Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramının bibliyometrik analizi: 2017-2021 dönemine bir bakış

Year 2023, , 597 - 614, 31.07.2023

Abdullah Zübeyr Akman , Meral Erdirencelebi

https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1153209

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk (KSS) anahtar kavramı üzerinden, SCOPUS veri tabanı kullanılarak 2017-2021 yıllarını kapsayan bir bibliyometrik çalışmadır. Çalışmanın amacı KSS alanında gerçekleştirilen son 5 yıldaki çalışmalara bilimsel açıdan bir ışık tutmak, mevcut bilimsel üretimin ilerlemesini sağlamak ve bu alanda çalışma yapacak bilim insanlarını destekleyici bilgiler ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda yöntem olarak bibliyometrik analiz tercih edilmiştir. Analizler VOSviewer 1.6.18 programı üzerinden gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuç olarak en çok makale 1233 adet ile 2020 yılında yazılmış ve en üretken ülke ABD olmuştur. Yine en üretken yazar García-Sánchez, en üretken dergi Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management’tir. Anahtar kelime olarak en çok “Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk” kavramı ön plana çıkmıştır. En üretken kurum “Hong Kong Polytechnic University”, en çok atıf alan yazar Lins, en çok birlikte atıf alan yazar Carroll ve en çok atıf alan makale de Lins ve ark.’nın 2017 yılında yazdıkları makale olmuştur.

Keywords

Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk (KSS), Bibliyometrik Analiz, İçerik Analizi, VOSviewer.

Bibliometric analysis of the concept of corporate social responsibility: A look at the period 2017-2021

Abstract

This study is a bibliometric study covering the years 2017-2021 using the SCOPUS database, based on the key concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The aim of the study is to shed a scientific light on the studies carried out in the last 5 years in the field of CSR, to ensure the progress of current scientific production and to provide supporting information for scientists who will work in this field. For this purpose, content analysis was preferred as a method. Analyzes were carried out using the VOSviewer 1.6.18 program. As a result, the most articles were written in 2020 with 1233 articles and the most productive country was the USA. Again, the most prolific writer is García-Sánchez, the most prolific journal is "Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. As a keyword, the concept of “Corporate Social Responsibility” came to the fore the most. The most productive institution was “Hong Kong Polytechnic University”, the most cited author was Lins, the most co-cited author was Carroll, and the most cited article was the article written by Lins et al. in 2017.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Bibliometric Analysis, Content Analysis, VOSviewer

References

• Ayhan, E.; Çolak, A.; Önder, M. (2022), Türkiye’deki Kamu Yönetimi Çalışmalarının Eğilimi), 1990-2019 Yılları Arasında AİD’de Yayınlanan Makalelerin Bibliyometrik Analizi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 17(1), 1-28.
• Boshoff, N.; Akanmu, M. A. (2018). Scopus or Web of Science for a Bibliometric Profile of Pharmacy Research at a Nigerian University?, South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 83(2), 12-22.
• Burke, L.; Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off, Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495-502.
• Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance, The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
• Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility), Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
• Carroll, A. B. (2008). A History of Corporate Social Responsibility, (A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel, Ed.; 1). Oxford University Press.
• Carroll, A. B.; Shabana, K. M. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility), A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
• Chen, Y.-C.; Hung, M.; Wang, Y. (2018). The Effect of Mandatory CSR Disclosure on Firm Profitability and Social Externalities), Evidence from China, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 169-190.
• Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
• Cobo, M. J.; López-Herrera, A. G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. (2011). An Approach for Detecting, Quantifying, and Visualizing the Evolution of a Research Field), A Practical Application to The Fuzzy Sets Theory Field, Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166.
• Commission of the European Communities. (2006). Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs, Making Europe a Pole of Excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility. Commission of the European Communities Report, Brussels, Belgium.
• Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined), An Analysis of 37 Definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.
• Dyck, A.; Lins, K. V.; Roth, L.; Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility?, International Evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693-714.
• Feng, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Lai, K. H. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility for Supply Chain Management), A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(8), 296-307.
• Flammer, (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Reaction), The Environmental Awareness of Investors, Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758-781.
• Garriga, E.; Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories), Mapping the Territory, Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51-71.
• García-Sánchez, I. M.; Frías-Aceituno, J. V.; Rodríguez-Domínguez, L. (2013). Determinants of Corporate Social Disclosure in Spanish Local Governments, Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 60-72.
• Handoko, L. H. (2020). Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Islamic Economics and Finance Articles Indexed in Scopus By Indonesian Authors, Science Editing, 7(2), 169-176.
• Jamali, D.; Karam, (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study, International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32-61.
• Julius, R.; Abd Halim, M. S.; Abdul Hadi, N.; Alias, A. N., Mohd Khalid, M. H.; Mahfodz, Z.; Ramli, F. F. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis of Research in Mathematics Education using Scopus Database, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), 20-40.
• Karagiorgos, T. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance), An Empirical Analysis on Greek Companies, European Research Studies Journal, 13(4), 85-108.
• Kaur, J.; Radicchi, F.; Menczer, F. (2013). Universality of Scholarly Impact Metrics, Journal of Informetrics, 7(4; 924-932.
• Krauskopf, E. (2018). A Bibiliometric Analysis of the Journal of Infection and Public Health: 2008-2016, Journal of Infection and Public Health, 11(2; 224-229.
• Lantos, G. P. (2001). The Boundaries of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595-632.
• Lee, S.; Seo, K.; Sharma, A. (2013). Corporate social Responsibility and Firm Performance in the Airline Industry), The Moderating Role of Oil Prices, Tourism Management, 38, 20-30.
• Lee(Y.; Carroll, E. (2011). The Emergence, Variation, and Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Public Sphere, 1980–2004: The Exposure of Firms to Public Debate, Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 115-131.
• Li, S.; Spry, L.; Woodall, T. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Reputation), A Bibliometric Analysis, Journal of Construction Materials, 2(3), 1-9.
• Lievrouw, L. A. (1989). The Invisible College Reconsidered), Bibliometrics and the Development of Scientific Communication Theory, Communication Research, 16(5), 615-628.
• Lins, K. V.; Servaes, H.; Tamayo, A. (2017). Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance), The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis, Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
• Meseguer-Sánchez, V.; Gálvez-Sánchez, F. J.; López-Martínez, G.; Molina-Moreno, V. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability. A Bibliometric Analysis of Their Interrelations, Sustainability, 13(4), 1636.
• Mongeon, P.; Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus), A Comparative Analysis, Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228.
• Noyons, M. (2004). Science Maps Within a Science Policy Context, Improving the Utility of Science and Domain Maps Within a Science Policy and Research Management Context. Içinde H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, Springer Netherlands.
• Prado‐Lorenzo, J. M.; Gallego‐Alvarez, I.; Garcia‐Sanchez, I. M. (2009). Stakeholder Engagement and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting), The Ownership Structure Effect, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), 94-107.
• Reyes-Menendez, A. Saura, J. R.; Thomas(B. (2020). Exploring Key Indicators of Social İdentity in the #MeToo Era), Using Discourse Analysis in UGC, International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102129.
• Sheehy, B.; Farneti, F. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, Sustainable Development and Corporate Sustainability), What Is the Difference, and Does It Matter?, Sustainability, 13(11), 5965.
• Small, H. (1973). Co-Citation in The Scientific Literature), A New Measure of The Relationship Between Two Documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
• Smith, N. (2001). Changes in Corporate Practices in Response to Public Interest Advocacy and Actions In P. N. Bloom and G. T. Gundlach (Ed.), Handbook of Marketing and Society. SAGE Publications, Inc.
• Sweileh, W. M. (2018). Research Trends on Human Trafficking), A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database, Globalization and Health, 14(1), 106-119.
• Van Eck, N. J.; Waltman, L. (2007). Bibliometric Mapping of the Computational Intelligence Field, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 15(05), 625-645.
• Waddock(A.; Bodwell, C.; Graves(B. (2002). Responsibility), The New Business Imperative, Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(2), 132-148.
• Wagner-Tsukamoto((2019). In Search of Ethics), From Carroll to Integrative CSR Economics, Social Responsibility Journal, 15(4), 469-491.
• WBCSD (2001). CSR Definition. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, http://www.wbcsd.org/work-program/business-role/previous-work/corporate-social responsibility.aspx, (Erişim: 15.06.2022).
• Ye, N.; Kueh, T.-B.; Hou, L.; Liu, Y.; Yu, H. (2020). A Bibliometric Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in Sustainable Development, Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122679.
• Zainuldin, M. H.; Lui, T. K. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of CSR in The Banking Industry), A Decade Study Based on Scopus Scientific Mapping, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(1), 1-26.
• Zupic, I.; Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization, Organizational Research Methods, 18(3; 429- 472.