Sosyal Sorumluluk Sahibi Girişimci

Year 2020, Volume: 16 Issue: 29, 2077 - 2092, 30.09.2020

Alexandra Szejniuk

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.755534

Abstract

İşletmelerin işleyişi birçok faktöre bağlıdır. Bu faktörlerin sayısı sürekli artmaktadır, sadece mevcut değil, aynı zamanda kuruluşun geleceğini de belirleyen koşulların belirlenmesine neden olmaktadır. Modern organizasyonların işleyişi çevre, bilgi ve zamandan etkilenir. Ancak, en önemlisi şirketlerin piyasadaki varlığına ilişkin kararlar veren kişilerdir. Kuruluşun tüm kaynaklarını kullanmanın etkinliği becerilerine, yeterliliklerine ve bilgilerine bağlıdır. Sorumlu ve etik iş stratejik bir yaklaşımdır. Sosyal diyalog ilkelerine ve hem işveren hem de çalışan için faydalı çözümler aramasına dayanmalıdır. Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk giderlerle eşdeğerdir. Hayırseverlik faaliyetlerinin yanı sıra ekolojik yatırımlarla da ilgilidir. Modern ekolojik teknolojilerin kullanımı ve yeni yönetim uygulamaları kaynak tüketimini azaltır ve her şeyden önce işlem maliyetlerini azaltır. Şirketin paydaşlarıyla kurulan ortaklıktan kaynaklanıyorlar. Polonya'da giderek daha fazla işletme, yerel çevrenin yararına sermaye ve kendi çalışanlarıyla ilgilenmektedir. Girişimciler, kuruluşların sadece kârla değil sosyal faaliyetlerin desteklenmesi ile de ilgilendikleri fikrini savunuyorlar.

Keywords

Girişimci, Sosyal Sorumluluk, İşletme, Girişimcilik, İş Etiği

A Socially Responsible Entrepreneur

Abstract

The functioning of enterprises depends on many factors. The number of these factors is constantly increasing causing specification of conditions determining not only the present but also the future of the organization. The operation of modern organizations is influenced by the environment, information and time. However, the most important are people who make decisions related to the existence of companies on the market. The effectiveness of using all the resources of the organization depends on their skills, competences and knowledge. Responsible and ethical business is a strategic approach. It should be based on the principles of social dialogue and the search for solutions beneficial for both the employer and the employee. Corporate social responsibility is equated with expenses. They relate to philanthropic activities as well as ecological investments. The use of modern ecological technologies as well as new management practices reduces resource consumption and, above all, reduces transaction costs. They result from the partnership built with the company's stakeholders. In Poland, more and more enterprises are engaging capital and their own employees for the benefit of the local environment. Entrepreneurs defend the idea that organizations are interested not only in profit but also in supporting social activities.

Keywords

Entrepreneur,, Social Responsibility, Business,, Entrepreneurship, Business Ethics

References

• Business Guide CSR info Warsaw (2011). AA 1000 standards, A tool for corporate social responsibility.
• Anrdovicova J., Florek I., Gross-Gołacka E., Laki I., Markova J., Sitek M., Sitek P., Slavicek J.and Uhlerova M. (2017). Final report: Diversity management in the v4 countries as an answer for demographic changes. WSGE, 74.
• Chudy K. (2010). The role of social reports in enterprise management in the opinion of academic youth [in] edited by the sciences A. Zachorowska, A. Wójcik-Mazur, Selected elements of the enterprise management process. Czestochowa.
• Dereń, A. (2014). Responsibility in business operations. In Malary Z. (ed.) Decency in management. Selected Issues. Wroclaw.
• Drucker P. (1992). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Practice and rules. PW.
• Fobel P. Fobelova D. (2007). Ethics and culture in organization. Tychy.
• Freeman E. ve Moutnik A. (2013). Stakeholder management and (SR questions and answers in Umwelt Wirtschafts Forum. Springer Verbg Bd 21 No. 1.
• Gasparski W. (2003). European standards of ethics of corporate social responsibility. Warsaw.
• Griffin W. (1996). Fundamentals of organizational management. PWN Warsaw. 144-145, 149-151.
• Kowalczyk J. (2009). Social responsibility and anti-corruption in organization management. Warsaw.
• Kroik J. (2014). Standardized activity of municipal companies on selected examples. In Z. Malary. Decency in management. Selected Issues.
• Łukasik K., Antonowicz M. (2015). Social responsibility of the organization. Corporate governance over the organization. https://www.chodkowska.edu.pl.app access 2015.01.24.
• Makuch Ł. (2011). Norms and standards of corporate social responsibility (CSR). A guide to key corporate social responsibility standards as well as relationships and interdependencies between them. WSPTVP, Warsaw, March.
• Obłój K. (2009). The constant features of a good strategy :Key choices and simplicity in "Organization Review".
• Ocieczek W. ve Gajdzik B. (2010). Social responsibility of manufacturing enterprises, Ed. S. Politechniki, 7.
• Social Accountability International [SA](n.d). Main Page. www.sa-intlory.org access 2015-01-24.
• Social Accountability International [SA] (n.d.). Main Page. www.sa.inf.org access 2015.01.24
• Skonieczny J. (2014). Socially responsible corporate strategy Z. Malary. Decency in management. Selected Issues. Wroclaw.