Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Lobektomi Sonrası Akciğerin Uzamış Hava Kaçağında Uygulanan Cerrahi Dışı Tedavi Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Year 2019, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 259 - 264, 18.12.2019

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmada
lobektomi sonrası uzamış hava kaçağı (UHK) gelişen hastalarda uygulanmış ve
başarıya ulaşmış cerrahi dışı tedavi yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması
amaçlanmıştır.



Materyal
ve Metot:
Şubat 2000 ve Ekim 2018 arasında lobektomi sonrasında UHK
gelişen 108 hastalara uygulanmış tedavi yöntemleri negatif aspirasyon, otolog
kan plöridezis ve tek yönlü göğüs valfi olmak üzere üç gruba ayrıldı. Her
tedavi grubu hastanede kalış süresi ve maliyet açısından karşılaştırıldı. 



Bulgular:
Karşılaştırılan
tedavi yöntemleri arasında
en yüksek tedavi maliyetinin negatif
aspirasyonla tedavi edilen grupta olduğu, en düşük hastane masrafının ise
otolog kan plöridezis uygulamasından kaynaklandığı saptandı. Ayrıca tedavi
süresi negatif aspirasyon uygulanan grupta en uzun iken en kısa hastanede yatış
süresinin tek yönlü valf ile tedavi edilen hastalarda olduğu belirlendi. 



Sonuç:
UHK’nın
cerrahi olmayan tedavisinde
kısa
sürede başarıya ulaşması ve düşük maliyeti nedeniyle otolog kan plöridezisin
tercih edilmesi uygun olacaktır.

References

  • Dugan KC, Laxmanan B, Murgu S, Hogarth DK. Management of persistant air leaks. Chest. 2017;152(2):417-23.
  • Bakhos C, Doelken P, Pupovac S, Ata A, Fabian T. Management of prolonged pulmonary air leaks with endobronchial valve placement. JSLS. 2016;20(3):1-6.
  • Burt BM, Shrager JB. Prevention and management of postoperative air leaks. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;3(2):216-8.
  • Hunt BM, Aye RW. Prolonged air leak after lung resection. Cur Resp Med Rev. 2012;8(4):280-4.
  • Sakata KK, Reisenauera JS, Kerna RM, Mullona JJ. Persistent air leak – review. Resp Med 2018;137:213–8.
  • Brunelli A, Varela G, Refai M, et al. A scoring system to predict the risk of prolonged air leak after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:204-9.
  • Elsayed H, McShane J, Shackcloth M. Air leaks following pulmonary resection for lung cancer: is it a patient or surgeon related problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94:422–7.
  • Hance JM, Martin JT, Mullett TW. Endobronchial valves in the treatment of persistent air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:1780–6.
  • Jabłonski S, Kordiak J , Wcisło S, Terlecki A, Misiak P, Santorek-Strumiłło E et al. Outcome of pleurodesis using different agents in management prolonged air leakage following lung resection. Clin Respir J. 2018;12:183–92.
  • Thapa B, Sapkota R, Sayami P. Autologous blood patching in the management of broncho-pleural fistula in spontaneous pneumothorax. JSSN. 2015;18(2):23-8.
  • Pathak V, Quinn C, Zhou C, Wadie G. Use of autologous blood patch for prolonged air leak in spontaneous pneumothoraces in the adolescent population. Lung India. 2018;35:328-31.

Comparison Of The Nonsurgical Management Models In Patients With Prolonged Air Leaks Following Lobectomy

Year 2019, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 259 - 264, 18.12.2019

Abstract

Objective: Aim of this study was to compare successful
nonsurgical treatment models performed in the patients with prolonged air
leakage (PAL) after lobectomy
.

Material
and Method:
Treatment
modalities applied to 108 patients who developed PAL after lobectomy between
February 2000 and October 2018 were divided into three groups as negative
suction, autologous blood pleuridesis and one way chest valves. Each treatment
group was compared in terms of hospital stay and cost.

Results: The highest treatment cost was in the group treated
with negative suction and the lowest hospital cost was due to autologous blood
pleuridesis. In addition, the duration of treatment was the longest in the
negative aspiration
treatment group and the shortest hospital stay was in patients
treated with one way valve.







Conclusion:
Autologous
blood pleurodesis should be preferred due to rapid effect and low cost in
nonsurgical treatment of the patients with PAL after lobectomy.

References

  • Dugan KC, Laxmanan B, Murgu S, Hogarth DK. Management of persistant air leaks. Chest. 2017;152(2):417-23.
  • Bakhos C, Doelken P, Pupovac S, Ata A, Fabian T. Management of prolonged pulmonary air leaks with endobronchial valve placement. JSLS. 2016;20(3):1-6.
  • Burt BM, Shrager JB. Prevention and management of postoperative air leaks. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;3(2):216-8.
  • Hunt BM, Aye RW. Prolonged air leak after lung resection. Cur Resp Med Rev. 2012;8(4):280-4.
  • Sakata KK, Reisenauera JS, Kerna RM, Mullona JJ. Persistent air leak – review. Resp Med 2018;137:213–8.
  • Brunelli A, Varela G, Refai M, et al. A scoring system to predict the risk of prolonged air leak after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:204-9.
  • Elsayed H, McShane J, Shackcloth M. Air leaks following pulmonary resection for lung cancer: is it a patient or surgeon related problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94:422–7.
  • Hance JM, Martin JT, Mullett TW. Endobronchial valves in the treatment of persistent air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:1780–6.
  • Jabłonski S, Kordiak J , Wcisło S, Terlecki A, Misiak P, Santorek-Strumiłło E et al. Outcome of pleurodesis using different agents in management prolonged air leakage following lung resection. Clin Respir J. 2018;12:183–92.
  • Thapa B, Sapkota R, Sayami P. Autologous blood patching in the management of broncho-pleural fistula in spontaneous pneumothorax. JSSN. 2015;18(2):23-8.
  • Pathak V, Quinn C, Zhou C, Wadie G. Use of autologous blood patch for prolonged air leak in spontaneous pneumothoraces in the adolescent population. Lung India. 2018;35:328-31.
There are 11 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Orginal Article
Authors

Murat Sarıçam 0000-0003-3469-5798

Serkan Kaya 0000-0002-9817-744X

Publication Date December 18, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Sarıçam, M., & Kaya, S. (2019). Comparison Of The Nonsurgical Management Models In Patients With Prolonged Air Leaks Following Lobectomy. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi, 7(3), 259-264.
AMA Sarıçam M, Kaya S. Comparison Of The Nonsurgical Management Models In Patients With Prolonged Air Leaks Following Lobectomy. NKMJ. December 2019;7(3):259-264.
Chicago Sarıçam, Murat, and Serkan Kaya. “Comparison Of The Nonsurgical Management Models In Patients With Prolonged Air Leaks Following Lobectomy”. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi 7, no. 3 (December 2019): 259-64.
EndNote Sarıçam M, Kaya S (December 1, 2019) Comparison Of The Nonsurgical Management Models In Patients With Prolonged Air Leaks Following Lobectomy. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi 7 3 259–264.
IEEE M. Sarıçam and S. Kaya, “Comparison Of The Nonsurgical Management Models In Patients With Prolonged Air Leaks Following Lobectomy”, NKMJ, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 259–264, 2019.
ISNAD Sarıçam, Murat - Kaya, Serkan. “Comparison Of The Nonsurgical Management Models In Patients With Prolonged Air Leaks Following Lobectomy”. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi 7/3 (December 2019), 259-264.
JAMA Sarıçam M, Kaya S. Comparison Of The Nonsurgical Management Models In Patients With Prolonged Air Leaks Following Lobectomy. NKMJ. 2019;7:259–264.
MLA Sarıçam, Murat and Serkan Kaya. “Comparison Of The Nonsurgical Management Models In Patients With Prolonged Air Leaks Following Lobectomy”. Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 3, 2019, pp. 259-64.
Vancouver Sarıçam M, Kaya S. Comparison Of The Nonsurgical Management Models In Patients With Prolonged Air Leaks Following Lobectomy. NKMJ. 2019;7(3):259-64.