Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Cerrahi Hastalarının Hemşirelik Bakımı Algısı ve İyileşme Kalitesinin Bazı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi

Year 2023, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 448 - 454, 18.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.26453/otjhs.1288053

Abstract

Amaç: Araştırmanın amacı cerrahi hastalarının bakım kalitesi algısı ve iyileşme kalitesi düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi ve kişisel özelliklerine göre farklılıkların belirlenmesidir.
Materyal ve Metot: Tanımlayıcı-kesitsel tipte olan araştırma, Aralık 2021-Mayıs 2022 tarihleri arasında bir üniversite hastanesinin cerrahi kliniklerinde tedavi gören 237 hastası ile yürütüldü. Veriler, tanımlayıcı bilgi formu, Hastanın Hemşirelik Bakımını Algılayışı Ölçeği ve İyileşme Kalitesi-40 Ölçeği ile toplandı.
Bulgular: Hastaların Hemşirelik Bakımını Algılayışı Ölçeği toplam puan ortalaması 71,45±9,81, İyileşme Kalitesi-40 ölçek toplam puan ortalaması 106±15,95’tir. İyileşme Kalitesi-40 ölçeğinin Fiziksel Bağımsızlık alt boyut puan ortalamasının (21,14±5,73) en yüksek, ağrı alt boyut puan ortalamasının ise en düşük (9,32±3,57) olduğu saptandı. Hastaların cinsiyeti, refakatçi varlığı ile Hastanın Hemşirelik Bakımını Algılayışı Ölçeği arasında, kronik hastalık varlığı ile İyileşme Kalitesi-40 Ölçeği arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki vardır.
Sonuç: Hastaların hemşirelik bakımı algı düzeyinin yüksek, iyileşme kalitesi düzeyinin ortalamanın altında olduğu ve hastaların hemşirelik bakımını algılama düzeyleri ile iyileşme kalitesi arasında ilişki olmadığı belirlendi.

References

  • Karaca A, Durna Z. Patient satisfaction with the quality of nursing care. Nurs Open. 2019;6(2):535-545. doi:10.1002/nop2.237
  • Kewi SY, Tesema AA, Negussie BB. Patient’s perception towards quality of nursing care in ınpatient department at public hospitals of benishangul gumuz regional state, North West Ethiopia. Journal of Nursing & Care. 2018;07(04). doi:10.4172/2167-1168.1000467
  • Gishu T, Weldetsadik AY, Tekleab AM. Patients’ perception of quality of nursing care; A tertiary center experience from Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2019;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12912-019-0361-z
  • Bowyer A, Royse C. L’importance de la qualité de récupération postopératoire: influences, évaluation et implications cliniques et pronostiques. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2016;63(2):176-183. doi:10.1007/s12630-015-0508-7
  • Xu XF, An JJ, Zhang YE, Liu L, Chen YM, Gong RR. Investigation of the quality of recovery of surgical patients based on the Chinese version of the quality of recovery-15 survey, a cross-sectional study. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing. 2022;37(2):199-203. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2021.04.002
  • Borrell-Vega J, Humeidan ML, Bergese SD. Defining quality of recovery – What is important to patients? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2018;32(3-4):259-268. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2018.07.002
  • Bayramoglu BG, Akyuz N. Investigation of preoperative fasting time and preoperative and postoperative well-being of patients. Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2022;30(1):33-39. doi:10.5152/FNJN.2022.21047
  • Wessels E, Perrie H, Scribante J, Jooma Z. Quality of recovery in the perioperative setting: A narrative review. J Clin Anesth. 2022;78. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110685
  • Çoban Gİ. Hastanın hemşirelik bakımını algılayış ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenirlilik çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Hemşirelik Esasları Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Erzurum, Türkiye. 2006.
  • Gürkan A, Dikmen Aydın Y, Aldemir K. Surgical patients’ perceptions of nursing care quality and their satisfactions with nursing care. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2020;12(3):329-336. doi:10.5336/nurses.2020-74985
  • Wakjira MK, Sandy PT, Mavhandu-Mudzusi AH. Patients’ perceived quality of care and their satisfaction with care given for MDR-TB at referral hospitals in Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2023;18(2 February). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270439
  • Ozturk H, Demirsoy N, Sayligil O, Florczak KL. Patients’ perceptions of nursing care in a university hospital. Nurs Sci Q. 2020;33(1):12-18. doi:10.1177/0894318419881798
  • Kol E, Arıkan F, İlaslan E, Akıncı MA, Koçak MC. A quality indicator for the evaluation of nursing care: determination of patient satisfaction and related factors at a university hospital in the Mediterranean Region in Turkey. Collegian. 2018;25(1):51-56. doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2017.03.006
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1992;1(3):98-101. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
  • Dozier AM, Kitzman HJ, Ingersoll GL, Holmberg S, Schultz AW. Development of an ınstrument to measure patient perception of the quality of nursing care. Res Nurs Health. 2001;24(6):506-517.
  • Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: The QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(1):11-15. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366
  • Karaman S, Arici S, Dogru S, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(8):2-6. http://www.hqlo.com/content/12/1/8.
  • Özşaker E, Durak H, Canbazogulları Ü. Günübirlik cerrahide hastaların ameliyat sonrasına ilişkin endişelerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Contemporary Medicine. 2019;9(1):100-105. doi:10.16899/gopctd.478417
  • Kızılcık Özkan Z, Dığın F, Dinlegör Sekmen I. Hastalarda perioperatif hemşirelik bakımı kalitesi ve etkileyen faktörler. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2023;10(1):26-32. doi:10.34087/cbusbed.1147163
  • Özsoy H, Çankaya A, Yavuz van Giersbergen M, Oruç G. Cerrahi hastalarının bakım algısı ve mahremiyet konusundaki deneyimleri. YOBU Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023;4(1):22-31.
  • Arslan C, Sobcalı S, Demirkan T. Hastaların hemşirelik bakımını algılayış düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Dergisi. 2022;4(3):129-132. doi:10.48071/sbuhemsirelik.1195723
  • Yusefi AR, Sarvestani SR, Kavosi Z, Bahmaei J, Mehrizi MM, Mehralian G. Patients’ perceptions of the quality of nursing services. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1). doi:10.1186/s12912-022-00906-1
  • Myles PS, Shulman MA, Reilly J, Kasza J, Romero L. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128(6):1029-1039. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/78HTA
  • Campfort M, Cayla C, Lasocki S, Rineau E, Léger M. Early quality of recovery according to QoR-15 score is associated with one-month postoperative complications after elective surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2022;78. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110638
  • Demirci B, Yılmaz Şahin S. Lomber disk hernisi ameliyatı öncesi hastaların cerrahi korku düzeylerinin ameliyat sonrası ağrı ve iyileşme kalitesi üzerine etkisi. Karya Journal of Health Science. 2023;4(1):19-25. doi:10.52831/kjhs.1182953
  • Hoxha R, Kosevska E, Berisha M, et al. Predictive factors for patient satisfaction in public and private hospitals in Kosovo. South East Eur J Public Health. 2019;12. doi:10.4119/seejph-2362
  • Aygin D, Yılmaz AÇ, Sert N. Yara iyileşmesini etkileyen komorbiditeler, genetik ve sistemik faktörler. Journal of Human Rhythm. 2021;7(1):28-42.

Examination of Perception of Nursing Care and Quality of Recovery in Surgical Patients According to Some Variables

Year 2023, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 448 - 454, 18.12.2023
https://doi.org/10.26453/otjhs.1288053

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to determine the relationship between the quality of care perception and healing quality levels of surgical patients and to determine the differences according to their characteristics.
Materials and Methods: The descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on 237 patients treated in the surgical clinics of a university hospital from December 2021 to May 2022. Data were collected using a descriptive information form, the Patient's Perception of Nursing Care Scale, and the Quality of Recovery-40 Scale.
Results: The mean total score of the Patient's Perception of Nursing Care Scale was 71.45±9.81, and the mean total score of the Quality of Recovery-40 Scale was 106±15.95. The mean score of the physical independence sub-dimension of the Quality of Recovery-40 Scale was the highest (21.14±5.73), and the mean score of the pain sub-dimension was the lowest (9.32±3.57). There was statistically significant relationship between gender, having a companion, and Patient's Perception of Nursing Care Scale and between having a chronic disease and the Quality of Recovery-40 Scale.
Conclusion: It was found that the level of patient's perception of nursing care was high, the level of recovery quality was below average, and there was no relationship between the level of perception of nursing care.

References

  • Karaca A, Durna Z. Patient satisfaction with the quality of nursing care. Nurs Open. 2019;6(2):535-545. doi:10.1002/nop2.237
  • Kewi SY, Tesema AA, Negussie BB. Patient’s perception towards quality of nursing care in ınpatient department at public hospitals of benishangul gumuz regional state, North West Ethiopia. Journal of Nursing & Care. 2018;07(04). doi:10.4172/2167-1168.1000467
  • Gishu T, Weldetsadik AY, Tekleab AM. Patients’ perception of quality of nursing care; A tertiary center experience from Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2019;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12912-019-0361-z
  • Bowyer A, Royse C. L’importance de la qualité de récupération postopératoire: influences, évaluation et implications cliniques et pronostiques. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. 2016;63(2):176-183. doi:10.1007/s12630-015-0508-7
  • Xu XF, An JJ, Zhang YE, Liu L, Chen YM, Gong RR. Investigation of the quality of recovery of surgical patients based on the Chinese version of the quality of recovery-15 survey, a cross-sectional study. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing. 2022;37(2):199-203. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2021.04.002
  • Borrell-Vega J, Humeidan ML, Bergese SD. Defining quality of recovery – What is important to patients? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2018;32(3-4):259-268. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2018.07.002
  • Bayramoglu BG, Akyuz N. Investigation of preoperative fasting time and preoperative and postoperative well-being of patients. Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2022;30(1):33-39. doi:10.5152/FNJN.2022.21047
  • Wessels E, Perrie H, Scribante J, Jooma Z. Quality of recovery in the perioperative setting: A narrative review. J Clin Anesth. 2022;78. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110685
  • Çoban Gİ. Hastanın hemşirelik bakımını algılayış ölçeğinin geçerlilik ve güvenirlilik çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Hemşirelik Esasları Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Erzurum, Türkiye. 2006.
  • Gürkan A, Dikmen Aydın Y, Aldemir K. Surgical patients’ perceptions of nursing care quality and their satisfactions with nursing care. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2020;12(3):329-336. doi:10.5336/nurses.2020-74985
  • Wakjira MK, Sandy PT, Mavhandu-Mudzusi AH. Patients’ perceived quality of care and their satisfaction with care given for MDR-TB at referral hospitals in Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2023;18(2 February). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270439
  • Ozturk H, Demirsoy N, Sayligil O, Florczak KL. Patients’ perceptions of nursing care in a university hospital. Nurs Sci Q. 2020;33(1):12-18. doi:10.1177/0894318419881798
  • Kol E, Arıkan F, İlaslan E, Akıncı MA, Koçak MC. A quality indicator for the evaluation of nursing care: determination of patient satisfaction and related factors at a university hospital in the Mediterranean Region in Turkey. Collegian. 2018;25(1):51-56. doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2017.03.006
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1992;1(3):98-101. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
  • Dozier AM, Kitzman HJ, Ingersoll GL, Holmberg S, Schultz AW. Development of an ınstrument to measure patient perception of the quality of nursing care. Res Nurs Health. 2001;24(6):506-517.
  • Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: The QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(1):11-15. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366
  • Karaman S, Arici S, Dogru S, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(8):2-6. http://www.hqlo.com/content/12/1/8.
  • Özşaker E, Durak H, Canbazogulları Ü. Günübirlik cerrahide hastaların ameliyat sonrasına ilişkin endişelerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Contemporary Medicine. 2019;9(1):100-105. doi:10.16899/gopctd.478417
  • Kızılcık Özkan Z, Dığın F, Dinlegör Sekmen I. Hastalarda perioperatif hemşirelik bakımı kalitesi ve etkileyen faktörler. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2023;10(1):26-32. doi:10.34087/cbusbed.1147163
  • Özsoy H, Çankaya A, Yavuz van Giersbergen M, Oruç G. Cerrahi hastalarının bakım algısı ve mahremiyet konusundaki deneyimleri. YOBU Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023;4(1):22-31.
  • Arslan C, Sobcalı S, Demirkan T. Hastaların hemşirelik bakımını algılayış düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Dergisi. 2022;4(3):129-132. doi:10.48071/sbuhemsirelik.1195723
  • Yusefi AR, Sarvestani SR, Kavosi Z, Bahmaei J, Mehrizi MM, Mehralian G. Patients’ perceptions of the quality of nursing services. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1). doi:10.1186/s12912-022-00906-1
  • Myles PS, Shulman MA, Reilly J, Kasza J, Romero L. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128(6):1029-1039. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/78HTA
  • Campfort M, Cayla C, Lasocki S, Rineau E, Léger M. Early quality of recovery according to QoR-15 score is associated with one-month postoperative complications after elective surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2022;78. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110638
  • Demirci B, Yılmaz Şahin S. Lomber disk hernisi ameliyatı öncesi hastaların cerrahi korku düzeylerinin ameliyat sonrası ağrı ve iyileşme kalitesi üzerine etkisi. Karya Journal of Health Science. 2023;4(1):19-25. doi:10.52831/kjhs.1182953
  • Hoxha R, Kosevska E, Berisha M, et al. Predictive factors for patient satisfaction in public and private hospitals in Kosovo. South East Eur J Public Health. 2019;12. doi:10.4119/seejph-2362
  • Aygin D, Yılmaz AÇ, Sert N. Yara iyileşmesini etkileyen komorbiditeler, genetik ve sistemik faktörler. Journal of Human Rhythm. 2021;7(1):28-42.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Surgical Diseases Nursing​​
Journal Section Research article
Authors

Pınar Ongün 0000-0003-2935-7583

Ayşe Karadaş 0000-0003-3955-2980

Early Pub Date December 13, 2023
Publication Date December 18, 2023
Submission Date April 26, 2023
Acceptance Date November 6, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 8 Issue: 4

Cite

AMA Ongün P, Karadaş A. Examination of Perception of Nursing Care and Quality of Recovery in Surgical Patients According to Some Variables. OTJHS. December 2023;8(4):448-454. doi:10.26453/otjhs.1288053

Creative Commons License

Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi [Online Turkish Journal of Health Sciences (OTJHS)] is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 4.0). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Click here to get help about article submission processes and "Copyright Transfer Form".