİKASI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.516792
AMA Kara G. TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇEVRE LABORATUVARLARININ ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNİN YEŞİL LABORATUVAR SERTİFİKASI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. NOHU J. Eng. Sci. January 2019;8(1):23-30. doi:10.28948/ngumuh.516792
Chicago Kara, Gülnihal. “TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇEVRE LABORATUVARLARININ ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNİN YEŞİL LABORATUVAR SERTİFİKASI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 8, no. 1 (January 2019): 23-30. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.516792.
EndNote Kara G (January 1, 2019) TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇEVRE LABORATUVARLARININ ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNİN YEŞİL LABORATUVAR SERTİFİKASI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 8 1 23–30.
IEEE G. Kara, “TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇEVRE LABORATUVARLARININ ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNİN YEŞİL LABORATUVAR SERTİFİKASI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”, NOHU J. Eng. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2019, doi: 10.28948/ngumuh.516792.
ISNAD Kara, Gülnihal. “TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇEVRE LABORATUVARLARININ ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNİN YEŞİL LABORATUVAR SERTİFİKASI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 8/1 (January 2019), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.516792.
JAMA Kara G. TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇEVRE LABORATUVARLARININ ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNİN YEŞİL LABORATUVAR SERTİFİKASI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. NOHU J. Eng. Sci. 2019;8:23–30.
MLA Kara, Gülnihal. “TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇEVRE LABORATUVARLARININ ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNİN YEŞİL LABORATUVAR SERTİFİKASI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 1, 2019, pp. 23-30, doi:10.28948/ngumuh.516792.
Vancouver Kara G. TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇEVRE LABORATUVARLARININ ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNİN YEŞİL LABORATUVAR SERTİFİKASI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. NOHU J. Eng. Sci. 2019;8(1):23-30.

download