NOHUT (Cicer arietinum L.)’TA TOHUM İRİLİĞİNE YÖNELİK SELEKSİYONUN VERİM VE VERİM ÖGELERİNE ETKİSİ

Year 2012, Volume: 27 Issue: 1, 17 - 22, 21.01.2012

Behiye Biçer , Dogan Şakar

Abstract

Araştırmada (Diyar 95 x ILC 482) melezinden gelen ve F4 kuşağına kadar bulk olarak ilerletilen nohut melez populasyonu, F4 kuşağında dört farklı tohum irilik sınıfına ayrılmış ve teksel seleksiyonla F8 kuşağına kadar bitki boyu, ilk bakla yüksekliği, bitkide dal ve bakla sayısı, bitki tane verimi ile 100 tane ağırlığına tohum iriliğinin etkisi gözlenmiştir. İncelenen karakterler yönünden generasyonlar arası ve tohum irilik grupları arası farklılıklar önemli bulunmuştur. İri tohumlular uzun boylu ve iri taneli, ancak dal ve bakla sayıları az ve bu nedenle düşük verimli olmuşlardır. Küçük taneliler ise verimli ancak Pazar değeri düşük küçük tohumlu olmuşlardır. İri tane seçimler ile iri tanelilik yakalanamamıştır.

THE EFFECT OF SELECTION ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS FOR SEED SIZE
IN CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)

Chickpea hybrid population, which has been derived from crosses Diyar 95 x ILC 482 and advanced until F4 generation by bulk, was separated to four different seed size-classes in this generation. Pedigri selection was used from F5 to F8, and seed size effecting plant height, first pod height, number of branches, pods and seeds per plant, seed yield per plant and 100 seed weight were evaluated. Differences among both seed size classes and generations were significant for all characters. The plants of large-seeded group grew up taller and produced larger seeds than the others, but this group gave less branches, pods and grain yield. Small-seeded groups had higher yields, but produced smaller seed with low market value. Large-seeded plants with high yield were not obtained by selection in this study.

Keywords

Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.), tohum iriliği, seleksiyon, tohum verimi, korelasyon

NOHUT (Cicer arietinum L.)’TA TOHUM İRİLİĞİNE YÖNELİK SELEKSİYONUN VERİM VE VERİM ÖGELERİNE ETKİSİ

Abstract

Araştırmada (Diyar 95 x ILC 482) melezinden gelen ve F4 kuşağına kadar bulk olarak ilerletilen nohut melez populasyonu, F4 kuşağında dört farklı tohum irilik sınıfına ayrılmış ve teksel seleksiyonla F8 kuşağına kadar bitki boyu, ilk bakla yüksekliği, bitkide dal ve bakla sayısı, bitki tane verimi ile 100 tane ağırlığına tohum iriliğinin etkisi gözlenmiştir. İncelenen karakterler yönünden generasyonlar arası ve tohum irilik grupları arası farklılıklar önemli bulunmuştur. İri tohumlular uzun boylu ve iri taneli, ancak dal ve bakla sayıları az ve bu nedenle düşük verimli olmuşlardır. Küçük taneliler ise verimli ancak Pazar değeri düşük küçük tohumlu olmuşlardır. İri tane seçimler ile iri tanelilik yakalanamamıştır

Keywords

Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.), tohum iriliği, seleksiyon, tohum verimi, korelasyon

References

• Belay, G., Zemede, A., Assefa, K., Metaferia G., Tefera H., 2009. Seed size effect on grain weight and agronomic performance of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. African J. of Agricultural Res., 4 (9): 836-839.
• Biçer, B.T., Şakar, D., 2008. Heritability and path analysis of some economical characteristics in Lentil. J. of Central European Agriculture, 9 (1):191-196.
• Biçer, B.T., 2009. The effect of seed size on yield and yield components of chickpea and lentil. African J. of Biotechnology, 8(8), 1482–1487 (2009).
• Chauhan, M.P., Singh, I.S., 1998. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for seed yield and other quantitative characters over two years in lentil. Lens News Letter, 25(1-2):3-6.
• Cubero, J.I., 1987. Morphology of chickpea. In: Saxena M.C. and K.B. Singh (eds.), Chickpea, pp: 35–67. CAB Pub., UK
• Çancı, H., Toker, C., 2009. Evaluation of yield criteria for drought and heat resistance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Agronomy & Crop Science, 195 :47-54.
• Düşünceli, F., Wood, J.A., Gupta, A., Yadav, M., Yadav, S.S., 2007. International Trade. Book Chapter in Chickpea Breeding and Management p:555-575, CABI Publishing.
• Erskine, W., 1996. Seed-size effects on lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) yield potential and adaptation to temperature and rainfall in West Asia. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 126: 335-341.
• Eser, D., Ukur, A., Adak, M.S., 1991. Effect of seed size on yield and yield components in chickpea. International Chickpea Newsletter 25:13-15.
• Freed, R., Einensmith, s. P., Guetz, S., Reicosky, D., Smail, V.W., Wolberg, P., User’s Guide to MSTAT-C Analysis of Agronomic Research Experiments, Michigan State Uni. USA, 1989.
• Gan, Y., McConkey, B.G., Miller, P.R., Zentner, R.P., McDonald, C.L., 2000. Chickpea in semiarid cropping systems. Can J. Plant Sci., 83: 39-46.
• Gaur, P.M., Krishnamurthy, L., Kashiwagi, J., 2008. Improving drought-avoidance root traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Current status of research at ICRISAT. Plant Production Science, 11:3-11.
• Kenneth, E. L., Johnson, B.L., 2004. Seed size and seeding depth influence on canola emergence and performance in the Northern Great Plains. Agron. J., 96:454-461.
• Kumar, S., Dubey, D.K., 2001. Variability, heritability and correlation studies in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Lathyrus Lathyrism, 2: 79-81.
• Muehlbauer, F.J., Singh, K.B., 1987. Genetics of Chickpea. In Saxena, M.C. and Singh, K.B. (eds). The Chickpea “That slows progress in breeding”. CAB International, London, UK, pp. 99-125.15.
• Na Chiangmai, P., Laosuwan, P., Waranyuwat, A. 2006. The Effect of mungbean seed Size on germinating ability, bean sprout production and agronomic characters. Silpakorn Uni. Int. Journal, 6 (1-2): 170-189.
• Pedersen, P., 2006. Soybean seed quality in 2006. IC-496 (5).
• Royo, C., Ramdani, A., Moragues, M., Villegas, D., 2006 Durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions as affected by seed size. J. Agron. & Crop Sci., 192: 257-266. Siddique, K.H.M., Loss, S.P., Regan, K.L., Jettner, R.I., 1999. Adaptation and seed yield of cool season grain legumes in Mediterranean continents of south-western Australia. Australian J. of Agric. Res., 50: 375-387.
• Singh, O., Paroda, R.S., 1986. Association analysis of grain yield and its components in chickpea following hybridization and a combination of hybridization and mutagenesis. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 56:139-141.
• Singh, K.B., Malhotra, R.S., Halila, M.H., Knights, E.J., Verma, M.M, 1994: Current status and future strategy in breeding chickpea for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Euphytica, 73: 137-149. Stougaard, R.N., Xue, Q., 2005. Quality versus quantity: spring wheat seed size and seeding rate effects on Avena fatua interference,economic returns and economic thresholds. European Weed Res. Soc. Weed Res., 45: 351-360.
• Şehirali, S. 1988. Yemeklik Dane Baklagiller. A.Ü.Z.F. Yayınları: 1089, Ankara. 360.
• Tawaha, A.M., Turk., M.A., 2004. Field pea seeding management for Semi-arid Mediterranean conditions. J. Agron. And Crop Sci., 190: 86-92.
• Turner, N., 2003. Increasing seed size in chickpeas. Science for Tomorrow Developments. Farming Ahead, CSIRO, No. 135: 50.
• Upadhyaya, H., Kumar, S., Gowda, C., Singh, S., 2006. Two major genes for seed size in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica, 147(3):311-315.
• Wang, J., Gan, Y.T., Clarke, F., McDonald, C. L., 2006. Response of chickpea yield to high temperature stress during reproductive development. Crop Sci., 46: 2171-2178.