COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL SWAY AND PERCEIVED EXERTION LEVEL DURING DIFFERENT PUSH-UP EXERCISES

Abstract

In this study, to examine the rate of perceived exertion level in the extension and flexion position of the elbows in push-up applications with traditional and suspension device (TRX) by comparing them with mechanical sway. Twenty-eight female athletes (age: 20.89 ± 2.07 years; height: 166.34 ± 0.04 cm; body weight: 57.52 ± 6.29 kg) between the ages of 18 and 25, and 33 sedentary females (age:19.75 ± 2.04 years; height: 163.66 ± 0.05 cm; body weight: 54.97 ± 6.12 kg) participated in this study. A total of 71 volunteers participated in this study. For both push-ups, the elbows are weighted in the extension and flexion positions for 30 seconds. After the application, the position was evaluated with the modified rate of perceived exertion scale. A total of five accelerometers, including wrist, shoulder blade, and lumbar region, were used to detect mechanical sway. Both types of push-ups were compared in terms of rate of perceived exertion and mechanical sway. In the suspension device, the highest degree of perceived exertion level was felt in the elbow flexion position, while the greatest sway occurred. In the traditional push-up application, while the elbows felt the least perceived exertion level in the extension position, the least sway occurred. As a result of examining the relationship between the rate of perceived exertion level and mechanical sway, it has been determined that as the perceived exertion level increases, the mechanical sway also increases. Especially for beginners, the order of progression from easy to difficult can be recommended in the form of traditional push-up extension, traditional push-up flexion, suspension device push-up extension, and suspension device push-up flexion.

Keywords

• Push-up
• Suspension Device (TRX)
• Sway
• Perceived Exertion Level

FARKLI ŞINAV EGZERSİZLERİ SIRASINDA MEKANİK SALINIMLAR VE ALGILANAN ZORLUK DERECELERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Abstract

Bu çalışmada geleneksel ve fonksiyonel egzersiz kayışı (FEK) ile yapılan şınav uygulamalarında, dirseklerin ekstansiyon ve fleksiyon pozisyonunda algılanan zorluk derecesinin mekanik salınımlarla karşılaştırılarak incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya 18-25 yaş arasında 38 kadın sporcu (yaş: 20,89±2,07 yıl; boy: 166,34±0,04 cm; vücut ağırlığı: 57,52±6,29 kg), 33 kadın sedanter (yaş: 19,75±2,04 yıl; boy: 163,66±0,05 cm; vücut ağırlığı: 54,97±6,12 kg) olmak üzere toplam 71 gönüllü katılmıştır. Her iki şınav uygulamasında da dirsekler ekstansiyon ve fleksiyon pozisyonunda 30 sn. bekletilmiş, uygulama sonrası pozisyonla ilgili modifiye algılanan zorluk skalası ile değerlendirme yapılmıştır. Mekanik salınımın tespiti için el bileği, omuz kuşağı ve lumbar bölge olmak üzere toplam beş adet ivme ölçer kullanılmıştır. Her iki şınav türü algılanan zorluk düzeyleri ve mekanik salınım açısından karşılaştırılmıştır. Fonksiyonel egzersiz kayışında dirsekler fleksiyon pozisyonunda en yüksek zorluk derecesi hissedilirken en fazla salınım ortaya çıkmıştır. Geleneksel şınav uygulamasında ise, dirsekler ekstansiyon pozisyonunda en az zorluk hissedilirken en az salınım gerçekleşmiştir. Algılanan zorluk dereceleri ile mekanik salınım ilişkileri incelenmesi sonucunda, algılanan zorluk derecesi arttıkça mekanik salınımın arttığı tespit edilmiştir. Özellikle spora yeni başlayanlarda kolaydan zora ilerlemedeki sıralama geleneksel şınav ekstansiyon, geleneksel şınav fleksiyon, FEK şınav ekstansiyon ve FEK şınav fleksiyon uygulaması biçiminde önerilebilir.

Keywords

• Şınav
• Fonksiyonel Egzersiz Kayışı(TRX)
• Salınım
• Algılanan Zorluk Derecesi (AZD)

References

1. Arıkan, S. (2018). Geleneksel Şınav ve Fonksiyonel Egzersiz Kayışı Kullanarak Uygulanan Şınav Arasındaki Yüklerin Değerlendirilmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
2. Beach, T. A., Howarth, S. J., & Callaghan, J. P. (2008). Muscular contribution to low-back loading and stiffness during standard and suspended push-ups. Human Movement Science, 27(3), 457-472.
3. Behm, D., & Colado, J. C. (2012). The effectiveness of resistance training using unstable surfaces and devices for rehabilitation. International journal of sports physical therapy, 7(2), 226.
4. Bettendorf, B. (2010). TRX suspension training bodyweight exercises: scientific foundations and practical applications. San Francisco: Fitness Anywhere Inc.Borg, G. (1985). An İntroduction To Borg’s RPE-Scale.
5. Byrne, J. M., Bishop, N. S., Caines, A. M., Crane, K. A., Feaver, A. M., & Pearcey, G. E. (2014). Effect of using a suspension training system on muscle activation during the performance of a front plank exercise. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 28(11), 3049-3055.
6. Chen Lin Lee, Y. F. C. and Y. L. D. (2005). Comparing The Difference Between Front-Leg And Back - Leg Round-House Kicks Attacking Movement Abilities In Taekwondo, 877–880.
7. Gulmez, I. (2017). Effects Of Angle Variations In Suspension Push-Up Exercise. Journal Of Strength And Conditioning Research. Https://Doi.Org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001401
8. Jay Dawes, D. M. (2015). Resistance Characteristics Of The TRXTM Suspension Training System At Different Angles And Distances From The Hanging Point. Journal Of Athletic Enhancement. Https://Doi.Org/10.4172/2324-9080.1000184

9. Lee, D., Lee, Y., Cho, H. Y., Lee, K. B., Hong, S., Pyo, S., & Lee, G. (2017). Investigation Of Trunk Muscle Activity For Modified Plank Exercise: A Preliminary Study. Isokinetics And Exercise Science. Https://Doi.Org/10.3233/IES-171113
10. Maeo, S., Chou, T., Yamamoto, M., & Kanehisa, H. (2014). Muscular Activities During Sling- And Ground-Based Push-Up Exercise. BMC Research Notes, 7(1), 1–7. Https://Doi.Org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-192
11. Melrose, D., & Dawes, J. (2015). Resistance characteristics of the TRX™ suspension training system at different angles and distances from the hanging point. Journal of athletic enhancement, 4(1), 2-5.
12. Mok, N. W., Yeung, E. W., Cho, J. C., Hui, S. C., Liu, K. C., & Pang, C. H. (2015). Core Muscle Activity During Suspension Exercises. Journal Of Science And Medicine İn Sport. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jsams.2014.01.002
13. Poncumhak, P., Wiyanad, A., Siriyakul, C., Kosura, N., Amatachaya, P., & Amatachaya, S. (2022). Validity and feasibility of a seated push-up test to indicate skeletal muscle mass in well-functioning older adults. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 1-8.
14. Sudadi, S., Suhdy, M., & Supriyadi, M. (2022). Pengaruh Latıhan Push-Up Terhadap Kemampuan Pukulan Lurus Atlıt Porprov Pencak Sılat Kabupaten Musı Rawas Tahun 2021. Genta Mulia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 13(1).
15. Saragih, D. H., & Akhmad, I. (2021). Dıfferent Effect Of Declıne Push Up Exercıse Wıth Medıcıne Ball Throw Traınıng Towards Increasıng Arm Muscle Power In Muaythaı Athletes Sımalungun Regency. Journal Physical Health Recreation, 1(2), 71-82.
16. Schwartzkopf-Phifer, K., Leach, S., Whetstone, K., Brown, K., & Matsel, K. (2021). The Effect of a Novel Training Program to Improve Trunk Stability Push Up Performance in Active Females: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 16(5), 1345.
17. Snarr, R., & Esco, M. R. (2013). Push-Up With Knee Tuck Using A Suspension Device. Strength And Conditioning Journal, 35(2), 30–32. Https://Doi.Org/10.1519/SSC.0b013e318277660d
18. Snarr, R. L., & Esco, M. R. (2013). Electromyographic Comparison Of Traditional And Suspension Push-Ups. Journal Of Human Kinetics, 39(1), 75–83. Https://Doi.Org/10.2478/Hukin-2013-0070
19. Şenol, M., & Gülmez, İ. (2017). Fonksiyonel Egzersiz Bandı ( TRX ) V E Vücut Ağırlığı Kullanılarak Uygulanan Direnç Antrenmanlarının Yüzme Performansına Etkisi * Effects Of Functional Exercise Band ( TRX ) And Body Weight Resistance Training On Swimming Performance Abstract Giriş Yüzme , 62–75.
20. Zatsiorsky, V. M., Kraemer, W. J., & Fry, A. C. (2020). Science and practice of strength training. Human Kinetics.