Exploring Pre-service Teachers’ Attitudes towards Online Peer Assessment

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 49 - 70, 30.06.2022

Kübra Karakaya Özyer

Abstract

The use of peer assessment has gained considerable interest as an alternative assessment method in higher education. This study explores pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards and opinions about the online peer assessment process. To this end, a basic qualitative research method was applied. A sample of 125 pre-service teachers from a city in Turkey participated in the study. The study employed the Attitudes towards Peer Assessment Scale and open-ended questions to investigate participants’ attitudes and opinions. The study found out that the vast majority of the participants felt that peer assessment is beneficial and enjoyable. However, some of the participants indicated that fairness and efficacy might be questionable. The study highlights the influence of anonymity, rater training, and teacher monitoring. Recommendations are provided to improve the design and implementation of peer assessment in Teacher Training Programmes.

Keywords

Attitudes towards Peer Assessment, Online peer assessment, pre-service teachers

References

• Al-Barakat, A., & Al-Hassan, O. (2009). Peer assessment as a learning tool for enhancing student teachers' preparation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 399-413.
• Al-Karasneh, S. (2005). Self-and peer-assessment as a learning tool to teach social studies: Students' views. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 32(1), 178-191.
• Ashenafi, M. M. (2017). Peer-assessment in higher education–twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 226-251. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711
• Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education, 15(1), 101-111.
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698-712.
• Bozkurt, E., & Demir, R. (2013). Students' views on peer assessment: A case study. Ilkogretim Online, 12(1), 241-253.
• Brindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 79-90.
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
• Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: A research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365-397.
• Chen, Y. M. (2005). Peer and self-assessment in EFL classrooms. Selected Papers of the Fourteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 320- 329). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
• Cheng, K. H., Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (2014). Exploring students’ emotional responses and participation in an online peer assessment activity: A case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(3), 271-287.
• Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 233-239.
• Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, 22(1), 93-121.
• Collimore, L. M., Paré, D. E., & Joordens, S. (2015). SWDYT: So what do you think? Canadian students’ attitudes about peerScholar, an online peer-assessment tool. Learning Environments Research, 18(1), 33-45.
• Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 346-355.
• Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020). The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481-509.
• Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32(2), 175-187.
• Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 365-377.
• Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304-315.
• Hinett, K., & Weeden, P. (2000). How am I doing?: Developing critical self-evaluation in trainee teachers. Quality in Higher Education, 6(3), 245-257.
• Hsu, T. C., & Hsu, A. C. K. (2016). Effects of a peer assessment system based on a grid-based knowledge classification approach on computer skills training. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 100-111.
• Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387-406.
• Kim, M., & Ryu, J. (2013). The development and implementation of a web-based formative peer assessment system for enhancing students’ metacognitive awareness and performance in ill-structured tasks. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 549-561.
• Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2020). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193-211. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679
• Li, L., & Gao, F. (2016). The effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning levels. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 885-900.
• Lin, S. S., Liu, E. Z., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Student attitudes toward networked peer assessment: Case studies of undergraduate students and senior high school students. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(2), 241.
• Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2003). A study of students' attitudes toward and desired system requirements of networked peer assessment system. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(4), 349-355.
• Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher education, 11(3), 279-290.
• Magin, D., & Helmore, P. (2001). Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentation skills: How reliable are they?. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 287-298.
• McGarr, O., & Clifford, A. M. (2013). ‘Just enough to make you take it seriously’: exploring students’ attitudes towards peer assessment. Higher Education, 65(6), 677-693.
• McGourty, J. (2000). Using multisource feedback in the classroom: A computer-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(2), 120-124.
• McGourty, J., Dominick, P., & Reilly, R. R. (1998, November). Incorporating student peer review and feedback into the assessment process. In FIE'98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 98CH36214) (Vol. 1, pp. 14-18). IEEE.
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
• Mok, J. (2011). A case study of students' perceptions of peer assessment in Hong Kong. ELT Journal, 65(3), 230-239.
• Moore, C., & Teather, S. (2013). Engaging students in peer review: Feedback as learning. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 196-211.
• Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102-122.
• Oldfield, K. A., & Macalpine, J. M. K. (1995). Peer and self‐assessment at tertiary level‐‐an experiential report. Assessment in Higher Education, 20(1), 125-132.
• Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 239-250.
• Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,44(8), 1253-1278.
• Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self-and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language Testing, 19(2), 109-131.
• Planas Lladó, A., Soley, L. F., Fraguell Sansbelló, R. M., Pujolras, G. A., Planella, J. P., Roura-Pascual, N., ... & Moreno, L. M. (2014). Student perceptions of peer assessment: an interdisciplinary study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 592-610.
• Praver, M., Rouault, G., & Eidswick, J. (2011). Attitudes and affect toward peer evaluation in EFL reading circles. Reading, 11(2), 89-101.
• Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30.
• Roskams, T. (1999). Chinese EFL students' attitudes to peer feedback and peer assessment in an extended pairwork setting. RELC Journal, 30(1), 79-123.
• Schunn, C., Godley, A., & DeMartino, S. (2016). The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP English classes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(1), 13-23.
• Sluijsmans, D. M., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 443-454.
• Sluijsmans, D., & Prins, F. (2006). A conceptual framework for integrating peer assessment in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(1), 6-22.
• Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in education and teaching international, 39(1), 71-81.
• Somervell, H. (1993). Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self‐peer and collaborative assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(3), 221-233.
• Stefani, L. A. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 69-75.
• Thomas, G., Martin, D., & Pleasants, K. (2011). Using self-and peer-assessment to enhance students’ future-learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(1), 52-69.
• Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
• Topping, K. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 55-87). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Topping, K. (2017). Peer assessment: Learning by judging and discussing the work of other learners. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 1(1), 1-17.
• Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. W. (2001). Peer assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 113-132.
• Tsai, C. C. (2009). Internet-based peer assessment in high school settings. In Handbook of research on new media literacy at the K-12 level: Issues and challenges (pp. 743-754). IGI Global.
• Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37(3), 293-310.
• Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 241-252.
• Tsai, C. C., Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S. S., & Yuan, S. M. (2001b). A networked peer assessment system based on a Vee heuristic. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(3), 220-230.
• Tucker, R., Fermelis, J., & Palmer, S. (2009). Designing, implementing and evaluating a self-and-peer assessment tool for e-learning environments. In E-learning technologies and evidence-based assessment approaches (pp. 170-194). IGI Global.
• Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher education, 31(03), 341-356.
• Vickerman, P. (2009). Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 221-230.
• Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1032-1047. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698
• Weaver, R. L., & Cotrell, H. W. (1986). Peer evaluation: A case study. Innovative Higher Education, 11(1), 25-39. Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27-44.
• Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2006). Attitudes towards peer assessment: a comparison of the perspectives of pre‐service and in‐service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 83-92.
• Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 429-443.
• Woolhouse, M. (1999). Peer assessment: the participants’ perception of two activities on a further education teacher education course. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23(2), 211-219.
• Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179-200.
• Yang, Y. F., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 72-83.
• Zariski, A. (1996, February). Student peer assessment in tertiary education: Promise, perils and practice. In Teaching and Learning Within and Across Disciplines, p189-200. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Teaching and Learning Forum, Murdoch University.
• Zheng, L., Chen, N. S., Cui, P., & Zhang, X. (2019). A systematic review of technology-supported peer assessment research: An activity theory approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 168-191.