BibTex RIS Cite

YOLSUZLUK ve EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜK İLİŞKİSİ:AB ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE YATAY KESİT ANALİZİ

Year 2016, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 195 - 207, 25.01.2016

Aylin Konu Ahmet Ata

Abstract

Ekonomik özgürlük kavramı, mal ve hizmetlerin üretim, dağıtım yada tüketim aşamalarında kamunun herhangi bir kısıtlayıcı yada zorlayıcı müdahalesinin olmamasını ifade etmektedir.Ekonomik özgürlükler ekonomik sistemin yapısını belirler ve bu ekonomik yapı yolsuzluk üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahiptir.Bu çalışmanın amacı ekonomik özgürlüklerin yolsuzluk üzerindeki etkisini 28 AB ülkesi ve Türkiye için 2014 verilerini kullanarak yatay-kesit analiz yöntemi ile test etmektir. Çalışmadan elde edilen analitik sonuçlarına göre ekonomik özgürlüklerin, yolsuzluk algılama endeksi üzerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü bir etkiye sahip olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Ekonomik Özgürlük Yolsuzluk Rant Kollama

References

  • Adaman, F.,Çarkoğlu, A. ve Şenatalar, B. (2001). Hane Halkı Gözünden Türkiye’de Yolsuzluğun Nedenleri, Önlenmesine İlişkin Öneriler, TESEV Yayınları, No.24, İstanbul.
  • Aidt, T.S. (2003). Economic Analysis of Corruption: A Survey, The Economic Journal, 113 (November), Roya Economic Society, Published by Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 632-652.
  • Akçay, S. (2000). Yolsuzluk, Ekonomik Özgürlükler ve Demokrasi, Muğla Üniversitesi, SBF Dergisi, 1(1),1-22.
  • Akçay, S. (2001). Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Yolsuzlukların Ekonomik Analizi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ekim, Afyon.
  • Andving, J.C. vd. (2000). Research on Corruption: A Policy Oriented Survey, Commissionedby NORAD Final Report,December, Oslo.
  • Ata, A. Y. (2009). Kurumsal İktisat Çerçevesinde Yolsuzluğun Fırsat ve Motivasyonları: AB Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme, İktisadi Araştırmalar Vakfı Yayınları, 2009, İstanbul.
  • Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and Development, Journal of Economic Literature, September, 35(3), 1320-1346.
  • Broadman, H.G.ve Recanatini, F. (2002). Corruption and Policy: Back to the Roots, The Journal of Policy Reform, January,5(1), 37-49.
  • Chafuen, A.A. ve Guzman, E. (2000). Economic Freedom and Corruption, 2000Index of Economic Freedom, Heritage Foundation Press, 51-63.
  • DiPietro, W.R. (2002). National Corruption and the Size of the Public Sector, Briefing Notes in Economics, Issue, No. 55, December 2002-January 2003, 1-12.
  • Elliott, K.A. (1997). Corruption as An International Policy Problem: Overview and Recommendations, Corruption and The Global Economy, Ed. K. A. Elliott, Institute for International Economics Publisher, 175-233.
  • Getz, K.A. ve Volkema, R.J. (2001). Culture, Perceived Corruption and Economics: A Model of Predictors and Outcomes, Business and Society, 40(1), 7-30.
  • Goel, R.K. ve Nelson, M.A. (1996). Corruption and Government Size: A Disaggregated Analysis, Public Choice,97(1), 107-120.
  • Goel, R.K. ve Nelson, M.A. (2005). Economic Freedom Versus Political Freedom: Cross Country Influences on Corruption, Australian Economic Papers, June, 44(2), 121-133.
  • Goldsmith, A.A. (1999). Slapping the GraspingHand: Correlates of PoliticalCorruption in Emerging Markets, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(4), 865-883.
  • Goudie, A.W. ve Stasavage, D. (1997). Corruption: The Issues, OECD Development Centre, WorkingPaper, No. 122, January.
  • Gray, C.W. ve Kaufman, D. (1998). Corruption and Development, Finance and Development, March, 35, (1), 7-11.
  • Heckelman, J.C. (2000). Economic Freedom and Economic Growth: A Short-Run Causal Investigation, Journal of Applied Economics, III(1), 71-91.
  • Husted, B.W. (1999). Wealth, Culture and Corruption, Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 339-360.
  • Kayalıdere, G. ve Özcan, P. (2014). Bütçe Saydamlığı ve Ekonomik Özgürlüğün Yolsuzluk Üzerindeki Etkisi, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(2), 219-234.
  • Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling Corruptio. University of California Press, England.
  • Krueger, O.A. (1974). The Political Economy of the Rent Seeking Society, The American Economic Review,64(3), 291-303.
  • Lambsdorff, J.G. (2007). The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform. Cambridge University Press.
  • LaPalombara, J. (1994). Structural and Institutional Aspects of Corruption, Social Research, 61 ( 2): 325-50. Longenecker, Justin G., Joseph A.
  • Mauro, P. (1997). Why Worry About Corruption?, IMF Economic Issues, No.6, February.
  • Montinola, G.R. ve Jackman, R.W. (2002). Sources of Corruption: A Cross-Country Study, British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Pres, 32, 147-170.
  • Ogus, A. (2004). Corruption and Regulatory Structure, Law and Policy, October, 26(3-4), 329-346.
  • Oğuz, F. (2003). Mülkiyet Hakları “Bir Ekonomik Analiz”. Roma Yayınları, Kasım, Ankara.
  • Özcan, B. (2012). OECD Ülkelerinde Yolsuzluğun Ekonomik Belirleyenleri: Panel Veri Analizi”, İ.Ü. İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 62(2), 253-282.
  • Özsoylu, A.F. (1996). Türkiye’de Kayıt Dışı Ekonomi. Ankara: Bağlam Yayınları.
  • Paldam, M. (1999). The Big Pattern of Corruption: Economics, Culture, andSeesaw Dynamics, WorkingPaper No: 11, Center for Dynamic Modelling in Economics, Department of Economics, University of Aarhus, Denmark
  • Paldam, M. (2002). The Cross-Country Pattern of Corruption: Economics, Culture and See saw Dynamic, 18(2), 215-240.
  • Pieroni, L. ve d’Augustino (2011). Corruption and the Effects of Economic Freedom, Working Paper, No. 133.
  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences and Reform. Cambridge University Press.
  • Saha, S. ve Su, J.J. (2012). Investigating the Interaction Effect of Democracy and Economic Freedom on Analaysis&Policy,December, 42(3), 389-396. Cross-Country Quantile Regression Analysis, Economic
  • Saha, S.,Gounder, R. ve Su, J.J. (2009). The Interaction Effect of Economic Freedom and Democracy on Corruption: A Panel Cross-Country Analysis, Economics Letters, 105, 173-176.
  • Serra, D. (2004). Empirical Determinants of Corruption: A Sensitivity Analysis, GPRG-WPS WorkingPaper, No. 12.
  • Shen, C. ve Williamson, J.B. (2005). Corruption, Democracy, Economic Freedom and State Strength, International Journal of ComparativeSociology, 46(4), 327-345.
  • Studenmund, A.H. (1992). Using Eonometrics: A Practical Guide. Second Edition, New York: HarperCollinsPublishers
  • Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption Around The World: Causes, Consequences, ScopeandCures, IMF StaffPapers,December, 45(4).
  • Tullock, G. (2003). The Origin Rent-Seeking Concept, International Journal of Business andEconomics, 2(1), 1-8.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panal Data. The MIT Press, Cambridge, London.

Year 2016, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 195 - 207, 25.01.2016

Aylin Konu Ahmet Ata

Abstract

References

  • Adaman, F.,Çarkoğlu, A. ve Şenatalar, B. (2001). Hane Halkı Gözünden Türkiye’de Yolsuzluğun Nedenleri, Önlenmesine İlişkin Öneriler, TESEV Yayınları, No.24, İstanbul.
  • Aidt, T.S. (2003). Economic Analysis of Corruption: A Survey, The Economic Journal, 113 (November), Roya Economic Society, Published by Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 632-652.
  • Akçay, S. (2000). Yolsuzluk, Ekonomik Özgürlükler ve Demokrasi, Muğla Üniversitesi, SBF Dergisi, 1(1),1-22.
  • Akçay, S. (2001). Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Yolsuzlukların Ekonomik Analizi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ekim, Afyon.
  • Andving, J.C. vd. (2000). Research on Corruption: A Policy Oriented Survey, Commissionedby NORAD Final Report,December, Oslo.
  • Ata, A. Y. (2009). Kurumsal İktisat Çerçevesinde Yolsuzluğun Fırsat ve Motivasyonları: AB Ülkeleri Üzerine Bir İnceleme, İktisadi Araştırmalar Vakfı Yayınları, 2009, İstanbul.
  • Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and Development, Journal of Economic Literature, September, 35(3), 1320-1346.
  • Broadman, H.G.ve Recanatini, F. (2002). Corruption and Policy: Back to the Roots, The Journal of Policy Reform, January,5(1), 37-49.
  • Chafuen, A.A. ve Guzman, E. (2000). Economic Freedom and Corruption, 2000Index of Economic Freedom, Heritage Foundation Press, 51-63.
  • DiPietro, W.R. (2002). National Corruption and the Size of the Public Sector, Briefing Notes in Economics, Issue, No. 55, December 2002-January 2003, 1-12.
  • Elliott, K.A. (1997). Corruption as An International Policy Problem: Overview and Recommendations, Corruption and The Global Economy, Ed. K. A. Elliott, Institute for International Economics Publisher, 175-233.
  • Getz, K.A. ve Volkema, R.J. (2001). Culture, Perceived Corruption and Economics: A Model of Predictors and Outcomes, Business and Society, 40(1), 7-30.
  • Goel, R.K. ve Nelson, M.A. (1996). Corruption and Government Size: A Disaggregated Analysis, Public Choice,97(1), 107-120.
  • Goel, R.K. ve Nelson, M.A. (2005). Economic Freedom Versus Political Freedom: Cross Country Influences on Corruption, Australian Economic Papers, June, 44(2), 121-133.
  • Goldsmith, A.A. (1999). Slapping the GraspingHand: Correlates of PoliticalCorruption in Emerging Markets, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(4), 865-883.
  • Goudie, A.W. ve Stasavage, D. (1997). Corruption: The Issues, OECD Development Centre, WorkingPaper, No. 122, January.
  • Gray, C.W. ve Kaufman, D. (1998). Corruption and Development, Finance and Development, March, 35, (1), 7-11.
  • Heckelman, J.C. (2000). Economic Freedom and Economic Growth: A Short-Run Causal Investigation, Journal of Applied Economics, III(1), 71-91.
  • Husted, B.W. (1999). Wealth, Culture and Corruption, Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 339-360.
  • Kayalıdere, G. ve Özcan, P. (2014). Bütçe Saydamlığı ve Ekonomik Özgürlüğün Yolsuzluk Üzerindeki Etkisi, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(2), 219-234.
  • Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling Corruptio. University of California Press, England.
  • Krueger, O.A. (1974). The Political Economy of the Rent Seeking Society, The American Economic Review,64(3), 291-303.
  • Lambsdorff, J.G. (2007). The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform. Cambridge University Press.
  • LaPalombara, J. (1994). Structural and Institutional Aspects of Corruption, Social Research, 61 ( 2): 325-50. Longenecker, Justin G., Joseph A.
  • Mauro, P. (1997). Why Worry About Corruption?, IMF Economic Issues, No.6, February.
  • Montinola, G.R. ve Jackman, R.W. (2002). Sources of Corruption: A Cross-Country Study, British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Pres, 32, 147-170.
  • Ogus, A. (2004). Corruption and Regulatory Structure, Law and Policy, October, 26(3-4), 329-346.
  • Oğuz, F. (2003). Mülkiyet Hakları “Bir Ekonomik Analiz”. Roma Yayınları, Kasım, Ankara.
  • Özcan, B. (2012). OECD Ülkelerinde Yolsuzluğun Ekonomik Belirleyenleri: Panel Veri Analizi”, İ.Ü. İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 62(2), 253-282.
  • Özsoylu, A.F. (1996). Türkiye’de Kayıt Dışı Ekonomi. Ankara: Bağlam Yayınları.
  • Paldam, M. (1999). The Big Pattern of Corruption: Economics, Culture, andSeesaw Dynamics, WorkingPaper No: 11, Center for Dynamic Modelling in Economics, Department of Economics, University of Aarhus, Denmark
  • Paldam, M. (2002). The Cross-Country Pattern of Corruption: Economics, Culture and See saw Dynamic, 18(2), 215-240.
  • Pieroni, L. ve d’Augustino (2011). Corruption and the Effects of Economic Freedom, Working Paper, No. 133.
  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences and Reform. Cambridge University Press.
  • Saha, S. ve Su, J.J. (2012). Investigating the Interaction Effect of Democracy and Economic Freedom on Analaysis&Policy,December, 42(3), 389-396. Cross-Country Quantile Regression Analysis, Economic
  • Saha, S.,Gounder, R. ve Su, J.J. (2009). The Interaction Effect of Economic Freedom and Democracy on Corruption: A Panel Cross-Country Analysis, Economics Letters, 105, 173-176.
  • Serra, D. (2004). Empirical Determinants of Corruption: A Sensitivity Analysis, GPRG-WPS WorkingPaper, No. 12.
  • Shen, C. ve Williamson, J.B. (2005). Corruption, Democracy, Economic Freedom and State Strength, International Journal of ComparativeSociology, 46(4), 327-345.
  • Studenmund, A.H. (1992). Using Eonometrics: A Practical Guide. Second Edition, New York: HarperCollinsPublishers
  • Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption Around The World: Causes, Consequences, ScopeandCures, IMF StaffPapers,December, 45(4).
  • Tullock, G. (2003). The Origin Rent-Seeking Concept, International Journal of Business andEconomics, 2(1), 1-8.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panal Data. The MIT Press, Cambridge, London.
There are 42 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Aylin Konu

Ahmet Ata This is me

Publication Date January 25, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Konu, A., & Ata, A. (2016). YOLSUZLUK ve EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜK İLİŞKİSİ:AB ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE YATAY KESİT ANALİZİ. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 195-207.
AMA Konu A, Ata A. YOLSUZLUK ve EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜK İLİŞKİSİ:AB ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE YATAY KESİT ANALİZİ. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. January 2016;9(1):195-207.
Chicago Konu, Aylin, and Ahmet Ata. “YOLSUZLUK Ve EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜK İLİŞKİSİ:AB ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE YATAY KESİT ANALİZİ”. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 9, no. 1 (January 2016): 195-207.
EndNote Konu A, Ata A (January 1, 2016) YOLSUZLUK ve EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜK İLİŞKİSİ:AB ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE YATAY KESİT ANALİZİ. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 9 1 195–207.
IEEE A. Konu and A. Ata, “YOLSUZLUK ve EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜK İLİŞKİSİ:AB ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE YATAY KESİT ANALİZİ”, Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 195–207, 2016.
ISNAD Konu, Aylin - Ata, Ahmet. “YOLSUZLUK Ve EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜK İLİŞKİSİ:AB ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE YATAY KESİT ANALİZİ”. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 9/1 (January 2016), 195-207.
JAMA Konu A, Ata A. YOLSUZLUK ve EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜK İLİŞKİSİ:AB ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE YATAY KESİT ANALİZİ. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;9:195–207.
MLA Konu, Aylin and Ahmet Ata. “YOLSUZLUK Ve EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜK İLİŞKİSİ:AB ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE YATAY KESİT ANALİZİ”. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, pp. 195-07.
Vancouver Konu A, Ata A. YOLSUZLUK ve EKONOMİK ÖZGÜRLÜK İLİŞKİSİ:AB ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE YATAY KESİT ANALİZİ. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;9(1):195-207.
 Download Cover Image