Comparison of innovation capacities of manufacturing sectors of OECD member countries

Mehmet Orhan; İbrahim Yalçın

doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.1013178

TR EN

Comparison of innovation capacities of manufacturing sectors of OECD member countries

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the innovation capabilities of the manufacturing sectors in Turkey and selected Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries and compare them on a national basis. The literature was primarily searched and 18 criteria were determined to be used for comparison in the study. The CRITIC method was used to determine the criterion weights. Then, using the EDAS method, countries were ranked according to the innovation performance of their manufacturing sectors. According to the results of the analysis using the According to the results of the analysis using the EDAS method, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Finland are in the first three places, while Poland, Hungary, and Chile are in the last three places. Comparison of Innovation Capacities of Manufacturing Sectors of OECD Member Countries.

Keywords

Innovation, Manufacturing Sector, CRITIC, EDAS, OECD.

References

Abdel-Basset, M., Ding, W., Mohamed, R. ve Metawa, N. (2020). An integrated plithogenic MCDM approach for financial performance evaluation of manufacturing industries. Risk Management, 22(3), 192-218. doi:10.1057/s41283-020-00061-4
Adali, E. A. ve Işik, A. T. (2017). Ranking Web Design Firms with the ORESTE Method. Ege Academic Review, 17(2), 243-254.
Akbulut, O. Y. (2019). CRITIC ve EDAS yöntemleri ile İş Bankası’nın 2009-2018 yılları arasındaki performansının analizi. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 249-263.
Aluko, M. A. O., Akinola, G. O. ve Sola, F. (2004). Globalization and the Manufacturing Sector: A Study of Selected Textile Firms in Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 119-130. doi:10.1080/09718923.2004.11892440
Apan, M. ve Öztel, A. (2020). Bütünleşik Entropi-EDAS Yöntemi ile Nakit Akım Odaklı Finansal Performans Analizi: BIST Orman, Kâğıt, Basım Endeksi’nde İşlem Gören Firmaların 2011-2018 Dönem Verisinden Kanıtlar. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 170-184. doi:10.24011/barofd.694820
Arslan, H. M., Köse, A. ve Durak, İ. (2018). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri İle Eğitim Kurumları Karar Problemlerinin Çözümü. Ejovoc (Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges), 8(2), 27-34.
Ayçin, E. ve Çakın, E. (2019). Ülkelerin İnovasyon Performanslarının Ölçümünde Entropi ve MABAC Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemlerinin Bütünleşik Olarak Kullanılması. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 19(2), 326-351. doi:10.25294/auiibfd.649275
Chakraborty, S. ve Biswas, M. C. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the textile, apparel and fashion manufacturing industry supply chain: Case study on a ready-made garment manufacturing industry. Journal of Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Procurement, 3(2), 181-199.
Chakravarty, S. ve Mitra, A. (2009). Is industry still the engine of growth? An econometric study of the organized sector employment in India. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(1), 22-35. Cho, Y. J., Leem, C. S. ve Shin, K. T. (2008). The relationships among manufacturing innovation, competitiveness, and business performance in the manufacturing industries of Korea. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 38(7), 840-850. doi:10.1007/s00170-007-1107-8
Çatı, K., Eş, A. ve Özevin, O. (2017). Futbol Takımlarının Finansal ve Sportif Etkinliklerinin Entropi Ve Topsıs Yöntemiyle Analiz Edilmesi: Avrupa’nın 5 Büyük Ligi ve Süper Lig Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(1), 199-222. doi:10.17130/ijmeb.20173126270

Dahooie, J. H., Abadi, E. B. J., Vanaki, A. S. ve Firoozfar, H. R. (2018). Competency-based IT personnel selection using a hybrid SWARA and ARAS-G methodology. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 28(1), 5-16. doi:10.1002/hfm.20713
Dasgupta, S. ve Singh, A. (2005). Will Services be the New Engine of Indian Economic Growth? Development and Change, 36(6), 1035-1057. doi:10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00449.x
Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G. ve Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. doi:10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
Eş, A. ve Çobanoğlu, C. (2017). TOPSIS Yöntemiyle Şirket Performans Sıralaması için Bir Çerçeve: Demir Çelik Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 18(2), 249-268.
Golini, R. ve Gualandris, J. (2018). An empirical examination of the relationship between globalization, integration and sustainable innovation within manufacturing networks. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(3), 874-894. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-12-2016-0725
Hamdan, S. ve Cheaitou, A. (2017). Supplier selection and order allocation with green criteria: An MCDM and multi-objective optimization approach. Computers & Operations Research, 81, 282-304. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2016.11.005
Haraguchi, N., Cheng, C. F. C. ve Smeets, E. (2017). The Importance of Manufacturing in Economic Development: Has This Changed? World Development, 93, 293-315. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.013 Heredia Pérez, J. A., Geldes, C., Kunc, M. H. ve Flores, A. (2019). New approach to the innovation process in emerging economies: The manufacturing sector case in Chile and Peru. Technovation, 79, 35-55. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.012
Herman, E. (2016). The Importance of the Manufacturing Sector in the Romanian Economy. Procedia Technology, 9th International Conference Interdisciplinarity in Engineering, INTER-ENG 2015, 8-9 October 2015, Tirgu Mures, Romania, 22, 976-983. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.121 Işik, N. ve Kilinç, E. C. (2012). İnovasyon-Güdümlü Kalkınma: Avrupa Birliği Ülkeleri ve Türkiye Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 1(1), 31-68.
Jiang, C., Zhang, Y., Bu, M. ve Liu, W. (2018). The Effectiveness of Government Subsidies on Manufacturing Innovation: Evidence from the New Energy Vehicle Industry in China. Sustainability, 10(6), 1692. doi:10.3390/su10061692
Kiracı, K. ve Bakır, M. (2019). CRITIC Temelli EDAS Yöntemi İle Havayolu İşletmelerinde Performans Ölçümü Uygulaması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (35), 157-174. doi:10.30794/pausbed.421992
Korkmaz, K. ve Öztel, A. (2020). BIST Ana Metal Sanayi Endeksinde Faaliyet Gösteren İşletmelerin Finansal Performanslarının Entropi Tabanlı Promethee Yöntemiyle Ölçülmesi: 2014-2018 Dönemi. Yönetim Ekonomi Edebiyat İslami ve Politik Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 57-85. doi:10.24013/jomelips.816956
Korucuk, S. (2019). ÇKKV Yöntemleri İle İmalat İşletmelerinde TZY Performans Faktörlerinin Önem Derecelerinin Belirlenmesi ve En İdeal Rekabet Stratejisi Seçimi: Ordu İli Örneği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2), 569-593.
Krishankumar, R., Premaladha, J., Ravichandran, K. S., Sekar, K. R., Manikandan, R. ve Gao, X. Z. (2020). A novel extension to VIKOR method under intuitionistic fuzzy context for solving personnel selection problem. Soft Computing, 24(2), 1063-1081. doi:10.1007/s00500-019-03943-2
Krishnan, A. R., Kasim, M. M., Hamid, R. ve Ghazali, M. F. (2021). A Modified CRITIC Method to Estimate the Objective Weights of Decision Criteria. Symmetry, 13(6), 973. doi:10.3390/sym13060973
Lacom, P., Bazzaro, F. ve Sagot, J.-C. (2017). Proposal of a Modelling of the Innovation Process in an International Manufacturing Company. Journal of technology management & innovation, 12(2), 26-33. doi:10.4067/S0718-27242017000200004
Leiter, A. M., Parolini, A. ve Winner, H. (2011). Environmental regulation and investment: Evidence from European industry data. Ecological Economics, 70(4), 759-770. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.013
Li, W., Xue, D. ve Huang, X. (2018). The Role of Manufacturing in Sustainable Economic Development: A Case of Guangzhou, China. Sustainability, 10(9), 3039. doi:10.3390/su10093039
Lin, Y.-T., Lin, C.-L., Yu, H.-C. ve Tzeng, G.-H. (2010). A novel hybrid MCDM approach for outsourcing vendor selection: A case study for a semiconductor company in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 4796-4804. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.036
Liu, H.-C., Quan, M.-Y., Li, Z. ve Wang, Z.-L. (2019). A new integrated MCDM model for sustainable supplier selection under interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic environment. Information Sciences, 486, 254-270. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.02.056
Madrid-Guijarro, A., Garcia, D. ve Auken, H. V. (2009). Barriers to Innovation among Spanish Manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 465-488. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00279.x
Nabeeh, N. A., Smarandache, F., Abdel-Basset, M., El-Ghareeb, H. A. ve Aboelfetouh, A. (2019). An Integrated Neutrosophic-TOPSIS Approach and Its Application to Personnel Selection: A New Trend in Brain Processing and Analysis. IEEE Access, 7, 29734-29744. IEEE Access, sunulmuş bildiri. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899841
Naidu, S. ve Chand, A. (2012). A comparative study of the financial problems faced by micro, small and medium enterprises in the manufacturing sector of Fiji and Tonga. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 7(3), 245-262. doi:10.1108/17468801211236974
Okorie, O., Subramoniam, R., Charnley, F., Patsavellas, J., Widdifield, D. ve Salonitis, K. (2020). Manufacturing in the Time of COVID-19: An Assessment of Barriers and Enablers. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3), 167-175. IEEE Engineering Management Review, sunulmuş bildiri. doi:10.1109/EMR.2020.3012112
Onaran, O. (2009). Wage share, globalization and crisis: The case of the manufacturing industry in Korea, Mexico and Turkey. International Review of Applied Economics, 23(2), 113-134. doi:10.1080/02692170802700435
Orhan, M. (2019). Türkiye ile Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Lojistik Performanslarının Entropi Ağırlıklı Edas Yöntemiyle Karşılaştırılması. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (17), 1222-1238. doi:10.31590/ejosat.657693 Orhan, M., Altun, H. ve Aytekin, M. (2020). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Finansal Performans Değerlendirme: Ulaştırma Alanında Bir Uygulama. Turkish Studies-Economics,Finance,Politics, 15(1), 395-410. doi:10.29228/TurkishStudies.40149
Orhan, M. ve Aytekin, M. (2020). Türkiye ile AB’ye Son Katılan Ülkelerin AR-GE Performanslarının CRİTİC Ağırlıklı MAUT ve SAW Yöntemiyle Kıyaslanması. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1), 754-778.
Önüt, S., Kara, S. S. ve Işik, E. (2009). Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2, Part 2), 3887-3895. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.045
Perçin, S. ve Çakır, S. (2013). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleriyle Lojistik Firmalarında Performans Ölçümü. Ege Akademik Bakis (Ege Academic Review), 13(4), 449-449. doi:10.21121/eab.2013418079
Pohekar, S. D. ve Ramachandran, M. (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8(4), 365-381. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
Rajapathirana, R. P. J. ve Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44-55. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002
Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Krishankumar, R., Ravichandran, K. S. ve Kar, S. (2021). Multi-criteria food waste treatment method selection using single-valued neutrosophic-CRITIC-MULTIMOORA framework. Applied Soft Computing, 107657. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107657
Rassier, D. G. ve Earnhart, D. (2015). Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability. Ecological Economics, 112, 129-140. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.011
Reynolds, E. B. ve Uygun, Y. (2018). Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 178-191. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.003
Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M. ve Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288-300. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014
Schroeder, R. G., Scudder, G. D. ve Elm, D. R. (1989). Innovation in manufacturing. Journal of Operations Management, 8(1), 1-15. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(89)80002-6
Shen, J. (2012). Social comparison, social presence, and enjoyment in the acceptance of social shopping websites. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(3), 198.
Singh, R., Deep Singh, C. ve Deepak, D. (2021). Analyzing performance indicators of advanced manufacturing technology implementation using MCDM. Materials Today: Proceedings. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.407
Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A. ve Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106231. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231
Szirmai, A. ve Verspagen, B. (2015). Manufacturing and economic growth in developing countries, 1950–2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 34, 46-59. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2015.06.002
Şenkal, E. ve Öztel, A. (2020). Perakende Sektöründe Entropi Temelli Copras Yöntemi ile Finansal Başarı Ölçümü: CARREFOURSA Örneği. Yönetim Ekonomi Edebiyat İslami ve Politik Bilimler Dergisi. doi:10.24013/jomelips.702821
Şenol, Z. ve Ulutaş, A. (2018). Muhasebe Temelli Performans Ölçümleri ile Piyasa Temelli Performans Ölçümlerinin CRITIC ve ARAS Yöntemleriyle Değerlendirilmesi. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, 55(641), 83-102.
Teresiene, D., Keliuotyte-Staniuleniene, G., Liao, Y., Kanapickiene, R., Pu, R., Hu, S. ve Yue, X.-G. (2021). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Consumer and Business Confidence Indicators. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 159. doi:10.3390/jrfm14040159
Velasquez, M. ve Hester, P. T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56-66. Wang, F., Xia, J. ve Xu, J. (2020). To upgrade or to relocate? Explaining heterogeneous responses of Chinese light manufacturing firms to rising labor costs. China Economic Review, 60, 101333. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101333
Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K. ve Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. (2017). Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3728-3740. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.095
Zavadskas, E. K., Stević, Ž., Turskis, Z. ve Tomašević, M. (2019). A Novel Extended EDAS in Minkowski Space (EDAS-M) Method for Evaluating Autonomous Vehicles. Studies in Informatics and Control, 28(3), 255-264. doi:10.24846/v28i3y201902
Žižović, M., Miljković, B. ve Marinković, D. (2020). Objective methods for determining criteria weight coefficients: A modification of the CRITIC method. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2), 149-161. doi:10.31181/dmame2003149z

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mehmet Orhan ^*
0000-0003-1160-0258
Türkiye

İbrahim Yalçın
0000-0001-7203-8030
Türkiye

Publication Date

January 31, 2022

Submission Date

October 21, 2021

Acceptance Date

January 9, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 15 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1013178

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA44YD79TA

APA

Orhan, M., & Yalçın, İ. (2022). Comparison of innovation capacities of manufacturing sectors of OECD member countries. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 208-226. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1013178

AMA

1.Orhan M, Yalçın İ. Comparison of innovation capacities of manufacturing sectors of OECD member countries. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;15(1):208-226. doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.1013178

Chicago

Orhan, Mehmet, and İbrahim Yalçın. 2022. “Comparison of Innovation Capacities of Manufacturing Sectors of OECD Member Countries”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 15 (1): 208-26. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1013178.

EndNote

Orhan M, Yalçın İ (January 1, 2022) Comparison of innovation capacities of manufacturing sectors of OECD member countries. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 15 1 208–226.

IEEE

[1]M. Orhan and İ. Yalçın, “Comparison of innovation capacities of manufacturing sectors of OECD member countries”, Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 208–226, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.25287/ohuiibf.1013178.

ISNAD

Orhan, Mehmet - Yalçın, İbrahim. “Comparison of Innovation Capacities of Manufacturing Sectors of OECD Member Countries”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 15/1 (January 1, 2022): 208-226. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1013178.

JAMA

1.Orhan M, Yalçın İ. Comparison of innovation capacities of manufacturing sectors of OECD member countries. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;15:208–226.

MLA

Orhan, Mehmet, and İbrahim Yalçın. “Comparison of Innovation Capacities of Manufacturing Sectors of OECD Member Countries”. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 208-26, doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.1013178.

Vancouver

1.Mehmet Orhan, İbrahim Yalçın. Comparison of innovation capacities of manufacturing sectors of OECD member countries. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022 Jan. 1;15(1):208-26. doi:10.25287/ohuiibf.1013178

Cited By

Rekabetçilik ve İnovasyon Performansı Değerlendirmesi: OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Ampirik Bir İnceleme

Alanya Akademik Bakış

https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1510889

Ömer Halisdemir Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi (OHUIIBF) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Pseudonymity License 4.0 international license.

OECD üyesi ülkelerin imalat sektörlerinin inovasyon kapasitelerinin karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Keywords

Comparison of innovation capacities of manufacturing sectors of OECD member countries

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Rekabetçilik ve İnovasyon Performansı Değerlendirmesi: OECD Ülkeleri Üzerine Ampirik Bir İnceleme