The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams

Sezer Ayaz; Belkıs Özkara

EN TR

The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams

Abstract

Open innovation has been studied in many different sample groups and cultures. However, relationship between open innovation attitude and open innovation generating capacity on open innovation teams is investigated for the first time in Turkey. The data were obtained through a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, independent samples t-test, simple linear regression analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were used to analyze data. In consequence of analysis and tests, significant differences were found as to demographic characteristics of respondents belonging to different groups. In result of correlation analysis, no significant relationship was found between open innovation attitude and open innovation generation capacity at the p <.01 level. The regression analysis showed that there is no significant predictor at p <.05 level between open innovation attitude and open innovation generation capacity. The results can be used in businesses to create new innovation strategies and for academicians to new researches on this subject.

Keywords

Open innovation, attitude, innovation generation capacity

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50. 179-211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 84:888-918
Arnold, J., Cooper, C. L., & Robertson, I. T. (1991). Work psychology. Understanding human behaviour in the workplace. Pitman, London
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analiz el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akedemi Yayıncılık.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (17. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Yayınları
Chae, B., Li, X. & Zhu, R. (2013). Judging product effectiveness from perceived spatial proximity. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 317-335.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). The Era of Open Innovation, MIT sloan Management Rewiew, Vol. 44, Issue 3, 35-41.
Chesbrough, H. W. & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open Innovation and Strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57–76.
Coulter, K. S. & Norberg, P. A. (2009). The effects of physical distance between regular and sale prices on numerical difference perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(2), 144-157.

Davidson, A. R., Jaccard, J. J. (1979). Variables that moderate the attitude-behavior relation: Results of a longitudinal survey. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1 364-76
Dodgson, M. Gann, D. & Salter, A. (2006).The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: The case of Procter and Gamble. Research and Development Management, 36, 333–346.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Gabrenya, W. K., Arkin, R. M. (1979). The effect of commitment on expectancy value and expectancy weight in social decision making. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 5:86-90
Gassmann, O (2006). Opening up the innovation process: Towards an agenda. RandD Management, 36, 223–228.
Huang, F., Rice, J. (2009). The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating “open innovation” outcomes: a study of australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Innovation Management Vol. 13, No. 2 pp. 201–220.
JISC (2009). Facilitating Open Innovation: Landscape and Feasiblity Study, JISC Business and Community Engagement Programme, October.
Karasar, N. (2004). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (13. Ed.). Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
King, B. T., Janis, 1. L. (1956). Comparison of the effectiveness of improvised versus non-improvised role-playing in producing opinion changes. Hum. Relat. 9: 1 77-86
Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Newyork: The Guilford Press, 3.Baskı.
Lichtenthaler, U. (2006). Technology exploitation strategies in the context of open innovation. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2(1), 1–21.
Morris, M., Bessant, J., & Barnes, J. (2006). Using learning networks to enable industrial development: Case studies from South Africa. International Journal of Operations & Production Management.
Nisbett, R. E., Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ovacı, C. (2015). Açık İnovasyon ve Tüketicilerin Birlikte Yaratma Davranışlarını Etkileyen Faktörler. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Eskişehir.
Penrose, E.G. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York:Wiley.
Powell, R. (1991). Absolute and relative gains in international relations, American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1303–1320.
Prajogo, D., Ahmed, P. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management. 36. 10.1111/j.1467 9310.2006.00450.x.
Seltzer, E., Mahmoudi, D. (2013). Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: Challenges and opportunities for planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), 3-18.
Sieg, J. H., Wallin, M. W. & Von Krogh, G. (2010). Managerial challenges in open innovation: a study of innovation intermediation in the chemical industry. Research and Development Management, 40(3), 281-291.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper. NY.
Schwartz, S. H. (1978). Temporal instability as a moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 36: 715-24
Stone, J., Cooper, J. (2003). The effect of self-attribute relevance on how selfesteem moderates attitude change in dissonance processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 508-515.
Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 249-288.
Thomas, M., Tsai, C. I. (2012). Psychological distance and subjective experience: How distancing reduces the feeling of difficulty. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 324-340.
Ural, A., Kılıç, İ. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
West, J., Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. Research and Development Management, 36, 319–331.
Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus action: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. J. Soc. Issues 25:41-78
Vrande, V. V. D., Jong, J. P. J. D., Vanhaverbeke, W. & Rochemont, M. D. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, Volume 29, Issues 6–7, 423-437.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Sezer Ayaz ^*
0000-0002-6374-8652
Türkiye

Belkıs Özkara
0000-0002-4324-9741
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 1, 2022

Submission Date

February 9, 2022

Acceptance Date

March 10, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 9 Number: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA34AD49DA

APA

Ayaz, S., & Özkara, B. (2022). The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams. Optimum Ekonomi Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 153-173. https://izlik.org/JA34AD49DA

AMA

1.Ayaz S, Özkara B. The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams. OJEMS. 2022;9(2):153-173. https://izlik.org/JA34AD49DA

Chicago

Ayaz, Sezer, and Belkıs Özkara. 2022. “The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams”. Optimum Ekonomi Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 9 (2): 153-73. https://izlik.org/JA34AD49DA.

EndNote

Ayaz S, Özkara B (July 1, 2022) The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 9 2 153–173.

IEEE

[1]S. Ayaz and B. Özkara, “The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams”, OJEMS, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 153–173, July 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA34AD49DA

ISNAD

Ayaz, Sezer - Özkara, Belkıs. “The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams”. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 9/2 (July 1, 2022): 153-173. https://izlik.org/JA34AD49DA.

JAMA

1.Ayaz S, Özkara B. The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams. OJEMS. 2022;9:153–173.

MLA

Ayaz, Sezer, and Belkıs Özkara. “The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams”. Optimum Ekonomi Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 2, July 2022, pp. 153-7, https://izlik.org/JA34AD49DA.

Vancouver

1.Sezer Ayaz, Belkıs Özkara. The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams. OJEMS [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 1;9(2):153-7. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA34AD49DA

Please click for the statistics of Google Scholar.

The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams

The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams

Abstract

Keywords

Açık İnovasyon Takımlarında Tutumun İnovasyon Üretme Üzerindeki Etkisi

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

IZ

Cite