Araştırma Makalesi

Is Serum C- Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Be A New Biomarker for Assessing Disease Activity and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Cilt: 44 Sayı: 3 14 Mart 2022
PDF İndir
EN TR

Is Serum C- Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Be A New Biomarker for Assessing Disease Activity and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Öz

The C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin ratio is a biomarker that has gained importance in recent years in demonstrating systemic inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship of CRP/albumin ratio with disease activity and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Fifty RA patients were included in this cross-sectional study. The CRP/albumin ratio was calculated from the blood of the individuals included in the study. The disease activity score-28 (DAS-28) measurement scale was used to determine disease activity. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) was used to assess functional status, and the Short-form health survey 36 (SF-36) was used to assess the quality of life. When the patients were evaluated according to the disease activity level, the CRP/albumin ratio was statistically significantly higher in patients with moderate-high disease activity compared to those in remission in post-hoc analyses (p=0.006). In correlation analyzes, moderate and positive correlation (p=0.002, rs= 0.426; p<0.001, rs= 0.536, respectively) was observed between CRP/albumin ratio and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and DAS 28-ESR scores. When the patients were evaluated according to the drug treatments they received, no significant difference was observed between conventional DMARD and biological DMARD users in terms of CRP/albumin ratio, SF-36, and HAQ scores (p>0.05). Our results suggest that CAR may be used in clinics to determine inflammation and disease activity as an inexpensive and easily applicable biomarker.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Goldring SR. Periarticular bone changes in rheumatoid arthritis: pathophysiological implications and clinical utility. Ann Rheum Dis.2009;68(3):297-9.
  2. 2. Fardellone P, Séjourné A, Paccou J, Goëb V. Bone remodelling markers in rheumatoid arthritis. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:484280.
  3. 3. Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, de Vries-Bouwstra JK, Allaart CF, van Zeben D, Kerstens PJ, Hazes JM, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum.2005;52(11):3381-90.
  4. 4. Buzatu C, Moots RJ. Measuring disease activity and response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2019;15(2):135-45.
  5. 5. Aletaha D, Funovits J, Breedveld FC, Sharp J, Segurado O, Smolen JS. Rheumatoid arthritis joint progression in sustained remission is determined by disease activity levels preceding the period of radiographic assessment. Arthritis Rheum.2009;60(5):1242-9.
  6. 6. Nakken B, Papp G, Bosnes V, Zeher M, Nagy G, Szodoray P. Biomarkers for rheumatoid arthritis: From molecular processes to diagnostic applications-current concepts and future perspectives. Immunology Lett. 2017;189:13-8.
  7. 7. Colglazier CL, Sutej PG. Laboratory testing in the rheumatic diseases: a practical review. South Med J.2005;98(2):185-91.
  8. 8. Yang WM, Zhang WH, Ying HQ, Xu YM, Zhang J, Min QH, et al. Two new inflammatory markers associated with disease activity score-28 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Albumin to fibrinogen ratio and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018;62:293-8.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

14 Mart 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

5 Ağustos 2021

Kabul Tarihi

8 Kasım 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 44 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Balevi Batur, E., & Levendoğlu, F. (2022). Is Serum C- Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Be A New Biomarker for Assessing Disease Activity and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis? Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi, 44(3), 301-308. https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.979042
AMA
1.Balevi Batur E, Levendoğlu F. Is Serum C- Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Be A New Biomarker for Assessing Disease Activity and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis? Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi. 2022;44(3):301-308. doi:10.20515/otd.979042
Chicago
Balevi Batur, Elif, ve Funda Levendoğlu. 2022. “Is Serum C- Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Be A New Biomarker for Assessing Disease Activity and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis?”. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi 44 (3): 301-8. https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.979042.
EndNote
Balevi Batur E, Levendoğlu F (01 Mart 2022) Is Serum C- Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Be A New Biomarker for Assessing Disease Activity and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis? Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi 44 3 301–308.
IEEE
[1]E. Balevi Batur ve F. Levendoğlu, “Is Serum C- Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Be A New Biomarker for Assessing Disease Activity and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis?”, Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi, c. 44, sy 3, ss. 301–308, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.20515/otd.979042.
ISNAD
Balevi Batur, Elif - Levendoğlu, Funda. “Is Serum C- Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Be A New Biomarker for Assessing Disease Activity and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis?”. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi 44/3 (01 Mart 2022): 301-308. https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.979042.
JAMA
1.Balevi Batur E, Levendoğlu F. Is Serum C- Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Be A New Biomarker for Assessing Disease Activity and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis? Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi. 2022;44:301–308.
MLA
Balevi Batur, Elif, ve Funda Levendoğlu. “Is Serum C- Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Be A New Biomarker for Assessing Disease Activity and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis?”. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi, c. 44, sy 3, Mart 2022, ss. 301-8, doi:10.20515/otd.979042.
Vancouver
1.Elif Balevi Batur, Funda Levendoğlu. Is Serum C- Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Be A New Biomarker for Assessing Disease Activity and Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis? Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi. 01 Mart 2022;44(3):301-8. doi:10.20515/otd.979042

Cited By


13299        13308       13306       13305    13307  1330126978