Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Yüksek Dereceli Lezyonların Dışlanamayacağı Atipik Skuamöz Hücrelerin Klinik Önemi; Anadolu’daki Bir Üçüncül Hastanenin Deneyimi

Year 2020, Volume: 42 Issue: 4, 412 - 417, 13.07.2020
https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.603831

Abstract

Çalışmamızın öncelikli amacı servikal sitolojide
yüksek dereceli skuamöz lezyonların dışlanamadığı atipik skuamöz hücre (ASC-H)
tanısı almış hastaların histolojik sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi ve bu durumun
klinik öneminin ortaya çıkarılmasıdır. Yirmibin
yüzaltmışüç hastanın smear sonuçları değerlendirildi. Yetmiş altı
(0.376 %)
hastada ASC-H tanısı kondu. ASCH tanısı konan hastaların dosyaları retrospektif
olarak gözden geçirildi. ASCH tanısı konan tüm hastalara kolposkopik muayene
işlemi yapıldı. Kolposkopik muayenede gerekli görülen hastalara eksizyonel
işlemler ile servikal ve endoservikal biyopsi işlemleri uygulandı. Hastaların
klinik patolojik bilgileri dosyalarından incelenip toplandı. Gözden geçirilen
20163 smear sonucunda 1188
(5.8%) hastada servikal anormal sitoloji tespit edildi. Bu
anormal servikal sitolojilerin 76 tanesinde ASCH
(0.37% ) tespit
edildi. ASCH tanısı alan 76 hastanın 36 (47.3%) tanesinde anormal servikal
displazi tespit edildi. Bunlarında 20 (20/76-26.3%) tanesinde yüksek dereceli servikal
intraepitelyal neoplazi (CIN2-3) ,12 (12/76-15.7%) tanesinde düşük dereceli
servikal intraepitelyal neoplazi(CIN1) ve 4 (4 /76-5%) tanesinde servikal
invazif kanser tespit edildi. ASCH
tanısı önemli oranda prekanseröz ve kanseröz lezyonlarla ilişkilidir. Bu
nedenle ASCH hastalarının yönetiminde ileri değerlendirme yapılırken gerekli
özen ve dikkat sağlanmalıdır.

References

  • References1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69:7-34.2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65:87-108.3. The 1988 Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytological Diagnoses. National Cancer Institute Workshop. JAMA. 1989; 262:931-934.4. Broder S. From the National Institutes of Health. JAMA. 1992; 267:1892.5. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: Terminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology. JAMA 2002; 287:2114-9.6. Nayar R, Wilbur DC. The Pap Test and Bethesda 2014: "The Reports of My Demise Have Been Greatly Exaggerated. (After a Quotation from Mark Twain)". J Low Genit Tract Dis 2015; 19:175-84.7. Katki HA, Schiffman M, Castle PE, et al. Five-year Risks of CIN 3+ and Cervical Cancer Among Women with HPV Testing of ASC-US Pap Results. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2013;17:S36.8. Demirtas GS, Akman L, Demirtas O, et al. Clinical Significance of ASCUS and ASC-H Cytological Abnormalities: A Six-year Experience at a Single Center. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2015; 36:150.9. Arco CD, Montoro CS, López DG, Escudero ER. Clinical Relevance of ASC-H Cytologies: Experience in a Single Tertiary Hospital. Acta Cytologica. 2016; 60:217–22410. Gilani SM, Tashjian R, Fathallah L. Cervical Cytology with A Diagnosis of Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion (ASC-H): A Follow-up Study with Corresponding Histology and Significance of Predicting Dysplasia by Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Testing. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014; 289:645–64811. Tokmak A, Guzel Aİ, Ozgu E, Oz M. Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance in Detecting Preinvasive Cervical Lesions in Post Menopausal Turkish Women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:6639-664112. Kim SH, Lee JM, Yun GH, Park US. Overall Accuracy of Cervical Cytology and Clinicopathological Significance of LSIL Cells in ASC-H Cytology. Cytopathology 2017; 28:16–2313. Arslan E, Gokdagli F, Bozdag H, Vatansever D. Abnormal Pap Smear Frequency and Comparison of Repeat Cytological Follow-up with Colposcopy During Patient Management: The İmportance of Pathologist’s Guidance in the Management. North Clin Istanb. 2019;6(1):69-7414. Nogara PRB, Manfroni LAR, Consolaro MEL. Cervical Cytology of Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion (ASC-H): Histological Results and Recurrence After a Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011; 284: 965–971.15. You K, Guo Y, Gen L, Qiao J. The Risk of CIN II or Greater in a One-year Follow-up Period in Patients with ASC-H İnterpreted with Cytology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 149: 215–217.16. Gupta S, Sodhani P. Reducing ‘Atypical Squamous Cells’ Overdiagnosis Cervicovaginal Smears by Diligent Cytology Screening. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012; 40: 764–769.17. Bonvicino A, Huitron S, Fadare O. Papanicolaou Test İnterpretations of ‘Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion’ : An İnvestigation of Requisite Duration and Number of Colposcopic Procedures to a Definitive Diagnosis of High-grade Dysplasia in Routine Practice. Cancer. 2007; 111: 477–481.18. Cytryn A, Russomano FB, Camargo MJ, Zardo LMG, Horta NMSR, Fonseca Rde C, et al. Prevalence of Cervical İntraepithelial Neoplasia Grades II/III and Cervical Cancer in Patients with Cytological Diagnosis of Atypical Squamous Cells When High-grade İntraepithelial Lesions (ASC-H) Cannot beRruled Out. Sã o Paulo Med J 2009; 127: 283–287.19. Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Tantipalakorn C, Suprasert P, Khunamornpong S, Nimmanhaeminda K, et al. Underlying Pathology of Women with ‘Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion’ Smears, in a Region with a High İncidence of Cervical Cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008; 34: 204–209.20. López-Alegría F, De Lorenzi DS, Quezada OP. Follow-up of Women with Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesions (ASC-H). Sã o Paulo Med J 2014; 132: 15–22.21. Selvaggi SM. Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High Grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion with Histologic Correlation: A 9-year Experience. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013; 41: 943–946.22. Ayhan A, Dursun P, Kuşçu E, Mülayim B. Prevalence of Cervical Cytological Abnormalities in Turkey. Turkish Cervical Cancer And Cervical Cytology Research Group. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 ;106(3):206-923. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. Practice Bulletin No. 168: Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 128:e111. Reaffirmed 2018.24. Mokhtar GA, Delatour NLDR, Assiri AH, Gilliatt MA, Senterman M, Islam S: Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion: Cytohistologic Correlation Study with Diagnostic Pitfalls. Acta Cytol. 2008; 52: 169–177.25. McHale MT, Souther J, Elkas JC, Monk BJ, Harrison TA. Is Atypical Squamous Cells That Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion Clinically Significant?. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007; 11:86–8926. Ozlem A, Umit I. Comparative Analysis of Cervical Cytology Screening Methods and Staining Protocols for Detection Rate and Accurate İnterpretation of ASC-H: Data From a High-volume Laboratory in Turkey. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015; 43: 863–869.27. Patton AL, Duncan L, Bloom L, Phaneuf G, Zafar N. Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude a High-grade İntraepithelial Lesion and Its Clinical Significance in Postmenopausal, Pregnant, Postpartum, and Contraceptive-use Patients. Cancer. 2008; 114:481–48828. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women with Cervical Cytological Abnormalities. JAMA 2002;287:2120–2129.

Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells in Which High Grade Lesions Cannot Be Excluded; Experience of aTertiary Hospital in Anatolia

Year 2020, Volume: 42 Issue: 4, 412 - 417, 13.07.2020
https://doi.org/10.20515/otd.603831

Abstract

The primary aim of our study
was to evaluate the histological results of patients diagnosed with atypical
squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade lesion (ASC-H) by cervical cytology
and to reveal the clinical importance of ASC-H.
Twenty thousand one hundred sixty three cervicovaginal smears were
evaluated.
Seventy six (0.376 %) patients were
diagnosed as ASC-H
. Files of patients diagnosed with ASC-H were
retrospectively reviewed. We referred patients who were diagnosed as ASC-H according
to the Bethesda classification system after cervicovaginal smear for
colposcopic examination. İf it is necessary, cervical biopsy, endocervical and
endometrial curettage were performed by the colposcopy guide
.
Clinicopathological features of the patients were examined and recorded.
Smear results of 20163 patients reviewed. Abnormal
cytological results were found in 1188 (5.8%) patients. The abnormal
cytological results were ASC-H in 76 (0.37% ) patients. Abnormal cervical
dysplasia was detected in 36 (47.3%) of 76 patients diagnosed as ASC-H. Twenty
(20/76-26.3%) of these abnormal lesions were high-grade cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2 / 3), 12 (12/76-15.7%) of them were low-grade
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 1) and 4 (4 /76-5%) of them were
cervical carcinoma. ASC-H is a diagnosis with significant association with
precancerous and cancerous lesions. Therefore, further evaluation of ASC-H
patients should be performed with the necessary care and attention

References

  • References1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69:7-34.2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65:87-108.3. The 1988 Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytological Diagnoses. National Cancer Institute Workshop. JAMA. 1989; 262:931-934.4. Broder S. From the National Institutes of Health. JAMA. 1992; 267:1892.5. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: Terminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology. JAMA 2002; 287:2114-9.6. Nayar R, Wilbur DC. The Pap Test and Bethesda 2014: "The Reports of My Demise Have Been Greatly Exaggerated. (After a Quotation from Mark Twain)". J Low Genit Tract Dis 2015; 19:175-84.7. Katki HA, Schiffman M, Castle PE, et al. Five-year Risks of CIN 3+ and Cervical Cancer Among Women with HPV Testing of ASC-US Pap Results. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2013;17:S36.8. Demirtas GS, Akman L, Demirtas O, et al. Clinical Significance of ASCUS and ASC-H Cytological Abnormalities: A Six-year Experience at a Single Center. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2015; 36:150.9. Arco CD, Montoro CS, López DG, Escudero ER. Clinical Relevance of ASC-H Cytologies: Experience in a Single Tertiary Hospital. Acta Cytologica. 2016; 60:217–22410. Gilani SM, Tashjian R, Fathallah L. Cervical Cytology with A Diagnosis of Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion (ASC-H): A Follow-up Study with Corresponding Histology and Significance of Predicting Dysplasia by Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Testing. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014; 289:645–64811. Tokmak A, Guzel Aİ, Ozgu E, Oz M. Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance in Detecting Preinvasive Cervical Lesions in Post Menopausal Turkish Women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:6639-664112. Kim SH, Lee JM, Yun GH, Park US. Overall Accuracy of Cervical Cytology and Clinicopathological Significance of LSIL Cells in ASC-H Cytology. Cytopathology 2017; 28:16–2313. Arslan E, Gokdagli F, Bozdag H, Vatansever D. Abnormal Pap Smear Frequency and Comparison of Repeat Cytological Follow-up with Colposcopy During Patient Management: The İmportance of Pathologist’s Guidance in the Management. North Clin Istanb. 2019;6(1):69-7414. Nogara PRB, Manfroni LAR, Consolaro MEL. Cervical Cytology of Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion (ASC-H): Histological Results and Recurrence After a Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011; 284: 965–971.15. You K, Guo Y, Gen L, Qiao J. The Risk of CIN II or Greater in a One-year Follow-up Period in Patients with ASC-H İnterpreted with Cytology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 149: 215–217.16. Gupta S, Sodhani P. Reducing ‘Atypical Squamous Cells’ Overdiagnosis Cervicovaginal Smears by Diligent Cytology Screening. Diagn Cytopathol. 2012; 40: 764–769.17. Bonvicino A, Huitron S, Fadare O. Papanicolaou Test İnterpretations of ‘Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion’ : An İnvestigation of Requisite Duration and Number of Colposcopic Procedures to a Definitive Diagnosis of High-grade Dysplasia in Routine Practice. Cancer. 2007; 111: 477–481.18. Cytryn A, Russomano FB, Camargo MJ, Zardo LMG, Horta NMSR, Fonseca Rde C, et al. Prevalence of Cervical İntraepithelial Neoplasia Grades II/III and Cervical Cancer in Patients with Cytological Diagnosis of Atypical Squamous Cells When High-grade İntraepithelial Lesions (ASC-H) Cannot beRruled Out. Sã o Paulo Med J 2009; 127: 283–287.19. Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Tantipalakorn C, Suprasert P, Khunamornpong S, Nimmanhaeminda K, et al. Underlying Pathology of Women with ‘Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion’ Smears, in a Region with a High İncidence of Cervical Cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008; 34: 204–209.20. López-Alegría F, De Lorenzi DS, Quezada OP. Follow-up of Women with Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesions (ASC-H). Sã o Paulo Med J 2014; 132: 15–22.21. Selvaggi SM. Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High Grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion with Histologic Correlation: A 9-year Experience. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013; 41: 943–946.22. Ayhan A, Dursun P, Kuşçu E, Mülayim B. Prevalence of Cervical Cytological Abnormalities in Turkey. Turkish Cervical Cancer And Cervical Cytology Research Group. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 ;106(3):206-923. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. Practice Bulletin No. 168: Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 128:e111. Reaffirmed 2018.24. Mokhtar GA, Delatour NLDR, Assiri AH, Gilliatt MA, Senterman M, Islam S: Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion: Cytohistologic Correlation Study with Diagnostic Pitfalls. Acta Cytol. 2008; 52: 169–177.25. McHale MT, Souther J, Elkas JC, Monk BJ, Harrison TA. Is Atypical Squamous Cells That Cannot Exclude High-grade Squamous İntraepithelial Lesion Clinically Significant?. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007; 11:86–8926. Ozlem A, Umit I. Comparative Analysis of Cervical Cytology Screening Methods and Staining Protocols for Detection Rate and Accurate İnterpretation of ASC-H: Data From a High-volume Laboratory in Turkey. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015; 43: 863–869.27. Patton AL, Duncan L, Bloom L, Phaneuf G, Zafar N. Atypical Squamous Cells, Cannot Exclude a High-grade İntraepithelial Lesion and Its Clinical Significance in Postmenopausal, Pregnant, Postpartum, and Contraceptive-use Patients. Cancer. 2008; 114:481–48828. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women with Cervical Cytological Abnormalities. JAMA 2002;287:2120–2129.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section ORİJİNAL MAKALE
Authors

Yusuf Çakmak 0000-0003-3128-247X

Tufan Öge This is me 0000-0002-1951-9713

Publication Date July 13, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 42 Issue: 4

Cite

Vancouver Çakmak Y, Öge T. Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells in Which High Grade Lesions Cannot Be Excluded; Experience of aTertiary Hospital in Anatolia. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi. 2020;42(4):412-7.


13299        13308       13306       13305    13307  1330126978