Gebe Kadınların Üriner İnkontinans ile İlgili Bilgi, Tutum ve Davranışlarını Değerlendirme Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 478 - 488

Yurdagül Yağmur , Zeliha Turan

https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.1509173

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma, Gebe Kadınların Üriner İnkontinans ile İlgili Bilgi, Tutum ve Davranışlarını Değerlendirme Ölçeği’ni Türkçe’ye uyarlamak üzere geçerlik ve güvenirliğini test etmek amacıyla gerçekleştirildi.
Yöntem: Metodolojik tipteki araştırmanın örneklemini, 240 gebe kadın oluşturdu. Ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirliği için; kapsam ve dil geçerliği, madde analizi (madde güçlük indeksi ve madde ayırt edicilik indeksi), bağımsız örneklem t-testi (madde ayırt edicilik indeksinin farklılık gösterip göstermediği), ölçek madde toplam puan analizi ve Kuder-Richardson Katsayısı kullanıldı.
Bulgular: Türkçe'ye uyarlanan ölçek 18 maddeden (bilgi-dokuz, tutum-beş, davranış-dört) oluşmaktadır. Bilgi alt boyutunun Kuder-Richardson katsayısının 0.85, tutum alt boyutunun Kuder-Richardson katsayısının 0.79, davranış alt boyutunun Kuder-Richardson katsayısının ise 0.92 olduğu belirlendi.
Sonuç: Ölçeğin Türkçe versiyonundan 5 madde çıkarıldı (bilgi= madde 5; tutum= madde 12, 13, 15; davranış= madde 19) ve elde edilen nihai ölçeğin gebelerde üriner inkontinans ile ilgili bilgi, tutum ve uygulamaların belirlenmesinde kullanılabileceği belirlendi.

Keywords

Bilgi , davranış , gebe kadınlar , tutum , üriner inkontinans

Project Number

Bulunmamaktadır

Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Scale for the Assessment of Pregnant Women's Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Related to Urinary Incontinence

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to determine the reliability and validity of the Scale for the Assessment of Pregnant Women's Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Related to Urinary Incontinence to adapt it into Turkish.
Methods: The sample of the methodological type study consisted of 240 pregnant women. For the validity and reliability of the Scale, content and language validity, item analysis (item difficulty index and item discrimination index), independent sample t-test (whether the item discrimination index differs), scale item-total score analysis and Kuder-Richardson Coefficient were used.
Results: The Turkish adapted Scale has 18 items (knowledge-nine, attitude-five, practice-four). The Kuder-Richardson coefficient of the knowledge subscale was 0.85, the Kuder-Richardson coefficient of the attitude subscale was 0.79, and the Kuder-Richardson coefficient of the practice subscale was 0.92.
Conclusions: Five items (knowledge= item 5; attitude= items 12, 13, 15; practice= item 19) were removed from the Turkish version of the scale and it was determined that the final scale can be used to determine the knowledge, attitude and practices related to urinary incontinence in pregnant women.

Keywords

Knowledge , practice , pregnant women , attitude , urinary incontinence

Project Number

Bulunmamaktadır

References

• Balik G, Güven ESG, Tekin YB, Şentürk Ş, Kağitci M, Üstüner I, et al. (2016). Lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence during pregnancy. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, 8(2), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12082
• Dağdeviren H, Kaya C, Cengiz H, Erdoğan VŞ, Helvacioğlu Ç, Bilecan MS. (2018). Urinary incontinence in pregnant women and its relation with quality of life. İstanbul Medical Journal, 19, 43-46. https://doi.org/10.5152/imj.2018.45722
• D’Ancona C, Haylen B, Oelke M, Abranches‐Monteiro L, Arnold E, Goldman H, et al. (2019). The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourology Urodynamics, 38(2), 433-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23897
• Demircan N, Özmen Ü, Köktürk F, Küçük H, Ata Ş, Harma M, et al. (2016). What are the probable predictors of urinary incontinence during pregnancy? Peer J, 4:e2283. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2283
• Dinç A. (2018). Prevalence of urinary incontinence during pregnancy and associated risk factors. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, 10(3), 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12182
• Dursun P, Dogan NU, Kolusari A, Dogan S, Ugur MG, Komurcu O, et al. (2014). Differences in geographical distribution and risk factors for urinary incontinence in Turkey: analysis of 6,473 women. Urologia Internationalis, 92(2), 209-214. https://doi.org/ 10.1159/000353347
• Frigerio M, Barba M, Cola A, Braga A, Celardo A, Munno GM, et al. (2022). Quality of life, psychological wellbeing, and sexuality in women with urinary incontinence-where are we now: a narrative review. Medicina (Kaunas), 58(4), 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040525
• Gyhagen M, Åkervall S, Molin M, Milsom I. (2019). The effect of childbirth on uri¬nary -inconti¬nence: a matched cohort study ¬in women aged 40-64 years. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 221(4), 322.e1-322.e17.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ajog.2019.05.022
• Hasançebi B, Terzi Y, Küçük Z. (2020). Distractor analysis based on item difficulty index and item discrimination index. Gumushane University Journal of Science Institute, 10(1), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.615465
• Hemmer A, Hitchcock K, Lim YS, Kovacic MB, Lee SY. (2021). Development of food literacy assessment tool targeting adults with low income. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 53(11), 966-976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2021.05.007
• Kara KC, Çıtak Karakaya İ, Tunalı N, Karakaya MG. (2018). Reliability and validity of the Incontinence Quiz-Turkish version. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 44(1), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13469
• Kok G, Seven M, Guvenc G, Akyuz A. (2016). Urinary incontinence in pregnant women: prevalence, associated factors, and ıts effects on health-related quality of life. Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing: Official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society, 43(5), 511-516. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.000 00 00000000262
• Milsom I, Gyhagen M. (2019). The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Climacteric, 22, 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2018.1543263
• Moossdorff-Steinhauser HFA, Berghmans BCM, Spaanderman MEA, Bols EMJ. (2021a). Prevalence, incidence and bothersomeness of urinary incontinence in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Urogynecology Journal, 32(7), 1633-1652.https://doi.org/10.1007 /s00192-020-04636-3
• Moossdorff-Steinhauser HFA, Berghmans BCM, Spaanderman MEA, Bols EMJ. (2021b). Prevalence, incidence and bothersomeness of urinary incontinence between 6 weeks and 1 year post-partum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Urogynecology Journal, 32(7), 1675-1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-048 77-w
• Mørkved S, Bø K. (2014). Effect of pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy and after childbirth on prevention and treatment of urinary incontinence: a systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(4), 299–310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091758
• Pernambuco L, Espelt A, Magalhães Junior HV, Lima KC. (2017). Recommendations for elaboration, transcultural adaptation and validation process of tests in speech, hearing and language pathology. CoDAS, 29(3), e20160217. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782 /20172016217
• Polit DF, Beck CT. (2006). The content: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29, 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002 /nur.20147
• Rav-Marathe K, Wan TTH, Marathe SA. (2016). Systematic review on the kap o framework for diabetes education and research. Medical Research Archives, 3(9). https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article /view/483
• Ribeiro GL, Firmiano MLV, Vasconcelos CTM, Saboia DM, de Moraes Lopes MHB, Vasconcelos Neto JA. (2021). Scale of pregnant women's assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice related to urinary incontinence. International Urogynecology Journal, 33(6), 1503-1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04837-4
• Sangsawang B, Sangsawang N. (2013). Stress urinary incontinence in pregnant women: a review of prevalence, pathophysiology, and treatment. International Urogynecology Journal, 24(6), 901-912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2061-7
• Sharma LR. (2021). Analysis of difficulty ındex, discrimination ındex and distractor efficiency of multiple choice questions of speech sounds of English. International Research Journal of MMC, 2(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v2i1.35 126
• Terzi H, Terzi R, Kale A. (2013). Urinary incontinence frequency and affecting factors in women aged over 18. Ege Journal of Medicine, 52(1),15-19.
• Ting HY, Cesar JA. (2020). Urinary incontinence among pregnant women in Southern Brazil: A population-based cross-sectional survey. PLoS one, 15(6), e0234338. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234 338
• Wang X, Jin Y, Xu P, Feng S. (2022). Urinary incontinence in pregnant women and its impact on health-related quality of life. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s 12955-022-01920-2
• Zamanzadeh V, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi Majd H, Nikanfar A, Ghahramanian A. (2014). Details of content validity and objectifying it in instrument development. Nursing Practice Today, 1(3), 163-171. https://npt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/npt/article/view/24