Research Article

Validaty and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale

Volume: 11 Number: 18 June 30, 2019
EN TR

Validaty and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale, validity and reliability studies of which have already been done abroad, to Turkish culture. For the validity of the scale, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed and the Core Bereavement Items was used for criterion validity. Among the reliability tests, material statistics and Cronbach's alpha coefficients were used. In order to test the invariance of time, the scale was applied to the same sample at four weeks intervals.  It was found that x2/Sd, CFI, IFI, RMSEA, SRMR, PNFI and PGFI model fit indices were in good level. A statistically significant, positive and linear relation was found between The Core Bereavement Items and UGRS. The item-scale total correlation values of all items were above .30. The Cronbach's alpha value of the UGRS was .94 and the Cronbach's alpha of the sub-dimensions ranged from .80 to .89. A positive directional linear relationship was found between pre-test and post-test measurements to determine the invariance of UGRS (r =.89; p=.000). Conclusion: As a result, it was determined that UGRS was valid and highly reliable and did not show any change in time. 

Keywords

Validity,Reliability,Rumination,Grief

References

  1. Aksayan, S. ve Gözüm, S. (2002). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber I: Ölçek uyarlama aşamaları ve dil uyarlaması. Hemşirelik Araştırma Dergisi, 4(1), 9-14.
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publication.
  3. Ayaz, T., Karanci, A. N. ve Aker, A. T. (2014). İki Boyutlu Yas Ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 25(4), 253-263.
  4. Balcı-Çelik, S. (2006). Yas Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(25), 105-114.
  5. Boelen, P. A., van den Bout, J. ve van den Hout, M. (2003). The role of negative interpretations of grief reactions in emotional problems after bereavement. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34, 225–238.
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  7. Çapık, C. (2014). Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(3), 196-205.
  8. Clark, D. A. ve Rhyno, S. (2005). Unwanted intrusive thoughts in nonclinical individuals: Implications for clinical disorders. (D. A. Clark Ed.), Intrusive thoughts in clinical disorders: Theory, research, and treatment In (pp. 1-29). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
  9. Crowley, S. L. ve Fan, X. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research. Journal of personality assessment, 68(3), 508-531.
  10. Doering, B. K., Barke, A., Friehs, T. ve Eisma, M. C. (2018). Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS). BMC psychiatry, 18(43), 1-13.