Can We Still Talk About ‘Asian’ HRM Practices? An Exploratory Analysis of HRM Practices in Different Asian Countries
Abstract
This is a study about HRM practices of Asian
countries. Asian HRM has been of interest to researchers. Several studies
focused on different dimensions of HRM practices in different countries located
in Asia. An important point to highlight while reviewing these studies is that
the region of Asia should not be considered to be the sum of countries sharing
same or similar characteristics. Every country has its own historical story and
contextual settings. This suggests the necessity to consider different backgrounds
of Asian countries in analysing HRM practices of these countries rather than
assuming that they follow similar HRM trends. Aiming to understand in what
aspects Asian countries’ HRM systems differ from each other and what the
underpinning reasons are for these differences, the paper explores the
traditional and changing pattern in HRM practices of China, Japan, Taiwan,
Thailand, and Korea. It is seen that changing conditions (disruptive
development in technology, economic reforms, Asian financial crisis, social and
cultural elements of a national state) have a substantial influence on HRM
practices of Asian countries and result in the transformation of these
practices in time. Nevertheless, each country’s response to the macro changes
has been different. Given this, the paper suggests that although countries may
go through the same macro changes, rather than a convergence pattern in their
HRM practices, countries preserve their nation-specific characteristics in
shaping the HRM practices.
Keywords
Asian HRM,HRM practices,Employment,China,Japan,Taiwan,Thailand,Korea
References
- Bae, J. (1997). Beyond seniority-based systems: A Paradigm shift in Korean HRM? Asia Pacific Business Review, 3(4), 82-110.
- Bae, J. (2011). Self-fulfilling process at a global level: The evolution of HRM practices in Korea 1987- 2007. Management Learning, 1, 1-29.
- Bae, J., & Lawler, J. (2000). Organizational and HRM strategies in Korea: Impact on firm performance in an emerging economy. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 502–17.
- Bae, J., & Rowley, C. (2001). The impact of globalization on HRM: The case of South Korea. Journal of World Business, 36, 402–28.
- Bae, J., & Rowley, C. (2004). Human resource management in South Korea after the Asian financial crisis: Emerging patterns from the labyrinth. International Studies of Management & Organization, 34(1), 52-82.
- Bae, J., & Yu, G. C. (2005). HRM Configurations in Korean venture firms: Resource availability, institutional force and strategic choice. International Journal of Human Resources Management, 16(9), 1759-1782.
- Bae, J., Chen, S., Wan, T., Lawler, J. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2003). Human resource strategy and firm performance in pacific rim countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(8), 1308-1332.
- Benson, J., & Debroux, P. (2003). Flexible labor markets and individualized employment: The beginnings of a new Japanese HRM system? Asia Pacific Business Review , 9(4), 55-75.
- Budhwar P. S, & Sparrow, P. R. (2002). An integrative framework for understanding cross-national human resource management practices. Human Resource Management Review,12(3), 377–403.
- Budhwar, P. S. (2004). HRM in the Asia-Pacific context. In Budhwar, P. S. (ed.), Managing Human Resources in Asia-Pacific, London: Routledge, 1-16.