Research Article

CLASSIFYING LIVER DISEASE WITH BOOSTING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES

Volume: 33 Number: 2 August 22, 2025
EN TR

CLASSIFYING LIVER DISEASE WITH BOOSTING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES

Abstract

Liver diseases pose a significant global health challenge due to their impact on metabolic function and the difficulty of early detection. Traditional diagnostic methods such as liver biopsy have limitations due to their invasive nature and high costs. This research examines the application of advanced machine learning techniques such as Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, XGBoost and CatBoost for classification of liver diseases using a publicly available dataset of 1700 clinical records. Statistical analyses identified key predictors such as age, body mass index (BMI), lifestyle factors, and liver function tests, which were used to train and evaluate the models. The performance of the models was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall and AUC-ROC. The CatBoost model showed the highest performance with an accuracy of 93.82%, while also producing the most consistent results with precision (91.97%), recall (96.62%), F1 score (94.25%) and AUC-ROC (95.64%). These results highlight the potential of machine learning-based approaches to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce reliance on invasive procedures. The proposed framework can contribute to improving patient outcomes and optimizing healthcare resources by providing a foundation for real-time clinical decision support systems.

Keywords

Liver disease , Machine learning , Diagnosis , Classification , Boosting

References

  1. An, Q., Rahman, S., Zhou, J., & Kang, J. J. (2023). A Comprehensive Review on Machine Learning in Healthcare Industry: Classification, Restrictions, Opportunities and Challenges. Sensors, 23(9), 4178. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/9/4178
  2. Anderson, D., Bjarnadottir, M. V., & Nenova, Z. (2022). Machine Learning in Healthcare: Operational and Financial Impact. In V. Babich, J. R. Birge, & G. Hilary (Eds.), Innovative Technology at the Interface of Finance and Operations: Volume I (pp. 153-174). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75729-8_5
  3. Aouragh, A. A., & Bahaj, M. (2023, 16-22 Dec. 2023). Feature Selection and Dimensionality Reduction for Unbalanced Liver Disease Classification with Optimized Machine Learning Algorithms. 2023 7th IEEE Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt),
  4. Ayyadevara, V. K. (2018). Gradient Boosting Machine. In Pro Machine Learning Algorithms : A Hands-On Approach to Implementing Algorithms in Python and R (pp. 117-134). Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3564-5_6
  5. Bennett, M., Hayes, K., Kleczyk, E. J., & Mehta, R. (2022). Similarities and differences between machine learning and traditional advanced statistical modeling in healthcare analytics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.02469.
  6. Bentéjac, C., Csörgő, A., & Martínez-Muñoz, G. (2021). A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(3), 1937-1967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09896-5
  7. Biau, G., Cadre, B., & Rouvière, L. (2019). Accelerated gradient boosting. Machine Learning, 108(6), 971-992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-019-05787-1
  8. Bozuyla, M. (2021). AdaBoost Ensemble Learning on top of Naive Bayes Algorithm to Discriminate Fake and Genuine News from Social Media [Naive Bayes Algoritmasının AdaBoost Topluluk Öğrenme Modeli ile Sosyal Medyada Sahte ve Gerçek Haberlerinin Ayırt Edilmesi]. European Journal of Science and Technology(28), 459-462. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1005577
  9. Casotti, V., & D’Antiga, L. (2019). Basic Principles of Liver Physiology. In L. D'Antiga (Ed.), Pediatric Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (pp. 21-39). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96400-3_2
  10. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining,
APA
Yılmaz, Ü., & Özçekiç, E. (2025). CLASSIFYING LIVER DISEASE WITH BOOSTING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2), 1882-1892. https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.1591951
AMA
1.Yılmaz Ü, Özçekiç E. CLASSIFYING LIVER DISEASE WITH BOOSTING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2025;33(2):1882-1892. doi:10.31796/ogummf.1591951
Chicago
Yılmaz, Ümit, and Erol Özçekiç. 2025. “CLASSIFYING LIVER DISEASE WITH BOOSTING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 33 (2): 1882-92. https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.1591951.
EndNote
Yılmaz Ü, Özçekiç E (August 1, 2025) CLASSIFYING LIVER DISEASE WITH BOOSTING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 33 2 1882–1892.
IEEE
[1]Ü. Yılmaz and E. Özçekiç, “CLASSIFYING LIVER DISEASE WITH BOOSTING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1882–1892, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.31796/ogummf.1591951.
ISNAD
Yılmaz, Ümit - Özçekiç, Erol. “CLASSIFYING LIVER DISEASE WITH BOOSTING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 33/2 (August 1, 2025): 1882-1892. https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.1591951.
JAMA
1.Yılmaz Ü, Özçekiç E. CLASSIFYING LIVER DISEASE WITH BOOSTING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2025;33:1882–1892.
MLA
Yılmaz, Ümit, and Erol Özçekiç. “CLASSIFYING LIVER DISEASE WITH BOOSTING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 33, no. 2, Aug. 2025, pp. 1882-9, doi:10.31796/ogummf.1591951.
Vancouver
1.Ümit Yılmaz, Erol Özçekiç. CLASSIFYING LIVER DISEASE WITH BOOSTING MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2025 Aug. 1;33(2):1882-9. doi:10.31796/ogummf.1591951