Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Spontan Pnömotoraksta Klinik Deneyimlerimiz

Year 2019, Volume: 41 Issue: 2, 147 - 152, 01.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.460918

Abstract

Spontan pnömotoraks göğüs
cerrahisi kliniklerinde sık karşılaşılan hastalıklardan birisidir. Küçük
boyutta ve asemptomatik pnömotoraks hastalarında O2 desteği ile gözlem
genellikle yeterli olurken; semptomatik olan hastalarda tedavi, aspirasyondan
açık cerrahi girişime kadar değişkenlik gösterebilir. Bu çalışmada 2015 ile
2017 yılları arasında kliniğimizde tedavi edilen spontan pnömotoraks hastalarının
cinsiyet, yaş, tedavi şekilleri ve nüks oranları açısından değerlendirilmeleri
amaçlandı. 2015 ile 2017 tarihleri arasında spontan pnömotoraks geçiren 41
hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Bu hastalar cinsiyet, yaş, tedavi şekilleri ve nüks
oranları açısından değerlendirildi 41 hastadan 3’ü (%7,3) kadın, 38’i (%92,7)
erkekti. Hastaların genel yaş ortalaması 29,2 olarak hesaplandı. Primer spontan
pnömotorakslı 35 hastada yaş ortalaması 25,8 (15-41), sekonder spontan
pnömotorakslı 6 hastada ise 49,3 (26-70) olarak bulundu. Hastalardan 3 (%7,3)
tanesinde oksijen desteği ile gözlem yeterli oldu. 26 (%63,4) hasta tüp
torakostomi ile iyileşirken, 12 (%29,3) hasta için ise takılan göğüs tüpü ile
tedavi yeterli olmayıp, ileri cerrahi prosedür gerekli oldu. Cerrahi işlemler
video yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi (VYTC) veya torakotomi yöntemleri ile
yapıldı. Çift lümen entübasyonu tolere edemeyen, yaygın büllöz-amfizamatöz
değişiklikleri olan veya toraks içerisinde ileri düzey yapışıklıkları olan
hastalarda torakotomi yöntemi kulanıldı. VYTC ile bül eksizyonu ve plevral
abrazyon yapılan hastalardan bir tanesinde nüks gözlendi. Tüp torakostomi veya
cerrahi işlem sırası ve sonrasında herhangi bir komplikasyona  rastlanmadı. Müdahale gerektirecek boyutta
olan veya O2 desteği ile resorbe olmayan semptomatik pnömotoraks olgularında
tüp torakostomi işlemi ilk tedavi seçeneği olarak güvenle uygulanabilir. Tekrar
eden pnömotoraks, uzamış hava kaçağı ve ekspansiyon problemi olan
olgularda  ek cerrahi  işlem yapılmalıdır. 

References

  • 1. Primrose WR. Spontaneous pneumothorax: a retrospective rewiev of aetiology; pathogenesis and management. Scott Med J. 1984;29:15-20.
  • 2. Beauchamp G, Ouellette D. Spontaneous pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum. In: Patterson G.A., Cooper J.D., Deslaruries J (et al) (eds). Pearsons’s Thoracic&Esophageal Surgery. Pheledelphia: Elsevier 2008:1094-1107.
  • 3. Noppen M, Keukeleire T D. Pneumothorax, Respiration, 2008;76:121-127.
  • 4. Klassen K.P., Meckstroth.Treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: Prompt expansion JAMA 1962; 182:1-5.
  • 5. Baumann M H, Strange C, Heffner J E, Light R, et al., Management of Spontaneous Pneumothorax : An American College of Chest Physicians. Chest 2001;119;590-602.
  • 6. MacDuff A, Arnold A, August J H. BTS Pleural Disease Guideline . Thorax 2010;65(Suppl 2)
  • 7. Soldati G, Testa A, Sher S, et al. Occult traumatic pneumothorax: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography in the emergency department. Chest. 2008 Jan;133(1):204-11. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
  • 8. Baumann M H. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Clinics in Chest Medicine. 2006 Jun;27(2):369-81.
  • 9. Kuester J R, Frese S, Stein RM, et al. Treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in Switzerland: results of a survey. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2006;5:139–144.
  • 10. Vohra H A, Adamson L, Weeden D F. Does video-assisted thoracoscopic pleurectomy result in beter outcomes than open pleurectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008;7:673–677.
  • 11. Ng C S H., Lee T W, Wan S, Yim A P C. Video assisted thoracic surgery in the management of spontaneous pneumothorax: the current status. Postgrad Med J. 2006 Mar; 82(965): 179–185.

Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Our Clinical Experınce

Year 2019, Volume: 41 Issue: 2, 147 - 152, 01.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.460918

Abstract

Spontaneous pneumothorax  is one of the common disease, that the
thoracic surgery clinics encounters. 
Observation with O2 support is usually sufficient for small and
asymptomatic pneumothorax patients; while the treatment for the symptomatic
patients varies from aspiration to open surgical procedures. In this study, we
aimed to evaluate spontaneous pneumothorax patients treated in our clinic
between 2015 and 2017 in terms of gender, age, treatment modalities and
recurrence rates.
41 patients who had spontaneous pneumothorax between 2015 and 2017 were
included in the study. These patients were evaluated in terms of gender, age,
treatment modalities and recurrence rates. 3 of the 41 patients (7.3%) were
female and 38 (92.7%) were male. The overall average age of the patients was
calculated as 29.2. Mean age in 35 patients with primary spontaneous
pneumothorax  was 25.8 (15-41) and 49.3
(26-70) in 6 patients with secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. Observation with
oxygen support was sufficient in 3 (7.3%) patients. Twenty six (63.4%) patients
recovered with tube thoracostomy, while in 12 (29.3%) patients treatment
with  chest tube was  insufficient and advanced surgical procedure
was necessary. Surgical procedures were performed with video assisted
thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)  or  thoracotomy. Thoracotomy was used for
patients, who could not tolarate double lumen entubation, who had diffuse
bullous-emphysematous changes or extensive pleural adhesions in their lungs. Recurrence
was observed in one of the patients who underwent bullae excision and pleural
abrasion with VATS.There were no complications during or after the tube
thoracostomy or surgical procedure. Tube thoracostomy can be safely applied as
a first-line treatment option for symptomatic pneumothorax patients who are in
need of intervention or whose pneumothorax do not resorb with O2 support. Additional
surgical procedures should be performed in cases of recurrent pneumothorax,
prolonged air leak, and expansion problems.

References

  • 1. Primrose WR. Spontaneous pneumothorax: a retrospective rewiev of aetiology; pathogenesis and management. Scott Med J. 1984;29:15-20.
  • 2. Beauchamp G, Ouellette D. Spontaneous pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum. In: Patterson G.A., Cooper J.D., Deslaruries J (et al) (eds). Pearsons’s Thoracic&Esophageal Surgery. Pheledelphia: Elsevier 2008:1094-1107.
  • 3. Noppen M, Keukeleire T D. Pneumothorax, Respiration, 2008;76:121-127.
  • 4. Klassen K.P., Meckstroth.Treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: Prompt expansion JAMA 1962; 182:1-5.
  • 5. Baumann M H, Strange C, Heffner J E, Light R, et al., Management of Spontaneous Pneumothorax : An American College of Chest Physicians. Chest 2001;119;590-602.
  • 6. MacDuff A, Arnold A, August J H. BTS Pleural Disease Guideline . Thorax 2010;65(Suppl 2)
  • 7. Soldati G, Testa A, Sher S, et al. Occult traumatic pneumothorax: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography in the emergency department. Chest. 2008 Jan;133(1):204-11. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
  • 8. Baumann M H. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Clinics in Chest Medicine. 2006 Jun;27(2):369-81.
  • 9. Kuester J R, Frese S, Stein RM, et al. Treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in Switzerland: results of a survey. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2006;5:139–144.
  • 10. Vohra H A, Adamson L, Weeden D F. Does video-assisted thoracoscopic pleurectomy result in beter outcomes than open pleurectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008;7:673–677.
  • 11. Ng C S H., Lee T W, Wan S, Yim A P C. Video assisted thoracic surgery in the management of spontaneous pneumothorax: the current status. Postgrad Med J. 2006 Mar; 82(965): 179–185.
There are 11 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section ORİJİNAL MAKALE
Authors

Erhan Durceylan 0000-0002-1054-1156

Duygu Mergan İliklerden This is me 0000-0001-8203-3946

Publication Date April 1, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 41 Issue: 2

Cite

Vancouver Durceylan E, Mergan İliklerden D. Spontan Pnömotoraksta Klinik Deneyimlerimiz. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi. 2019;41(2):147-52.


13299        13308       13306       13305    13307  1330126978