Sporda Öz-Düzenlemeli Öğrenme Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Psikometrik Özellikleri ve Farklı Düzeydeki Sporcuların Öz-Düzenlemeli Öğrenme Becerilerin İncelenmesi

Abstract

Bu araştırma, Öz-Düzenlemeli Öğrenme Ölçeğinin Türk sporcular örnekleminde uyarlanması sürecini ve bu ölçeğin yapısal geçerliliğini ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma iki aşamalı bir yaklaşımla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Birinci aşamaya 210’u erkek 157’si kadın olmak üzere 367 kişi, ikinci araştırmaya ise 167’si erkek 115’i kadın olmak üzere toplam 282 kişi katılmıştır. Araştırmada ilk olarak ölçeğin uzmanlar tarafından çeviri süreci tamamlanmış ve ardından birinci bölümde verilerin analizinde, madde-toplam test korelasyonları, iç tutarlık katsayıları, birinci ve ikinci düzey doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve son olarak Pearson-Korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. İkinci bölümde ise gruplar arasındaki farklılığı ortaya koymak adına One-Way MANOVA analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar incelendiğinde, madde-toplam test korelasyon değerlerinin ,569 ile ,771 arasında iç tutarlık katsayı değerlerinin ise ,75 ile ,96 arasında olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ölçeğe ilişkin birinci ve ikinci düzey DFA analiz sonuçları incelendiğinde, değerler kabul edilebilir olarak bulunmuştur. Araştırmanın ikinci bölümünde, sporculuk düzeyinin bütünleşik etkide önemli olduğunu göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte öz düzenlemeli öğrenme alt boyutları sporculuk düzeyine göre incelenmiş ve sporculuk düzeyinin bu boyutlar üzerinde anlamlı bir farklılığa sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Profesyonel sporcular, amatör sporculara göre planlama, kontrol, değerlendirme, öz-yeterlik ve çaba gibi boyutlarda daha yüksek puanlar aldığı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma, öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme ölçeğinin Türk sporculara uygulanabilirliğini ve bu ölçeğin sporcuların performans düzeylerine göre öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme becerilerini ayırt edebilme kapasitesine ilişkin kanıtlar sağlanmıştır.

Keywords

• Öz-Düzenlemeli öğrenme
• Spor
• Profesyonel
• Amatör

Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Form of Self-Regulated Learning in Sports Scale and Examination of Self-Regulated Learning Skills of Athletes at Different Levels

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of adapting the Self-Regulated Learning Scale to Turkish athletes, and evaluating the structural validity and reliability of this scale. The research was conducted in two stages. A total of 367 participants, 210 of whom were male and 157 of whom were female, participated in the first stage. A total of 282 participants, 167 of whom were male and 115 of whom were female, participated in the second stage. In the research, first, the translation process of the scale was completed by experts, and then in the first part of the data analysis, item-total test correlations, internal consistency coefficients, first and second level confirmatory factor analysis, and finally Pearson Correlation analysis were used. In the second part, One-Way MANOVA analysis was used to reveal the differences between the groups. When the results were examined, it was found that the item-total test correlation values ranged from .569 to .771 and the internal consistency coefficients ranged from .75 to .96. When the results of the first and second level CFA analysis for the scale were examined, the values were found to be acceptable. In the second part of the study, it was shown that the level of athleticism had a significant integrated effect. However, the sub-dimensions of self-regulated learning were examined according to the level of athleticism, and it was determined that the level of athleticism had a significant difference on these dimensions. Professional athletes scored higher on dimensions such as planning, control, evaluation, self-efficacy, and effort compared to amateur athletes. In conclusion, this study provided evidence for the applicability of the Self-Regulated Learning Scale to Turkish athletes and the ability of this scale to distinguish self-regulated learning skills according to athletes' performance levels.

Keywords

• Self-Regulated learning
• Sports
• Professional
• Amateur

References

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Bartulovic, D., Young, B. W., & Baker, J. (2017). Self-regulated learning predicts skill group differences in developing athletes. Psychology of sport and Exercise, 31, 61-69.
3. Borsa, J. C., Damasio, B. F. & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: some considerations. Paide´ia (Ribeira˜o Preto), 22(53), 423- 432.
4. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of cross-cultural
5. Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Self-regulation differences during athletic practice by experts, non-experts, and novices. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13(2), 61–82. doi: 10.1080/104132001753149883
6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The 'what' and 'why' of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
7. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: theory and applications. Sage Publications.
8. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

9. Elbe, A. M., & Wikman, J. (2017). Psychological factors in developing high performance athletes, in Routledge Handbook of Talent Identification and Development in Sport, eds J. Baker, S. Cobley, and N. Wattie (London: Routledge), 236–252.
10. Ertmer, P., & Newby, T. (1996). The expert learner: strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instruct. Sci. 24, 1–24. doi: 10.1007/BF00156001
11. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003 066X.34.10.906
12. Fornell C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
13. Gledhill, A., Harwood, C., & Forsdyke, D. (2017). Psychosocial factors associated with talent development in football: A systematic review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 31, 93-112.
14. Hair J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. (5.th Ed). Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
15. Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for ımproving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1- 13.
16. Hanin, Y. L. (2000). Emotions in sport. Human Kinetics.
17. Jonker, L., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., & Visscher, C. (2010). Differences in self-regulatory skills among talented athletes: The significance of competitive level and type of sport. Journal of sports sciences, 28(8), 901-908.
18. Jonker, L., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., de Roos, I. M., & Visscher, C. (2012). The role of reflection in sport expertise. The Sport Psychologist, 26(2), 224-242.
19. Kitsantas, A., & Kavussanu, M. (2011). Acquisition of sport knowledge and skill. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman, D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulataion of learning and performance. New York and London, Routledge.
20. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th Edt.). Guilford Press.
21. Larsen, C., Alfermann, D., & Christensen, M. (2012). Psychosocial skills in a youth soccer academy: A holistic ecological perspective. Sport Sci. Rev. 11, 51–74. doi: 10.2478/v10237 012-0010-x
22. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
23. MacNamara, Á, Button, A., & Collins, D. (2010). The role of psychological characteristics in facilitating the pathway to elite performance Part 1: Identifying mental skills and behaviors. Sport Psychol. 24, 52–73. doi: 10.1080/ 03634520802237383.
24. McCardle, L., Webster, E. A., Haffey, A., & Hadwin, A. F. (2017). Examining students’ self-set goals for self-regulated learning: Goal properties and patterns. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2153-2169.
25. McCardle, L., Young, B. W., & Baker, J. (2018). Two-phase evaluation of the validity of a measure for self-regulated learning in sport practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2641.
26. Reverberi, E., Gozzoli, C., D’Angela, C., Lanz, M., & Sorgente, A. (2021). The self-regulation of learning – self-report scale for sport practice: Validation of an Italian version for football. Frontiers in Psychology. 12, 604852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604852
27. Siekanska M., Wilson S. G., Blecharz J., & Young B.W. (2023) Examining the validity of the polish short form version of the self-regulated learning—sport practice survey among competitive athletes. Front. Psychol. 14, 1132608. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132608
28. Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
29. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidel, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th Edt.). Pearson.
30. Tedesqui, R. A. B., McCardle, L., Bartulovic, D., & Young, B. W. (2018). Toward a more critical dialogue for enhancing self-report surveys in sport expertise and deliberate practice research. Movement and Sport Sciences–Science and Motricité 102, 5–18. doi: 10.1051/sm/2018027.
31. Tedesqui, R. A., & Young, B. W. (2015). Perspectives on active and inhibitive self-regulation relating to the deliberate practice activities of sport experts. Talent Development & Excellence, 7(1), 29-39.
32. Tezbaşaran, A. (1996). Likert Tipi Ölçek Hazırlama Kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
33. Toering, T., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Jordet, G., Pepping, G. J., & Visscher, C. (2012). Self-regulation of learning and performance level of elite youth soccer players. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 43(4), 312.
34. Toering, T., Elferink-Gemser, M., Jordet, G., Jorna, C., Pepping, G., & Visscher, C. (2011). Self-regulation of practice behavior among elite youth soccer players: an exploratory observation study. J. Appl. Sport Psychol, 23(1), 110–128. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2010.534544
35. Toering, T.T., Elferink-Gemser, M.T., Jordet, G., & Visscher, C. (2009). Self-regulation and performance level of elite and non-elite youth soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 1509-1517.
36. Van de Vijver, F., & Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: an overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 54(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004.
37. Wilson, S. G., Young, B. W., Hoar, S., & Baker, J. (2021). Further evidence for the validity of a survey for self-regulated learning in sport practice. Psychol. Sport & Exercise, 56, 101975. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101975
38. Wilson, S., Johnston, K., Young, B., & Baker, J. (2021). Self-regulated learning predicts final grades in varsity student-athletes, but is there more than meets the eye? J. Ex. Move Sport, (52)1. Available online at: https://www.scapps.org/jems/index.php/1/article/view/2645
39. Winne, P. H. (1995). Self-regulation is ubiquitous but its forms vary with knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 30, 223–228. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3004_9
40. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3): 329–39. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
41. Zimmerman, B. J., & M. Martinez-Pons. (1986). Development of a Structured Interview for Assessing Student use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4): 614–28. doi:10.3102/00028312023004614.
42. Zimmerman, B.J. (2006). Development and adaptation of expertise: The role of self-regulatory processes and beliefs. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 705-722). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Zimmerman, B.J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909.