Enhancing Space Efficiency Through Improvement Strategies in Industrial Pre-Assembly Lines

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 1941 - 1952, 16.09.2025

Ülge Taş

https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1728367

Abstract

In today's competitive manufacturing environment, space efficiency has become a critical aspect of operational performance. This study aims to enhance space utilization in industrial pre-assembly lines by applying lean improvement strategies, including 5S and poka-yoke. A case study was conducted in a manufacturing company from March to June 2025. Data were collected through on-site observations, workflow analysis, and staff interviews. The methodology involved assessing the current layout, implementing lean tools, and comparing performance metrics before and after the improvements. The findings indicate substantial advancements in four key areas: material management, layout and flow optimization, inventory and space utilization, and ergonomic design. The most significant gains were observed in material management and spatial optimization. Additionally, ergonomic improvements contributed to worker safety and reduced unnecessary motions. The application of poka-yoke techniques led to the elimination of internal defects, thereby enhancing quality and reliability. This study fills a gap in the existing literature by providing a data-driven, real-world analysis of space efficiency improvements and offers practical insights for industry stakeholders.

Keywords

case study , lean practices , pre-assembly lines , space efficiency

Endüstriyel Ön Montaj Hatlarında İyileştirme Stratejileriyle Alan Verimliliğinin Artırılması

Abstract

Günümüzün rekabetçi üretim ortamında, alan verimliliği operasyonel performansın kritik bir yönü haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışma, 5S ve poka-yoke dahil olmak üzere yalın iyileştirme stratejilerini uygulayarak endüstriyel ön montaj hatlarında alan kullanımını geliştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bir üretim şirketinde Mart-Haziran 2025 arasında bir vaka çalışması yürütülmüştür. Veriler yerinde gözlemler, iş akışı analizi ve personel görüşmeleri yoluyla toplanmıştır. Metodoloji, mevcut düzeni değerlendirmeyi, yalın araçları uygulamayı ve iyileştirmelerden önce ve sonra performans ölçümlerini karşılaştırmayı içermektedir. Bulgular, dört temel alanda önemli ilerlemeler olduğunu göstermektedir: malzeme yönetimi, düzen ve akış optimizasyonu, envanter ve alan kullanımı ve ergonomik tasarım. En önemli kazanımlar malzeme yönetimi ve mekansal optimizasyonda gözlemlenmiştir. Ek olarak, ergonomik iyileştirmeler işçi güvenliğine katkıda bulunmuş ve gereksiz hareketleri azaltmıştır. Poka-yoke tekniklerinin uygulanması, iç kusurların ortadan kaldırılmasına yol açarak kalite ve güvenilirliği artırmıştır. Bu çalışma, alan verimliliği iyileştirmelerinin veri odaklı, gerçek dünya analizini sağlayarak mevcut literatürdeki bir boşluğu dolduruyor ve sektör paydaşları için pratik içgörüler sunmaktadır.

Keywords

vaka analizi , yalın uygulama , ön montaj hatları , alan verimliliği

References

• Abdulmalek FA., Rajgopal J. Analyzing the benefits of lean manufacturing and value stream mapping via simulation: A process sector case study. International Journal of Production Economics 2007; 107: 223-236.
• Agrahari RS., Dangle PA., Chandratre KV. Implementation of 5S methodology in the small-scale industry: A case study. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research 2015; 4: 180-187.
• Ahmed S., Hassan MH., Taha Z. Implementation of 5S practices in the manufacturing compa-nies: A case study. American Journal of Applied Sciences 2010; 7(8): 1182–1189.
• Bateman N., David A. Process improvement programmes: A model for assessing sustainability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2002; 22(5): 515–526.
• Bhamu J., Sangwan KS. Lean manufacturing: Literature review and research issues. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2014; 34(7): 876–940.
• Boysen N., Emde S., Hoeck M., Kauderer M. Part logistics in the automotive industry: decision problems, literature review and research agenda. European Journal of Operational Re-search 2015; 242(1): 107-120.
• Braglia M., Gallo M., Marrazzini L., Santillo LC. Operational space efficiency (OpSE): a struc-tured metric to evaluate the efficient use of space in industrial workstations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 2024; 73(4): 1027-1049.
• Burggräf P., Dannapfel M., Uelpenich J. Sustainability of factories in urban surroundings ena-bled by a space efficiency approach. In Proceedings of the Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production Conference and the World Mass Customization & Personalization Conference 2021; 987-996.
• Chien CF., Peng JT., Yu JT. Building energy saving performance indices for cleaner semicon-ductor manufacturing and an empirical study. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2016b; 99: 448-457.
• Choong KK. The fundamentals of performance measurement systems: a systematic approach to theory and a research agenda. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Man-agement 2014; 63(7): 879-922.
• Crowe S., Cresswell K., Robertson A., Huby G., Avery A., Sheikh A. The case study approach, Medical Research Methodology 2011; 11(100): 1-9.
• Dale BG., van der Wiele T., van Iwaarden J. Managing Quality 2007; Blackwell Publishing: Hong Kong.
• Gapp R., Fisher R., Kobayashi K. Implementing 5S within a Japanese context: An integrated management system. Management Decision 2008; 46(4): 565–579.
• Hertwig M., Lentes J. Smart eco-factory—Aspects for next generation facilities supporting sus-tainable and high-tech production. In Intelligent and Transformative Production in Pan-demic Times: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Production Research 2023; 661-670.
• Kilic HS., Durmusoglu MB. Advances in assembly line parts feeding policies: A literature re-view. Assembly Automation 2015; 35(1): 57-68.
• Mun HS., Lagua EB., Hong SK., Ryu SB., Sharifuzzaman M., Hasan MK., ... Yang CJ. Energy-Efficient Technologies and Strategies for Feasible and Sustainable Plant Factory Systems. Sustainability 2025; 17(7): 3259.
• Neely A., Gregory M., Platts K. Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 2005; 25(12): 1228-1263.
• Shingo S. A revolution in manufacturing: The SMED system. 1986; Productivity Press: Cam-bridge.
• Shraddha PD., Vipul VD., Merang LP., Akshay BK. Implementation of ‘5s’ technique in a man-ufacturing organization: A case study, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 2015; 4: 136-148.
• Shah R., Ward PT. Lean manufacturing: Context, practice bundles, and performance. Journal of Operations Management 2003; 21(2): 129-149.
• Vipulkumar CP., Thakkar H. Review on implementation of 5s in various organization, Interna-tional Journal of Engineering Research and Applications 2014; 4: 774-779.
• Wan H., Frank CF. A leanness measure of manufacturing systems for quantifying impacts of lean initiatives. International Journal of Production Research 2008; 46(23): 6567-6584.
• Womack JP., Jones DT. Lean thinking: Yalın Düşünce, (Çev: Oygur Yamak) 2016; Optimist Kitap: İstanbul.