The Balancing Act: Can Corruption Control and the Accountability Save Public Efficiency in India?

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2, 464 - 490, 24.07.2025

İbrahim Halil Polat , Mahir Tosunoğlu , Müslüm Gümüş

https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.1682596

Öz

This study investigates the effects of corruption (COR), rule of law (ROL), voice and accountability (VOA), and government spending control (GOF) on government effectiveness (GOE) in India between 2002 and 2023 using the ARDL Bounds Testing approach. The results show that reducing COR and managing GOF positively influence GOE, while VOA has a negative impact. Surprisingly, ROL appears to have no significant effect on GOE in India. These findings suggest that existing practices related to VOA and GOF require reform, as inefficiencies in these areas hinder government performance. Therefore, the study recommends public policy efforts focus on curbing corruption and enhancing the role of law to foster more effective governance and institutional development in India.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Government effectiveness , Control of Corruption , Accountability

Teşekkür

Vereceğiniz emekler içim şimdiden çok teşekkür ederiz. Saygılarımla.

Denge Oyunu: Yolsuzluğun Kontrolü ve Hesap Verebilirlik Hindistan’da Kamu Verimliliğini Kurtarabilir mi?

Öz

Yolsuzluk, hukukun üstünlüğü, hesap verebilirlik ve kamu harcamalarının denetimi genellikle hükümet etkinliğini olumlu yönde etkileyen unsurlar olarak gösterilmektedir. Ancak, son çalışmalar bu değişkenler arasındaki karmaşık etkileşimi göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda, çalışmanın amacı söz konusu faktörlerin Hindistan’da hükümet etkinliği üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmektir. Bu çalışma, 2002–2023 dönemi için Hindistan’da yolsuzluk, hukukun üstünlüğü, hesap verebilirlik ve kamu harcamalarının denetiminin hükümet etkinliği üzerindeki etkilerini Gecikmesi Dağıtılmış Otoregresif (ARDL) Sınır Testi modeli ile incelemektedir. Bulgular, yolsuzluğun kontrolü ve hükümet harcamaları hükümet etkinliğini pozitif etkilerken, hesap verebilirlik ise hükümet etkinliğini negatif etkilemektedir. Son olarak, Hindistan’da hukukun üstünlüğünün ise hükümet etkinliğini etkilemediği bulunmuştur. Bu bulgular, hesap verebilirlik ve harcama denetimi alanlarında mevcut uygulamaların reforme edilmesi gerektiğini, çünkü bu alanlardaki sorunların hükümet etkinliği üzerinde olumsuz sonuçlar doğurduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hükümet etkinliği , Yolsuzluğun kontrolü , Hesap verilebilirlik

Kaynakça

• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Currency.
• Adaman, F., Çarkoğlu, A., & Şenatalar, B. (2001). Hane halkı gözünden Türkiye’de yolsuzluğun nedenleri ve önlenmesine ilişkin öneriler. TESEV Publications.
• Adsera, A., Boix, C., & Payne, M. (2003). Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 19(2), 445–490.
• Aidt, T., Dutta, J., & Sena, V. (2008). Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(2), 195–220.
• Alam, I., & Quazi, R. (2003). Determinants of capital flight: An econometric case study of Bangladesh. International Review of Applied Economics, 17(1), 85–103.
• Arndt, C. (2008). The politics of governance ratings. International Public Management Journal, 11(3), 275–297. Arslaner, H., & Karaca, Y. (2017). Perception of governance in Turkish public administration: An application in the tax offices of Aydın province. Adnan Menderes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 4(4), 128–151.
• Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., & Mestre, R. (1998). Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 19(3), 267–283.
• Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2019). Good economics for hard times. Public Affairs.
• Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., & Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 37(2), 149–163.
• Brewer, G. A. (2004). Does administrative reform improve bureaucratic performance? A cross-country empirical analysis. Public Finance and Management, 4(3), 399–428.
• Brewer, G., & Choi, Y. (2007, April). Toward a performing public sector: A cross-country study of democracy’s impact on government performance. In Annual Meeting of the International Research Society for Public Management, Potsdam, Germany (pp. 2–4).
• Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (1999). More open economies have better governments. Economic Series, 9905, 1–29. Cooray, A. (2009). Government expenditure, governance and economic growth. Comparative Economic Studies, 51, 401–418.
• Court, J., Kristen, P., & Weder, B. (1999). Bureaucratic structure and performance: First Africa survey results. Wirtschaft.
• Çağan, N. (1982). Taxation authority [Vergilendirme yetkisi] (in Turkish). Kazancı Law Publications.
• Çağlar, S. (2013). The relationship between legal certainty and rule of law [Hukuk devleti açısından hukuki belirlilik-hukuk güvenliği ilişkisi] (in Turkish). .Turkish Bar Association Publications: No. 277
• De Grauwe, P. (2012). A fragile Eurozone in search of a better governance. The Economic and Social Review, 43(1), 1–30.
• Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057–1072.
• Dreher, A., & Schneider, F. (2010). Corruption and the shadow economy: An empirical analysis. Public Choice, 144, 215–238.
• Erdoğan, M. (2011). Constitutional law (7th ed.) [Anayasa hukuku] (in Turkish). Orion Publishing.
• Eriçok, R. E., & Yılancı, V. (2013). The relationship between education expenditures and economic growth: A bounds testing approach [Eğitim harcamaları ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Sınır testi yaklaşımı] (in Turkish). Journal of Knowledge Economy and Management, 8(1), 87–101.
• European Union. (2024). Corruption – Internal security policies. Retrieved from https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/internal-security/corruption_en
• Falay, N. (1997). Audit, efficiency/effectiveness/economy (EEE) and the Court of Accounts [Denetim, verimlilik/etkinlik/tutumluluk (VET) ve Sayıştay] (in Turkish). Court of Accounts Journal, April–June (25), 18–30.
• Farazmand, A. (2017). Governance reforms: The good, the bad, and the ugly; and the sound: Examining the past and exploring the future of public organizations. Public Organization Review, 17, 595–617.
• Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2006). Bargaining for bribes: The role of institutions. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), International handbook on the economics of corruption (pp. 127–139). Edward Elgar.
• Gerring, J., Kingstone, P., Lange, M., & Sinha, A. (2011). Democracy, history, and economic performance: A case-study approach. World Development, 39(10), 1735–1748.
• Gholipour, H. F., & Farzanegan, M. R. (2018). Institutions and the effectiveness of expenditures on environmental protection: Evidence from Middle Eastern countries. Constitutional Political Economy, 29, 20–39.
• Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111–120. Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 533–574.
• Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic econometrics (4th ed., pp. 814–818). McGraw-Hill.
• Güney, T. (2013). Corruption and welfare [Yolsuzluk ve refah] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Dumlupınar University, Institute of Social Sciences, Kütahya) (in Turkish).
• Han, X., Khan, H. A., & Zhuang, J. (2014). Do governance indicators explain development performance? A cross-country analysis. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series, (417).
• Haque, M. S. (2001). Recent transition in governance in South Asia: Contexts, dimensions, and implications. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(12), 1405–1436.
• Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2003). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture and influence in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4), 751–773.
• Hood, C., & Heald, D. (Eds.). (2006). Transparency: The key to better governance? (Vol. 135). Oxford University Press for The British Academy.
• Ingraham, P. W., & Moynihan, D. P. (2000). Evolving dimensions of performance from the CSRA to the present. In J. Perry (Ed.), The future of merit: Twenty years after the Civil Service Reform Act (pp. 103–126). Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
• Jamalmanesh, A., Meidani, A. A. N., & Mashhadi, M. K. (2014). Government effectiveness, rule of law and informal economy in Asian developing countries. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 3(10), 551–555.
• Jamil, I., Askvik, S., & Dhakal, T. N. (2013). Understanding governance in South Asia. In I. Jamil, S. Askvik, & T. N. Dhakal (Eds.), In search of better governance in South Asia and beyond (pp. 13–35). Springer.
• Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169–210.
• Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2024). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and 2024 update. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5154675
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246.
• Kaufmann, D., Zoido-Lobaton, P., & Lee, Y. (2000). Governance and anticorruption: Empirical diagnostic study for Ecuador. World Bank. Mimeo.
• Kaufmann, W., & Lafarre, A. (2021). Does good governance mean better corporate social performance? A comparative study of OECD countries. International Public Management Journal, 24(6), 762–791.
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222–279.
• Lee, S. Y., & Whitford, A. B. (2009). Government effectiveness in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(2), 249–281.
• Licht, A. N., Goldschmidt, C., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4), 659–688.
• Lio, M., & Liu, M. C. (2008). Governance and agricultural productivity: A cross-national analysis. Food Policy, 33(6), 504–512.
• Malik, P., Dhillon, P., & Verma, P. (2014). Challenges and future prospects for E-governance in India. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research, 3(7), 1964–1972.
• Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.
• Méndez, F., & Sepúlveda, F. (2006). Corruption, growth and political regimes: Cross-country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 82–98.
• Montenegro, C., & Islam, R. (2002). What determines the quality of institutions (Policy Research Working Paper No. 2764). World Bank.
• Mukherjee, N., & Sah, R. (2021). Corruption and economic growth: A correlation study for India. International Journal of Policy Sciences and Law, 1(4), 2248–2263.
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2023). Transparency and corruption: Measuring real transparency by a new index. Regulation & Governance, 17(4), 1094–1113.
• Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990.
• Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2005). Electricity consumption, employment and real income in Australia: Evidence from multivariate Granger causality test. Energy Policy, 33(9), 1109–1116.
• Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2005). Trade liberalization and economic growth in Fiji: An empirical assessment using the ARDL approach. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 10(1), 96–115.
• Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2005). Estimating income and price elasticities of imports for Fiji in a cointegration framework. Economic Modelling, 22, 423–438.
• Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2006). What determines migration flows from low-income to high-income countries? An empirical investigation of Fiji–U.S. migration 1972–2001. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(2), 332–342.
• Norris, P. (2012). Making democratic governance work: How regimes shape prosperity, welfare, and peace. Cambridge University Press.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance 2023. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/g20-oecd-principles-of-corporate-governance-2023_ed750b30-en.html
• Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. (2025). Governance. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/governance?q=governance
• Park, C. M. (2017). Quality of governance and regime support: Evidence from East Asia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(2), 154–175.
• Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2006). Democracy and development: The devil in the details. American Economic Review, 96(2), 319–324.
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.
• Phillips, P. C. B. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
• Ramesh, R., & Vinayagathasan, T. (2023). The impact of corruption, rule of law, accountability, and government expenditure on government effectiveness: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 59(6), 1843–1866.
• Rauch, J. E., & Evans, P. B. (2000). Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics, 75(1), 49–71.
• Robinson, J. A., & Acemoglu, D. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty (pp. 45–47). Profile.
• Rodrik, D. (2008). One economics, many recipes: Globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton University Press.
• Samaratunge, R., Alam, Q., & Teicher, J. (2008). Public sector reforms and accountability: The case of South and Southeast Asia. Public Management Review, 10(1), 101–126.
• Schatz, F. (2013). Fighting corruption with social accountability: A comparative analysis of social accountability mechanisms' potential to reduce corruption in public administration. Public Administration and Development, 33(3), 161–174.
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.
• Sukhtankar, S., & Vaishnav, M. (2015). Corruption in India: Bridging research evidence and policy options. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
• Su, X., & Ni, X. (2018). Citizens on patrol: Understanding public whistleblowing against government corruption. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(3), 406–422.
• Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42.
• Tarı, R., & Yıldırım, D. Ç. (2009). The effect of exchange rate uncertainty on exports: An application for Turkey [Döviz kuru belirsizliğinin ihracata etkisi: Türkiye için bir uygulama] (in Turkish). Journal of Management and Economics, 16(2), 95–105.
• Taşar, M. O., & Çevik, S. (2017). Cultural determinants of corruption and bribery [Yolsuzluk ve rüşvetin kültürel belirleyicileri] (in Turkish). Selçuk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (38), 140–153.
• Taylar, Y., & Artun, E. S. (2022). Joint liability of the new owner in property tax in forced sales of mortgaged real estates: An evaluation within the framework of the principle of legal certainty [İpotekli gayrimenkullerin cebri satışlarında yeni malikin emlak vergisi açısından müteselsil sorumluluğu: Belirlilik ilkesi çerçevesinde bir değerlendirme] (in Turkish). Journal of the Turkish Justice Academy, 13(49), 245–264.
• Tosunoğlu, M. (2024). The relationship between technological innovation and economic growth in EU countries: A system GMM approach. Journal of Productivity, 58(4), 651–662.
• Tosunoğlu, M., & Uçal, H. (n.d.). The relationship between energy consumption and economic growth: Cointegration and causality approaches. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (67), 177–193.
• Transparency International. (2025). Corruption perceptions index 2023. https://www.transparency.org/en/publications/corruption-perceptions-index-2023 Vittal, N. (2012). Ending corruption?: How to clean up India. Penguin UK.
• World Bank Group (WBG). (2020). Anticorruption fact sheet. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/factsheet/2020/02/19/anticorruption-fact-sheet
• World Bank. (2024). World development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
• World Bank. (2024). World Bank metadata glossary. https://databank.worldbank.org/metadataglossary/world-development-indicators/series/NE.CON.GOVT.ZS
• World Justice Project (WJP). (2025a). WJP rule of law index 2024: Global press release. https://worldjusticeproject.org/news/wjp-rule-law-index-2024-global-press-release
• WJP (2025b). World Justice Project. Countries scored by overall score. Avaible at https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/global.
• WJP (2025c). World Justice Project. About us. Avaible at https://worldjusticeproject.org/about-us.