Research Article

Attitudes of Women’s NGO Members towards Women’s Representation in Turkey

Volume: 15 Number: 25 May 31, 2020
TR EN

Attitudes of Women’s NGO Members towards Women’s Representation in Turkey

Abstract

The issue of women's representation started to be discussed intensely in the academic literature, especially in the 2000s. Conceptual discussions demonstrate that this term has different dimensions such as descriptive and substantive representations, and theoretical discussions often focus on the relationship between these dimensions. Besides representation of women's interests is one of these dimensions, it can be observed in different levels such as national, subnational or cross-national. Moreover, representation can be hold by different agencies, actors, institutions or organizations such as members of parliament, women’s NGOs, femocrats or women’s policy machineries. This study analyses representation of women’s interests in Turkey in two levels. First of all, women’s NGO members’ attitudes on representation policies of governments and political parties will be questioned. Secondly this study will focus on the perception of women’s NGO members on how well women’s interests are represented by different public institutions, women’s policy machineries and political parties. For the aims of this study, between November 2017 and February 2018 a survey was run with 735 women who are members of women’s associations from Ankara and Istanbul, two biggest cities of Turkey. 151 women’s associations were included in this research that reflects a representative sample of women’s NGOs in those two cities. The results of this research suggest that members of women’s NGOs does not have high levels satisfaction with representation of women’s interests by government actors and institutions

Keywords

Women's representation,policy,women's NGOs,gender quotas,survey research

References

  1. Akbaş, K. and Şen, İ. G. (2013). Türkiye’de kadına yönelik pozitif ayrımcılık: Kavram, uygulama ve toplumsal algılar. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 13, 165- 189.
  2. Anıl, E., Arın, C., Berktay, A., Hacımirzaoğlu, Bingöllü, M., İlkkaracan, P., and Amado, L. E. (2005). Turkish civil and penal code reforms from a gender perspective: The success of two nationwide campaigns. İstanbul: Women for Women’s Human Rights (WWHR) – NEW WAYS.
  3. Arslan, D. A. (2004). Türk siyasi elitleri arasında kadının temsili. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 103- 120.
  4. Atchinson, A. (2015). The impact of female cabinet ministers on a female-friendly labor environment. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 36(4), 388-414.
  5. Ayata, A. G., and Tutuncu, F. (2008). Critical acts without critical mass: The substantive representation of women in the Turkish parliament. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(3), 461-475.
  6. Aydın, A. and Kahraman, Ö.F. (2017). Türkiye’de kadın temsili sorunsalına kadın bakanlar bağlamında bir bakış. Yasama Dergisi, 31, 46-64.
  7. Beckwith, K. (2007). Numbers and newness: The descriptive and substantive representation of women. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 27-49.
  8. Belli, A. (2017). Yerel yönetimlerde kadın temsili ve yerel demokrasi. Yasama Dergisi, 31, 65-88.
  9. Biricikoğlu, (2013). Yerel yönetimlerde kadın temsilinin yetersizliği: sakarya ilinde yapılan bir araştırma. Sakarya İktisat Dergisi, 2(3), 65-96.
  10. Bratton, K. A., and Ray, L. P. (2002). Descriptive representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 428- 437.
APA
Ertan, S. (2020). Attitudes of Women’s NGO Members towards Women’s Representation in Turkey. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(25), 3138-3166. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.659064