The Evolution of Strategic Management Researches: An Evaluation on Approaches and Micro Views

Year 2020, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 347 - 370, 01.04.2020

Mehmet Bağış Oğuzhan Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.496482

Cited By: 3

Abstract

This study seeks to answer the question, "How have strategic management research evolved?" Within the framework of this question, an investigation has been made on the basis of the position view, the resource-based view and the complementary (micro) views which have an impact on the historical development process of the strategic management discipline between 1980 and 2018. The review was carried out in the form of systematic resource review, taking into account the historical formation order of the approaches and micro-views. In order to carry out the study within a certain framework, a comparison was made within the framework of three criteria: (1) theoretical foundations of approaches and micro views, (2) competitive advantage bases and (3) sustainability mechanisms. As a result, theoretical frameworks and suggestions have been made with the potential to contribute to the consolidation, improvement and expansion of the strategic management area.

Keywords

Strategic Management, Approaches, Micro Views, Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Historical Evolution

Stratejik Yönetim Araştırmalarının Evrimi: Yaklaşımlar ve Mikro Görüşler Üzerinden Bir Değerlendirme

Abstract

Bu çalışma, “stratejik yönetim araştırmaları nasıl evrilmiştir?” sorusuna cevap aramaktadır. Bu soru çerçevesinde stratejik yönetim disiplinin 1980-2018 yılları arasındaki tarihsel gelişim sürecinde etkisi olan Pozisyon Yaklaşımı, Kaynaklara Dayalı Yaklaşım ve Kaynaklara Dayalı Yaklaşımı tamamlayıcı (mikro) görüşler temelinde bir inceleme yapılmıştır. İnceleme yaklaşımların ve mikro-görüşlerin tarihsel oluşum sırası dikkate alınarak sistematik literatür incelemesi şeklinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmayı belli bir çerçevede yürütebilmek adına, yaklaşımların ve mikro görüşlerin (1) teorik temelleri, (2) rekabet avantajının dayanakları ve (3) sürdürülebilirlik mekanizmalarına ilişkin açıklamaları çerçevesinde bir karşılaştırma yapılmıştır. Sonuçta stratejik yönetim alanının birleştirilmesine, iyileştirilmesine ve genişlemesine katkı sağlama potansiyeli olan teorik çerçeveler ve öneriler sunulmuştur.  

Keywords

Stratejik Yönetim, Yaklaşımlar, Mikro Görüşler, Sürdürülebilir Rekabet Avantajı, Tarihsel Evrim

References

• Acedo, Francisco Jose; Barroso, Carmen; Galan, Jose Luis (2006), The resource‐based theory: Dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 621-636.
• Adner, Ron; Helfat, Constance E. (2003), Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011-1025.
• Allard-Poesi, F. (2015), A Foucauldian perspective on strategic practice: strategy as the art of (un) folding. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl et E. Vaara (Eds.), Strategy as Practice, Theory, Epistemology, Methodology, 2nd ed., Cambridge : Cambridge University Press: 234- 248.
• Ambrosini, Véronique; Bowman, Cliff; Collier, Nardine (2009), Dynamic capabilities: an exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management, 20, 9-24.
• Amit, Raphael; Schoemaker, Paul J. H. (1993), Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
• Argyris, Chris; Schön, Donald. (1978), Organizational Learning, Readings: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
• Augier, Mie; Teece, David J. (2009), Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organization science, 20(2), 410-421.
• Bacharach, Samuel B. (1989), Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496-515.
• Bağış, Mehmet; Hızıroğlu, Mahmut (2017), Stratejinin kaynaklara dayalı yaklaşımına yönelik eleştirilere dair kategorik bir inceleme. Yorum-Yönetim-Yöntem Uluslararası Yönetim-Ekonomi ve Felsefe Dergisi, 5(1), 1-27.
• Bağış, Mehmet; Hızıroğlu, Mahmut (2018), Stratejik Yönetim'in Kaynaklara Dayalı Yaklaşımı: Ekonomik, Sosyolojik, Psikolojik Temeller. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Bain, Joe S. (1956), Barriers to new competition: Their character and consequences in manufacturing industries. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.
• Barca, Mehmet (2003), Economic foundations of strategic management: Gower Publishing, Ltd.
• Barca, Mehmet (2005), Stratejik yönetim düşüncesinin evrimi: Bilimsel bir disiplinin oluşum hikayesi. Yönetim Araştirmalari Dergisi, 5(1), 7-38.
• Barca, Mehmet (2009), Stratejik yönetim düşüncesinin gelişimi. Ankara Sanayi Odası Dergisi, 34-52.
• Barca, Mehmet; Hızıroğlu, Mahmut. (2009), 2000’li Yıllarda Türkiye’de Stratejik Yönetim Alanının Entelektüel Yapısı. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 4(1), 113-148.
• Barney, Jay B. (1986), Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241.
• Barney, Jay B. (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Barney, Jay B. (1996), The resource-based theory of the firm. Organization Science, 7(5), 469-469.
• Blyler, Maurenn; Coff, Russell W. (2003), Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7), 677-686.
• Bracker, Jeffrey (1980), The historical development of the strategic management concept. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 219-224.
• Buğra, Ayşe. (2017), Devlet ve işadamları: İletişim Yayınları.
• Burt, Ronald S. (1992), Structural Holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press.
• Cannella Jr, Albert A.; Paetzold, Romano L. (1994), Pfeffer's barriers to the advance of organizational science: A rejoinder. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 331-341.
• Cantillon, Richard (1755), An Essay on Commerce in General. History of Economic Thought Books.
• Carlsson, Sven A. (2008), An Attention-based view on DSS. Encyclopaedia of Decision Making and Decision Support Technologies, F. Adam and P. Humphreys Eds., Idea Publishing Group, Hershey: 38-45.
• Chamberlin, Edward H. (1933), The Theory of Monopolistic Competition: Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Collis, David J. (1994), Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 15(8), 143-152.
• Conner, Kathleen R.; Prahalad, C. K. (1996), A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477-501.
• Cyert, Richard M.; March, James G. (1963), A behavioral theory of the firm, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Çubukçu, Murat (2018), Stratejik yönetimin gelişim süreci ve stratejik yönetime dair literatürdeki güncel araştırma konularının sınıflandırılması. Stratejik Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 61-84.
• Danneels, Erwin (2002), The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095-1121.
• De La Ville, Valérie-Inès; Mounoud, Eléonore (2010), A narrative approach to strategy as practice: strategy making from texts and narratives. Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 183-197.
• Demsetz, Harold (1973), Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 1-9.
• Dierickx, Ingemar; Cool, Karel (1989), Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1511.
• DiMaggio, Paul J.; Powell, Walter W. (1983), The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
• Durand, Radolphe; Grant, Robert M.; Madsen, Tammy L. (2017), The expanding domain of strategic management research and the quest for integration. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 4-16.
• Dyer, Jeffrey H.; Singh, Harbir (1998), The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
• Dyer, Jeffrey H.; Singh, Harbir; Hesterly, William S. (2018), The relational view revisited: A dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3140-3162.
• Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989), Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
• Eisenhardt, Kathlen M.; Martin, Jeffrey A. (2000), Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
• Eryiğit, Burak Hamza (2013), Stratejik Planlama, Stratejik Planlamaya İlişkin Alternatif Yaklaşımlar ve Stratejik Yönetim Okulları. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 4(9), 152-173.
• Foss, Nicolai J. (1996a), Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organization Science, 7(5), 470-476.
• Foss, Nicolai J. (1996b), More critical comments on knowledge-based theories of the firm. Organization Science, 7(5), 519-523.
• Foss, Nicolai J.; Hallberg, Niklas L. (2016), Changing assumptions and progressive change in theories of strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 1-13.
• Foss, Nicolai J.; Klein, Peter. G.; Kor, Yasemin. Y.; Mahoney, Joseph T. (2008), Entrepreneurship, subjectivism, and the resource‐based view: toward a new synthesis. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(1), 73-94.
• Furrer, Olivier; Thomas, Howard; Goussevskaia, Anna (2008), The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1-23.
• Giles, Lionel (2013), Sun Tzu on the Art of War. New York, Berlin: Taylor and Francis, Globusz Publishing.
• Ginsberg, Ari (1994), Minding the competition: From mapping to mastery. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Winter Special Issue), 153-174.
• Golsorkhi, Damon; Rouleau, Linda; Seidl, David; Vaara, Eero (2010), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice: Cambridge University Press.
• Gomez, Marie-Leandre (2010), A Bourdieusian perspective on strategizing. Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 141-154.
• Granovetter, Mark S. (1973), The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
• Granovetter, Mark S. (1985), Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
• Grant, Robert M. (1991), The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
• Grant, Robert M. (1996a), Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
• Grant, Robert M. (1996b), Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 109-122.
• Guerras-Martín, Luis Áangel; Madhok, Anoop; Montoro-Sánchez, Ángeles (2014), The evolution of strategic management research: Recent trends and current directions. Business Research Quarterly, 17(2), 69-76.
• Gulati, Ranjay. (1998), Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317.
• Gulati, Ranjay. (1999), Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420.
• Gulati, Ranjay; Nohria, Nitin; Zaheer, Akbar (2000), Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215.
• Haldun, İbni (2007), Mukaddime, Cilt I, Hazırlayan: Süleyman Uludağ, 5. Baskı, İstanbul: Dergah Yayınları.
• Hayek, Friedrich A. (1945), The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519-530.
• Helfat, Constance E.; Finkelstein, Sydney; Mitchell, Will; Peteraf, Margaret; Singh, Harbir; Teece, David J.; Winter, Sidney G. (2009), Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations: John Wiley and Sons.
• Helfat, Constance E.; Martin, Jeffrey A. (2015), Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281-1312.
• Helfat, Constance. E.; Peteraf, Margaret A. (2015), Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831-850.
• Helfat, Constance. E.; Winter, Sidney. G. (2011), Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (N) ever‐changing world. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), 1243-1250.
• Herrmann, Pol (2005), Evolution of strategic management: The need for new dominant designs. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 111-130.
• Hodgkinson, Gerard P.; Healey, Mark P. (2011), Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1500-1516.
• Hoskisson, Robert E.; Hitt, Michael A.; Wan, William P.; Yiu, Daphne (1999), Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum. Journal of Management, 25(3), 417-456.
• Jarzabkowski, Paula (2004), Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529-560.
• Jarzabkowski, Paula (2005), Strategy as practice: An activity based approach: Sage.
• Jarzabkowski, Paula, Balogun, Julia; Seidl, David (2007), Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1), 5-27.
• Jarzabkowski, Paula; Kaplan, Sarah; Seidl, David; Whittington, Richard (2016), On the risk of studying practices in isolation: Linking what, who, and how in strategy research. Strategic Organization, 14(3), 248-259.
• Jemison, David B. (1981), The importance of an integrative approach to strategic management research. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 601-608.
• Johnson, Gerry; Langley, Ann; Melin, Leif; Whittington, Richard (2007), Strategy as practice: research directions and resources: Cambridge University Press.
• Johnson, Gerry; Melin, Leif; Whittington, Richard (2003), Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity‐based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3-22.
• Kirzner, Israel M. (1973), Competition and entrepreneurship: University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London.
• Knight, Frank H. (1921), Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Hart, Schaffner and Marx.
• Kogut, Bruce; Zander, Udo (1992), Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
• Kogut, Bruce; Zander, Udo (1996), What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502-518.
• Kuhn, Thomas S. (2012), The structure of scientific revolutions:University of Chicago press.
• Latour, Bruno (2005), Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory: Oxford university press.
• Lave, Jean; Wenger, Etienne (1991), Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Lavie, Doven (2006), The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658.
• Liebeskind, Julia Porter (1996), Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 93-107.
• Lippman, Steven Anderson; Rumelt, Richard P. (1982), Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 418-438.
• Mahoney, Joseph T.; Pandian, J. Rarajndran (1992), The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363-380.
• Makadok, Richard; Burton, Richard; Barney, Jay B. (2018), A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1530-1545.
• Mantere, Saku (2013), What is organizational strategy? A language‐based view. Journal of Management Studies, 50(8), 1408-1426.
• March, James G.; Simon, Herbert A. (1958), Organizations, USA, Blackwell Business.
• McKiernan, Peter (2017), Historical Evolution of Strategic Management, Volumes I and II: Routledge.
• Meyer, John W.; Rowan, Brian (1977), Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
• Mintzberg, Henry; Ahlstrand, Bruce; Lampel, Joseph (2001), Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through The Wilds of Strategic Mangament: Simon and Schuster.
• Nelson, Richard R.; Winter, Sidney G. (1982), An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The Belknap Press
• Nonaka, Ikujiro (1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
• North, Douglas C. (1990), Institutions, institutional change and economic performance: Cambridge University Press.
• Ocasio, William (1997), Towards an attention based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer Special Issue), 187-206.
• Ocasio, William; Joseph, John (2005), An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro-and macroperspectives in strategy processes. Strategy Process, 22, 39-61
• Ocasio, William; Laamanen, Tomi; Vaara, Eero (2017), Communication and Attention Dynamics: An Attention‐Based View of Strategic Change. Strategic Management Journal. 39(1), 155-167
• Oliver, Christine (1997), Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 697-713.
• Peng, Mike W. (2002), Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2-3), 251-267.
• Peng, Mike W.; Sun, Sunny. Li.; Pinkham, Brian; Chen, Hao (2009), The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63-81.
• Penrose, Edith T. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Mansfield Centre, USA: Martino Publishing.
• Pentland, Brian T.; Rueter, Henry H. (1994), Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 484-510.
• Peteraf, Margaret A. (1993), The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
• Polanyi, Michael (1962), Tacit knowing: It’s bearing on some problems of philosophy. Reviews of Modern Physics, 34(4), 601-616.
• Polanyi, Michael (1967), The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
• Porter, Michael E. (1980), Competitive startegy: Technigues for analyzing industies and competitors. New York: Free Press.
• Porter, Michael E. (1981), The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 609-620.
• Porter, Michael E. (1989), How competitive forces shape strategy Readings in Strategic Management. Springer: 133-143.
• Porter, Michael E. (1991), Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 95-117.
• Porter, Michael E. (2008a), The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78-93.
• Porter, Michael E. (2008b), On competition: Harvard Business Press.
• Porter, Michael E.; Spence, A. M. (1982), The capacity expansion process in a growing oligopoly: the case of corn wet milling The economics of information and uncertainty. University of Chicago Press: 259-316
• Powell, Thomas C.; Lovallo, Dan; Fox, Craig R. (2011), Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (13), 1369-1386.
• Priem, Richard L.; Butler, John E. (2001a), Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research?. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40.
• Priem, Richard L.; Butler, John E. (2001b). Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: Further comments. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 57-66.
• Ramos‐Rodríguez, Antonio-Rafael; Ruíz‐Navarro, Jose (2004), Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981-1004.
• Reckwitz, Andreas (2002), Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263.
• Reed, Richard; Defilippi, Robert (1990), Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation and sustainable advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15, 88-102.
• Regnér, Patrick (2008), Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: Steps towards a dynamic view of strategy. Human Relations, 61(4), 565-588.
• Ricardo, David (1821), On the principles of political economy and taxation (third edition edit.), Canada: Batoche Books.
• Robinson, Joan (1933), Economics of imperfect competition. McMillian: ST Martin's Press.
• Ronda‐Pupo, Guillerimo Armando; Guerras‐Martin, Luis Ángel (2012), Dynamics of the evolution of the strategy concept 1962–2008: A co‐word analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 33(2), 162-188.
• Rumelt, Richard P. 2005. Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Springer.
• Salvato, Carlo; Vassolo, Roberto (2018), The sources of dynamism in dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1728-1752.
• Sarvan, Fulya; Arıcı, Eren Durmuş; Özen, Janset; Özdemir, Bahattin; İçigen, Ebru Tarcan (2003), On stratejik yönetim okulu: Biçimleşme okulunun bütünleştirici çerçevesi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6, 73-122.
• Schulze, William S. (1994), The two schools of thought in resource-based theory: Definitions and implications for research. Advances in Strategic Management, 10(1), 127-152.
• Schumpeter, Joseph Alois (1934), The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (R. Opie, Trans. Sixteenth ed.), New Brunswick (USA) and London (U.K.): Transaction Publishers.
• Schumpeter, Joseph Alois (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London and New York: Taylor and Francis e-Library.
• Shepherd, Dean A.; Mcmullen, Jeffrey S.; Ocasio, William (2017), Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers' opportunity beliefs for strategic action. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 626-644.
• Simon, Herbert A. (1947), Administrative behavior. A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization: The Free Press, New York.
• Spender, J. C.; Grant, Robert M. (1996), Knowledge and the firm: overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 5-9.
• Teece, David J. (2007), Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
• Teece, David J. (2014), The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of management perspectives, 28(4), 328-352.
• Teece, David J.; Pisano, Gary; Shuen, Amy (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
• Teece, David J.; Pisano, Gary (1994), The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and corporate change, 3(3), 537-556.
• Wasserman, Stanley; Faust, Katherine (1994), Social network analysis: Methods and applications: Cambridge University Press.
• Wernerfelt, Birger (1984), A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
• Whetten, David A.; Felin, Teppo; King, Brayden G. (2009), The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Management. 35(3), 537-563.
• Whittington, Richard (1996), Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731-735.
• Whittington, Richard (2006), Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613-634.
• Williamson, Oliver E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. London: The Free Press: A Division of Macmillian Publishing Co., Inc.
• Williamson, Oliver E. (1981), The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548-577.
• Williamson, Oliver E. (1999), Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1087-1108.
• Winter, Sidney G. (2003), Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991-995.
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1951), Philosophical investigations. John Wiley & Sons.
• Zollo, Maurizio; Winter, Sidney G. (2002), Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.