Research Article

Impact of National Cultural Dimensions on Child Rights Policy Management: A Cross-Country Study

Volume: 22 Number: 1 February 12, 2025
EN TR

Impact of National Cultural Dimensions on Child Rights Policy Management: A Cross-Country Study

Abstract

Efforts to improve children's welfare are guided by international frameworks like the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. However, the implementation of these rights varies significantly across countries due to the influence of cultural factors. This study explored the relationship between national cultural dimensions and the Child Rights Index (KRI) through a cross-country comparative analysis. Using Hofstede's cultural dimensions as an explanatory framework, data from 78 countries spanning 2015-2022 were analyzed. The KRI evaluates countries' performance in upholding children's rights across five domains: the right to life, health, education, protection, and an environment that promotes children's rights. A multiple regression model was employed to assess the impact of cultural dimensions on KRI scores. The findings revealed that cultural dimensions such as power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term orientation significantly influence KRI scores. These results underscore the importance of integrating cultural factors into child rights policies to develop effective strategies for promoting and protecting children's well-being globally.

Keywords

Culture , Child Rights , Hofstede , KidsRights Index , Multiple Regression Analysis

References

  1. Adler, N. J. (1991). International dimensions of organizational behavior. PWS-Kent Publishing.
  2. Basabe, N., & Ros, M. (2005). Cultural dimensions and social behavior correlates: Individualism-collectivism and power distance. International Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 189–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00516.x
  3. Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., & Algesheimer, R. (2024). Measuring the four higher-order values in Schwartz’s theory: validation of the higher-order-value scale-17 (HOVS-17). Journal of Personality Assessment, 106(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2024.2311193
  4. Cobb, C., Danby, S., & Farrell, A. (2005). Governance of children’s everyday spaces. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 30(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910503000104
  5. DiStefano, J. J., & Maznevski, M. L. (2000). Global leaders are team players: Developing global leaders through membership on global teams. Human Resource Management, 39(2 & 3), 195–208.
  6. Doğan, İ. (2000). Akıllı küçük: Çocuk kültürü ve çocuk hakları üzerine sosyo-kültürel bir inceleme (Smart little: Child culture and a socio-cultural review on children's rights). Sistem Yayınları (Sistem Publications).
  7. Fayganoğlu, P., Gökmen, Y., Yalçın, R. C., Beğenirbaş, M., & Işıkçı, E. (2022). The Possible Effects of National Culture Dimensions on Sustainable Child Development Index: A Cross-Country Analysis of Countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 56(5), 467-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971221093117
  8. Fichter, J. (2002). Sosyoloji nedir? (What is sociology?). (N. Çelebi, Trans.). Anı Yayıncılık (Anı Publishing).
  9. Figlio, D., Giuliano, P., Özek, U., & Sapienza, P. (2019). Long-term orientation and educational performance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 272–309. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20180374
  10. Finkelhor, D., Turner, H. A., Shattuck, A. M., & Hamby, S. L. (2013). Violence, crime, and abuse exposure in a national sample of children and youth: An update. JAMA Pediatrics, 167 (7), 614-621.
APA
Işıkçı, E. (2025). Impact of National Cultural Dimensions on Child Rights Policy Management: A Cross-Country Study. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 22(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1585119