Kamu ve Özel Sektör Ar-Ge Faliyetleri ve İktisadi Büyüme: OECD Örneği

Year 2019, Volume: 14 Issue: 20, 1594 - 1625, 31.12.2019

Fatma Kethudaoğlu Yusuf Bayraktutan

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.581612

Cited By: 1

Abstract

İnovasyonun önemli bir bileşeni olarak araştırma-geliştirme (ar-ge),
verimliliği arttırmakta ve iktisadi büyümeye katkı sağlamaktadır. Ülkeler,
yetenek ve bilgi stoğunu arttırmak için özel kesim ar-ge faaliyetlerini
desteklemekte; kamu kesimi araştırma kapasitesini geliştirmek üzere ulusal
araştırma sistemleri oluşturmakta; üniversiteler, mobilite programları ve
eğitim ürünleri üzerinde durmaktadır. Özel, kamu ve yükseköğrenim ar-ge
faaliyetlerinin büyüme üzerindeki etkileri farklılaşmaktadır. Teorik literatür,
inovasyon ve ekonomik büyüme arasında pozitif yönlü bir bağlantı olduğunu
göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, ar-ge’ye dayalı büyüme modellerinin hipotezlerini
harcama kaynağı ayrımında test etmektedir. OECD üyesi 29 ülkenin 1996-2015
verileriyle özel, kamu ve yükseköğrenim kesimlerinin araştırma- geliştirme
harcamalarının büyüme üzerindeki etkilerini panel veri yöntemiyle araştırmayı
amaçlayan bu çalışma, temel kavramsal ve kuramsal tanıtımı takiben dünyada ve
OECD üyelerinde ar-ge verilerini yorumlamakta; ilgili literatürü özetleyerek
model ve bulgulara dayalı değerlendirmeler sunmaktadır. Analiz sonuçları, ar-ge
harcamalarının iktisadi büyümeyi pozitif olarak etkilediğini göstermekte;
büyüme üzerindeki etkisi bakımından yükseköğrenim ar-ge harcamaları ve özel
kesim öne çıkmaktadır.

Keywords

Ar-ge, büyüme, içsel büyüme, oecd

R&D Activities of Public and Private Sector and Economic Growth: The Case of OECD

Abstract

As an important component of innovation,research and development
(R&D) raises productivity and leads to economic growth. Countries support
private sector R&D activities to increase the capacity and knowledge base;
develop national research systems to consolidate public sector research
infrastructure; developing university capacities to create mobility programs
and educational products. The effects of private, public and higher education
sectors’ R&D activities on economic growth are different. The theoretical
literature shows that there is a positive link between innovation and economic
growth. This study aims to test the hypothesis of growth models based on
R&D in terms of expenditure sources. This study, which aims to investigate
the affects of business, government and higher education expenditures on
R&D on economic growth for the 29 OECD countries by using the annual data for
the period of 1996- 2015, following the basic conceptual and theoretical
introduction, interprets the R& D data of world and OECD members;
summarizes the relevant literatüre, and presents the evaluations based on
analysis of two models and their findings. The results of the analysis show
that R&D expenditures in this field affect economic growth positively;
higher education and private sector are at the forefront in terms of the effect
on growth.

Keywords

R&D, Growth, Endonenous Growth, OECD

References

• Aghion, P. ve Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323-352.
• Aghion, P. ve Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Arrow, K. J. (1962). The Economic ımplications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173.
• Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. England: John Wiley&Sons.
• Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogeneous growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 103-125.
• Bassanini, A. ve Scarpetta, S. (2001). The driving forces of economic growth: Panel data evidence for the OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies, 33(2001/II), 9-56.
• Bayraktutan, Y. ve Bıdırdı, H. (2016). Teknoloji ve rekabetçilik: Temel kavramlar ve endeksler bağlamında bir değerlendirme. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 8(14), 1-24.
• Bayraktutan, Y. ve Kethudaoğlu, F. (2017). Ar-Ge ve iktisadi büyüme ilişkisi: OECD örneği. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(53), 679-694.
• Beck, N. ve Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time series cross-section data. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634-647.
• Beck, N. and Katz, J. N. (1996). Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time-series-cross-section models. Political Analysis, 6, 1-36.
• Blanco, L., Prieger, J. ve Gu, J. (2013). The Impact of research and development on economic growth and productivity in the US States. Pepperdine University School of Public Policy Working Paper Series, No: 48.
• Bucci, A. (2005). Product market competition, R&D effort and economic growth, UNIMI - Research Papers in Economics, Business and Statistics, Milano: Universitá degli Studi di Publications.
• Eaton, J. ve Kortum, S. (1994). International patenting and technology diffusion. NBER Working Paper Series, No: 4931.
• Falk, M. (2007). R&D spending in the high-tech sector and economic growth. Research in Economics, 61, 140-147.
• Fine, B. (2000). Endogenous growth theory: A critical assessment. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(2), 245-265.
• Galor, O. ve Weil, D. N. (1999). From malthusian stagnation to modern growth. The American Economic Review, 89(2), 150-154.
• Goel, R. K., ve Ram, R. (1994). Research and development expenditures and economic growth: A cross- country study. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 42(2), 403-411.
• Goel, R. K., Payne, J. E., ve Ram, R. (2008). R&D expenditures and U.S. economic growth: A disaggregated approach. Journal of Policy Modelling, 30(2), 237-250.
• Göçer, İ., Alataş, S. ve Peker, O. (2016). Effects of R&D and ınnovation on ıncome in EU Countries: New generation panel cointegration and casuality analysis. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 4(609), 153-164.
• Grossman, G. M., ve Helpman, E. (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43-61.
• Guellec, D., ve Potterıe, V. P. B. (2001). R&D and productivity growth: Panel data analysis of 16 OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies, 33, 103-126.
• Griffith, R. (2000). How ımportant is business R&D for Economic growth and should the goverment subsidise it?, London: The Institute for Fiscal Studies Publications.
• Gyekye, A. B., Oseifual, E. K., ve Quarshie, G. N. K. V. (2012). The ımpact of research and development on socio-economic development: Perspectives from selected developing economies. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(6), 915-922.
• Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Im, K. S., Pesaran, H. M., ve Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit root in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53-74.
• Jesus, M., ve Seren, F. (1999). Aggregate R&D expenditure and endogenous economic growth. UFAE and IAE Working Papers, No: 436-99.
• Khan, M., Luintel, K. B., ve Theodoridis, K. (2010). How robust is the r&d-productivity relationship? Evidence from OECD Countries. WIPO Economic Research Working Paper Series, No: 1.
• Levin, A., Lin, C. F., ve Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
• Lichtenberg, F. R. (1993). R&D ınvestment and ınternational productivity differences. NBER Working Paper Series, No: 4161.
• Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
• Marx, K. (2003). Kapital I, (Çev. A. Bilgi), İstanbul: Eriş Yayınları.
• OECD (1993). Frascati manual 1993: The measurement of scientific and technological activities: proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental. Paris: OECD Publications.
• OECD (2002). Dynamising national ınnovation systems. Paris: OECD Publications.
• OECD (2004). Science, technology and ındustry outlook 2004. Paris: OECD Publications.
• OECD (2008). Policy responses to the economic crisis: Investing in innovation for long - term growth.
• OECD Policy Brief, Paris: OECD Publications.
• OECD (2010a). Measuring ınnovation: A new perspective. Paris: OECD Publications.
• OECD (2010b). OECD Science, technology and ındustry outlook 2010. Paris: OECD Publications.
• OECD (2011a). OECD Reviews of regional ınnovation, regions and ınnovation policy. Paris: OECD Publications.
• OECD (2011b). Factbook - economic, environmental and social statistics. Paris: OECD Publications.
• OECD (2013). “R&D tax ıncentives”, in OECD science, technology and ındustry scoreboard 2013: Innovation for growth. Paris: OECD Publications.
• OECD (2014a). Expert consultation on the silver economy: facts, challenges and opportunities. Directorate for science, technology and ındustry committee on digital economy policy. United Kingtom: Oxford Publications.
• OECD (2014b). Science, technology and ındustry outlook 2014. Paris: OECD Publications.
• OECD (2017). Science, technology and ınnovation database. 18.04.2017 tarihinde www.oecd.org/ adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Park, W. G. (1995). International R&D spillovers and OECD economic growth. Economic Inquiry, 33(4), 571-591.
• Poorfaraj, A., SAMIMI, A. J., ve Keshavarz, H. (2011). Knowledge and economic growth: Evidence from some developing countries. Journal of Education and Vocational Research, 1(1), 21-25.
• Psillaki, M., ve Daskalakis, N. (2009). Are the determinants of capital structure country or firm specific? Small Busssiness Economy, 33, 319-333.
• Rensman, M. (1996). Economic growth and technological change in the long run: A survey of theoretical and empirical literature. 21.12.2015 tarihinde http://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/3247240/96c10.pdf/ adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
• Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long - run growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
• Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
• Romer, Paul M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3-22.
• Sadraoui, T., A., Tarek, B., ve Deguachi, B. (2014). Testing for panel granger casuality relationship between ınternational R&D cooperation and economic growth, International Econometrics and Financial Management, 2(1), 7-21.
• Schumpeter, J. A. (2003). Capitalizm, socialism and democracy. Taylor & Francis e-Library. 09.05.2016 tarihindehttp://digamo.free.fr/capisoc.pdf/ adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Smith, Adam (1776). An ınquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations - An electronic classics series publication, (Ed. J. Manis), Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University.
• Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
• Tang, S., Hu, Z., ve Lin, Y. (2005). Knowledge as production factor: Toward a unified theory of economic growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2005, 1-68.
• UNESCO (2010). Measuring R&D: Challenges faced by developing countries. Technical Papers, No: 5.
• UNESCO (2016). UNESCO Science report - towards 2030. New York: United Nations Publications.
• Ülkü, H. (2004). R&D, ınnovation, and economic growth: An empricial analysis, IMF Working Paper Series, No. 04/185.
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• World Bank (2019). Statistical database. 09.12.2019 tarihinde https://data.worldbank.org/topic/science-and-technology adresinden erişilmiştir.
• UNESCO (2019). Statistical database. 09.12.2019 tarihinde http://data.uis.unesco.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=scn_ds adresinden erişilmiştir.