İspir ve Kızılcahamam Kuru Fasulyesi için Gama Işını Lineer Soğurma Katsayıları ile Transmisyon Faktörlerinin Ölçülmesi Üzerine Deneysel Bir Çalışma

Year 2023, , 585 - 593, 10.03.2023

Burcu Akça

https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1081811

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Erzurum İspir kuru fasulyesi ve Ankara Kızılcahamam kuru fasulyesi için gama ışını lineer soğurma katsayıları (µ) ve transmisyon faktörleri (TF) ölçülmüştür. Deneyde Am-241 nokta kaynağının 59,54 keV enerjili fotonları, Energy Dispersive X-Ray Floresans Spektrometrisi (EDXRFS) ve bir Si (Li) detektörü kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, Erzurum İspir kuru fasulyesinin ortalama transmisyon faktörünün, Ankara Kızılcahamam kuru fasulyesininkinden daha büyük, ortalama lineer soğurma katsayısının ise daha küçük olduğu gözlenmiştir. Bu durum, Ankara Kızılcahamam kuru fasulyesinin, Erzurum İspir kuru fasulyesinden daha fazla gama ışını soğurduğu, yani gama ışınları ile daha fazla etkileşime girdiği anlamına gelmektedir.

Keywords

Turkey, IDB, KDB, TF, EDXRFS

An Experimental Study on the Measurement of Gamma-Ray Linear Attenuation Coefficients with Transmission Factors for Ispir and Kızılcahamam Dry Bean

Abstract

In the present work, the gamma-ray linear attenuation coefficients (µ) and transmission factors (TF) were measured for Erzurum Ispir dry bean (IDB) and Ankara Kızılcahamam dry bean (KDB). Photons of the Am-241 point source with an energy of 59.54 keV, an Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (EDXRFS), and a Si (Li) detector were used in the experiment. As a result, it was observed that the average transmission factor of Erzurum İspir dried beans was higher than that of Ankara Kızılcahamam dry beans, and the average linear attenuation coefficient was smaller. This means that Ankara Kızılcahamam dry beans absorb more gamma rays than Erzurum İspir dry beans, that is, they interact more with gamma rays.

Keywords

Turkey, IDB, KDB, TF, EDXRFS

References

• A.D.A., Position of the American Dietetic Association: Food Irradiation. ADA Reports, 2000.
• ACSH (2003). http://www.acsh.org/docLib/20040331_irrad%20iated.pdf. (Date of Access: 03 June 2021).
• Atasever AM., Atasever M. Usage of Irradiation for Food Technology. Atatürk University Journal of Veterinary Sciences 2007; 2(3): 107-116.
• Diehl JF. Safety of Irradiated Foods. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker 1995.
• Lacroix, M., Ouattara B. Combined industrial processes with irradiation to assure innocuity and preservation of food products — a review. Food Research International 2000; 33: 719-724.
• Lagunas-Solar, MC. Radiation processing of foods: An overview of scientific principles and current status. Journal of Food Protection 1995; 58: 186-192.
• Monk, JD., Beuchat, LR., Doyle, MP. Irradiation inactivation of food-microorganisms. Journal of Food Protection 1995; 58: 197-208.
• Olson, DG. Scientific Status Summary, Irradiation of Food. A Publication of the IFT Expert Panel on Food Safety and Irradiation. Food Technology 1998; 52: 56-62.
• Swallow AJ. Wholesomeness and safety of irradiated foods. In: Friedman M, ed. Nutritional and Toxicological Consequences of Food Processing. NewYork, NY: Plenum Press 1991; 11-31.
• Turhan MF., Akman F., Polat H., Kaçal MR., Demirkol İ. Gamma-ray attenuation behaviors of hematite doped polymer composites. Progress in Nuclear Energy 2020 129: 103504.
• WHO (1983). http://www.euro.who.int/document.pdf. (Date of Access: 03 June 2021).