A Strength Based Approach and Empowerment: Collective Identity, Knowledge-Skills, Self-Concept, Critical Awareness, Propensity to Act
Abstract
This study aims to address the concept of empowerment by considering various aspects of a strength based approach. Although the concept of empowerment is widely included in the Turkish literature, the dimensions of collective identity, knowledge and skills, self concept, critical awareness and propensity to act have not been previously addressed. It is thought that these dimensions, which are thought to add richness to the concept of empowerment, will benefit both the social work literature and the practices of social workers. A strength based approach emerged based on social constructivist view. A strenght based approach is a way of working that directs the social worker towards interactions and interventions focusing on powers, skills, resources and achievements rather than focusing on the problems or flaws of the clients. In determining the clients' strengths, social workers should focus beyond the apparent powers of the clients. Furthermore, capacities, competencies, character, promise, possibility, resources, resilience, reserve of the clients should be carefully reviewed. On the other hand, the idea that there is power within the individual is a starting point in terms of empowerment. It is important that these two concepts, which are thought to be related to each other, be handled together. Various aspects of empowerment are mentioned in the literature. In this study, the dimensions of empowerment are explained through five dimensions conceptualized by Frans (1993). These dimensions are called collective identity, knowledge and skills, self concept, critical awareness and propensity to act. It is suggested that the other dimensions mentioned in the literature should be evaluated by considering the perspective of social worker.
Keywords
Power , Empowerment , A strength based approach , Social work , Social worker
References
- Acar, H., İçağasıoğlu-Çoban, A. ve Polat, G. (2017). Sosyal hizmetlerde yanlış uygulamalar, etik ihlaller ve sorunlara ilişkin bir araştırma. Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu Derneği.
- Adams, R. (2003). Social work and empowerment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Adams, R., Dominelli, L. and Payne, M. (2015). Eleştirel bir sosyal anlayışına doğru. In (R. Adams, L. Dominelli, M. Payne Eds.), Sosyal hizmet: Temel alan ve eleştirel tartışmalar. Ankara: Nika Yayınevi.
- Anthias, F. (2002). Where do I belong? Narrating collective identity and translocational positionality. Ethnicities, 2(4), 491-514.
- Anuradha, K. (2004). Empowering families with mentally ill members: A strengths perspective. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 26(4), 383-391.
- Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K. and McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80-114.
- Aydın, B. (1996). Benlik kavramı ve ben şemaları. M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8, 41-47.
- Barker, R. L. (1995). The social work dictionary. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
- Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality Harmondsworth. Harmondswoth: Penguin.
- Blum, D. (1998). Finding strength: How to overcome anything. Psychology Today, 31(3), 32-38.