Research Article

THE ACUTE EFFECTS OF ISOMETRIC PRECONDITIONING CONTRACTION ON JUMPING PERFORMANCE

Volume: 8 Number: 3 December 15, 2017
EN TR

THE ACUTE EFFECTS OF ISOMETRIC PRECONDITIONING CONTRACTION ON JUMPING PERFORMANCE

Abstract

Performance and response of a muscle group to voluntary or electrically induced contraction are positively or negatively affected by its contractile history. The performance of a muscle can decrease after continuous contractions under the exhaustive influence of contractile history or can increase after potentiation-induced a couple of maximal or close to maximal preconditioning contractions. The aim of this study was to investigate acute effects of preconditioning contraction during isometric leg press followed by a standard warm-up on squat and countermovement jump heights. Twenty (7 female, 13 male) sport sciences faculty students (age; 22.1±2.07 years, height; 173.5±8.7 cm, weight; 68.9±10.2 kg, body fat percentage; 16.5±5.84 %) participated in this study. Pretest-posttest study design was used in this study and subjects completed squat and countermovement jump test before and after preconditioning contraction. Preconditioning contraction was performed on a seated leg press machine (knee flexion 135o) maximal isometric voluntary contraction for 5 s. Preconditioning contraction was performed with 3 maximal repetitions and 90 s rest intervals, after this 3 maximum repetitions 8 min passive recovery was given and then jump tests were performed. A paired sample T-test was used to determine differences between pretest and posttest values of squat and countermovement jump. Statistical analysis showed that no statistically significant differences between pre and post test for squat (p=0.13) and countermovement jump (P=0.83). According to the results, there are no differences between squat and countermovement jumping heights measured before preconditioning contraction and 8 min after preconditioning contraction. As a result of the preconditioning contraction applied in this research, acute increase was not found in squat and countermovement jumping performances. According to these results, it was concluded that this preconditioning contraction protocol did not increase jumping performance. 

Keywords

References

  1. Bishop D. Warm up I: Potential mechanisms and the effects of passive warm up on exercise performance. Sports Medicine, 2003a; 33(6): 439-54.
  2. Sale D. Postactivation potentiation: Role in human performance. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 2002; 30(3): 138-143.
  3. Hodgson M, Docherty D, Robbins D. Post-activation potentiation: Underlying physiology and implications for motor performance. Sports Medicine, 2005; 35(7): 585-595.
  4. Robbins DW. Postactivation potentiation and its practical applicability: A brief review. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2005; 19(2): 453-458.
  5. Kilduff LP, Bevan HR, Kingsley MI, Owen NJ, Bennett MA, Bunce PJ, et al. Postactivation potentiation in professional rugby players: Optimal recovery. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2007; 21(4): 1134-1138.
  6. Kilduff LP, Owen N, Bevan H, Bennett M, Kingsley MI, Cunningham D. Influence of recovery time on post-activation potentiation in professional rugby players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2008; 26(8): 795-802.
  7. Güllich A, Schmidtbleicher D. MVC-induced short-term potentiation of explosive force. New Studies in Athletics, 1996; 11(4): 67-81.
  8. Rassier DE, Macintosh BR. Coexistence of potentiation and fatigue in skeletal muscle. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2000; 33(5): 499-508.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Celil Kaçoğlu
ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Uğur Yıldırım
ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 15, 2017

Submission Date

December 28, 2016

Acceptance Date

December 13, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 8 Number: 3

APA
Kaçoğlu, C., & Yıldırım, U. (2017). İZOMETRİK ÖNKONDİSYONLANMA KONTRAKSİYONUNUN SIÇRAMA PERFORMANSINA AKUT ETKİLERİ. Spor Ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(3), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.281754
AMA
1.Kaçoğlu C, Yıldırım U. İZOMETRİK ÖNKONDİSYONLANMA KONTRAKSİYONUNUN SIÇRAMA PERFORMANSINA AKUT ETKİLERİ. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2017;8(3):183-194. doi:10.17155/omuspd.281754
Chicago
Kaçoğlu, Celil, and Uğur Yıldırım. 2017. “İZOMETRİK ÖNKONDİSYONLANMA KONTRAKSİYONUNUN SIÇRAMA PERFORMANSINA AKUT ETKİLERİ”. Spor Ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi 8 (3): 183-94. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.281754.
EndNote
Kaçoğlu C, Yıldırım U (December 1, 2017) İZOMETRİK ÖNKONDİSYONLANMA KONTRAKSİYONUNUN SIÇRAMA PERFORMANSINA AKUT ETKİLERİ. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi 8 3 183–194.
IEEE
[1]C. Kaçoğlu and U. Yıldırım, “İZOMETRİK ÖNKONDİSYONLANMA KONTRAKSİYONUNUN SIÇRAMA PERFORMANSINA AKUT ETKİLERİ”, Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 183–194, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.17155/omuspd.281754.
ISNAD
Kaçoğlu, Celil - Yıldırım, Uğur. “İZOMETRİK ÖNKONDİSYONLANMA KONTRAKSİYONUNUN SIÇRAMA PERFORMANSINA AKUT ETKİLERİ”. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi 8/3 (December 1, 2017): 183-194. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.281754.
JAMA
1.Kaçoğlu C, Yıldırım U. İZOMETRİK ÖNKONDİSYONLANMA KONTRAKSİYONUNUN SIÇRAMA PERFORMANSINA AKUT ETKİLERİ. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2017;8:183–194.
MLA
Kaçoğlu, Celil, and Uğur Yıldırım. “İZOMETRİK ÖNKONDİSYONLANMA KONTRAKSİYONUNUN SIÇRAMA PERFORMANSINA AKUT ETKİLERİ”. Spor Ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 3, Dec. 2017, pp. 183-94, doi:10.17155/omuspd.281754.
Vancouver
1.Celil Kaçoğlu, Uğur Yıldırım. İZOMETRİK ÖNKONDİSYONLANMA KONTRAKSİYONUNUN SIÇRAMA PERFORMANSINA AKUT ETKİLERİ. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2017 Dec. 1;8(3):183-94. doi:10.17155/omuspd.281754

Cited By