BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇIK DENİZ RÜZGÂR ENERJİSİ POLİTİKALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ

Halil Kaya

BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇIK DENİZ RÜZGÂR ENERJİSİ POLİTİKALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ

Abstract

Öz: Son yıllarda kullanımı önemli oranda artan rüzgar enerjisi; kara ve açık deniz rüzgar enerjisi olarak ikiye ayrılmaktadır. Kara rüzgar enerjisi alanında küresel lider Çin iken, açık deniz rüzgar enerjisi alanında Birleşik Krallık öne çıkmaktadır. Birleşik Krallık coğrafi konumunu etkin kullanarak mevcut potansiyelini harekete geçirecek politikalar üretmiştir. Bu çalışmada açık deniz rüzgâr enerjisinin gelişimine liderlik eden Birleşik Krallık politikalarının incelenerek Türkiye’de henüz gelişim aşamasında bulunan açık deniz rüzgar enerjisi politikalarına ışık tutmak amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmanın bulguları; Türkiye’nin açık deniz rüzgarını geliştirebilmek için izin, onay gibi idari süreçleri kısaltması ve kolaylaştırması, teşvik sürelerinin arttırılması, tedarik zincirinin kurulması için devlet desteklerinin verilmesi, kara rüzgar enerjisi üretimindeki tecrübenin açık deniz rüzgar enerjisi alanında değerlendirilmesi, yer seçiminin teknik, hukuki, idari ve ekonomik açıdan çok yönlü incelenmesi, sektöre yönelik özel ve uzun vadeli politikaların geliştirilmesi, altyapı yatırımlarında desteklerin sürdürülmesi, teşvik sisteminin Birleşik Krallık uygulamaları ışığında revize edilmesi, şeklindedir. Abstract: The wind energy whose use has increased significantly in recent years, is divided into two, as onshore and offshore wind energy. While China is the global leader of onshore wind energy, United Kingdom stands out on the field of offshore wind energy. United Kingdom produced policies which will activate current potential by using its geographic location. This study has aimed to shed light on offshore wind energy policies which are in development stage in Turkey, by examining the United Kingdom policy which is leader for the development of offshore wind energy. The finding of the study include; to shorten and facilitate of administrative process for approval of Turkey's offshore wind development, to increase the incentive period, to provide government assistance in order to establish supply chain, to evaluate the onshore wind energy production experience on the field of offshore wind energy, to examine the site election in terms of technique, legal, administrative and economic fields, to develop special and long term policies for sector, to continue the support of infrastructure investments, to revise the incentive system in the light of United Kingdom practices.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi

Project Number

İKT-126

References

Argin, M., Yerci, V., Erdoğan, N., Kucuksarı, S., Cali, U. (2019). Exploring The Offshore Wind Energy Potential Of Turkey Based On Multi-Criteria Site Selection, Energy Strategy Reviews, 23, 33-46.
Bilgili, M., Yaşar, A., Şimsek, E. (2011). Offshore Wind Development İn Europe And İts Comparison With Onshore Counterpart., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 905-915.
Clıfford Chance (2015), “Contracts for Difference: an EMR CfD Primer”, Briefing Note, 1-7.
Colmenar-Santos, A., Perez, J. P., Die, D.B. (2016), “Offshore wind energy: A review of current status, challenges and future development in Spain”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, 1-18.
Crabtree, C., Zappala, D., Hogg, S. (2015), “Wind Energy: UK Experiences and offshore operational challenges”, Journal of Power and Energy, Special Issue on Renewables, 1-20.
Da, Z., Xiliang, Z., Jiankun, H., Qimin, C. (2011), “Offshore wind energy development in China: Current status and future perspective”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, (15), 4673-4684.
deCastro, M., Salvador, S., Gesteıra, M., Costoya, X., Carvalho, D., Larruga, F.J., Gimeno, L., (2019), “Europe, China and United States: Three different approaches to the development of offshore wind energy”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, (109), 55-70.
Dewar, J., De Cintre K. (2019), “United Kıngdom”, in: The Renewable Energy Law Review, ed: Karen B. Wong, 164-171.

Emeksiz, C., Demirci, B. (2019), “The determination of offshore wind energy potential of Turkey by using novelty hybrid site selection method”, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 36, 1-21.
Fitch-Roy, O. W., Woodman, B. (2016), “Auctions for Renewable Energy Support in the United Kingdom: Instruments and Lessons Learnt”, AURES Report D4.1-UK. Graziano, M., Lecca, P., Mussu, M. (2017), ”Historic paths and future expectations: The macroeconomic impact of the offshore wind technologies in the UK”, Energy Policy, (108), 715-730.
He, Z., Xu, S., Shen, W., Zhang, H., Long, R., Yang, H., Chen, H. (2016), “Review of factors affecting China’s offshore wind power industry”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews”, (56), 1372-1386.
Higgins, P., Foley, A. (2014), “The evolution of offshore wind power in the United Kingdom”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, (37), 599-612.
Hockley, T. (2017), “UK Offshore Wınd Energy: What Role for Competition”, https://policy-centre.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Offshore-Wind-LSE-report.pdf (e03.04.2020).
HM Government, Industrial Strategy-Offshore Wind Sector Deal, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/offshore-wind-sector-deal (16.04.2020)
Green, R., Vasilakos, N. (2011), “The Economics of Offshore Wind”, Energy Policy, 39, 496-502.
Gürkan, G., Langestraat, R. (2014), “Modeling and analysis of renewable energy obligations and technology bandings in the UK electricity market”, Energy Policy, 70, 85-95.
IEA/IRENA, Renewables Energy Database, https://www.iea.org/policies?country=United%20Kingdom&topic=Renewable%20Energy&page=2 (20.04.2020)
IRENA, Data&Statistics, https://www.irena.org/Statistics/View-Data-by-Topic/Capacity-and-Generation/Statistics-Time-Series, 20.04.2020.
IRENA, Renewable Capacity Highlights, E.T:18.04.2020, https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Mar/Renewable-Capacity-Statistics-2020
J.K. Kaldellis, M. Kapsali (2013), “Shifting towards offshore wind energy-Recent activity and future development”, Energy Policy, 53, pp.136-148.
Kern, F., Smith, A., Shaw, C., Raven, R., Verhees, B. (2014), “From laggard to leader: Explaining offshore wind developments in the UK”, Energy Policy, 69, 635-646.
KPGM (2017), https://home.kpmg/uk/en/home/insights/2017/09/cfd-allocation-round-2-results-that-will-blow-you-away.html (20.04.2020)
Kota, S., Bayne, S. B., Nimmagadda, S. (2015), “Offshore Wind Energy: A comparative analysis of UK, USA and India” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 685-694.
Krohn, S., Morthorst, P., Awerbuch, S. (2009), “ The Economics of Wind Energy”, EWEA Report.
LeMay, T.J. (2019), “Offshore Wind: Lessons from Abroad”, LSU Journal of Energy Law and Resources, 7(1), 160-192.
Mani, S., Dhingra T. (2013a), “Offshore wind energy policy for India- Key factors to be considered”, Energy Policy, (56), 672-683.
Mani, S., Dhingra T. (2013b), “Policies to accelerate the growth of offshore wind energy sector in Indıa”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 473-482.
Microgeneration Strategy, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/microgeneration-strategy (20.04.2020)
Normann, H.E. (2015), “The role of politics in sustainable transitions: The rise and decline of offshore wind in Norway”, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, (15), 180-193.
Noonan, M. (2019), “UK Offshore Wind: Realising the Sector Deal Opportunity”, https://ore.catapult.org.uk/analysisinsight/realising-the-sector-deal-opportunity/ (e.t.: 03.04.2020).
Ochieng, E.G., Melaine, Y., Potts, S.J., Zuofa, T., Egbu, C.O., Price, A.D., Ruan, X. (2014), “Future for offshore wind energy in the United Kingdom: The way forward”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, (39), 655-666.
Özkol, B.B. (2011), “The Possible Ways to Fınance The Renewable Energy Projects in Term of Project Finance and Law”, Ankara Bar Review, 13-62.
Portman, M.E., Duff, J.A., Köppel, J., Reisert, J., Higgins, M.E. (2009), “Offshore wind energy development in the exclusive economic zone: Legal and policy supports and impediments in Germany and US”, Energy Policy, (37), 3596-3607.
Poudineh, R., Brown, C., Foley, B. (2017), Economics of Offshore Wind Power- Challenges and Policy Wind Power, Palgrave Macmillian, ISBN 978-3-319-66420-0 (eBook), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66420-0
Rodriques, S., Restrepo, C., Pinto, R. T., Bauer, P. (2015), “Trends of offshore wind projects”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, (49), 1114-1135.
Reichardt, K., Rogge, K. (2016), “How the policy mix impact innovation: Findings from company case studies on offshore wind in Germany”, Enviromental Innovation and Societal Transitions, (18), 62-81.
Sarı, A.C., Saygın, D. (2018), “Enerji Dönüşümünü Destekleyen Düzenleyici Çerçevenin Güçlendirilmesi için YEKA İhalelerini Daha Etkin Kılan Fırsatlar”, Shura Enerji Dönüşümü Merkezi Yayınları, https://www.shura.org.tr (e.t.: 04.04.2020).
Söderholm, P., Pettersson, M. (2011), “Offshore wind power policy and planning Sweden”, Energy Policy, (39), 518-525.
Taranto, Y., Dinçel, G. (2019), “Türkiye’de Enerji Dönüşümünün Finansmanı”, Shura Enerji Dönüşümü Merkezi Yayınları, https://www.shura.org.tr (e.t.: 04.04.2020).
Toke, D. (2011), “The UK offshore wind power programme: A sea-change in UK energy policy?”, Energy Policy, (39), 526-534.
Ulazia, A., Arriola, C. (2018), “United Kingdom”, WWEA Policy Paper Series (PP-0218-E).
Whitmarsh, M. (2019), “The UK Offshore Wind Industry: Supply Chain Review”, https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.renewableuk.com/resource/resmgr/publications/supply_chain_review_31.01.20.pdf (e.t.: 04.04. 2020).
Woodman, B., Mitchell, C. (2011), “Learning from experience? The development of the Renewables Obligation in England and Wales (2002-2010)”, Energy Policy, 39, 3914-3921.
Woodman, B., Roy, O. (2019), “Auctions for the support of renewable energy in the UK”, AURES II Project, 1-34.
WB ve IFC (2019), “Going Global-Expanding Offshore Wind to Emerging Markets”. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/716891572457609829/pdf/Going-Global-Expanding-Offshore-Wind-To-Emerging-Markets.pdf (e.t.: 05.04.2020).
Welisch, M., Poudineh, E. (2020), “Auctions for allocation of offshore wind contracts for difference in the UK”, Renewable Energy, 147, 1266-1274.
Wood, G., Dow, S. (2011), “What lessons have benn learned in reforming the Renewables Obligation? An analysis of internal and external failures in UK renewable energy policy”, Energy Policy, (39), 2228-2244.
Vieria, M., Snyder, B., Henriques, E., Reis, L. (2019), “European offshore wind capital cost trends up to 2020”, Energy Policy, (129), 1364-1371.
Verhees, B., Raven, R., Kern, F., Smith, A. (2015), “The role of policy in shielding, nurturing and enabling offshore wind in the Netherlands (1973-2013)”, Renewable and Sustainable Enegy Reviews, (47), 816-829.
Xia, Fang, Lu, Xi, Song, Feng, The role of feed-in tariff in the curtailment of wind power in China, Energy Economics, 86 (2020), 1-9.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Halil Kaya ^*
0000-0001-8331-0853
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 30, 2020

Submission Date

October 29, 2020

Acceptance Date

November 18, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 2 Number: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA58SJ94GS

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kaya, H. (2020). BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇIK DENİZ RÜZGÂR ENERJİSİ POLİTİKALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(2), 138-157. https://izlik.org/JA58SJ94GS

AMA

1.Kaya H. BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇIK DENİZ RÜZGÂR ENERJİSİ POLİTİKALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2020;2(2):138-157. https://izlik.org/JA58SJ94GS

Chicago

Kaya, Halil. 2020. “BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇIK DENİZ RÜZGÂR ENERJİSİ POLİTİKALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ”. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2 (2): 138-57. https://izlik.org/JA58SJ94GS.

EndNote

Kaya H (December 1, 2020) BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇIK DENİZ RÜZGÂR ENERJİSİ POLİTİKALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2 2 138–157.

IEEE

[1]H. Kaya, “BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇIK DENİZ RÜZGÂR ENERJİSİ POLİTİKALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ”, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 138–157, Dec. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA58SJ94GS

ISNAD

Kaya, Halil. “BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇIK DENİZ RÜZGÂR ENERJİSİ POLİTİKALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ”. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2/2 (December 1, 2020): 138-157. https://izlik.org/JA58SJ94GS.

JAMA

1.Kaya H. BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇIK DENİZ RÜZGÂR ENERJİSİ POLİTİKALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2020;2:138–157.

MLA

Kaya, Halil. “BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇIK DENİZ RÜZGÂR ENERJİSİ POLİTİKALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ”. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2020, pp. 138-57, https://izlik.org/JA58SJ94GS.

Vancouver

1.Halil Kaya. BİRLEŞİK KRALLIK AÇIK DENİZ RÜZGÂR ENERJİSİ POLİTİKALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 1;2(2):138-57. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA58SJ94GS