Research Article

Effect of Voters’ Demographic Profiles, Political Participation and Commitment Levels on Political Promotion Mix Elements: Case of Adana

Volume: 10 Number: 17 March 31, 2019
EN TR

Effect of Voters’ Demographic Profiles, Political Participation and Commitment Levels on Political Promotion Mix Elements: Case of Adana

Abstract

Political parties and candidates intensively use political promotion activities to reach voters during election campaigns. They develop relationships with the voters via campaigns to influence their voting behavior. It is important to measure influence of campaign activities on voters’ behavior in order to organize election campaigns for the next elections. This study aims therefore at determining influence levels of campaign activities involving political promotion mix elements and discussing whether such levels differ in terms of demographic characteristics, political participation levels and commitment levels of voters in Adana. Pursing this aim, a field research was organized and conducted in Adana analyzing June 7, 2015 parliamentary elections. Six hypotheses, which were developed in relation to level of being influenced by political promotion mix elements in line with the purpose of research, were tested. Significant differences were observed between demographic characteristics of voters (age, marital status and education level) and their levels of being influenced by political promotion. Moreover, there is significant difference between political participation level of voters and their levels of being influenced by political promotion. Significant difference is also found between commitment level of voters and the levels of being influenced by political promotion. However, no significant difference was observed between gender of voters and their levels of being influenced by political promotion. In conclusion, study results present that voters are influenced from all activities involving political promotion mix elements at different levels.

Keywords

Political Marketing,Political Promotion Mix,Electoral Campaigns

References

  1. Akgül, A. and Çelik, O. (2003). İstatistiksel analiz teknikleri: SPSS’te işletme yönetimi uygulamaları. Ankara: Emek Ofset Ltd.
  2. Bongrad, M. (1992). Politikada pazarlama (Trans. Fatoş Ersoy). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  3. Bowler, S. and Farrel, D. M. (2011). Electoral institutions and campaigning in comparative perspective: Electioneering in european parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research 50, 668–688.
  4. Budak, G. and Budak, G. (2014). İmaj mühendisliği vizyonundan halkla ilişkiler. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık.
  5. Çatlı, A. (2011). Politik pazarlamada tutundurma faaliyetlerinin üniversite öğrencileri tarafından algılanışı. M.A. Dissertation, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  6. Demirtaş, M. C. (2010). Seçmen tercihlerinin siyasal pazarlama karması açısından analizi: İzmir İlinde bir uygulama. M.A. Dissertation, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
  7. Demirtaş, M. C. and Orçun, Ç. (2015). Siyasal pazarlama uygulamalarının ilk kez oy kullanacak seçmenler üzerindeki etkilerine yönelik bir araştırma. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergi-si, 17(28), 41-48.
  8. Demirtaş, M. C. and Özgül, E. (2011). Siyasal pazarlama karması unsurlarının seçmen tercihleri üzerindeki etkisinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir uygulama. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 48(553), 15-35.
  9. Divanoğlu, S. (2007). Seçim kampanyalarında milletvekili adaylarının ve partilerin kullandıkları pazarlama karması elemanları üzerine bir çalışma. Doctoral Dissertation, Niğde Üniversitesi, Niğde.
  10. Gürbüz, E. and İnal M. E. (2004). Siyasal pazarlama stratejik bir yaklaşım. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
APA
Penpece Demirer, D., Aksu Çam, Ç., & Coskan, B. (2019). Effect of Voters’ Demographic Profiles, Political Participation and Commitment Levels on Political Promotion Mix Elements: Case of Adana. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 10(17), 22-47. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.492267