Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Yüksek Öğrenim Kurumlarında Aktif Öğrenmenin Öğrencilerin Performansına Etkisi

Year 2019, Volume: 10 Issue: 17, 949 - 972, 31.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.524707

Abstract

Bu çalışma Çukurova
Üniversitesi’nde farklı sınıflarda öğrenim gören 305 öğrencinin performans
analizlerini sunmaktadır. Çalışma, öğrencilerin hafızalarının ve farklı çalışma
materyallerine ilişkin genel performansının diğer sınıflarda öğrenim gören öğrencilerinkinden
nasıl farklılaştığını tespit etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma
deseni kullanılmıştır ve veri üç farklı dersi alan öğrencilerden toplanmıştır.
Sonuçlar, çalışmaya dahil edilen derslere göre tablolaştırılmıştır.  Kesitsel görünümü sunmak için bütün
derslerden en çok hatırlanan beş kavramı ve tüm derslerdeki hatırlama
sonuçlarını gösteren iki tabloya da yer verilmiştir. Sonuçlar, tüm
katılımcılarda öğretim yöntemleri ve anma kalıpları arasında bir korelasyon
olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Öğrenim seviyesi ve ders içeriğine bağlı olarak,
ders materyalinin daha iyi anlaşılması öğretmen tarafından benimsenen sunum
biçimine bağlıdır. Bu sebeple dersi veren kişinin sınıftaki bütün öğrencilere
en iyi deneyimleri kazandıracak materyalleri seçmesi büyük önem taşımaktadır.
Özellikle video sunumu yoluyla öğretilen ders materyallerinin diğer öğrenme
biçimlerine kıyasla daha yüksek ortalama puanlarına sahip olduğu görülmüştür.

References

  • Acer, E. K., & Güçlü, N. (2017). An analysis of the expansion of higher education in Turkey using the new institutional theory. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 17(6), 1911-1933. doi:http:-//dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.6.0031
  • Alvarez-Bell, R., Wirtz, D., & Bian, H. (2017). Identifying keys to success in innovative teaching: Student engagement and instructional practices as predictors of student learning in a course using a team-based learning approach. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 128-146.
  • Amasyalı, M. F. (2013, June). Active learning for Turkish sentiment analysis. In Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA), 2013 IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
  • Baskan, G. A., & Ayda, N. K. (2018). A case study on the problems of teacher training system based on the opinions of faculty members, school administrators, teachers, and unionists in north Cyprus. Education Sciences, 8(3), 127. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390-/educsci8030127
  • Börkan, B., Ünlühisarcıklı, Ö., Caner, H. A., & Sart, Z. H. (2015). The catch-up education programme in turkey: Opportunities and challenges. International Review of Education, 61(1), 21-41. doi:h ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9464-2
  • Bray, M., Mazawi, A. E., & Sultana, R. G. (Eds.). (2013). Private tutoring across the Mediterranean. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Çelik, Z., & Gür, B. S. (2013). Turkey's Education Policy During the AK Party Era (2002-2013). Insight Turkey, 15(4). doi:http://dx.-doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9464-2
  • Cooper, K. M., Downing, V. R., & Brownell, S. E. (2018). The influence of active learning practices on student anxiety in large-enrollment college science classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-18. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0123-6
  • Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85. doi:http://dx.doi.-org/10.1007/s11159-015-9464-2
  • Çiçen, Y. B. (2016). The institutional fundamentals of Turkey's economic performance: A new institutional perspective. Turkish Economic Review, 3(1), 207-215. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/ter.v3i1.708
  • Devers, K. J. & Frankel, R. M. (2000). Study design in qualitative research –2: Sampling and data collection strategies. Education for health, 13 (2), 263 – 271.
  • Demir, B., & Bruzzone, L. (2015). A novel active learning method in relevance feedback for content-based remote sensing image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(5), 2323-2334. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0039
  • Ela, M. (2013). An assessment on the relationship between informal economy and educational level in turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(4), 910-922.
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410-8415.
  • Gibson, S. I. (2015). Promoting active learning out-of-class via online “study questions” leads to higher than expected exam scores in general biology.PeerJ PrePrints, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7287-/peerj.preprints.1223v1
  • Healey, M., Pawson, E., & Solem, M. (2013). Active learning and student engagement: International perspectives and practices in geography in higher education. Routledge. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353-/pla.2011.0039
  • Hwang, G., Shao-Chen, C., Pei-Ying, C., & Chen, X. (2018). Effects of integrating an active learning-promoting mechanism into location-based real-world learning environments on students’ learning performances and behaviors.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 66(2), 451-474. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9567-5
  • Ishiyama, J. (2013). Frequently used active learning techniques and their impact: A critical review of existing journal literature in the United States. European Political Science: EPS, 12(1), 116-126. doi:http://-dx.doi.org/10.1057/eps.2012.3
  • Jerome, A., & Barbetta, P. M. (2015). The effect of active student responding during computer-assisted instruction on social studies learning by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(3), 13-23.
  • Karataş, K., & Oral, B. (2015). Teachers' perceptions on cultural responsiveness in education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 2(2), 47-57.
  • Karpicke, J. D., & Grimaldi, P. J. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: A perspective for enhancing meaningful learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 401-418. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9202-2
  • Keengwe, J. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of research on educational technology integration and active learning. IGI Global. doi:http://-dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9202-2
  • Kiviniemi, M. T. (2014). Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course. BMC Medical Education, 14, 47. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-47
  • Mach, M., & Saldaña, P. (2018). The consultants' fair: An active learning pedagogical methodology for large groups. Revista d'Innovació i Recerca En Educació, 11(2), 110-125. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1344-/reire2018.11.220677
  • Mercan, M., & Sezer, S. (2014). The effect of education expenditure on economic growth: The case of Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109(0), 925-930. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.-0039
  • Mourshed, M., Farrell, D., & Barton, D. (2013). Education to employment: Designing a system that works. McKinsey Center for Government.
  • Ng, P., Pinto, J., & Williams, S. K. (2011). The Effects of Learning Styles On Course Performance: A Quantile Regression Analysis. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15(1), 15-37.
  • Persky, A. M., PhD., & Dupuis, R. E., PharmD. (2014). An eight-year retrospective study in "flipped" pharmacokinetics courses. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(10), 1-7.
  • Ridder, H. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business Research, 10(2), 281-305. doi:10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z
  • Ross, A., & Furno, C. (2011). Active learning in the library instruction environment: An exploratory study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(4), 953-970. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0039
  • Sagsan, M., Subasi, S., & Gürhan, N. (2018). A theoretical prescription for turkey higher education publicity: An umbrella model. Quality and Quantity, 1-12. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0696-7
  • TeKippe, S. S. (2017). A roadmap to increase active learning: Reading methodology courses with problem-based learning in professional learning communities. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 17(9), 118-129.
  • Todd, D., & Tivener, K. (2016). Effects of sharing clickers in an active learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 260-268.
  • Uzair-ul-Hassan, M., Parveen, I., & Riaz, M. (2016). Active and receptive behaviours of trainee teachers and students during the teaching-learning process in classrooms. Journal of Educational Research, 19(2), 15-31.
  • Wan, K., Cheung, G., & Chan, K. (2017). Prediction of students’ use and acceptance of clickers by learning approaches: A cross-sectional observational study. Education Sciences, 7(4), 91. doi:http://dx.doi.-org/10.3390/educsci7040091
  • Yüksel, İ. (2013). Graduate students' perception of standards and accreditation in higher education in Turkey: A qualitative analysis. The Qualitative Report, 18(38), 1-14.

Effects of Active Learning on Students’ Performance in Higher Learning Institutions

Year 2019, Volume: 10 Issue: 17, 949 - 972, 31.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.524707

Abstract

The study
features analysis of the performance of 305 university students from Cukurova
University at different grades. The study aims to establish how the memories
and overall performance regarding different study materials of students from
diverse grades differ from each other. Qualitative study design was employed
with data collected from students in three different courses. Results were
tabulated as per the various courses under study. Two tables, featuring five
most remembered concepts in all courses, and all course recall outcomes were
also included to offer a cross-sectional view. The results pointed to a
correlation between teaching methods and remembrance patterns in all the
participants. Depending on the grade and the content, enhanced understanding of
the course material was found to depend on the forms of class presentations
adopted by the tutor. It is therefore important that the tutor choose
appropriate teaching methods and techniques that would deliver optimal
experiences to all the students in the same class. Notably, there were higher
average and mean scores for course materials taught through video presentation
compared to the rest of the learning forms. 

References

  • Acer, E. K., & Güçlü, N. (2017). An analysis of the expansion of higher education in Turkey using the new institutional theory. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 17(6), 1911-1933. doi:http:-//dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.6.0031
  • Alvarez-Bell, R., Wirtz, D., & Bian, H. (2017). Identifying keys to success in innovative teaching: Student engagement and instructional practices as predictors of student learning in a course using a team-based learning approach. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 128-146.
  • Amasyalı, M. F. (2013, June). Active learning for Turkish sentiment analysis. In Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA), 2013 IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
  • Baskan, G. A., & Ayda, N. K. (2018). A case study on the problems of teacher training system based on the opinions of faculty members, school administrators, teachers, and unionists in north Cyprus. Education Sciences, 8(3), 127. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390-/educsci8030127
  • Börkan, B., Ünlühisarcıklı, Ö., Caner, H. A., & Sart, Z. H. (2015). The catch-up education programme in turkey: Opportunities and challenges. International Review of Education, 61(1), 21-41. doi:h ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9464-2
  • Bray, M., Mazawi, A. E., & Sultana, R. G. (Eds.). (2013). Private tutoring across the Mediterranean. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Çelik, Z., & Gür, B. S. (2013). Turkey's Education Policy During the AK Party Era (2002-2013). Insight Turkey, 15(4). doi:http://dx.-doi.org/10.1007/s11159-015-9464-2
  • Cooper, K. M., Downing, V. R., & Brownell, S. E. (2018). The influence of active learning practices on student anxiety in large-enrollment college science classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-18. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0123-6
  • Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers in the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85. doi:http://dx.doi.-org/10.1007/s11159-015-9464-2
  • Çiçen, Y. B. (2016). The institutional fundamentals of Turkey's economic performance: A new institutional perspective. Turkish Economic Review, 3(1), 207-215. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/ter.v3i1.708
  • Devers, K. J. & Frankel, R. M. (2000). Study design in qualitative research –2: Sampling and data collection strategies. Education for health, 13 (2), 263 – 271.
  • Demir, B., & Bruzzone, L. (2015). A novel active learning method in relevance feedback for content-based remote sensing image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(5), 2323-2334. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0039
  • Ela, M. (2013). An assessment on the relationship between informal economy and educational level in turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(4), 910-922.
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410-8415.
  • Gibson, S. I. (2015). Promoting active learning out-of-class via online “study questions” leads to higher than expected exam scores in general biology.PeerJ PrePrints, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7287-/peerj.preprints.1223v1
  • Healey, M., Pawson, E., & Solem, M. (2013). Active learning and student engagement: International perspectives and practices in geography in higher education. Routledge. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353-/pla.2011.0039
  • Hwang, G., Shao-Chen, C., Pei-Ying, C., & Chen, X. (2018). Effects of integrating an active learning-promoting mechanism into location-based real-world learning environments on students’ learning performances and behaviors.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 66(2), 451-474. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9567-5
  • Ishiyama, J. (2013). Frequently used active learning techniques and their impact: A critical review of existing journal literature in the United States. European Political Science: EPS, 12(1), 116-126. doi:http://-dx.doi.org/10.1057/eps.2012.3
  • Jerome, A., & Barbetta, P. M. (2015). The effect of active student responding during computer-assisted instruction on social studies learning by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(3), 13-23.
  • Karataş, K., & Oral, B. (2015). Teachers' perceptions on cultural responsiveness in education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 2(2), 47-57.
  • Karpicke, J. D., & Grimaldi, P. J. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: A perspective for enhancing meaningful learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 401-418. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9202-2
  • Keengwe, J. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of research on educational technology integration and active learning. IGI Global. doi:http://-dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9202-2
  • Kiviniemi, M. T. (2014). Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course. BMC Medical Education, 14, 47. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-47
  • Mach, M., & Saldaña, P. (2018). The consultants' fair: An active learning pedagogical methodology for large groups. Revista d'Innovació i Recerca En Educació, 11(2), 110-125. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1344-/reire2018.11.220677
  • Mercan, M., & Sezer, S. (2014). The effect of education expenditure on economic growth: The case of Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109(0), 925-930. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.-0039
  • Mourshed, M., Farrell, D., & Barton, D. (2013). Education to employment: Designing a system that works. McKinsey Center for Government.
  • Ng, P., Pinto, J., & Williams, S. K. (2011). The Effects of Learning Styles On Course Performance: A Quantile Regression Analysis. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15(1), 15-37.
  • Persky, A. M., PhD., & Dupuis, R. E., PharmD. (2014). An eight-year retrospective study in "flipped" pharmacokinetics courses. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(10), 1-7.
  • Ridder, H. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business Research, 10(2), 281-305. doi:10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z
  • Ross, A., & Furno, C. (2011). Active learning in the library instruction environment: An exploratory study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(4), 953-970. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0039
  • Sagsan, M., Subasi, S., & Gürhan, N. (2018). A theoretical prescription for turkey higher education publicity: An umbrella model. Quality and Quantity, 1-12. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0696-7
  • TeKippe, S. S. (2017). A roadmap to increase active learning: Reading methodology courses with problem-based learning in professional learning communities. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 17(9), 118-129.
  • Todd, D., & Tivener, K. (2016). Effects of sharing clickers in an active learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 260-268.
  • Uzair-ul-Hassan, M., Parveen, I., & Riaz, M. (2016). Active and receptive behaviours of trainee teachers and students during the teaching-learning process in classrooms. Journal of Educational Research, 19(2), 15-31.
  • Wan, K., Cheung, G., & Chan, K. (2017). Prediction of students’ use and acceptance of clickers by learning approaches: A cross-sectional observational study. Education Sciences, 7(4), 91. doi:http://dx.doi.-org/10.3390/educsci7040091
  • Yüksel, İ. (2013). Graduate students' perception of standards and accreditation in higher education in Turkey: A qualitative analysis. The Qualitative Report, 18(38), 1-14.
There are 36 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Egemen Hanımoğlu 0000-0001-7734-5013

Publication Date March 31, 2019
Acceptance Date March 7, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 10 Issue: 17

Cite

APA Hanımoğlu, E. (2019). Effects of Active Learning on Students’ Performance in Higher Learning Institutions. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 10(17), 949-972. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.524707