Polimiyaljia Romatika ile İlgili YouTube Videolarının Kalitesi ve Güvenilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amacımız Polimiyaljia romatika (PMR) ile ilgili YouTube videolarının kalitesini ve güvenilirliğini araştırmaktır. https://www.youtube.com'da “polimiyalji romatika” terimi ile arama yaptık. PMR ile ilgili en çok izlenen 60 YouTube videosu iki bağımsız fiziatrist tarafından analiz edildi. Analizde kullanılan çalışma verileri arasında yükleme tarihi, toplam görüntüleme, beğeni ve yorum sayısı, videonun uzunluğu, videonun içeriği, yükleyicinin kaynağı ve hedeflenen popülasyon yer almaktadır. PMR ile ilgili videoların kalitesini ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmek için Küresel Kalite Ölçeği (GQS) ve modifiye DISCERN kullanıldı. Video özelliklerinin, kalitesinin ve güvenilirliğinin karşılaştırmalı analizleri, yükleyicilerin kaynağına (profesyonel ve profesyonel olmayan) ve GQS alt gruplarına göre gerçekleştirildi. Değerlendirilen videoların %76,7'si semptomlar ve %61,7'si tedavi ile ilgili olup, %65'i sağlık profesyonelleri tarafından yüklenmiştir. GQS ve modifiye DISCERN ortanca puanları profesyonellerde 3 ve profesyonel olmayanlarda 2 idi (sırasıyla p< 0,001 ve p = 0,001). GQS puanına göre düşük, orta ve yüksek kaliteli videolar arasında toplam izlenme sayısı, beğeni sayısı, yorum sayısı ve izlenme oranı değerleri açısından anlamlı bir fark bulunamadı. PMR ile ilgili YouTube videolarının %35'i profesyonel olmayan kişiler tarafından yüklenmiş olup güvenilirlik ve kaliteleri düşüktür. Bu nedenle sağlık profesyonellerinin bu platformda PMR hakkında daha doğru ve kaliteli bilgi veren videolar üretmesi gerekmektedir. YouTube videoları yayınlanmadan önce içeriklerinin doğruluğu açısından objektif olarak değerlendirilmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Polimiyaljia romatika
• kalite
• güvenilirlik
• YouTube

Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Polymyalgia Rheumatica

Öz

To investigate polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR)-related YouTube videos’ quality and reliability. We searched the term “polymyalgia rheumatica” on https://www.youtube.com. The most viewed 60 YouTube videos about PMR were analyzed by two independent physiatrists. Study data used in the analysis included upload date, total views, number of likes and comments, length of video, contents of video, source of the uploader, and targeted population. The Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the Modified DISCERN tool were used to assess PMR-related video quality and reliability, respectively. Comparative analyses of video features, quality, and reliability were performed based on source of uploaders (professional and non-professional) and GQS score subgroups. Of the videos analyzed, 76.7% and 61.7% of the uploaded videos were related to symptoms and treatment, respectively, and 65% of the videos were uploaded by healthcare professionals. The median GQS and modified DISCERN tool scores were 3 in professionals and 2 in non-professionals (p< 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). According to the GQS score, there was no significant difference in terms of total views, number of likes, number of comments, and view ratio values between low, moderate, and high quality videos. 35% of the YouTube videos concerning PMR were uploaded by non-professionals with poor reliability and quality. Therefore, healthcare professionals need to produce videos that provide more accurate and high quality information about PMR on this platform. Before being published, YouTube videos should be evaluated objectively for the accurity of their content.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Polymyalgia rheumatica
• quality
• reliability
• YouTube

Kaynakça

1. 1. Lundberg I E, Sharma A, Turesson C, Mohammad AJ. An update on polymyalgia rheumatica. J Intern Med 2022;292:717–732.
2. 2. Colombo MG, Wetzel AJ, Haumann H, Dally S, Kirtschig G, Joos S. Polymyalgia Rheumatica Dtsch Arztebl Int 2022;119:411–417.
3. 3. Castañeda S, García-Castañeda N, Prieto-Peña D, Martínez-Quintanilla D, Vicente EF, Blanco R, González-Gay MA. Treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica. Biochem pharmacol 2019;165:221–229.
4. 4. Dasgupta B, Cimmino MA, Kremers HM, Schmidt WA, Schirmer M, Salvarani C, Bachta A, Dejaco C, Duftner C, Jensen HS, Duhaut P, Poór G, Kaposi NP, Mandl P, Balint PV, Schmidt Z, Iagnocco A, Nannini C, Cantini F, Macchioni P, Pipitone N, Del Amo M, Espígol-Frigolé G, Cid MC, Martínez-Taboada VM, Nordborg E, Direskeneli H, Aydin SZ, Ahmed K, Hazleman B, Silverman B, Pease C, Wakefield RJ, Luqmani R, Abril A, Michet CJ, Marcus R, Gonter NJ, Maz M, Carter RE, Crowson CS, Matteson EL. 2012 Provisional classification criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica: a European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology collaborative initiative. Arthritis rheum 2012;64:943–954.
5. 5. Camellino D, Giusti A, Girasole G, Bianchi G, Dejaco C. Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Management of Polymyalgia Rheumatica. Drugs aging 2019;36:1015–1026.
6. 6. Karakoyun A, Yildirim A. YouTube videos as a source of information concerning Behçet's disease: a reliability and quality analysis. Rheumatol Int 2021;41:2117–2123.
7. 7. Madathil K C, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J 2015;21:173–194.
8. 8. Onder M E, Zengin O. YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis. Rheumatol Int 2021;41:1321–1328.

9. 9. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call?. J Rheumatol 2012;39:899–903.
10. 10. Kocyigit BF, Nacitarhan V, Koca TT, Berk E. YouTube as a source of patient information for ankylosing spondylitis exercises. 2019;Clin rheumatol 38:1747–1751.
11. 11. Ozsoy-Unubol T, Alanbay-Yagci E. YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia. Int J Rheum Dis 2021;24:197–202.
12. 12. Unal-Ulutatar C, Ulutatar F. YouTube as a source of information on systemic sclerosis. Int J Rheum Dis 2022;25:887–892.
13. 13. Cüzdan N, Türk İ. Evaluation of quality and reliability of musculoskeletal ultrasound videos on YouTube. Mod Rheumatol 2022;32:999–1005.
14. 14. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:105–111.
15. 15. Osman W, Mohamed F, Elhassan M, Shoufan A. Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review. BMC Med Educ 2022;22:382.
16. 16. Lee J, Jang SN. Have changes in Internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic affected older adults' self-rated health? A cross-sectional study of young-old and old-old populations in Korea. Geriatr Nurs 2022;48:145–149.
17. 17. Coskun Benlidayi I. Why is polymyalgia rheumatica a disease of older adults? Explanations through etiology and pathogenesis: a narrative review. Clin Rheumatol Advance online publication. 2023.
18. 18. Coskun Benlidayi I, Gokce Kutsal Y. Antirheumatic drugs in older adults and polypharmacy issues. Antirheumatika bei älteren Erwachsenen und die Probleme der Polypharmazie. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2022;55: 507–512.
19. 19. Sasse M, Ohrndorf S, Palmowski A, Wagner AD, Burmester GR, Pankow A, Krusche M. Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis. Rheumatol Int 2023;43:163–171.
20. 20. Elangovan S, Kwan YH, Fong W. The usefulness and validity of English-language videos on YouTube as an educational resource for spondyloarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2021;40:1567–1573.
21. 21. Ng CH, Lim GRS, Fong W. Quality of English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheum Dis 2020;23:1636–1644.
22. 22. Joshi M, R N, Jagtap K, Gupta R, Agarwal V, Aggarwal R, Goel A, Gupta L. Assessment of quality and reliability of YouTube videos for patient and physician education on inflammatory myositis. Clin Rheumatol 2023;42:1339–1349.
23. 23. Onder ME, Zengin O. Quality of healthcare information on YouTube: psoriatic arthritis. Qualität von Gesundheitsinformationen auf YouTube: Psoriasisarthritis. Z Rheumatol 2023;82:30–37.
24. 24. Kocyigit BF, Akyol A. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 vaccination in rheumatic diseases. Rheumatol Int 2021;41:2109–2115.
25. 25. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren's syndrome?. Oral Dis 2016;22:196–201.