What the Distance Education Themed Master’s Theses and Dissertations in Türkiye Examined Prior to Covid-19 Pandemic

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 1 - 30, 31.12.2024

Emrah Orakcıoğlu , Cavide Demirci

https://doi.org/10.59409/ojer.1369623

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the research tendencies of the theses and dissertations published in Türkiye prior to the Covid-19 pandemic between 2013 and 2018 in the field of distance education in terms of thematic research fields, methodological preferences and the components that scientific researches should include. In accordance with this purpose, theses and dissertations were analysed with regard to such sections as introduction, method, findings, result and recommendations. This qualitative study was carried out through document (content) analysis method and was made use of purposeful sampling. The results suggest the most popular theme among researches is web-based distance learning, most preferred designs are quantitative, qualitative, respectively. Top universities publishing doctoral dissertations in the field are the Universities of Anadolu and Ankara while Gazi University ranks first in master’s theses. The years of 2013 and 2014 outnumber other years in terms of doctoral dissertations while 2018 was found as the year when most master’s theses was carried out. It was found out dissertations and theses generally have the basic components of a scientific research. The quantitative studies were designed in survey model while qualitative studies focused on case studies. The most commonly used sampling method is purposeful sampling in the case of both research models. It is recommended that more doctoral dissertations could be carried out in the field of distance education in Türkiye and future studies may include not only the studies that the term of distance education exists in the title but also others carried out in the field.

Keywords

Distance education, remote education, covid-19, content analysis

References

• Ankara Üniversitesi. (2019). Programlar. https://ankuzem.ankara.edu.tr/index.php/programlar
• Berge, Z. L., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527090
• Bowen, G. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
• Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbek, E., Yilmazel, S., Erdogdu, E., Ucar, H., Guler, E., … Aydın, C. H. (2015). Trends in distance education research: A content analysis of journals 2009-2013. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(1), 330-363.
• Bruder, I. (1989). Distance learning. Electronic Learning, 8(6), 30.
• Bryant, S. M., Kahle, J. B., & Schafer, B. A. (2005). Distance education: A review of the contemporary literature. Issues in Accounting Education, 20(3), 255-272.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (21. baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
• Eldeleklioğlu Onuk, D. (2019). Türkiye'de yetişkin eğitimi temalı 2007-2018 yılları arasında yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
• Garrison, D. R., & Shale, D. (1987). Mapping the boundaries of distance education: Problems in defining the field. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1(1), 5-11.
• Gökmen, Ö. F., Uysal, M., Yaşar, H., Kırksekiz, A., Güvendi, G. M., & Horzum, M. B. (2017, Şubat). Türkiye'de 2005-2014 yılları arasında yayınlanan uzaktan eğitim tezlerindeki yöntemsel eğilimler: Bir içerik analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 189, 1-25.
• Horzum, M. B., Özkaya, M., Demirci, M., & Alpaslan, M. (2013). Türkçe uzaktan eğitim araştırmalarının incelenmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 79-100.
• Kambutu, J. (2002). Administrators prefer technology-based distance learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(3), 341-343.
• Karppinen, K., & Moe, H. (2012). What we talk about when we talk about document analysis. In Trends in Communication Policy Research: New Theories, Methods and Subjects (pp. 177-193). Bristol: Intellect.
• Kaya, Z. (2002). Uzaktan eğitim. Pegem Yayıncılık.
• Özdemir, M. (2010). Nitel veri analizi: Sosyal bilimlerde yöntembilim sorunsalı üzerine bir çalışma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 323-343.
• Schlosser, L. A., & Simonson, M. (2009). Distance education: Definition and glossary of terms (3rd ed.). Information Age.
• Şimşek, A., Özdamar, N., Uysal, Ö., Kobak, K., Berk, C., Kılıçer, T., & Çiğdem, H. (2009). İkibinli yıllarda Türkiye’deki eğitim teknolojisi araştırmalarında gözlenen eğilimler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 115-120.
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
• Zawacki-Richter, O., & Naidu, S. (2016). Mapping research trends from 35 years of publications in distance education. Distance Education, 37(3), 245-269.