Prevalence of Dermanyssus gallinae in Backyard Poultry Houses and Its Relation with Hen-house Conditions in Canakkale, Turkey

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 3, 520 - 527, 12.10.2021

Coşkun Konyalı , Türker Savaş

https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.981203

Cited By: 1

Öz

Poultry red mite (PRM) is most important ectoparasite of poultry due to its harmful effects. This study aims to determine the prevalence of PRM in small free range farms and backyards of poultry breeding and to reveal the correlation between the condition and location of hen-houses with the prevalence of PRM. Analyses were carried out between on August 25th – September 30th in a total of 10 districts and 124 villages in Çanakkale, Turkey. The districts and villages visited in the region were divided into 5 different locations based on their geographical structure and analyses were performed for these locations. In total, 355 coops were surveyed, and the presence of red mite and the conditions of poultry houses were recorded. It was found out that the infestation rate of red mite was 72.39% in the province of Çanakkale. According to location prevalence, the highest infestation rate was detected in Location 3 (81.25%) which is situated in the higher parts of the region. The study observed that the presence of perch, location, air conditioning, height and roof materials of the coops significantly affected the infestation rate (P < 0.05). The probability of incidence of mites was higher in the hen-houses higher than 0.60m and with better ventilation and perches. The lowest infestation rate was found in the coops with a galvanized roof, compared to those with the roofs made from tiles, woods or asbestos (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the findings highlighted that geographical and coop conditions should be considered as a point of control for red mites.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dermanyssus gallinae, poultry red mite, prevalence, Turkey, infestation, ectoparasite

Destekleyen Kurum

ÇOMÜ – BAP

Proje Numarası

FDK-2014-53

Çanakkale Yöresindeki Kümeslerde Kanatlı Kırmızı Akarı’nın Prevalansı ve Kümes Koşulları ile İlişkisi

Öz

Çalışma, 25 Ağustos-30 Eylül tarihleri arasında Çanakkale’ye bağlı 10 ilçe ve 124 köyde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ziyaret edilen ilçe ve köyler, bölgenin coğrafik yapısına göre 5 farklı lokasyona ayrılarak analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Toplam 355 kümes incelenmiş olup, kümeslerdeki Dermanyssus gallinae varlığı tespit edilmiş ve kümes koşullarına ilişkin bilgiler kayıt edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre Çanakkale geneline ait akar prevalansının %72.39 olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Lokasyonlar bazında en yüksek prevalansın %81.25 ile bölgenin dağlık-yüksek kesimine sahip Lokasyon 3’e ait olduğu görülmektedir. Ele alınan faktörlerden lokasyon, kümes içi havalandırma durumu, tünek varlığı, kümes yüksekliği ve çatı materyalinin akar prevalansı üzerinde istatistiksel olarak önemli etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir (P<0.05). İyi havalanan, tünek bulunan ve yüksekliği 0.60 m’den yüksek olan kümeslerde prevalansın daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca çatı malzemesi galvaniz saç olan kümeslerde kiremit, tahta ya da atermit olanlara kıyasla daha az akara rastlanmıştır (P<0.05). Parazit mücadelesine yönelik yapılan uygulamaların akar prevalansı üzerinde istatistiksel olarak önemli bir etkisinin olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak D.gallinae ile mücadelede bölgenin lokasyonu ve kümese bağlı faktörlerin de ele alınması gerektiği görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dermanyssus gallinae, kanatlı kırmızı akarı, prevalans, Türkiye, enfestasyon, dış parazit

Proje Numarası

FDK-2014-53

Kaynakça

• Abd El-Halim, A.S., Allam, K.A., Metwally, A.M., El Boraey, A.M., 2009. Seasonal variation of infestation rate with lice, tick and mite among rodents in certain Egyptian regions. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 2009; 39(2):617-24. PMID: 19795768.
• Aldemir, O.S., 2004. Ectoparasites in Chickens in the Province of Kars. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi 2004; 28 (3): 154-157.
• Arkle, S., Guy, J.H., Sparagano, O., 2006. Immunological effects and productivity variation of red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) on laying hens- implications for egg production and quality. World’s Poultry Science Journal 2006; 62 (2): 249-257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200594.
• Bakr, M.E., Morsy, T.A., Nassef, N.E., el Meligi, M.A., 1995. Mites infesting commensal rodents in Shebin El Kom, Menoufia G., Egypt. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 1995; 25(3):853-9. PMID: 8586878.
• Beugnet, F., Chauve, C., Gauthey, M., Beert, L., 1997. Resistance of the red poultry mite to pyrethroids in France. Veterinary Record 1997; 31;140 (22) :577-9. doi: 10.1136/vr.140.22.577. PMID: 9194299.
• Chauve, C., 1998. The poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778): current situation and future prospects for control. Veterinary Parasitology 1998; 16;79 (3) :239-45. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(98)00167-8. PMID: 9823064.
• Circella, E., Pugliese, N., Todisco, G., Cafiero, M.A., Sparagano, O.A., Camarda, A., 2011. Chlamydia psittaci infection in canaries heavily infested by Dermanyssus gallinae. Experimental and Applied Acarology 2011; 55(4):329-38. doi: 10.1007/s10493-011-9478-9. Epub 2011 Jul 15. PMID: 21761223.
• Duncan, S., 1957. Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778) attacking man. Journal of Parasitology 1957; 43:637.
• Escobar, C.M.A., Pérez-Lara, E., Garcíalópez, J.C., Arroyo-Ledezma, J., Sánchez-Bernal, E.I., 2014. Parasitic Mites in Backyard Turkeys In Oaxaca’s Coast, Mexico. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 2014; 12: 675 – 679.
• Fletcher, M.G., Axtell, R.C., 1991. Susceptibility of northern fowl mite, Ornithonyssus sylviarum (Acarina:Macronyssidae), and chicken mite, Dermanyssus gallinae (Acarina: Dermanyssidae) to selected acaricides. Experimental and Applied Acarology 1991; 13:137–142. doi:10.1007/BF01193664.
• Gıcık, Y., 1999. Ankara ve Çevresinde Yaban Güvercinlerde Ektoparazitler. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 1999; 5 (1): 71-74.
• Haag-Wackernagel, D., 2008. Gesundheitsgefährdungen durch die Straßentaube Columba livia: Parasiten. Amtstierärztlicher Dienst und Lebensmittelkontrolle 2008; 15:174-188.
• Hoffman, G.V., 1987. Vogelmilben als Lästlinge, Krankenheitsserzeuger und Vektoren bei Mensch und Nutztier. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 1987; 95: 7-10.
• Kaoud, H.A., El-Dashan, A.R., 2010. Effect of Red Mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) Infestation on the Performance and Immun Response in Broiler Breeder Flocks. Journal of American Science 2010; 6 (8) : 72-79.
• Keçeci, T., Handemir, E., Orhan, G., 2004. Dermanyssus gallinae infestasyonunun horozların bazı hematolojik değerleri ve canlı ağırlıkları üzerine etkisi. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi 2004; 28 (4) : 192 – 196.
• Kilpinen, O., Roepstorff, A., Permin, A., Nørgaard-Nielsen, G., Lawson, L.G., Simonsen, H.B., 2005. Influence of Dermanyssus gallinae and Ascaridia galli infections on behaviour and health of laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). British Poultry Science 2005; Feb;46 (1) :26-34. doi: 10.1080/00071660400023839. PMID: 15835249. Konyalı, C., Erdem, H., Eralp, E., Savaş, T., 2018. Inseparable Duo: Dermanyssus gallinae and Its Birds. Scientia Parasitologica 2018; 19: Special issue, 48-48.
• Lesna, I., Wolfs, P., Faraji, F., Roy, L., Komdeur, J. Sabelis, M.W., 2009. Candidate predators for biological control of the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae. Experimental and Applied Acarology 2009; 48 (1-2):63-80. doi: 10.1007/s10493-009-9239-1. Epub 2009 Jan 30. PMID: 19184469.
• Lubac, S., Dernburg, A., Bon, G., Chauve, C., Zenner, L., 2003. Problématique Et Pratiques D’élevages En Poules Pondeuses Dans Le Sud Est De La France Contre Les Nuisibles: Poux Rouges Et Mouches. In: ITAVI, INRA, AFSSA (eds) 5emes journées de la recherche avicole 2003; pp 101–104.
• Maurer, V., Baumgärtner, J., 1992. Temperature influence on life table statistics of the chicken mite Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 1992; 15(1):27-40. doi: 10.1007/BF01193965. PMID: 1511637.
• Maurer, V., Fösch, D.W., Baumgärtner, J., 1993. Untersuchung der Populationsdynamik der Roten Vogelmilbe im Hinblick auf die Entwicklung von nachaltigen Bekämpfungsmethoden. Landwirtschaft Schweitz 1993; 6:475-480.
• McGarry, J.W., Trees, A.J., 1991. Trap perches to assess the activity of pyrethrins against the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae in cage birds. Experimental and Applied Acarology 1991; 12(1-2):1-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01204395. PMID: 1748030.
• Nordenfors, H., Höglund, J., Uggla, A., 1999. Effects of temperature and humidity on oviposition, molting, and longevity of Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 1999; 36 (1) :68-72. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/36.1.68. PMID: 10071495.
• Nordenfors, H., Höglund, J., 2000. Long term dynamics of dermanyssus gallinae in relation to mite control measures in aviary systems for layers. British Poultry Science 2000; 41 (5):533-40. doi: 10.1080/713654991. PMID: 11201430. SAS lnstitute Inc., 2002. User's Guide. Version 6.07, Cary, NC, USA.
• Sikes, R.K., Chamberlain, R.W., 1954. Laboratory observations on three species of bird mites. Journal of Parasitology 1954; 40(6): 691-7. PMID: 13212549.
• Sparagano, O., Pavlićević, A., Murano, T., Camarda, A., Sahibi, H., Kilpinen, O., Mul, M., Van Emous, R., Bouquin, S., Hoel, K., Cafiero, M.A., 2009. Prevalence and key figures for the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae infections in poultry farm systems. Experimental and Applied Acarology 2009; 48 (1-2): 3-10. doi: 10.1007/s10493-008-9233-z. Epub 2009 Jan 22. PMID: 19160060.
• Sparagano, O.A., George, D.R., Harrington, D.W., Giangaspero, A., 2014. Significance and control of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae. Annual Review of Entomology 2014; 59:447-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162101. PMID: 24397522.
• Tucci, E.C., Prado, A.P., Araújo, R.P., 2008. Development of Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae) at different temperatures. Veterinary Parasitology 2008; 1;155(1-2):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.005.
• Yakhchali, M., Rasouli, S., Alborzi, E., 2013. Prevalence and body distribution of the poultry red mite in layer farms from Markazi province of Iran. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research 2013; 14 (1), 72-74. doi: 10.22099/ijvr.2013.1394