Dinamik yapı-kazık-zemin etkileşimi bağlamında temel gömme derinliğinin spektral tepki üzerindeki etkisi

Abstract

Dinamik Yapı-Kazık-Zemin Etkileşiminin (YKZE) yapısal elemanlar üzerindeki etkisinin araştırılması amacıyla, Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği’nde (TBDY, 2018) tariflenen yöntemlerin (Yöntem I, II, III), hangi durumlarda tercih edilmesi gerektiği ve kapsamı ilgili bölümlerde (TBDY Tablo 16.5 ve EK16C) açıklanmıştır. Yönetmelikte, Yöntem I için belirlenen farklı çözüm yöntemleri (Ortak ve Altsistem Yöntemi) takip edilerek yapılan analizlerde “Kinematik” ve “Eylemsizlik” Etkileşimi doğrudan dikkate alınsa da diğer yöntemlerde (Yöntem II-III) dolaylı ve yaklaşık sonuçların elde edildiği (özellikle Kinematik etkileşim) varsayılarak çalışmalar gerçekleştirilmektedir. Bilindiği üzere Kinematik etkileşiminde 2 faktör baskın olmaktadır: Gömme derinliği ve Taban Plaka Ortalaması. Bu çalışmada Yapı-Kazık-Zemin etkileşim analizleri Ortak Yöntem ile Altsistem yönteminin Kinematik kısmı dikkate alınarak hazırlanan modellerle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Üstyapının modelde bulunduğu ve bulunmadığı durumlarda oluşan Temel Tepki Spektrumlarının değişimi gömme derinliğine bağlı olarak incelenmiştir.

Keywords

• Yapı-Kazık-Zemin etkileşimi
• Ortak yöntem
• Altsistem yöntemi
• Kinematik ve eylemsizlik etkileşimi

Effect of foundation embedment depth on spectral response considering dynamic structure-pile-soil interaction

Abstract

To investigate the effect of Dynamic Structure-Pile-Soil Interaction (SPSI) on structural elements, one of the following methods (Methods I, II, III) should be selected regarding the Structural Case described in the Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBDY, 2018) in the relevant sections (TBDY Table 16.5 and Annex 16C). Although "Kinematic" and "Inertial" effects are considered directly in the analyzes outlined in TBDY 2018 (Direct and Substructural Methods) determined for Method I, in other methods (Method II-III), indirect and approximate results are obtained (especially in Kinematic Interaction Analysis). Generally, two factors dominate the Kinematic Interaction: Embedment Depth and Base-slab Averaging. In this research, Soil-Pile-Structure interaction analyzes were performed according to the Direct Method and the Kinematic Part of the Substructural Method. The variation of the Foundation Response Spectrum, one in which the Structure is present or not in the model, has been investigated according to the variation of embedment depth.

Keywords

• Soil pile structure interaction
• Direct method
• Substructure method
• Kinematic and inertial interaction

References

1. [1] Kausel E. “Early history of soil–structure interaction”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(9), 822-832, 2010.
2. [2] Reissner E. “Stationäre, axialsymmetrische, durch eine schüttelnde Masse erregte Schwingungen eines homogenen elastischen Halbraumes”. Ingenieur-Archiv, 7(6), 381-396, 1936.
3. [3] Kausel E, Roesset JM. “Soil structure interaction problems for nuclear containment structures”. Electric Power and the Civil Engineer, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 13 August 1974.
4. [4] Roesset JM. “Soil structure interaction the early stages”. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 16(1), 1–8, 2013
5. [5] Whitman RV. Soil-Structure Interaction. Editors: Hansen RJ. Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, 245-269, Cambridge, London, England, 1970.
6. [6] Mylonakis G, Gazetas G. “Seismic soil-structure interaction: beneficial or detrimental?”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 4(3), 277-301, 2000.
7. [7] Federal Emergency Management Agency. “Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures”. Washington, USA, 440, 2004.
8. [8] Stewart J, Crouse C, Hutchinson T, Lizundia B, Naeim F and Ostadan, F. “Soil-Structure Interaction for Building Structures, Grant/Contract Reports (NISTGCR)”. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, USA, 12-917-21, 2012.

9. [9] OGUT OC. Soil-Structure Interaction Effect of Embedded Foundation and Adjacent Buildings on Response Characteristics of Superstructures. Ph.D. Thesis, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan, 2017.
10. [10] Fan K, Gazetas G, Kaynia A, Kausel E, Ahmad S. “Kinematic Seismic Response of Single Piles and Pile Groups”. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117(12), 1860-1879, 1991.
11. [11] Kaynia AM, Kausel E. “Dynamic behavior of pile groups”. Proc. 2nd International Conference on Numerical Methods in Offshore Piling, Texas, USA, 29-30 April 1982.
12. [12] Kim S, Stewart JP. “Kinematic soil-structure interaction from strong motion recordings”. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(4), 323-335, 2003.
13. [13] Rainer JH. “Simplified analysis of dynamic structure–ground interaction”. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(3), 345-356, 1975.
14. [14] Kaynia AM, Mahzooni S. “Forces in pile foundations under seismic loading”. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 122(1) 46-53, 1996.
15. [15] Aguilar H, Avil´es J. “Influencia de pilotes de fricción en la interacción dinámica suelo–estructura” Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos, 19(1), 3-18, 2003.
16. [16] Avilés, J, Pérez‐Rocha, LE. “Effects of foundation embedment during building–soil interaction”. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 27(12), 1523-1540, 1998.
17. [17] Lu X, Chen B, Li P, Chen Y. “Numerical analysis of tall buildings considering dynamic soil-structure interaction”. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 2(1), 1-8, 2003.
18. [18] Maravas A, Mylonakis G, Karabalis DL. “Dynamic characteristics of structures on piles and footings”. In 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Thessaloiki, Greece, 24-26 June 2007.
19. [19] Padrón LA, Aznárez JJ, Maeso O. “3-D boundary element–finite element method for the dynamic analysis of piled buildings”. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 35(3), 465-477, 2011.
20. [20] Nasseri-Moghaddam A, Cascante G, Phillips C. Hutchinson DJ. “Effects of underground cavities on Rayleigh waves-Field and numerical experiments”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27(4), 300-313, 2007.
21. [21] Bilal O. Kazık Temelli Yapıların Deprem Etkisi Altında Yapı-Kazık-Zemin Etkileşiminin İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 2021.
22. [22] Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. “Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği”. Ankara, Türkiye, 30364, 2018.
23. [23] Itasca Consulting Group Inc. “FLAC3D-Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in Three-Dimensions, Ver. 9.0.” https://www.itascainternational.com/software/flac3d (10.11.2023).
24. [24] Venture NCJ. “Soil-Structure Interaction for Building Structures”. Nist GCR, 12, 917-921, 2012.
25. [25] Kausel E, Whitman RV, Morray JP, Elsabee F. “The spring method for embedded foundations”. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 48, 377-392, 1978.
26. [26] Day SM. “Seismic response of embedded foundations”. Preprints of Conference Proceedings of ASCE Convention and Exposition, Chicago, USA, 16-20 October 1978.
27. [27] Matlock H. "Correlations for design of laterally loaded piles in soft clay". Proc. of the 2nd Offshore Technology Conference, Texas, USA, 22-24 April 1970.
28. [28] Hashash YMA, Park D. "Nonlinear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the mississippi embayment". Engineering Geology, 62, 185-206, 2001.
29. [29] Vucetic M, Dobry R. “Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response”. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117(1), 89-107, 1991.