Secondary education students’, guidance teachers’ and classroom guidance teachers’ opinions related to active learning

Volume: 3 Number: 4 July 23, 2016
Mukadder Büyükeskil , Şahin Kesici
EN TR

Secondary education students’, guidance teachers’ and classroom guidance teachers’ opinions related to active learning

Abstract

In today’s world where knowledge and technological developmentes move speedily active learning is becoming increasingly important. Active learning is a learning in which active participation of students is provided taking place in the center of learning, teachers guide in learning process and students have learning responsibility. Providing development opportunity in individual and social fields as well as educational fields for students increased importance of active learning more and more. Students learning actively are individuals that have some skills such as critical thinking, creative thinking, problem solving skills, that are self-confident, self-expressive and able to establish interpersonal relations, learn how to learn and that gained effective working habits. In this research, it’s aimed to determine secondary education students’, guidance teachers’ and classroom guidance teachers’ opinions related to active learning. Research was performed by using qualitative research technique. In gathering date in research, semistructured interview technique was used as data acquisition method. Working group of research was constituted by 50 people in total that consists of guidance teachers and classroom guidance teachers working in different secondary education schools connected to Konya Directorate of National Education and also students educated in these institutions. Obtained data were coded into Nvivo2, then themes and categories related to themes were constituted. Findings obtained at the end of research were discussed and proposals related to results were developed.

Keywords

Active learning, secondary education guidance teachers, classroom guidance teachers’

References

  1. Açıkgöz, K.Ü. (2002). Aktif Öğrenme. İzmir: Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları.
  2. Açıkgöz, K.Ü., Sucuoğlu, H. ve Gökdağ, M. (2002). “Öğretmenlerin Etkin Öğrenmenin Acemilik Döneminde Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar ve Baş Etme Stratejileri”. Uluslararası Katılımlı 2000’li Yıllarda I. Öğrenme ve Öğretme Sempozyumu.
  3. Akos, P. (2002). Student perceptions of the transition from elementary to middle school. Professional School Counseling, 5 (5), 339-345.
  4. Arends, R.I. (1997). Classroom instruction and management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Atmaca, S. (2006). “Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Etkin Öğrenme Yaklaşımı Konusundaki Bilgi ve Becerilerinin Değerlendirilmesi” Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  6. Ay, Ş. (2005). “Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin eleştirel düşünme güçleri ve öğrencileri etkileyen eleştirel düşünme faktörleri” Doktora Tezi. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  7. Ayan, M. (2002). “Etkin Öğrenme Yaklaşımının Sınıf Öğretmenleri Tarafından Uygulanması” Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  8. Aytunga, O. (1999). “Derste Not Almanın Öğrenme Ve Hatırlama Düzeyine Etkisi” Doktora Tezi. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  9. Baltaş, A. (1997). Stres Altında Ezilmeden Öğrenmede ve Sınavlarda Üstün Başarı. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  10. Bilen, M. (2002). Plandan Uygulamaya Öğretim. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
APA
Büyükeskil, M., & Kesici, Ş. (2016). Secondary education students’, guidance teachers’ and classroom guidance teachers’ opinions related to active learning. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 3(4), 92-136. https://izlik.org/JA39KE63JE
AMA
1.Büyükeskil M, Kesici Ş. Secondary education students’, guidance teachers’ and classroom guidance teachers’ opinions related to active learning. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches. 2016;3(4):92-136. https://izlik.org/JA39KE63JE
Chicago
Büyükeskil, Mukadder, and Şahin Kesici. 2016. “Secondary Education Students’, Guidance Teachers’ and Classroom Guidance Teachers’ Opinions Related to Active Learning”. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches 3 (4): 92-136. https://izlik.org/JA39KE63JE.
EndNote
Büyükeskil M, Kesici Ş (July 1, 2016) Secondary education students’, guidance teachers’ and classroom guidance teachers’ opinions related to active learning. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches 3 4 92–136.
IEEE
[1]M. Büyükeskil and Ş. Kesici, “Secondary education students’, guidance teachers’ and classroom guidance teachers’ opinions related to active learning”, OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 92–136, July 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA39KE63JE
ISNAD
Büyükeskil, Mukadder - Kesici, Şahin. “Secondary Education Students’, Guidance Teachers’ and Classroom Guidance Teachers’ Opinions Related to Active Learning”. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches 3/4 (July 1, 2016): 92-136. https://izlik.org/JA39KE63JE.
JAMA
1.Büyükeskil M, Kesici Ş. Secondary education students’, guidance teachers’ and classroom guidance teachers’ opinions related to active learning. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches. 2016;3:92–136.
MLA
Büyükeskil, Mukadder, and Şahin Kesici. “Secondary Education Students’, Guidance Teachers’ and Classroom Guidance Teachers’ Opinions Related to Active Learning”. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, vol. 3, no. 4, July 2016, pp. 92-136, https://izlik.org/JA39KE63JE.
Vancouver
1.Mukadder Büyükeskil, Şahin Kesici. Secondary education students’, guidance teachers’ and classroom guidance teachers’ opinions related to active learning. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches [Internet]. 2016 Jul. 1;3(4):92-136. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA39KE63JE