Tek ve Çift Yüzeyli Fotovoltaik Sistemlerde Yüzey Temizliğinin ve Panel Yerleşim Açılarının Enerji Üretim Performansına Etkisi

Year 2026, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 144 - 166, 14.01.2026

Nihat Pamuk

https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1667754

https://izlik.org/JA52SH25NX

Abstract

Son yıllarda fotovoltaik (FV) enerji üretiminde teknolojik gelişmeler hızla ilerlemektedir. Bu gelişmeler, modül hücre sayısının artırılması, gelişmiş cam teknolojilerinin uygulanması ve çift yüzeyli cam kullanılarak üretilen FV modüllerinin geliştirilmesi gibi önemli yenilikleri içermektedir. Ayrıca, bu ilerlemeler, FV modüllerinin enerji üretim verimliliğini artırmaya yönelik çeşitli saha uygulamalarının önünü açmıştır. Bu tür uygulamalar, kurulum maliyetinin amortisman süresini kısaltmanın yanı sıra FV modüllerinin verimliliğini de artırmaktadır. Özellikle çift yüzeyli modüller, her iki yüzeyden de güneş ışığını absorbe ederek enerji üretiminde önemli bir artış sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Ankara ili Polatlı ilçesinde belirlenen koordinatlarda, PVSyst ve PV*SOL benzetim programları kullanılarak tasarlanan 9.639,630 kWp üretim kapasiteli bir güneş enerjisi santrali analiz edilmektedir. Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, tek yüzeyli ve çift yüzeyli FV panellerin eğim açılarındaki değişimlerin enerji üretimine etkilerini incelemek ve tespit edilen optimum açı değerleri ile temizlik stratejilerini belirlemektir. Böylece, santralin enerji üretim kapasitesini en üst düzeye çıkarırken aynı zamanda işletme maliyetlerini düşürmek hedeflenmektedir. Bu araştırmanın bulguları, güneş enerjisi yatırımlarının hem yerel hem de ulusal düzeyde daha verimli hale getirilmesine önemli bir katkı sağlayacaktır. Ayrıca, güneş enerjisi sektörüne optimal sistem konfigürasyonları ve bakım uygulamaları konusunda kritik bilgiler sunarak sektöre önemli bir kaynak oluşturacaktır.

Keywords

Tek ve çift yüzeyli paneller , Eğim açısı , Yüzey temizliği , PV*SOL , PVSyst , Verimlilik

The Impact of Surface Cleaning and Panel Placement Angles on Energy Production Performance in Monofacial and Bifacial Photovoltaic Systems

https://izlik.org/JA52SH25NX

Abstract

In recent years, technological advancements in photovoltaic (PV) energy production have progressed rapidly. These developments include significant innovations such as increasing the number of module cells, implementing advanced glass technologies, and producing PV modules with double-sided glass. Furthermore, these advancements have facilitated various field applications aimed at enhancing the energy production efficiency of PV modules. Such applications not only shorten the amortization period of installation costs but also improve PV module efficiency. Bifacial modules, in particular, offer a notable increase in energy generation by capturing sunlight from both surfaces. In this study, a solar power plant with a production capacity of 9.639,630 kWp, designed using PVSyst and PV*SOL simulation programs at specified coordinates in the Polatlı district of Ankara Province, is analyzed. The primary objective of this research is to investigate the effects of variations in the tilt angles of unidirectional and bidirectional PV panels on energy production and to determine the optimal angles and cleaning strategies. By doing so, the study aims to maximize the power plant’s energy generation capacity while simultaneously reducing operational costs. The findings of this research will serve as a valuable resource for improving the efficiency of solar energy investments both locally and nationally. Moreover, they will contribute significantly to the solar energy sector by providing insights into optimal system configurations and maintenance practices.

Keywords

Monofacial and bifacial panels , Tilt angle , Surface cleaning , PV*SOL , PVSyst , Efficiency

References

• Ahmed A., Elsakka M., Elhenawy Y., Amer A., Mansi A., Bassyouni M., Gadalla M., Refaat A. Experimental investigation of a nano coating efficiency for dust mitigation on photovoltaic panels in harsh climatic conditions. Scientific Reports 2024; 14(1): 23013.
• Ait Omar O., EL Fadil H., El Fezazi NE., Oumimoun Z., Ait Errouhi A., Choukai O. Real yields and PVSYST simulations: comparative analysis based on four photovoltaic installations at Ibn Tofail University. Energy Harvesting and Systems 2024; 11(1): 20230064.
• Alzahrani M., Rahman T., Rawa M., Weddell A. Impact of dust and tilt angle on the photovoltaic performance in a desert environment. Solar Energy 2025; 288: 113239.
• Baqir M., Channi HK. Analysis and design of solar PV system using Pvsyst software. Materials Today: Proceedings 2022; 48: 1332-1338.
• Chine W., Mellit A., Lughi V., Malek A., Sulligoi G., Pavan AM. A novel fault diagnosis technique for photovoltaic systems based on artificial neural networks. Renewable Energy 2016; 90: 501-512.
• Çağlar A. Farklı derece-gün bölgelerindeki şehirler için optimum eğim açısının belirlenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 2018; 22(2): 849-854.
• Çoban HH. Experimental study of bifacial solar photovoltaic systems in snowy envıronments. 2nd International Congress on Innovation Technologies & Engineering, October 2023; 189-201.
• Dirlik EE., Gezegin C., Mohammadi SA. Comparison of pvsyst, pvsol and homer simulation software results with real production data of solar power plants in different provinces of Turkey. Journal of Engineering Research and Applied Science 2023; 12(2): 2357-2364.
• Endiz MS., Coşgun AE. Assessing the potential of solar power generation in Turkey: A PESTLE analysis and comparative study of promising regions using PVsyst software. Solar Energy 2023; 266: 112153.
• Faiz FU., Shakoor R., Raheem A., Umer F., Rasheed N., Farhan M. Modeling and analysis of 3 MW solar photovoltaic plant using PVSyst at Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. International journal of Photoenergy 2021; 2021(1): 6673448.
• Garrod A., Ghosh A. A review of bifacial solar photovoltaic applications. Frontiers in Energy 2023; 17(6): 704-726.
• Ghafiri S., Darnon M., Davigny A., Trovão JPF., Abbes D. A comprehensive performance evaluation of bifacial photovoltaic modules: insights from a year-long experimental study conducted in the Canadian climate. EPJ Photovoltaics 2024; 15(28): 1-14.
• Hernández-Callejo L., Gallardo-Saavedra S., Alonso-Gómez V. A review of photovoltaic systems: Design, operation and maintenance. Solar Energy 2019; 188: 426-440.
• Irwan YM., Amelia AR., Irwanto M., Leow WZ., Gomesh N., Safwati I. Stand-alone photovoltaic (SAPV) system assessment using PVSYST software. Energy Procedia 2015; 79: 596-603.
• Islam MA., Ali MN., Benitez IB., Habib SS., Jamal T., Flah A., Blazek V., El-Bayeh CZ. A comprehensive evaluation of photovoltaic simulation software: A decision-making approach using Analytic Hierarchy Process and performance analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews 2025; 58: 101663.
• Juaidi A., Kobari M., Mallak A., Titi A., Abdallah R., Nassar M., Albatayneh A. A comparative simulation between monofacial and bifacial PV modules under palestine conditions. Solar Compass 2023; 8: 100059.
• Kara R., Ekici M., Yıldırım G. Fotovoltaik hücrelerin panel açılarına göre enerji verimliliği. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development 2024; 16(2): 573-584.
• Karakaya E., Sriwannawit P. Barriers to the adoption of photovoltaic systems: The state of the art. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 49: 60-66.
• Kasim NK., Hussain HH., Abed AN. Performance analysis of grid-connected CIGS PV solar system and comparison with PVsyst simulation program. International Journal of Smart Grid 2019; 3(4): 172-179.
• Kayri İ. Investigation of near shading losses in photovoltaic systems with PVsyst software. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 2024; 12(1): 10-19.
• Lupangu C., Bansal RC. A review of technical issues on the development of solar photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 73: 950-965.
• Makki A., Omer S., Sabir H. Advancements in hybrid photovoltaic systems for enhanced solar cells performance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 41: 658-684.
• Mermoud A., Wittmer B. PVSYST user’s manual. Switzerland, 2014.
• Muñoz Y., Vargas O., Pinilla G., Vásquez J. Sizing and study of the energy production of a grid-tied photovoltaic system using PVsyst software. Tecciencia 2017; 12(22): 27-32.
• Obi M., Bass R. Trends and challenges of grid-connected photovoltaic systems-A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016; 58: 1082-1094.
• Pamuk N. Performance analysis of different optimization algorithms for MPPT control techniques under complex partial shading conditions in PV systems. Energies 2023;16(8): 3358.
• Pearsall NM. Introduction to photovoltaic system performance. InThe performance of photovoltaic (PV) systems, Woodhead Publishing 2017; 1-19.
• Rajesh R., Mabel MC. A comprehensive review of photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 51: 231-248.
• Sancar MR., Bayram AB. Modeling and economic analysis of greenhouse top solar power plant with Pvsyst Software. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research 2023; 5(1): 48-59.
• Türkdoğru E., Kutay M. Analysis of albedo effect in a 30-kW bifacial PV system with different ground surfaces using PVSYST software. Journal of Energy Systems 2022; 6(4): 543-559.
• Usah EO., Ozuomba S., Oduobuk EJ., Ekott EE. Pvsyst software-based comparative techno-economic analysis of PV power plant for two ınstallation sites with different climatic conditions. International Multilingual Journal of Science and Technology 2020; 5(7): 2819-2829.
• Venkateswari R., Sreejith S. Factors influencing the efficiency of photovoltaic system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019; 101: 376-394.