17 VE 19 YAŞ ALTI KADIN MİLLİ BADMİNTON OYUNCULARININ MÜSABAKA SIRASINDA YAPTIKLARI BASİT HATALARIN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2019, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 123 - 130, 19.08.2019

Beyhan Özgür

https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.457023

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışmada 17 ve 19 yaş grubu kadın
milli badminton oyuncularının maç ortamında yaptıkları basit hataların
karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Araştırmaya, U19 kategorisinden 6 (yaş 17,17±0,40)
ve U17 kategorisinden 15 (yaş 15,53±0,51) kadın milli badmintoncu gönüllü
olarak katılmıştır. Basit hata analizi için U19 kategorisinde 9 tek kadın maçı
ve U17 kategorisinde 20 tek kadın maçı değerlendirilmiştir. Basit hatalar, TH (toplamda
yapılan basit hata), KTS (kaybedilen toplam sayı), BKTSY (basit hataların
kaybedilen toplam sayıdaki yüzdesi), HÖK (hata ön kort), HOK (hata orta kort),
HAK (hata arka kort), HAÖK (hata aut ön kort), HAOK (hata aut orta kort), HAAK
(hata aut arka kort), TAH (toplam aut hatası), HFÖK (hata file ön kort), HFOK
(hata file orta kort), HFAK (hata file arka kort), TFH (Toplam File Hatası)
olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler SPSS 22 paket programına aktarılmış ve
tanımlayıcı istatistikleri için minimum, maksimum, ortalama ve standart sapma
değerlerihesaplanmıştır. Kategoriler arası
ve kazanan-kazanamayan sporcular arası farkın analizi için Mann
Whitney U testi kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak,
U19 kategorisinde kazanan ve kazanamayan sporcuların KTS değerleri arasında
anlamlı fark bulunurken (p<0,05), U17 kategorisinde kazanan ve kazanamayan
sporcuların KTS(p<0,01), TH, TFH ve HOK değerleri
arasında anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p<0,05). 

Keywords

Badminton, basit hata, müsabaka

COMPARISON OF UNFORCED ERRORS DURING COMPETITION OF U17 AND U19 FEMALE NATIONAL BADMINTON PLAYERS'

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to
compare the unforced errors of the U17 and U19 female national badminton
players during competition. 6 female badminton players from the U19 category
(age 17.17±0.40) and 15 female badminton players from the U17 category (age
15.53±0.51) participated in the study voluntarily. Forunforcederroranalysis, 9
women’s single matches in the U19 category and 20 women’s single matches in the
U17 category were evaluated. Unforced errors were analysed as TE (error in
total), TPL (total pointlost), ETLPP (unforced error percentage of the total
number lost),  EFC (error in front court), EMC (error in mid court), EBC
(error in back court), AEFC
(out error in front court), AEMC (out error in mid court), AEBC (out error in
back court), TAE (out error in total), NEFC ( net error in front court), NEMC (net error in
mid court), NEBC (net error in back court), TNE (net error in total). The
obtained data were transferred to the SPSS 22 package program. Mean and
standard deviation values for the descriptive statistics were calculated.Mann Whitney U test was used to analyse the
difference between the categories and the winner and the loser. As a result,
there was a significant difference between the TPL (p<0.01), TE, TNE and EMC values of the
winner and loser athletes in the U17 category (p<0.05), while there was a
significant difference between the TPL values of the winners and losers in the
U19 category (p<0.05).

Keywords

Badminton, competition, unforced error

References

• 1. Loi YK, Kassim M. Malaysia’s badminton top men’s singles player performance analysis.Zulfaqar International Journal of DefenceScience, Engineering&Technology, 2014;1:33-42.
• 2. Badminton World Federation. BWF coaches’ manual level 1. Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia: Badminton World Federation; 2011.
• 3. Chen HL, Wu CJ, Chen TC. Physiological and notational comparison of new and old scoring systems of singles matches in men's badminton.Asian Journal of Physical Education & Recreation, 2011; 17(1): 6-17.
• 4. CümşütoğluMemedov R, Kale R.Uçantüytop badminton. İstanbul: BaşakOfset; 1994.
• 5. Butterworth DA, Turner JD, Johnstone AJ. Coaches’ perceptions of the potential use of performance analysis in badminton. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 2012; 12(2): 452-467.Doi: 10.1080/24748668.2012.11868610.
• 6. BankoszZ, Nawara H, Ociepa M. Assessment of simple reaction time in badminton players. Trends Sports Sci, 2013; 20: 54-61.
• 7. Poyraz A, Baş O, Ocak Y, Yıldırım İ, Tortop Y. Avrupa badminton takım şampiyonasına katılan sporcuların bazı fiziksel ve fizyolojik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2015; 6 (2): 121-133.
• 8. Chiminazzo JGC, Barreira J, Luz LSM, Saraiva WC, Cayres JT. Technical and timing characteristics of badminton men’s single: comparison between groups and play-offs stages in 2016 Rio Olympic Games. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 2018;18(2):245-254.Doi: 10.1080/24748668.2018.1463785.
• 9. Cabello D, Padial P, Lees A, Rivas F. Temporal and physiological characteristics of elite womens and mens singles badminton. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences, 2004; 16: 1-12.
• 10. Abdullahi Y, Coetzee B. Notational singles match analysis of male badminton players who participated in the African Badminton Championships. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 2017; 17 (1-2): 1-16.Doi:10.1080/24748668.2017.1303955.
• 11. Salman MH, Salman S. Badmintonda oyun kazandıran vuruşların bölgesel dağılımı ve çeşitliliğinin cinsiyet faktörü açısından karşılaştırılması, In: Taşkıran Y, Sertbaş K, Atalı L, Demirdizen A, Gönener A, 2. Raket sporları sempozyumu, editörler. Kocaeli: 2005.
• 12. Gao RY. (2007).A comparison between Talent Identification and Development (TID) for badminton in China and the UK.Master of Philosophy, The University of Stirling, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport.
• 13. Abian-Vicen J, Castanedo A, Abian P, Sampedro J. Temporal and notational comparison of badminton matches between men’s singles and womenʹs singles. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 2013; 13 (2): 310-320.Doi: 10.1080/24748668.2013.11868650.
• 14. Laffaye G,Phomsoupha M, Dor F.Changes in thegamecharacteristics of a badminton match: a longitudinalstudythroughtheOlympicgamefinalsanalysis in men’ssingles. J Sports Sci Med, 2015;14(3):584–590.
• 15. Yadav SK, Shukla YM. Analysis of unforced errors in relation to performance in singles in badminton. International Journal of Physical Education, 2011;4(2):117-119.
• 16. Cabello Manrique D, Gonzalez Badillo JJ. Analysis of the characteristics of competitive badminton. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2003; 37(1): 62-66.
• 17. Abian P, Castanedo A, Feng XQ, Abian-Vicen J. Notational comparison of men’s singles badminton matches between Olympic Games in Beijing and London. Int J Perform Anal Sport, 2014; 14 (1): 42-53.Doi: 10.1080/24748668.2014.11868701.
• 18. Larsen K. Badminton Europe coacheducationlevel 3. Denmark: Broendby, 2006.
• 19. Tong YM, Hong Y. The playing pattern of the world’s top single badminton players in competition-a notation analysis. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 2000; 38: 185-200.