The Metaverse as a Convergence of Virtual and Real Worlds: A Risk Assessment in the Context of Ethics

Abstract

Abstract: When Bitcoin first emerged as a virtual and digital asset, skepticism about its potential for even short-term success was widespread. Yet, it ultimately reshaped financial systems globally. Now, Facebook, one of the largest virtual platforms with nearly 3 billion users, has taken a pivotal step toward establishing a digital parallel universe known as the Metaverse. Rebranded as "Meta," the company has consolidated social media platforms like Instagram and WhatsApp under its umbrella, signaling a bold move toward a fully immersive digital realm. However, this initiative has triggered significant reactions from economic, technological, political, and religious domains. While the Metaverse promises to revolutionize human interaction through technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), it also raises profound concerns regarding technology addiction, cyberbullying, data privacy, psychological dependency, and ethical dilemmas. These concerns are particularly salient in the commodification of personal faith and the trivialization of sacred practices. This study conducts a theoretical and conceptual analysis of the Metaverse, focusing on the intersection of technological advancements with religious, moral, and ethical values. Drawing on existing literature, it examines cultural, spiritual, and technological risks while identifying significant gaps in scholarly discussions. By highlighting these risks, the research advocates for the development of comprehensive ethical frameworks to ensure inclusivity, authenticity, and accountability in this hyper-connected digital realm. Additionally, the study explores the potential role of the Turkish Presidency of Religious Affairs in mitigating these risks, offering practical recommendations for managing challenges in a balanced and reasonable manner. This work aims to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the Metaverse and its implications for human values in an increasingly digitized world.

Keywords

• Metaverse
• technology addiction
• cyberbullying
• virtual reality
• ethical and religious realities
• mixed realities
• risk assessment.

Sanal ve Gerçek Dünyaların Kesişim Noktası Olarak Metaverse: Etik Bağlamında Bir Risk Değerlendirmesi

Abstract

Bitcoin’in sanal ve dijital bir varlık olarak ilk ortaya çıktığında, kısa vadede bile başarılı olacağına dair geniş bir şüphe vardı. Ancak Bitcoin, nihayetinde küresel finansal sistemleri köklü bir şekilde değiştirdi. Şimdi ise, yaklaşık 3 milyar kullanıcısıyla dünyanın en büyük sanal platformlarından biri olan Facebook, Metaverse adı verilen dijital bir paralel evren oluşturma yolunda önemli bir adım atmıştır. Şirket, adını "Meta" olarak değiştirerek Instagram ve WhatsApp gibi sosyal medya platformlarını çatısı altında birleştirmiş ve tam anlamıyla kapsayıcı bir dijital aleme yönelik cesur bir girişimde bulunmuştur. Bununla birlikte, bu girişim ekonomik, teknolojik, politik ve dini alanlardan önemli tepkilerle karşılaşmıştır. Metaverse, sanal gerçeklik (VR) ve artırılmış gerçeklik (AR) gibi teknolojiler aracılığıyla insan etkileşimlerini köklü bir şekilde dönüştürme potansiyeline sahipken, aynı zamanda veri gizliliği, psikolojik bağımlılık ve etik ikilemlerle ilgili derin endişeler doğurmaktadır. Bu endişeler, özellikle kişisel inançların metalaştırılması ve kutsal pratiklerin sıradanlaştırılması konularında belirgin hale gelmektedir. Dönüştürücü potansiyeline rağmen, Metaverse üzerine yapılan akademik tartışmaların, bu dijital ortamın din ve etik üzerindeki etkilerine yeterince odaklanmadığı görülmektedir. Bu çalışma, Metaverse’i teknolojik gelişmelerin dini, ahlaki ve etik değerlerle kesişim noktasında ele alarak teorik ve kavramsal bir analiz gerçekleştirmektedir. Mevcut literatüre dayanarak, kültürel, manevi ve teknolojik riskleri inceleyen çalışma, akademik tartışmalardaki önemli boşlukları tespit etmektedir. Bu riskleri vurgulayan araştırma, kapsayıcılığı, özgünlüğü ve hesap verebilirliği sağlamak için kapsamlı etik çerçevelerin geliştirilmesini savunmaktadır. Ayrıca, çalışma, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı’nın bu riskleri hafifletme konusundaki potansiyel rolünü inceleyerek, bu zorlukların dengeli ve makul bir şekilde yönetilmesine yönelik pratik öneriler sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, giderek dijitalleşen bir dünyada Metaverse’in insan değerleri üzerindeki etkilerine dair daha incelikli bir anlayışa katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Keywords

• Metaverse
• teknoloji bağımlılığı
• siber zorbalık
• sanal gerçeklik
• etik ve dini gerçeklikler
• karma gerçeklikler
• risk değerlendirmesi.

References

1. Akpınar R (2022) "Bağlılık Ile Bağımlılık Arasında: Dijital Dünya" İslam Fıkhının Dijital Dünya İmtihanı/İmkânı, Perspektif, https://perspektif.eu/2022/02/01/islam-fikhinin-dijital-dunya-imtihani-imkani/
2. Arcia, P., Fuentealba, A., Retamal, C., Lara, S., et al. (2023). Ethical issues of digital identity in metaverse. ICERI2023 Proceedings.
3. Armano D. (2021) Web 3.0 And The Metaverse Will Mainstream—That Might Not Be A Good Thing, Forbes Magazine, https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidarmano/2021/11/11/web-30-and-the-metaverse-will-mainstream-that-might-not-be-a-good-thing/
4. Avila, A. (2022). Prophetic churches for the metaverse: Communities who sing the melody of hope. Indonesian Journal of Theology.
5. Aydemir H. (2022) Metaverse, Batıla Karşı İslam İçin Fırsattır, https://www.islamvemedya.com/ metaverse-batila-karsi-islam-icin-firsattir/926/
6. Azhar, M., Ali, R., & Naz, A. (2024). Faith in metaverse: Understanding adoption intentions of metaverse amongst the Muslim students. Journal of Islamic Marketing.
7. Bainbridge, W. S. (2007). The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science, 317(5837), 472-476.
8. Bányai, F., Zsila, Á., Király, O., Maraz, A., Elekes, Z., Griffiths, M. D., & Demetrovics, Z. (2017). Problematic social media use: Results from a large-scale nationally representative adolescent sample. PloS one, 12(1), e0169839.

9. Batra, R., Sinha, J., & Gupta, R. (2021). Impact of Superstitions on Human Life. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications, 5(5), 389-395.
10. Bibri, S. E., & Allam, Z. (2022). The metaverse as a virtual form of data-driven smart cities: The ethics of hyper-connectivity, datafication, algorithmization, and platformization of urban society. Computational Urban Science.
11. Bostrom, N., & Sandberg, A. (2009). Cognitive enhancement: methods, ethics, regulatory challenges. Science and engineering ethics, 15(3), 311-341.
12. CVJ, (2021) A glance into the Metaverse, https://cvj.ch/en/education/basics/a-look-into-the-metaverse/
13. Dağ A. (2022) Platon’un mağarasına geri dönüyoruz: METAVERSE, Lacivert Dergi, https://www.lacivertdergi.com/dosya/2022/01/26/platonun-magarasina-geri-donuyoruz-metaverse
14. Dereli, M. D. (2022) Metaverse'te Dindarlık, https://www.islamvemedya.com/metaverse-te-dindarlik/908/
15. Fernandez, J. (2024). The future of religion is virtual reality: Authenticating religious practice in the coming metaverse through an examination of religion in Second Life. ProQuest.
16. Fernández-Quijada, D., & Wang, C. (2021). The metaverse: from science fiction to reality. The Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 14(1), 1-15.
17. Fogg, B. J. (2018). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity Press.
18. Gilbert, K. (2017). Virtual blasphemy: the dangers and delights of taking religion into virtual worlds. Religion and the Arts, 21(1-2), 207-232.
19. Güven U.Z. (2022) Metaverse, NFT ve Müzikte Dönüşüm, Kentten Sesler, https://www.sanattanyansimalar.com/yazarlar/ugur-zeynep-guven/metaverse-nft-ve-muzikte-donusum/2724/
20. Haihan Duan, Jiaye Li, Sizheng Fan, Zhonghao Lin, Xiao Wu, and Wei Cai. 2021. Metaverse for Social Good: A University Campus Prototype. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3474085.3479238
21. Hasanah, U. (2024). From digital ethics to digital community: An Islamic principle on strengthening safety strategy on information. Data Analytics in System Engineering.
22. Hassan, M. U., Tahir, M., Ahmed, A., & Arshad, S. (2019). True faith in God: a critical review of the contemporary discourse. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 15(2), 55-68.
23. Hemming, P., & Roudavski, S. (2017). Sacred technologies: Designing for ritual engagement in mixed reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 105, 22-32.
24. Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Privacy as protection of the incompleteness of identity: The value of privacy for democratic societies. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 19(1), 71-93.
25. Hindolia, A., Arya, J., Pathak, R., & Kazmi, A. (2024). Halal B2B marketing in the metaverse: Crafting a conceptual framework to pinpoint opportunities and challenges. Journal of Islamic Marketing.
26. Hoover, S. M. (2016). Virtual Reality and Religion: Opportunities and Challenges. In J. Hutchings, & E. L. Gunn (Eds.), Religion and the senses in the ancient world (pp. 349-367). Brill.
27. Iamthemeta, (2022) Mother, 43, has her avatar groped by three male characters in the online Metaverse, http://aboutmetaverse.wiki/tag/avatar/
28. Ince A. (2022) Suudi Arabistan’ın Metaverse Hamlesi Dini Ritüelleri Nasıl Etkileyecek?, https://haber.sakarya.edu.tr/suudi-arabistanin-metaverse-hamlesi-dini-rituelleri-nasil-etkileyecek-h102324.html
29. Jawad, H. A. (2020). Virtual Reality and Religion: Opportunities and Challenges. Open Theology, 6(1), 182-194. doi: 10.1515/opth-2020-0013 J oinson, A. N. (2007). Disinhibition and the internet. In The Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 75-85). Oxford University Press.
30. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440.
31. Kevins, Jerameel, Metaverse as a New Emerging Technology: An Interrogation of Opportunities and Legal Issues: Some Introspection (March 6, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4050898 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4050898
32. Kharif, O. (2021, August 5). The Metaverse is coming. Is the world ready? Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-08-05/the-metaverse-is-coming-is-the-world-ready.
33. Kılıçarslan A. (2022) Metaverse’de Dini İbadet Yerlerine İlgi: Hangi Hizmetler Mevcut? https://coin-turk.com/metaversede-dini-ibadet-yerlerine-ilgi-hangi-hizmetler-mevcut
34. Kiong V. L. (2022) Metaverse Made Easy: A Beginner's Guide to the Metaverse, independently published, ISBN-13: ‎ 979-8798340927
35. Kuban Torun, N., & Torun, T. (2022). Metaverse ve Din Kavramlarının Sosyal Medya Madenciliği Yolu ile İncelenmesi. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 6(2), Sayfa No.2511-2526.
36. Kurtuluş Ö. (2022) Gerçek Metaverse Bu Değil!, https://t.ly/FLxV
37. Kuş, O. (2021). Metaverse: ‘Dijital Büyük Patlamada’ Fırsatlar ve Endişelere Yönelik Algılar. Intermedia International E-journal, 8 (15), 245-266. DOI: https://10.21645/intermedia.2021.109
38. ahiri, I., Deka, L., Chakraborty, N., Pattni, K., et al. (2023). Dynamics of dialogue, humanity, and peace in the metaverse: Towards a conceptual debate. IGI Global.
39. Lipka, M. (2017). How US religious groups are embracing (and resisting) virtual reality. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/07/27/how-u-s-religious-groups-are-embracing-and-resisting-virtual-reality/
40. Marchionni G. (2022) The Metaverse in 2040, https://www.elon.edu/u/imagining/surveys/xiv-2022/future-of-metaverse-web3-2040/
41. Mashable (2020) MIT Researchers Develop A Way To Record And Even Alter Dreams, https://in.mashable.com/science/16056/mit-researchers-develop-a-way-to-record-and-even-alter-dreams
42. Matthias C. Rillig, Kenneth A. Gould, Marcus Maeder, Shing Woong Kim, Juan F. Dueñas, Liliana Pinek, Anika
43. Lehmann, and Milos Bielcik, (2021) Opportunities and Risks of the “Metaverse” For Biodiversity and the Environment, Environmental Science &Technology Article ASAP DOI: https://10.1021/acs.est.2c01562
44. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems, E77-D(12), 1321-1329.
45. Oxford Analytica (2022), "Metaverse holds unknowable societal risks", Expert Briefings. https://doi.org/10.1108/OXAN-DB267012
46. Petersen, G. M., & Lieberman, J. D. (2021). The ethics of virtual and augmented reality. The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI, 673-686.
47. Pietro D.P. & Cresci S. (2021) Metaverse: Security and Privacy Issues , The Third IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems, and Applications (IEEE TPS'21)At: Virtual, 10.1109/TPSISA52974.2021.00032
48. Radovanović, N., & Tomić, B. (2022). Ethical and religious challenges within metaverse. Religion in Late Modern Society.
49. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.
50. Saluzzo, D. (2023). Transparency and due diligence obligations for online platforms and safer space online users’ fundamental rights, now and in metaverse. Journal of Law, Market & Innovation.
51. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
52. Snider M. & Molina B. (2021) Everyone wants to own the metaverse including Facebook and Microsoft. But what exactly is it?, https://www.recordonline.com/story/tech/2021/11/10/ metaverse-what-is-it-explained-facebook-microsoft-meta-vr/6337635001/
53. Thomas, J., Kuhail, M. A., & AlBeyahi, F. (2024). The metaverse, religious practice, and wellbeing: A narrative review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.
54. Webtekno, (2022) Tehlike çanları çalıyor. Çocuklar Metaverse'te 'cinsel içerikli kulüplere' kolayca girebilecek!, Yeniçağ Gazetesi, https://www.yenicaggazetesi.com.tr/metaverse-skandali-cocuklar-cinsel-icerikli-yayinlara-girebiliyor-514088h.htm
55. Yee, N. (2006). The psychology of massively multi-user online role-playing games: Motivations, emotional investment, Relationship Formation, and Problematic Usage.