İNSANLIĞA KARŞI SUÇLAR VE SOYKIRIM SUÇUNUN GELİŞİMİ: NÜRNBERG ULUSLARARASI ASKERİ CEZA MAHKEMESİNİN FARKLI ETKİLERİ

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 69 - 124, 08.07.2024

Yener Yıldırımkal

https://doi.org/10.51562/nkuhukuk.2024513

Öz

İkinci Dünya Savaşı yılları, uluslararası suçların geniş ölçekte işlendiği bir dönem olmuştur. Henüz savaş devam ederken, Müttefik Devletler, Mihver Devletleri adına hareket ederek suç işleyen kişileri cezalandırma iradelerini açıklamış, savaşın sona ermesiyle birlikte bu yöndeki ortak irade hayata geçirilmiştir. Savaşta işlenen bazı suçlar, Müttefik Devletlerin ulusal askeri ceza mahkemelerinde kovuşturulmuş olmakla birlikte, ‘büyük savaş suçlusu’ kabul edilen kişilerin yargılanması için, biri Tokyo diğeri Nürnberg’de olmak üzere iki ayrı uluslararası ceza mahkemesi kurulmuştur. Avrupa Mihver Devletleri adına hareket eden kişileri yargılamak üzere kurulan Nürnberg Uluslararası Askeri Ceza Mahkemesi’nin statüsünde (m.6/c), insanlığa karşı suçlar tarihte ilk defa tanımlanmıştır. Statü, bu yönüyle uluslararası ceza hukukunun gelişiminde önemli bir adım teşkil etmektedir. Soykırım suçu bakımından ise durum farklıdır. Mahkeme’nin madde bakımından yetkisini düzenleyen Statü m. 6’da soykırım suçuna yer verilmediği gibi, hükümde de bu suçtan bahsedilmemiştir. İddianameye bakıldığında, soykırımın bağımsız bir suçlama olarak sanıklara yüklenmediği, işgal edilen bölgelerdeki sivil halka karşı işlenen bir savaş suçu olarak değerlendirildiği görülmektedir. Bu makalede, Londra Konferansı hazırlık çalışmalarından başlayarak, hükmün tefhimine kadar devam eden Nürnberg sürecinde, inceleme konusu suçların maddi ceza hukuku bakımından nasıl ele alındığı, bu ‘yeni’ suçlarla uluslararası örf ve adette yer alan ‘klasik’ savaş suçları arasındaki ilişkinin nasıl yorumlandığı açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nürnberg, Uluslararası Ceza Hukuku, İnsanlığa Karşı Suçlar, Savaş Suçları, Soykırım Suçu.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE: DIFFERENT EFFECTS OF THE NUREMBERG INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL

Öz

The Second World War and the years leading up to it were a period of large-scale international crimes. While the war was still ongoing, the Allied States declared their will to punish those who committed crimes while acting on behalf of the Axis States, and this common will was put into practice with the end of the war. Although some crimes committed during the war were prosecuted in the national military tribunals of the Allied States, two separate international criminal tribunals, one in Tokyo and one in Nuremberg, were established for the prosecution of persons deemed to be ‘major war criminals’. The statute of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal, which was established to prosecute persons acting on behalf of the European Axis Powers, defined crimes against humanity for the first time in history (Art. 6/c). In this respect, the Statute constitutes an important step in the development of international criminal law. The case is different with regard to the crime of genocide. Article 6 of the Statute, which regulates the Court's material jurisdiction, does not include the crime of genocide, nor is this crime mentioned in the judgment. When the indictment is examined, it is seen that genocide is not charged as an independent crime, but is considered as a type of war crime committed against the civilian population in the occupied territories. In this article it has been tried to explain how the crimes under discussion were handled in terms of substantive criminal law and to put forward how the relationship between these 'new' crimes and the 'classic' war crimes was interpreted at Nuremberg, starting from the preparatory work of the London Conference until the pronouncement of the judgment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nuremberg, International Criminal Law, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes, Crime of Genocide.

DIE ENTWICKLUNG DER VERBRECHEN GEGEN DIE MENSCHLICHKEIT UND DES VERBRECHENS DES VÖLKERMORDES: UNTERSCHIEDLICHE AUSWIRKUNGEN DES INTERNATIONALEN MILITÄRGERICHTSHOFS IN NÜRNBERG

Öz

Der Zweite Weltkrieg und die Jahre davor waren eine Zeit der internationalen Verbrechen im großen Stil. Noch während des Krieges erklärten die alliierten Staaten ihren Willen, diejenigen zu bestrafen, die im Auftrag der Achsenmächte Verbrechen begangen hatten, und dieser gemeinsame Wille wurde mit dem Ende des Krieges in die Tat umgesetzt. Obwohl einige der während des Krieges begangenen Verbrechen vor den nationalen Militärgerichten der alliierten Staaten verfolgt wurden, wurden zwei getrennte internationale Strafgerichtshöfe, einer in Tokio und einer in Nürnberg, für die Verfolgung von Personen eingerichtet, die als "Hauptkriegsverbrecher" galten. Das Statut des Internationalen Militärgerichtshofs in Nürnberg, der zur Verfolgung von Personen eingerichtet wurde, die im Namen der europäischen Achsenmächte handelten, definierte zum ersten Mal in der Geschichte Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit (Art. 6/c). In dieser Hinsicht stellt das Statut einen wichtigen Schritt in der Entwicklung des internationalen Strafrechts dar. Anders verhält es sich mit dem Verbrechen des Völkermordes. In Artikel 6 des Statuts, der die materielle Zuständigkeit des Gerichtshofs regelt, ist das Verbrechen des Völkermords nicht enthalten, und auch im Urteil wird dieses Verbrechen nicht erwähnt. Bei der Prüfung der Anklageschrift wird deutlich, dass der Völkermord nicht als eigenständiges Verbrechen angeklagt ist, sondern als eine Art Kriegsverbrechen gegen die Zivilbevölkerung in den besetzten Gebieten betrachtet wird. In diesem Artikel wurde versucht zu erläutern, wie die zur Diskussion stehenden Verbrechen in Bezug auf das materielle Strafrecht behandelt wurden, und darzulegen, wie das Verhältnis zwischen diesen "neuen" Verbrechen und den "klassischen" Kriegsverbrechen in Nürnberg interpretiert wurde, beginnend mit den Vorbereitungsarbeiten der Londoner Konferenz bis zur Verkündung des Urteils.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nürnberg, Internationales Strafrecht, Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit, Kriegsverbrechen, Verbrechen des Völkermordes.

Kaynakça

• Acer Y, Uluslararası Hukukta Saldırı Suçu (1st edn, Roma Yayınları 2004)
• Aksar Y, ‘Uluslararası Adalet Divanı’nın Belçika Tutuklama Kararı Davası (Belgian Arrest Warrant Case) (14 Şubat 2002) ve Uluslararası Ceza Hukuku’ (2003) 52 (4) Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 131-146
• Aronson S, ‘Preparations for the Nuremberg Trial: The O.S.S., Charles Dwork and the Holocaust’ (1998) 12 (2) Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 257-281
• Bass GJ, Stay the Hand of Vengeance The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals (3rd Printing, Princeton 2002)
• Bassiouni MC, ‘From Versailles to Rwanda in Seventy-Five Years: The Need to Establish a Permanent International Criminal Court’ (1997) 10 Harvard Human Rights Journal 11-62
• Bassiouni MC, ‘War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and Genocide’ in M. Cherif Bassiouni (ed), International Criminal Law, Volume 1: Sources, Subjects and Contents (3rd edn, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2008) 267-531
• Bassiouni MC and Schabas WA, The Legislative History of the International Criminal Court Volume 1 (Second Revised and Expanded Edition, Brill Nijhoff 2016)
• Boas G, Bischoff JL and Reid NL, International Criminal Law Practitioner Library Volume II Elements of Crimes Under International Law (CUP 2009)
• Boister N and Cryer R, Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal Charter Indictment and Judgments (OUP 2008)
• Bozbayındır AE, Turkey and the International Criminal Court A Substantive Criminal Law Analysis in the Context of the Principle of Complementarity (1st edn, Nomos 2013)
• Cassese A, ‘The Martens Clause: Half a Loaf or Simply Pie in the Sky?’ (2000) 11 (1) European Journal of International Law 187-216
• Cassese A and Gaeta P, Cassese’s International Criminal Law (3rd edn, OUP 2011)
• Clark RS, ‘Crimes Against Humanity at Nuremberg’ in George Ginsburgs and Vladimir N. Kudriavtsev (eds.), The Nuremberg Trial and International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1990) 177-198
• Clark RS, ‘History of Efforts to Codify Crimes Against Humanity From the Charter of Nuremberg to the Statute of Rome’ in Leila N. Sadat (ed) Forging a Convention for Crimes Against Humanity (Cambridge 2011) 8-27
• Cooper J, Raphael Lemkin and the Struggle for the Genocide Convention (Palgrave Macmillan 2008) Cryer R and Boister N, The Tokyo International Military Tribunal (OUP 2007)
• Cryer R, Robinson D and Sergey V, An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure (4th edn, CUP 2014)
• Değirmenci O and Mavuş A, Uluslararası Ceza Hukukunda Saldırı Suçu (1st edn, Seçkin Yayıncılık 2016) De Vabres HD, ‘The Nuremberg Trial and the Modern Principles of International Criminal Law’ in Guénaël Mettraux (ed), Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial (OUP 2008) 213-227
• De Zayas A, The Genocide Against The Armenians 1915-1923 and the Relevance of the 1948 Genocide Convention (Haigazian University Press 2010)
• Erem F, İnsanlığa Karşı Cürümler (Génocide) (Güney Matbaacılık 1948)
• ‘Formulation of Nurnberg Principles, Document A/CN.4/22, Report by J. Spiropoulos, Spécial Rapporteur, 12 April 1950” in UN Yearbook of the International Law Commision, Volume II (UN 1950)
• ‘German Instrument of Surrender May 7, 1945’ <https://iowaculture.gov/history/education/educator-resources/primary-source-sets/world-war-ii/german-instrument-surrender> Erişim Tarihi 12 Mayıs 2024
• Gillespie A, A History of the Laws of War: Volume 1, The Customs and Laws of War with Regards to Combatants and Captives (Hart Publishing 2010)
• Guénaël M, International Crimes Law and Practice Volume 1 Genocide (OUP 2019)
• Guénaël M, Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial (OUP 2008)
• Hafetz J, Punishing Atrocities Through a Fair Trial International Criminal Law from Nuremberg to the Age of Global Terrorism (CUP 2018)
• Heller KJ, The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (OUP 2011) Lauterpacht H, ‘The Law of Nations and the Punishment of War Crimes’ in Guénaël Mettraux (ed), Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial (OUP 2008) 13-54
• Lemkin R, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe Laws of Occupation Analysis of Government Proposals for Redress (Carnegie Endowment 1944)
• Leyh BM, ‘Nuremberg’s Legacy Within Transitional Justice: Prosecutions Are Here to Stay’ (2016) 15 (4) Washington University Global Studies Law Review 559-574
• Lopardo MJ, Nuremberg Trials and International Law (1978) 8 (2) University of Baltimore Law Forum 34-37 Lütem İ, Harp Suçları ve Devletlerarası Hukuk (Güney Matbaacılık 1951)
• Merkel R, ‘The Law of the Nuremberg Trial: Valid, Dubious, Outdated’ in Guénaël Mettraux (ed), Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial (OUP 2008) 555-576
• ‘Minutes of Conference Session of July 19, 1945’ in Report of Robert H. Jackson United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials (Department of State 1949) 295-309
• ‘Minutes of Conference, Session of July 23, 1945’ in Report of Robert H. Jackson United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials (Department of State 1949) 328-347
• Morris N and Knaap A, ‘When Institutional Design Is Flawed Problems of Cooperation at the United Nations War Crimes Commision 1943–1948’ (2017) 28 (2) European Journal of International Law 513-534
• Muhammet ER, Adolf Hitler ve Nazizm Alman Faşizmi ve Yahudi Soykırımı (1st edn, On iki Levha Yayıncılık 2017)
• Odman T, ‘Eski Yugoslavya ile İlgili Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesinin Kuruluşu ve Yasal Dayanağı’ (1996) 45 (1) Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 131-151
• ‘Opening Statement before the International Military Tribunal’ <https://www.roberthjackson.org/speech-and-writing/opening-statement-before-the-international-military-tribunal> Erişim Tarihi 12 Mayıs 2024 Orakhelashvili A, Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law (8th revised edn, Routledge 1997)
• Önok MR, Tarihi Perspektifiyle Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi (Turhan Kitabevi 2003)
• Önok MR, Yapısal Suçlarda Failin Tespiti: Müşterek Suç Girişimi (Joint Criminal Enterprise) ve Örgütsel Hakimiyete Dayalı Dolaylı Faillik Doktrinleri, (1st edn, Seçkin Yayıncılık 2019)
• Pazarcı H, Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri 1. Kitap (14th edn, Turhan Kitabevi 2017)
• Pazarcı H, Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri 2. Kitap (11th edn, Turhan Kitabevi 2017)
• ‘Planning Memorandum Distributed to Delegations at Beginning of London Conference, June 1945’ in Report of Robert H. Jackson United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials (Department of State 1949) 64-68
• Poroy N, Nüremberg Davası (Milli Eğitim Basımevi 1948)
• ‘Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal’ in UN Yearbook of the International Law Commision, Volume II (UN 1950) 374-378
• ‘Report to the President from Justice Robert H. Jackson, Chief of Counsel for the United States in the Prosecution of Axis War Criminals’ (1945) 39 (3) American Journal of International Law 178-190
• ‘Revision of Definition of Crimes Submitted by American Delegation, July 3I, 1945’ in Report of Robert H. Jackson, United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials 395
• Rodenhäuser T, Organizing Rebellion: Non-State Armed Groups under International Humanitarian Law Human Rights Law and International Criminal Law (OUP 2018)
• Sadat LN, ‘The Nuremberg Paradox’ (2010) 58 (1) American Journal of Criminal Law 151-204
• ‘Saint James Declaration’ <https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-declaration-of-st-james-s-palace-on-punishment-for-war-crimes> Erişim Tarihi 12 Mayıs 2024
• Schabas WA, Genocide in International Law The Crime of Crimes (2nd edn, CUP 2009)
• Schabas WA, The Trial of the Kaiser (OUP 2018)
• Schabas WA, ‘Victor’s Justice: Selecting Situations at the International Criminal Court’ (2010) 43 (3) Marshall Law Review 535-552
• Schwelb E, ‘Crimes against Humanity’ (1946) 23 British Year Book of International Law 178-226
• Sözüer A and Erman B, ‘Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’ in Adalet Yüksekokulu 20. Yıl Armağanı, (Beta Basım Yayım 2001) 243-291
• Tan Y, ‘Prosecuting Crimes against Humanity before International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh A Nexus with an Armed Conflict’ (2018) 24 Asian Yearbook of International Law 294-321
• Tezcan D, ‘Saldırgan Savaş ve Devletlerarası Ceza Hukuku’ (1994) 49 (1-2) Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi Prof. Dr. İlhan Öztrak’a Armağan 349-363
• Tezcan D, ‘Uluslararası Suçları Kovuşturmada Katedilen Yol: Uluslararası Nüremberg Askeri Mahkemesinden Eski Yugoslavya Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesine’ in Prof. Dr. Kenan Tunçomağ'a Armağan, (İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi İş ve Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi 1997) 481-490
• Tezcan D, Erdem MR and Önok RM, Uluslararası Ceza Hukuku (Revised 7th edn, Seçkin Yayınevi 2023)
• ‘The Moscow Conference’ <https://avalon.law.yale.edu/wwii/moscow.asp> Erişim Tarihi 12 Mayıs 2024
• Tomuschat C, ‘The Legacy of Nuremberg’ (2006) 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice 830-844 Töner Şen S, Uluslararası Hukukta Soykırım Etnik Temizlik ve Saldırı (On iki Levha Yayıncılık 2010)
• Tütüncü AN, İnsancıl Hukuka Giriş (Beta Basım Yayım 2006)
• Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal Nuremberg 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume I (The International Military Tribunal 1947)
• Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal Nuremberg 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume XVII (The International Military Tribunal 1948)
• Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal Nuremberg 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume XIX (The International Military Tribunal 1948)
• Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals, Volume IX, (U.S. Government Printing Office 1950)
• Wright Q, ‘The Law of the Nuremberg Trial’ (1947) 41 (1) American Journal of International Law 38-72 Yürükel SM, The History of Genocide, Volume I (New East Publishing 2004)
• Violation of the Laws and Customs of War, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Division of International Law, Pamphlet No 32, Annex II (The Endowment 1919)