The Educational Context of Adolescents in a Low-Income Urban District: A Mixed-Method Research on Family Functioning and Schooling

Year 2022, Volume: 19 Issue: 46, 228 - 245, 30.03.2022

Nurullah Çalış , Ercüment Erbay

https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1092834

Abstract

For disadvantaged communities in the society, educational and family-based problems are more likely to affect children and adolescents. In this regard, the aim of the study is to examine adolescent students’ experience in their educational life in terms of family relations and family functioning, from an ecological perspective. The study was carried out in a low-income district of Ankara. Based on the mixed-method approach, a convergent design was used. The quantitative data were collected from vocational high school students, using McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD). Qualitative data were obtained from 22 students and 8 school professionals through one-on-one interviews. Findings showed that students’ perceptions of family functioning varied by mother’s employment, average grade point, attitudes towards school, educational support from family, student-family consensus on education. The qualitative findings mostly supported the quantitative findings, referring to adolescent’s low academic motivation, problematic and dysfunctional family relationships, and families' poor or superficial support for education. Based on these results, it can be asserted that proactive programs to facilitate more effective family-school relations should be implemented.

Keywords

Adolescence, Family Functioning, High School Students, Mixed-Method

References

• Adıgüzel, A. & Karadaş, H. (2013). Ortaögretim ögrencilerinin okula iliskin tutumlarının devamsızlık ve okul başarıları arasındaki ilişki [The level of effect of high school students’ attitudes towards school on their absenteeism and school success]. YYÜ Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 49-66.
• Alonso-Castillo, M. M., Yañez-Lozano, Á., & Armendáriz-García, N. A. (2017). Family functionality and alcohol use among high school teenagers. Health & Addictions, 17(1), 87-96.
• Amato, P. R., Patterson, S., & Beattie, B. (2015). Single-parent households and children’s educational achievement: A state-level analysis. Social Science Research, 53, 191-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.05.012.
• American Psychological Association (APA). (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf.
• Angacian, S., Bray, M. A., Kehle, T. J., Byer-Alcorace, G., Theodore, L. A., Cross, K., & DeBiase, E. (2015). School-based intervention for social skills in children from divorced families. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 31(4), 315-346. DOI:10.1080/15377903.2015.1084964.
• Ankara Kalkınma Ajansı (AKA). (2018). Istatistiklerle Ankara 2017. http://www.ankaraka.org.tr/tr/icerik/arastirmalar-serisi_232.
• Annunziata, D., Hogue, A., Faw, L., & Liddle, H. A. (2006). Family functioning and school success in at-risk, inner-city adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(1), 105-113.
• Arslan, G. (2012). Ortaögretimde ögrenim gören ergenlerde görülen problem davranısların aile sorunlari ve aile yapısı açısından incelenmesi [Adolescent problem behaviours in high school students to investigate in family problems and family structure]. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Denizli.
• Arslan, G. & Balkıs, M. (2014). The investigation of relationship between problem behaviors and family problems in adolescence. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 11-23.
• Ateş, F. B., & Akbaş, T. (2012). Ergenlerde görülen kural dısı davranıslarin aile islevselligi ve yasam kalitesi açısından incelenmesi. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(2), 337-352.
• Atik, S. & Özer, N. (2020). The direct and indirect role of school attitude alienation to school and school burnout in the relation between the trust in teacher and academic achievements of students. Education and Science, 45(202), 441-458. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8500.
• Aydıner Boylu, A, & Öztop, H. (2013). Tek ebeveynli aileler: Sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri [Single parent families: Problems and solutions]. Sosyoekonomi, 19(19), 207-220.
• Aydogan, İ. (2011). Genel liselerde ögrenim gören kız ögrencilerin problemleri [Female students’ problems who study in general high schools]. Aile ve Toplum, 7(24), 47-68.
• Baltacı, A. (2017). Nitel veri analizinde Miles-Huberman modeli [Miles-Huberman model in qualitative data analysis]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(1), 1-14.
• Banerjee, P. A. & Lamb, S. (2016). A systematic review of factors linked to poor academic performance of disadvantaged students in science and maths in schools, Cogent Education, 3(1). DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1178441.
• Bayat, İ. (2015). Türkiye'de yoksul hanelerde yaşayan kadinlarin enformel istihdama katilma nedenleri [Causes of women living in poor households participation in the informal employment in Turkey]. Journal of Labor Relations, 6(1), 53-69.
• Bayhan, G. & Dalgıç, G. (2012). Liseyi terk eden ögrencilerin tecrübelerine göre okul terki [School dropout according to the views of high school leavers]. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(3), 107-130.
• Baykara-Acar, Y. & Acar, H. (2002). Sistem Kuramı, ekolojik sistem kuramı ve sosyal hizmet: Temel kavramlar ve farklılıklar [System-ecological system theory and social work: basic concepts and differences]. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 13(1), 29-35.
• Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56–95. DOI:10.1177/0272431691111004. Bellibas, M. S. (2016). Who are the most disadvantaged? Factors associated with the achievement of students with low socio-economic backgrounds. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(2), 671-710. doi:10.12738/estp.2016.2.0257.
• Berksun, O. E., Hızlı-Sayar, G. (2013). Aile ve es terapileri [Family and couple therapies]. Detay Yayıncılık.
• Bodvin, K., Verschueren, K., De Haene, L., & Struyf, E. (2017). Social inequality in education and the use of extramural support services: access and parental experiences in disadvantaged families. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(2), 215-233. doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0335-z.
• Bulut, I. (1990). Aile Degerlendirme Ölçegi (ADÖ) El Kitabı [Family Assessment Device Handbook]. Özgüzelis Matbaası.
• Carolan, B. V., & Wasserman, S. J. (2015). Does parenting style matter? Concerted cultivation, educational expectations, and the transmission of educational advantage. Sociological Perspectives, 58, 168–186. doi:10.1177/0731121414562967.
• Carvalho, J., Fernandes, O. M., & Carvalho Relva, I. (2017). Family functioning and its relation to parental discipline. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 35, 31-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-017-0501-9.
• Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002.
• Chukwuka, F. O. (2018). Impact of single parent on child education in primary schools in Oshimili South Local Government Area of Delta State. International Journal of Innovative Education Research, 6(1), 101-107.
• Constable, R. (2009). The role of the school social worker. In C. R. Massat, R. Constable, S. McDonald, J. P. Flynn (Ed.), School social work: Practice, policy, and research (Seventh Edition, p.3-29). Lyceum Books.
• Coskun, Y. (2007). Ortaögretim ögrencilerinin umutsuzluk durumları ve aile işlevselligi iliskisinin bazı degiskenlere göre incelenmesi [Examination of the relationship between hopelessness and family relations of high school students according to some variables]. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 26(26), 11-26.
• Coskun, Y. (2008). Ortaögretim ögrencilerinin aile içi iliskilerinin, ögrenilmis güçlülük düzeylerini yordama gücü [The prediction of learned resourcefulness of high school students by the relationship within their families]. Inönü Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(16), 43-65.
• Creswell, J. W. & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2014). Karma yöntem arastırmaları: Tasarımı ve yürütülmesi [Mix-method research: Designing and Conducting] (Y. Dede, S. B. Demir, Trans.). Anı Yayıncılık.
• Dam, H. (2008). Ögrencinin okul başarısında aile faktörü [The family factor on the student’s success of school]. Hitit Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(14), 75-99.
• Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 294–304. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.294.
• Eğitim Reformu Girişimi (ERG) (2017). Egitim Izleme Raporu 2016-2017. Sabancı Üniversitesi. http://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/EIR2016-17_12.10.17.web-1.pdf.
• Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01497.x.
• Epstein, N. B., Ryan, C. E., Bishop, D. S., Miller, I. W., & Keitner, G. I. (2003). The McMaster Model: A view of healthy family functioning. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal Family Processes (p.581-607). The Guilford Press.
• Erbay, E. (2008). Çocuk isçi olmak: Çocuk isçiligine retrospektif bir bakış. Sosyal Hizmet Uzmanları Dernegi Yayını No:14.
• Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Aile yapisi ergeni mutlu eder mi? [Can family structure of adolescents make happy adolescents?]. Sosyal Politika Çalısmaları Dergisi, 22(22), 21-30.
• Eymann, A., Busaniche, J., Llera, J., De Cunto, C., & Wahren, C. (2009). Impact of divorce on the quality of life in school-age children. Jornal de Pediatria, 85(6), 547-552.
• Feij, J. A. & Taris, T. W. (2010). Beyond the genetic basis of sensation seeking: The influence of birth order, family size and parenting styles. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 12(2), 54-61.
• Feyzioglu, S., & Kusçuoglu, C. (2011). Tek ebeveynli aileler [Single parent families]. Aile ve Toplum, 7(26), 97-109.
• Gökçearslan-Çifci, E. (2016). Suçun yolculugu: Yasanmıs olaylardan öyküler. Ürün Yayınları.
• Hastings, O. P. & Schneider, D. (2021). Family structure and inequalities in parents' financial investments in children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 83, 717-736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12741.
• Havermans, N., Botterman, S., & Matthijs, K. (2014). Family resources as mediators in the relation between divorce and children's school engagement. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 564-579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.04.001.
• Injo Ulloque, Á. G. (2020). Funcionamiento familiar y bienestar psicologico en estudiantes de una institucion educativa publica, lambayeque, 2019. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Universidad Católica Los Ángeles de Chimbote Facultad De Ciencias, Chile.
• Jarolmen, J. (2014). School social work: A direct practice guide. Los Angeles: Sage.
• Kalyencioğlu, D. & Kutlu, Y. (2010). Ergenlerin aile islevi algılarına göre uyum düzeyleri [The adjustment level according to family function perceptions of adolescents]. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 18(2), 56-62.
• Kapçı, E. G. & Hamamcı, Z. (2010). Aile islevi ile psikolojik belirtiler arasındaki iliski: Erken dönem uyum bozucu semaların aracı rolü [The relationship between family dysfunction and psychological symptomatology: the meditating role of early maladaptive schemas]. Klinik Psikiyatri, 13, 127-136.
• Karaagaç, M. & Erbay, H. (2015). Aile islevselliginin matematik basarısıyla iliskisi [The relationship between family functioning and mathematics success]. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(31), 21-33.
• Karaca, S., Ünsal-Barlas, G., Onan, N., & Öz, Y. C. (2013). 16-20 yas grubu ergenlerde aile işlevleri ve kişiler arası ilişki tarzının incelenmesi: Bir üniversite örneklemi [Investigation of the interpersonal relationship styles and family functions in 16-20 years old adolescents: A university sample]. Balıkesir Saglık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(3), 139-146.
• Karataş, S., Sertelin-Mercan, Ç., & Düzen, A. (2016). Ergenlerin ebeveyn ilişkilerine yönelik algıları: Nitel bir inceleme [Perceptions of adolescents’ relationships with parents: A qualitative research]. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(36), 237-257.
• Kirk, C. M., Lewis‐Moss, R. K., Nilsen, C., & Colvin, D. Q. (2011) The role of parent expectations on adolescent educational aspirations, Educational Studies, 37(1), 89-99. DOI: 10.1080/03055691003728965.
• Leech, N. L. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43(2), 265-275. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3.
• Lindberg, N. & Demircan, A. N. (2013). Ortaöğretim okullarında aile katılımının değerlendirilmesi: Aile katılım ölçeği veli ve öğretmen formlarının Türkçe’ye uyarlanması [Parental Participation at High School: Adaptation of Teachers’ and Parents’ Scales of Parental Participation]. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 2(3), 64-78.
• Özbesler, C. & Bulut, I. (2013). Sosyal hizmette genelci yaklaşım ve ekolojik perspektif. In H. Acar, N. Negiz, E. Akman (Ed.), Sosyal politika ve kamu yönetimi bileşenleriyle sosyal hizmet: Temelleri ve uygulama alanları (s. 97-107). Maya Akademi.
• Özçatal, E. Ö. (2011). Ataerkillik, toplumsal cinsiyet ve kadının çalışma yaşamına katılımı [Patriarchy, gender and women’s participation in working life]. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 21-39.
• Özkurt, Y. & Camadan, F. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin aile içi iletişimlerinin ve sosyal uyum durumlarının incelenmesi [Investigation of the intra-family communication and social adjustment of middle school students]. Turkish Studies, 13(19), 347–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13925.
• Özyürek, A., & Tezel-Şahin, F. (2014) Anne-baba olmak ve anne-babaların çocuk yetiştirme tutumları. In T. Güler-Yıldız (Ed.). Anne baba eğitimi. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Ma, X., Yao, Y. and Zhao, X. (2013). Adolescents, families and behavioral problems. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, 5(E1-E8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5872.2012.00211.x.
• Mensah, E. K. & Oduro, E. (2019). Assessment of student of single parents’ support at Konongo-Odumase Senior Higher School in Ashanti Region. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(31), 44-50. DOI: 10.7176/JEP/10-31-05.
• Moser, A. & Korstjens, I. (2018) Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9-18, DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091.
• Paz-Navarro, L. D. S., Rodríguez Roldán, P. G., & Martínez González, M. G. (2008) Family functioning of students with poor school performance and its comparison with a group of average performance in a high school at the University of Guadalajara. Revista de Educación y Desarrollo, 10(Abril-Junio), 5-15.
• Raines, J. C., Stone, S., & Frey, A. (2010). Parent involvement. In J. C. Raines, M. S. Kelly, S. Stone, A. Frey (Ed.), School social work: an evidence-informed framework for practice. Oxford University Press.
• Rodríguez-Fernández, A. Ramos-Díaz, E. Ros, I. & Zuazagoitia, A. (2018). Implicación escolar de estudiantes de secundaria: La influencia de la resiliencia, el autoconcepto y el apoyo social percibido. Educación XX1, 21(1), 87-108, DOI: 10.5944/educXX1.16026.
• Rodríguez Garcés, Carlos, Padilla Fuentes, Geraldo, & Gallegos Fuentes, Marcelo. (2020). Calidad educativa, apoyo docente y familiar percibido: la tridimensionalidad de la satisfacción escolar en niños y adolescentes. Cuadernos de Investigación Educativa, 11(2), 157-173. https://dx.doi.org/10.18861/cied.2020.11.2.2995.
• Roksa, J. & Kinsley, P. (2019). The role of family support in facilitating academic success of low-income students. Research in Higher Education, 60, 415–436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9517-z.
• Sapharas, N. K., Estell, D. B., Doran, K. A., & Waldron, M. (2016). Effects of parental divorce or a father's death on high school completion. Psychology in the Schools, 53(8), 861-874.
• Shek, D. T. L., Leung, H., & Lu, S. (2014). Perceived family life quality in junior secondary school students in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 117(3), 757–775. doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0397-5.
• Steinberg, L. (2013). Ergenlik [Adolescent]. (F. Çok, Trans.). İmge Kitabevi.
• Stubbs, N.S. & Maynard, D. M. B. (2017). Academic self-efficacy, school engagement and family functioning, among postsecondary students in the Caribbean. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 792–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0595-2.
• Sümer, N., Gündoğdu-Aktürk, E., & Helvacı, E. (2010). Anne-baba tutum ve davranışlarının psikolojik etkileri: Türkiye’de yapılan çalışmalara toplu bakıs. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 13(25), 42-59.
• Şimşek, H. (2011). Lise öğrencilerinde okulu bırakma eğilimi ve nedenleri [Dropout tendency among high school students and its reasons]. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 27-47.
• Şirvanlı-Özen, D. (2009). Ergenlerde anneden algılanan kabul/ilgi ile benlik-algısı arasındaki ilişki: Babadan algılanan kabul/ilginin aracı rolü. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 12(24), 28-38.
• Teather, B. (2015). Sosyal hizmet kuram ve yöntemleri: Uygulama için bir giriş. A. Karatay (Trans. Ed.). Nika Yayınevi.
• Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE Publications.
• Tezcan, M. (2014). Eğitim Sosyolojisi. (14. Basım). Anı Yayıncılık.
• Ünal, N. (2019). Akran zorbalığı ile ergenlerin algıladıkları aile işlevselliğinin incelenmesi [Investigation of family functionality detected by adolescents with peer bullying]. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ankara Yıldırım Beyazit Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• van Renen, L. J. & Wild, L. G. (2008). Family functioning and suicidal ideation/behaviour in adolescents: a pilot study. Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20(2), 111-121.
• Vuranok, T. T., Özcan, M., & Çelebi, N. (2017). Mesleki ve genel lise öğrencilerinin sosyo-ekonomik statüsü (İstanbul Avrupa yakası örneği). In E. Babaoğlan, E. Kıral, A. Çilek & F. Güçlü Yılmaz (Ed.). Eğitime Farklı Bakış (p.177-188). EYUDER Yayınları.
• Watkins, D. & Gioia, D. (2015). “First floor”: An introduction to a “mixed” way of thinking. In Mixed Methods Research. Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199747450.003.0001.
• Yavuz, S. & Özmete, E. (2012). Türkiye'de genç bireyler ve ebeveynleri arasında yaşanan sorunların "Aile Yapısı Araştırması" sonuçlarına göre değerlendirilmesi [Assessment of problems between young individuals and their parents in Turkey according to results of “Research on Family Structure 2006” Survey]. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 7(29), 9-27.
• Yazgan, Ç., & Suğur, N. (2019). Yukarıya doğru hareketlilikte bir imkân ve sınırlılık olarak Türkiye’de meslek liseleri: Eskişehir örneği üzerine sosyolojik bir araştırma [intersection of advantages and disadvantages for upward social mobility: A sociological research on vocational high schools’ students in Eskisehir]. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 21(3), 65-86. DOI: 10.4026/isguc.634393.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yılmaz-Fındık, L. (2016). What makes a difference for resilient students in Turkey? Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 64, 91-108. doi:10.14689/ejer.2016.64.
• Zinnur-Kılıç, E. (2012). Ergenlerde şiddet kullanımı: Bireysel ve ailesel etkenler [Violent behavior in adolescence: Individual and familial factors]. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, 49(4), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.4274/npa.y6100.