Research Article

Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-sectional Study

Volume: 8 Number: 1 April 5, 2025
EN TR

Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-sectional Study

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between nurses' attitudes toward monitoring vital signs and patient safety. Methods: This descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study was conducted at a university hospital in Turkey. The population of the study was 390 nurses, and it was planned to include at least 206 nurses in the study with power analysis. The study was completed with 218 nurses between June 2020 and May 2021. The data were collected using tools like the Nurse Information Form, V-Scale Instrument, and Patient Safety Attitude Questionnaire. Results: Nurses’ V-Scale total mean score was 59.51±8.89, and the Patient Safety Attitude Questionnaire total mean score was 169.89±27.46 in this study. A positive, low-level significant correlation existed between the nurses’ V-Scale and SAQ total scores (r=0.248, p<0.001). According to the results of linear regression analysis, receiving patient safety training in the current year and Patient Safety Attitude Questionnaire “safety climate” and “stress recognition” sub-dimension scores significantly affected V-Scale total scores (p=0.022, p=0.032, p=0.002, respectively). Conclusions: In this study, nurses’ vital signs monitoring and patient safety attitudes were above average, and there was a statistically significant correlation between these attitude scores. Keywords: Nursing assessment, patient monitoring, patient safety, vital signs

Keywords

nursing assessment, patient monitoring, patient safety, vital signs

References

  1. Barton C, Chettipally U, Zhou Y, Jiang Z, Lynn-Palevsky A, Le S, et al. (2019). Evaluation of a machine learning algorithm for up to 48-hour advance prediction of sepsis using six vital signs. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 109, 79-84.
  2. Baykal Ü, Şahin NH, Altuntaş S. (2010). Turkish adaptation of patient safety attitude questionnaire. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 7(1), 39-45.
  3. Brekke IJ, Puntervoll LH, Pedersen PB, Kellett J, Brabrand M. (2019). The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: A systematic review. PLoS One, 14(1), e0210875.
  4. Brasaite I, Kaunonen M, Suominen T. (2015). Healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and skills regarding patient safety: a systematic literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 29, 30-50.
  5. Breteler MJM, KleinJan EJ, Dohmen DAJ, Leenen LPH, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda JP. et al. (2020). Vital signs monitoring with wearable sensors in high-risk surgical patients: a clinical validation study. Anesthesiology, 132(3), 424-439.
  6. Burchill CN, Polomano R. (2016). Certification in emergency nursing associated with vital signs attitudes and practices. International Emergency Nursing, 27, 17-23.
  7. Cheng H, Yang, H, Ding, Y, Wang, B. (2020). Nurses' mental health and patient safety: An extension of the Job Demands–Resources model. Journal of Nursing Management, 28, 653–663.
  8. Chua WL, Mackey S Liaw SY. (2013). Front line nurses' experiences with deteriorating ward patients: a qualitative study. International Nursing Review, 60, 501-509.
  9. Dall'Ora C, Griffiths P, Hope J, Barker H, Smith GB. (2020). What is the nursing time and workload involved in taking and recording patients' vital signs? A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(13-14), 2053-2068.
  10. Durgun H, Kaya H. (2018). The attitudes of emergency department nurses towards patient safety. International Emergency Nursing, 40, 29-32.
APA
Özsaban, A., Turan, N., Kıyak, Y., Karabacak, A., Ataş, G., Öner, G., & Aştı, T. (2025). Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-sectional Study. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.1405925
AMA
1.Özsaban A, Turan N, Kıyak Y, et al. Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-sectional Study. Ordu University J Nurs Stud. 2025;8(1):165-173. doi:10.38108/ouhcd.1405925
Chicago
Özsaban, Aysel, Nuray Turan, Yasemin Kıyak, et al. 2025. “Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi 8 (1): 165-73. https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.1405925.
EndNote
Özsaban A, Turan N, Kıyak Y, Karabacak A, Ataş G, Öner G, Aştı T (April 1, 2025) Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-sectional Study. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi 8 1 165–173.
IEEE
[1]A. Özsaban et al., “Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-sectional Study”, Ordu University J Nurs Stud, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 165–173, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.38108/ouhcd.1405925.
ISNAD
Özsaban, Aysel - Turan, Nuray - Kıyak, Yasemin - Karabacak, Ayşen - Ataş, Gözde - Öner, Gizem - Aştı, Türkinaz. “Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi 8/1 (April 1, 2025): 165-173. https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.1405925.
JAMA
1.Özsaban A, Turan N, Kıyak Y, Karabacak A, Ataş G, Öner G, Aştı T. Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-sectional Study. Ordu University J Nurs Stud. 2025;8:165–173.
MLA
Özsaban, Aysel, et al. “Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Çalışmaları Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 1, Apr. 2025, pp. 165-73, doi:10.38108/ouhcd.1405925.
Vancouver
1.Aysel Özsaban, Nuray Turan, Yasemin Kıyak, Ayşen Karabacak, Gözde Ataş, Gizem Öner, Türkinaz Aştı. Relationship Between Nurses’ Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Safety Attitudes: A Cross-sectional Study. Ordu University J Nurs Stud. 2025 Apr. 1;8(1):165-73. doi:10.38108/ouhcd.1405925