ROBOTIC REVOLUTION: DOES ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TRIGGER INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICT OR NON- INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICT
Abstract
The introduction of new forms of artificial intelligence (AI) military weaponry specifically autonomous weapon systems (AWS) can select and engage targets without human intervention therefore the application of lethal AWS incorporation with AI has revolutionized armed conflicts.The main concern regarding the military application of AI is the use of force should be maintained by only human soldiers. There is an urgent need to reinterpret the threshold for triggering an international armed conflict because AI technology unintentionally causes war during border control or surveillance operation. This article predominantly focuses on fully autonomous weapon systems which refer to human agents being removed from certain force applications. The main research questions in this article are first, is it possible that an AWS might, alone, spark an international armed conflict, thus bringing international humanitarian law into force? Second, can the criteria of organisation and intensity that give rise to non-international armed conflicts be met when AWS are controlled by non-state armed actors? This study will examine the research questions by focusing on the main areas of debate in the field of international law on AWS, specifically the compatibility of AI with the principles of humanitarian law, the determination of international responsibility, and ethical problems.
Keywords
Non-State Armed Actors, Autonomous Weapon Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Non-International Armed Conflicts
References
- Amoroso, D. (2017). Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum Arguments Against Autonomy in Weapons Systems: A Re- Appraisal. Questions of International Law, 5-31.
- Anderson, K., Reisner, D., & Waxman, M. (2014). Adapting the Law of Armed Conflict to Autonomous Weapon Systems. International Law Studies, 386-406.
- Army Technology. (2021, 07 16). Brimstone Advanced Anti-Armour Missile. https://www.army-technology.com/: https://www.army-technology.com/projects/brimstone/ adresinden alındı
- Asaro, P. (2012). On Banning Autonomous Weapon Systems: Human Rights, Automation, and the Dehumanisation of Lethal Decision-making. International Review of the Red Cross, 700.
- Barnidge, R. (2006). The Due Diligence Principle Under International Law. International Community Law Review, 81-121.
- Beard, J. (2014). Autonomous Weapons and Human Responsibilities. Georgetown Journal of International Law , 617-678.
- Bothe, M., Partsch, K. J., & Solf, W. (2013). New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts: Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
- Bruun, L., Goussac , N., & Boulanin, V. (2021). Autonomous Weapon Systems and International Humanitarian Law: Identifying Limits and the Required Type and Degree of Human–Machine Interaction. Stockholm : Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
- Carron, D. (2018). When is a Conflict International? Time for New Control Tests in IHL. International Review of the Red Cross, 1019-1041.
- Chengeta, T. (2016). Accountability Gap: Autonomous Weapon Systems and Modes of Responsibility in International Law. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 1-50.
