Review

Can We Still Talk About ‘Asian’ HRM Practices? An Exploratory Analysis of HRM Practices in Different Asian Countries

Volume: 10 Number: 17 March 31, 2019
EN TR

Can We Still Talk About ‘Asian’ HRM Practices? An Exploratory Analysis of HRM Practices in Different Asian Countries

Abstract

This is a study about HRM practices of Asian countries. Asian HRM has been of interest to researchers. Several studies focused on different dimensions of HRM practices in different countries located in Asia. An important point to highlight while reviewing these studies is that the region of Asia should not be considered to be the sum of countries sharing same or similar characteristics. Every country has its own historical story and contextual settings. This suggests the necessity to consider different backgrounds of Asian countries in analysing HRM practices of these countries rather than assuming that they follow similar HRM trends. Aiming to understand in what aspects Asian countries’ HRM systems differ from each other and what the underpinning reasons are for these differences, the paper explores the traditional and changing pattern in HRM practices of China, Japan, Taiwan, Thailand, and Korea. It is seen that changing conditions (disruptive development in technology, economic reforms, Asian financial crisis, social and cultural elements of a national state) have a substantial influence on HRM practices of Asian countries and result in the transformation of these practices in time. Nevertheless, each country’s response to the macro changes has been different. Given this, the paper suggests that although countries may go through the same macro changes, rather than a convergence pattern in their HRM practices, countries preserve their nation-specific characteristics in shaping the HRM practices. 

Keywords

Asian HRM,HRM practices,Employment,China,Japan,Taiwan,Thailand,Korea

References

  1. Bae, J. (1997). Beyond seniority-based systems: A Paradigm shift in Korean HRM? Asia Pacific Business Review, 3(4), 82-110.
  2. Bae, J. (2011). Self-fulfilling process at a global level: The evolution of HRM practices in Korea 1987- 2007. Management Learning, 1, 1-29.
  3. Bae, J., & Lawler, J. (2000). Organizational and HRM strategies in Korea: Impact on firm performance in an emerging economy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 502–17.
  4. Bae, J., & Rowley, C. (2001). The impact of globalization on HRM: The case of South Korea. Journal of World Business, 36, 402–28.
  5. Bae, J., & Rowley, C. (2004). Human resource management in South Korea after the Asian financial crisis: Emerging patterns from the labyrinth. International Studies of Management & Organization, 34(1), 52-82.
  6. Bae, J., & Yu, G. C. (2005). HRM Configurations in Korean venture firms: Resource availability, institutional force and strategic choice. International Journal of Human Resources Management, 16(9), 1759-1782.
  7. Bae, J., Chen, S., Wan, T., Lawler, J. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2003). Human resource strategy and firm performance in pacific rim countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(8), 1308-1332.
  8. Benson, J., & Debroux, P. (2003). Flexible labor markets and individualized employment: The beginnings of a new Japanese HRM system? Asia Pacific Business Review , 9(4), 55-75.
  9. Budhwar P. S, & Sparrow, P. R. (2002). An integrative framework for understanding cross-national human resource management practices. Human Resource Management Review,12(3), 377–403.
  10. Budhwar, P. S. (2004). HRM in the Asia-Pacific context. In Budhwar, P. S. (ed.), Managing Human Resources in Asia-Pacific, London: Routledge, 1-16.
APA
Taşlı, V. (2019). Can We Still Talk About ‘Asian’ HRM Practices? An Exploratory Analysis of HRM Practices in Different Asian Countries. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 10(17), 1853-1874. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.479399