Türk Bireylerin Kekemeliği Olan Bireylere Yönelik Dinleyici Tepkileri: Kültürlerarası Bir Karşılaştırma

Year 2021, Volume: 17 Issue: 34, 831 - 854, 28.02.2021

Mehmet Emrah Cangi , Cansu Alpay

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.809286

Abstract

Kekemeliği olan bireylere yönelik toplumsal tutumların ve tepkilerin genellikle ölçekler ile incelendiği görülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Türk ve Türk olmayan bireylerin kekemeliği olan bir bireyle etkileşimleri esnasında sergiledikleri tutumları ve davranışları deneysel bir koşulda karşılaştırmaktır. Çalışmanın katılımcıları, kekemeliği olan iki yetişkin birey ve etkileşim partneri rolünde sekiz Türk ve sekiz Türk olmayan 16 yetişkin bireydir. Deney aşamasında her bir etkileşim partneri, kekemeliği olan bir birey ile bazı temalarda bire bir sohbet etmiştir. Değerlendirme aşamasında dört puanlayıcı algıladıkları tutumlar bakımından 49 maddelik, zıt sıfatlardan oluşan bir sıfat listesi üzerinden etkileşim partnerlerini puanlamışlardır. Ayrıca iki puanlayıcı etkileşimcilerin etkileşim davranışlarını hesaplamışlardır. İki grup, puanlayıcılar arası uyum düzeyi .7 ve üstünde bulunan nitelikler bakımından bağımsız örneklemler t-testi ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Davranışsal açıdan Türk grup Türk olmayan gruptan anlamlı düzeyde daha sık ‘cümle tamamlama’ ve ‘art arda soru sorma’ davranışı sergilemiştir. Etkileşim tutumu açısından ise Türk grup yabancı gruba göre ilk hecede cevap veren, ifadeyi tamamlayan, ciddi ve kaygılı maddelerinden anlamlı düzeyde yüksek puanlar almıştır. Türk olmayan grup Türk gruba göre jest/mimik kullanan, empatik, cana yakın, pozitif, içten, samimi ve açık sıfatlarında anlamlı düzeyde yüksek puanlar almıştır.

Keywords

kekemelik, kültür, etkileşimci davranışı, etkileşimci tutumu

Turkish Individuals' Listener Reactions To The Person Who Stutters: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study

Abstract

Social attitudes and reactions towards people who stutter (PWS) are generally examined through scales. The purpose of this study is to compare the attitudes and behaviors of Turkish and non-Turkish individuals in their interactions with PWS in an experimental condition. The participants were two PWS and 16 adults as interaction partners, including eight Turkish and eight non-Turkish individuals. In the experiment, each interaction partner engaged in a conversation with PWS on spontaneous themes. Four raters scored the attitudes of the interactors by watching the recorded videos via a questionnaire consisting of 49 antonym adjectives. Two raters calculated the interactive behaviors of the interaction partners. Based on the qualities with an agreement rate over .7 according to the reliability findings, the groups were compared with independent samples t-test. In the behavioral sense, the Turkish group exhibited significantly more 'sentence completion' and 'asking consecutive questions' behaviors compared to the non-Turkish group. In terms of interaction attitudes, the Turkish group received significantly higher scores in responding in the first syllable, completing the statement, being serious and anxious. In comparison to the Turkish group, the non-Turkish group received significantly higher scores in using gestures/facial expressions and being empathetic, warm, positive, sincere, sympathetic, and open.

Keywords

culture, interactor attitude, interactor behavior, stuttering

References

• Abdalla, F., Irani, F., and Hughes, S. (2014). Attitudes of Arab university students and general public towards people who stutter. Speech, Language and Hearing, 17(4), 186-195. DOI: 10.1179/2050572814Y.0000000036
• Abdalla, F. A., and Louis, K. O. S. (2012). Arab school teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and reactions regarding stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 37(1), 54-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.11.007
• Abdalla, F., and St. Louis, K. O. (2014). Modifying attitudes of Arab school teachers toward stuttering. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(1), 14-25. DOI: 10.1044/2013_LSHSS-13-0012
• Altiparmak, S., and Sari, H. Y. (2012). Manisa ilinde engelli bireylere karşı toplumsal tutum. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 13(2), 110-116.
• Archer, D. (1997). Unspoken diversity: Cultural differences in gestures. Qualitative sociology, 20(1), 79-105. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024716331692
• Baloglu, S., and Mangaloglu, M. (2001). Tourism destination images of Turkey, Egypt, Greece, and Italy as perceived by US-based tour operators and travel agents. Tourism management, 22(1),1-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00030-3
• Bloodstein, O., and Bernstein Ratner, N. (2008). A handbook on stuttering. NY: Thomson-Delmar.
• Bowers, A. L., Crawcour, S. C., Saltuklaroglu, T., and Kalinowski, J. (2010). Gaze aversion to stuttered speech: a pilot study investigating differential visual attention to stuttered and fluent speech. International journal of language and communication disorders, 45(2), 133-144. DOI: 10.3109/13682820902763951
• Boyle, M. P. (2013). Assessment of stigma associated with stuttering: Development and evaluation of the self-stigma of stuttering scale (4S). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(5), 1517-1529. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0280)
• Boyle, M. P. (2015). Identifying correlates of self-stigma in adults who stutter: Further establishing the construct validity of the Self-Stigma of Stuttering Scale (4S). Journal of Fluency Disorders, 43, 17-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.12.002
• Boyle, M. P. (2017). Personal perceptions and perceived public opinion about stuttering in the United States: Implications for anti-stigma campaigns. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(3), 921-938. DOI: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0191
• Bozo, Ö., Toksabay, N. E., and Kürüm, O. (2009). Activities of daily living, depression, and social support among elderly Turkish people. The Journal of psychology, 143(2), 193-206. DOI: 10.3200/JRLP.143.2.193-206
• Burcu, E. (2011). Türkiye'deki engelli bireylere ilişkin kültürel tanımlamalar: Ankara örneği, Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Letters, 28(1), 37-54.
• Çağlayan, A. (2019). Employers' attitudes toward people who stutter in Turkey - İzmir sample. Unpublished MSc Dissertation. İstanbul Medipol University, Institute of Health Sciences, İstanbul.
• Demirtaş-Madran, H. A. (2012). Sex, gender role orientation and need for cognition. Turkish Psychological Articles, 15(29), 1-10.
• Farley, J. E., and Flota, M. W. (2018). Sociology. London: Taylor and Francis.
• Finn, P., and Cordes, A. K. (1997). Multicultural identification and treatment of stuttering: A continuing need for research. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 22(3), 219-236. DOI: 10.1016/S0094-730X(97)00008-9
• Freud, D., Moria, L., Ezrati-Vinacour, R., and Amir, O. (2016). Turn-taking behaviors during interaction with adults-who-stutter. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28(4), 509-522. DOI:10.1007/s10882- 016-9488-y
• Girli, A., Sarı, H. Y., Kırkım, G., and Narin, S. (2016). University students’ attitudes towards disability and their views on discrimination. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 62(2), 98-107. DOI: 10.1179/2047387715Y.0000000008
• Göregenli, M. (1997). Individualist-collectivist tendencies in a Turkish sample. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(6), 787-794. DOI: 10.1177/0022022197286009
• Guntupalli, V. K., Erik Everhart, D., Kalinowski, J., Nanjundeswaran, C., and Saltuklaroglu, T. (2007). Emotional and physiological responses of fluent listeners while watching the speech of adults who stutter. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42(2), 113-129. DOI: 10.1080/10610270600850036
• Guntupalli, V. K., Kalinowski, J., Nanjundeswaran, C., Saltuklaroglu, T., and Everhart, D. E. (2006). Psychophysiological responses of adults who do not stutter while listening to stuttering. International journal of psychophysiology, 62(1), 1-8. DOI: 10.1080 / 10610270600850036
• Healey, E. C. (2010, November). What the literature tells us about listeners' reactions to stuttering: Implications for the clinical management of stuttering. In Seminars in speech and language (Vol. 31, No. 04, pp. 227-235). © Thieme Medical Publishers. DOI: 10.1055 / s-0030-1265756
• Hofstede insights. (t.y). National culture. Available at https://hi.hofstede-insights.com/national-culture accessed on November 19, 2020.
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 10(4), 15-41. DOI: 10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications. DOI: 10.1016 / S0005-7967 (02) 00184-5
• Hudock, D., Stuart, A., Saltuklaroglu, T., Zhang, J., Murray, N., Kalinowski, J., and Altieri, N. (2015). Segmented Analysis of eye gaze behaviors of fluent and stuttered speech. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 39(2). DOI: 10.3109 / 13682820902763951
• Kalinowski, J., Stuart, A., and Armson, J. (1996). Perceptions of stutterers and nonstutterers during speaking and nonspeaking situations. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5(2), 61-67. DOI: 10.1044 / 1058-0360.0502.61
• Kamhi, A. G. (2003). Two paradoxes in stuttering treatment. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 28(3), 187-196. DOI: 10.1016 / s0094-730x (03) 00022-6
• Kita, S. (2009). Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and cognitive processes, 24(2), 145-167. DOI: 10.1080/01690960802586188
• Iimura, D., Yada, Y., Imaizumi, K., Takeuchi, T., Miyawaki, M., and Van Borsel, J. (2018). Public awareness and knowledge of stuttering in Japan. Journal of communication disorders, 72, 136-145.
• KONDA (2006). Toplumsal yapı araştırması: Biz kimiz? Retrieved from http://www.konda.com.tr/tr/raporlar/2006_09_KONDA_Toplumsal_Yapi.pdf
• Madding, C. C. (1995). The stuttering syndrome: Feelings and attitudes of stutterers and non-stutterers among four cultural groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, CA.
• Manning, W. H., Burlison, A. E., and Thaxton, D. (1999). Listener response to stuttering modification techniques. Journal of fluency disorders, 24(4), 267-280.
• MCAT (2018). MCAT Psychology and Sociology Review. Princeton Review.
• Meyer, H. D. (2010). Framing disability: Comparing individualist and collectivist societies. Comparative sociology, 9(2), 165-181. DOI: 10.1163/156913210X12548146054985
• Nabieh El-Adawy, A. A. S., St. Louis, K., Emam, A. M., Elbarody, Z. M., and Mostafa, E. (2020). Attitudes towards stuttering of parents and other family members of children who stutter in Egypt. Speech, Language and Hearing, 1-11. DOI: 10.1080/2050571X.2020.1724360
• Özdemir, R. S. (2010). Measuring public attitudes toward stuttering: Eskişehir sample. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Anadolu University, Institute of Health Sciences, Eskişehir.
• Özdemir, R. S., Louis, K. O. S., and Topbaş, S. (2011a). Public attitudes toward stuttering in Turkey: Probability versus convenience sampling. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 36(4), 262-267. DOI: 10.1016 / j.jfludis.2011.07.002
• Özdemir, R. S., Louis, K. O. S., and Topbaş, S. (2011b). Stuttering attitudes among Turkish family generations and neighbors from representative samples. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 36(4), 318-333. DOI: 10.1016 / j.jfludis.2011.07.002
• Phalet, K., and Claeys, W. (1993). A comparative study of Turkish and Belgian youth. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 24(3), 319-343. DOI: 10.1177/0022022193243004
• Robinson, T.L. (2012). Cultural diversity and fluency disorders. In D.E. Battle (Ed.), Communication Disorders in Multicultural and International Populations (4th edition p. 164.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier,
• Robinson Jr, T. L., and Crowe, T. A. (1998). Culture-based considerations in programming for stuttering intervention with African American clients and their families. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29(3), 172-179. DOI: 10.1044 / 0161-1461.2903.172
• Sahin, H., and Gedik, Z. (2020). Attitudes towards people with disabilities: The Turkish version of the disability attitudes in health care Scale. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1 (11). DOI: 10.1080/1034912X.2020.1724270
• St Louis, K.O., Filatova, Y., Coskun, M., Topbas, S., Özdemir, S., et al. (2011) Public attitudes toward cluttering and stuttering in four countries. In E. L. Simon (Ed.) Psychology of stereotypes. (p.81-113).Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers:
• St. Louis, K. O. and Lass, N. J. (1981). A survey of communicative disorders students' attitudes toward stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 6(1), 49-79. DOI: 10.1016/0094-730X(81)90030-9
• St. Louis, K. O., Lubker, B. B., Yaruss, J. S., and Aliveto, E. F. (2009). Development of a prototype questionnaire to survey public attitudes toward stuttering: Reliability of the second prototype. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 36(Fall), 101-107. DOI: 10.1044/cicsd_36_F_101
• St. Louis, K. O., Sønsterud, H., Junuzović-Žunić, L., Tomaiuoli, D., Del Gado, F., Caparelli, E., ... , Kvenseth, H. (2016). Public attitudes toward stuttering in Europe: Within-country and between-country comparisons. Journal of communication disorders, 62, 115-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.05.010
• Şendağ, S., Gedik, N., and Toker, S. (2018). Impact of repetitive listening, listening-aid and podcast length on EFL podcast listening. Computers and Education, 125, 273-283. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.019
• Tezcan, M. (1997). Gençlik sosyolojisi ve antropolojisi araştırmaları. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları.
• Turkstat (2020). Turkish Statistical Institute. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Start.do accessed on.
• Uskul, A. K., Hynie, M., and Lalonde, R. N. (2004). Interdependence as a mediator between culture and interpersonal closeness for Euro-Canadians and Turks. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(2), 174-191. DOI: 10.1177/0022022103262243
• Valente, A. R. S., Louis, K. O. S., Leahy, M., Hall, A., and Jesus, L. M. (2017). A country-wide probability sample of public attitudes toward stuttering in Portugal. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 52, 37-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.03.001
• Van Riper, C. (1982). The nature of stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Walden, T. A., and Lesner, T. A. (2018). Examining implicit and explicit attitudes toward stuttering. Journal of fluency disorders, 57, 22-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.06.001
• Weidner, M. E., St Louis, K. O., Nakisci, E., and Ozdemir, R. S. (2017). A comparison of attitudes towards stuttering of non-stuttering preschoolers in the United States and Turkey. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 64(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.4102 / sajcd.v64i1.178
• Westbrook, M. T., Legge, V., and Pennay, M. (1993). Attitudes towards disabilities in a multicultural society. Social Science & Medicine, 36(5), 615-623. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90058-C
• Yairi, E., and Seery, C. H. (2015). Stuttering: Foundations and clinical applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
• Yaruss, J. S., & Quesal, R. W. (2006). Overall assessment of the speaker's experience of stuttering (OASES): Documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31(2), 90-115. DOI: 10.1016 / j.jfludis.2006.02.002
• Zhang, J., Kalinowski, J., Saltuklaroglu, T., and Hudock, D. (2010). Stuttered and fluent speakers' heart rate and skin conductance in response to fluent and stuttered speech. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45(6), 670-680. DOI: 10.3109 / 13682820903391385
• Zhang, J., and Kalinowski, J. (2012). Culture and listeners’ gaze responses to stuttering. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47(4), 388-397. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00152.x
• Zhang, J., and Kalinowski, J. (2014). Perceived shame-and guilt-proneness of people who stutter by Caucasian and African-American college students. Revue Canadienne d’Orthophonie et dAudiologie, 38(4), 416-422.