Research Article

Determining Consumers’ Choices for Fish Using Conjoint Analysis: A Pilot Study in Turkey

Volume: 12 August 31, 2019
EN TR

Determining Consumers’ Choices for Fish Using Conjoint Analysis: A Pilot Study in Turkey

Abstract

The emphasis of this study is to investigate, the relative importance of different attributes (fish type, production method, place of purchase and price) on consumer perception for the fish purchase decision-making process. The data employed in this paper were taken from a face to face cross-sectional survey conducted with 526 individuals in the biggest cities (İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Trabzon, Adana, Van, and Gaziantep) of the seven regions of Turkey during the period July-September 2018. The questionnaire was consisting of two parts; questions on socio-demographic characteristics of the sample and the choice card. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and conjoint analysis by SPSS© 21. Results show that with regard to consumer perception, place of purchase is the most important product attribute for choosing fish. The importance is line-up as price, production method and fish type. Within the place of purchase options most preferred one is the fish markets. They also prefer wild fish, sea bass and logically minimum price level compared with the designated alternatives.

Keywords

consumer choice,conjoint analysis,fish consumption,survey,Turkey

References

  1. Altintzoglou, T., Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., and Luten, J. (2011). Association of health involvement and attitudes towards eating fish on farmed and wild fish consumption in Belgium, Norway and Spain. Aquacult Int. 19, 475–488. https://doi:10.1007/s10499-010-9363-2
  2. Bernabéu, R. and Díaz, M. (2016). Preference for olive oil consumption in the Spanish local market. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2016144-10200
  3. Boesch, I. (2013). Preferences of processing companies for attributes of Swiss milk: A conjoint analysis in a business-to-business market. J. Dairy Sci., 96, 2183-2189. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5887
  4. Cardoso, C., Lourenço, H., Costa, S., Gonçalves, S. and Nunes, M.L. (2013). Survey into the seafood consumption preferences and patterns in the Portuguese population. Gender and regional variability, Appetite, 64, 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.12.022
  5. Cardoso, C., Lourenço, H., Costa, S., Gonçalves S. & Nunes, M.N. (2016), Survey into the seafood consumption preferences and patterns in the Portuguese population: education, age and health variability. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 22(4), 421-435. https://doi.org-/10.1080/10454446.2014.949982
  6. Claret, A., Guerrero, L., Aguirre, E., Rincón, L., Hernández, M.D., Martínez, I., Peleteir, J.B., Grau, A. and Rodríguez, C.R. (2012). Consumer preferences for sea fish using conjoint analysis: Exploratory study of the importance of country of origin. obtaining method. Storage conditions and purchasing price. Food Quality and Preference, 26, 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.05.006
  7. Erdoğan, B.S., Mol, S. and Coşansu, S. (2011). Factors influencing the consumption of seafood in Istanbul, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1, 631-639. https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v11_4_18
  8. Gelmar, G.V., Reyner, P.C., Rodobaldo, M.V. and Alexander, S.V. (2016). Conjoint analysis tool for determining attributes on designing a graduate degree program. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 1(5), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.14.3005
  9. Grigg, D. (1995). The Pattern of World Protein Consumption. Geoforum, 26(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(94)00020-8
  10. Güney, O.I. (2019). Consumers’ Perceived Differences between Wild and Farmed Fish: A Survey Study in Turkey. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 28(2), 2010-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/104988-50.2019.1572684
APA
Güney, O. İ., & Sangün, L. (2019). Determining Consumers’ Choices for Fish Using Conjoint Analysis: A Pilot Study in Turkey. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 12, 218-229. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.583878