Variations in Concrete Quality Produced from A Blend of Clay-Based Concrete Admixtures and Multiple Additives for Structural Applications

Öz

The present study examines the variation in the quality of concretes (in terms of compressive strength) produced from a blend of clay-based concrete admixtures and multiple additives using standard test methods such as slump test, concrete cube test, curing duration etc. It was observed that for control samples with no clay and high clay content at 7, 14, and 28 days of curing, the average compressive strengths were 21.05, 22.13, 30.62 and 13.57,14.26 21.49N/mm2. For periwinkle shell ash and superplasticizer (conplastSP430) combined together at 7, 14 and 28 days at 5%, the compressive strength were 26.06, 24.76 and 27.52N/mm2. Similarly for Rice husk ash and Hydrated Lime combined together at 7, 14, and 28 days at 5%, the compressive strength were 29.47, 29.02 and 31.52N/mm2. For all additives combined together at 5% and 2.5% each at 7, 14 and 28 days, the compressive strengths were 11.15, 15.52, 20.64 and 18.11, 22.79. 25.68N/mm2 respectively. However, superplasticizer (conplastSP430) at 10% yielded the highest compressive strength of 30.78, 33.48, and 35.72 at 7, 14, and 28 days curing. This implies that concrete with high clay content possess low compressive strength as well as low quality which is not suitable for structural applications, in which case can be improved to satisfactory levels and percentages when combined with additives at adequate curing durations and mix ratios.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Compressive Strength
• Concrete
• Mix Ratio
• Curing Period
• Additives

References

1. Sanchez, F. and Sobolev, K., (2010). Nanotechnology in concrete: a review. Construction and Building Materials, 24(11):2060-2071.
2. Birgisson, B., Mukhopadhyay, A.K., Geary, G., Khan, M., and Sobolev, K., (2012). Nanotechnology in concrete materials: a synopsis. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, ISSN 097-8515.
3. Ndon, A.E. and Ikpe, A.E., (2021). Experimental study on the effect of different coarse aggregate sizes on the strength of concrete. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research, 3(1):29-38.
4. Taylor, H.F.W., (1997). Cement chemistry, 2nd ed., Thomas Telford, London.
5. Mehta, P.K., (1986). Concrete structure, properties and materials. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, N.J.
6. Ukpata, J., Ephraim, M.E., and Akeke, G.A., (2012). Compressive strength of concrete using lateritic sand and quarry dust as fine aggregate. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 7(1):81-90.
7. Ikpe, A.E., Ebunilo, P.O., and Okovido, J., (2018). Geotechnical evaluation of bentonite clay for municipal solid waste landfill lining membrane. Applied Journal of Environmental Engineering Science, 4(3):337-351.
8. Samani, M.Z., Mokhtari, S.P., and Raji, F., (2018). Effects of fly ash on mechanical properties of concrete. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, 8(2):35-40.

9. Qadir, W., Ghafor, K., and Mohammed, A., (2019). Evaluation the effect of lime on the plastic and hardened properties of cement mortar and quantified using vipulanandan model. Open Engineering, 9:468-480.
10. Demyanenko, O., Kopanitsa, N., Sarkisov, Y., and Kopanitsa, G., (2017). Peculiarities of silica additives application in building mixes production. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1800(020010), 1-8.
11. Bamigboye, G.O., Ede, A.N., Egwuatu, C., Jolayemi, J., Olowu, O., and Odewumi, T., (2015). Assessment of compressive strength of concrete produced from different brands of portland cement (2015) civil and environmental research. 7(8):31-38.
12. Machado, D.M., Bertassoni, L.E., Souza, E.M., Almeida, J.B., and Rached, R.N., (2010). Effect of additives on the compressive strength and setting time of a Portland cement. Braz Oral Res., 24(2):158-164.
13. Ndon, A.E. and Ikpe, A.E., (2020). Evaluation of the effects of different additives on compressive strength of clay-based concrete admixtures. Applied Journal of Environmental Engineering Science, 6(4):436-451.
14. Sathya, A., Bhuvaneshwari, P., Niranjan, G., and Vishveswaran, M., (2014). Influence of bio admixture on mechanical properties of cement and concrete. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(4):205-214.
15. Oyekan, G.L. and Kamiyo, O.M., (2011). A study on the engineering properties of sandcrete blocks produced with rice husk ash blended cement. Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 3(3):88-98.
16. Dabai, M.U., Muhammad, I.C., Bagudo, B.U., and Musa, A., (2009). Studies on the effect of rice husk ash as cement admixture. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 17(2):252-256.
17. Attah, I.C., Etim, R.K., and Ekpo, D.U., (2018). Behaviour of periwinkle shell ash blended cement concrete in sulphuric acid environment. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 37(2):315-321.
18. Abdul-Wahab, S.A., Hassan, E.M., Al-Jabri, K.S., and Yetilmezsoy, K., (2019). Application of zeolite/kaolin combination for replacement of partial cement clinker to manufacture environmentally sustainable cement in Oman. Environmental Engineering Resources, 24(2):246-253.
19. Awang, H., Mydin, A.O., and Roslan, A.F., (2012). Effect of additives on mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight foamed concrete. Advances in Applied Science Research, 3(5):3326-3338.
20. Mitoulis, S. and Bennett, A.R., (2016). Effect of waste tyre rubber additive on concrete mixture strength. British Journal of Environmental Sciences, 4(4):11-18.
21. Neville, A.M. and Brooks, J.J., (2010). Concrete technology, Longman Ltd. Singapore.