Research Article

The Relationship of STEM Attitudes and Reflective Thinking Skills on Problem-Solving

Volume: 16 Number: 27 July 31, 2020
TR EN

The Relationship of STEM Attitudes and Reflective Thinking Skills on Problem-Solving

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between STEM attitudes of middle-school students and their reflective thinking skills on problem-solving. For this aim, a survey was administered to a total of 576 students, including between 5-8 grades. In this study, the “STEM Attitude Scale” and the “Reflective Thinking Skill on Problem Solving Scale” were used as the data collection tools. The results showed that significant differences were found for the students’ reflective thinking skills on problem-solving in terms of gender, questioning, and reasoning dimensions in favor of female students. Also, significant differences among grade-levels were found in the questioning and evaluation dimen-sions of the reflective thinking skill on the problem-solving scale. Besides, significant differences were found in the engineering and technology dimensions in favor of female students and also in the mathe-matics and 21st-century skills dimensions in terms of grade-levels. Based on the findings obtained from this study, implications for teaching are made.

Keywords

STEM attitude , Problem solving , Reflective thinking

References

  1. Acar, D., Tertemiz, N., and Taşdemir, A. (2018). The Effects of STEM training on the academic achievement of 4th graders in science and mathematics and their views on stem training. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 505-513. doi:10.26822/iejee.2018438141
  2. Aydagül, B., and Terzioğlu, T. (2014). Bilim, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematiğin önemi. TÜSİAD Görüş Dergisi, 85, 13-19. Retrived from http:// www.stemtusiad.org/bilgi- merkezi/makaleler
  3. ACTS (2007). Assessment & Teaching of 21st Century Skills. ATC21S
  4. Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., and Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2), 85-125. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1349
  5. Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., and Koehler, C. M. (2012). What Is STEM?: A Discussion About Conception of STEM in Education and Partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
  6. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., and Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., and Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (23.ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  8. Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM? Science, 329, 996. doi: 10.1126/science.1194998.
  9. Ceylan, S. (2014). Ortaokul fen bilimleri dersindeki asitler ve bazlar konusunda fen, teknoloji, mühendislik ve matematik (FeTeMM) yaklaşımı ile öğretim tasarımı hazırlanmasına yönelik bir çalışma [A study for preparing an instructional design based on sicence, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) Approach on the topics of acids and bases at secondary school science course].Master of Thesis, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa.
  10. Chiu, A., Price, C. A. and Ovrahim, E. (2015,April). Supporting elementary and middle school stem education at the whole school level: A review of the literature.NARST, Chicago, IL.https://www.msichicago.org/fileadmin/assets/educators/science_leadership_initiative/SLI_Lit_Review.pdf